Hi all,
I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in
there:
===
Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
Technology].
===
I am wondering how is it possible to this be compatible wit
Hi,
Andy (i guess) states on
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/solaris.com.html
---
Clarification Note
"Commercial licensing terms for distribution on Solaris"
means that if a 3rd party would like to include dvd+rw-t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:43:59PM +0100, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> ===
> Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
> for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
> Technology].
> ===
>
> I am wondering how is it possible to this be compatible with the
Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in
>there:
>
> ===
> Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
> for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
> Technology].
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andy (i guess) states on
> http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/solaris.com.html
>
> ---
> Clarification Note
> "Commercial licensing terms for distribution on Solaris"
> means that if
Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:43:59PM +0100, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> > ===
> > Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
> > for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
> > Technology].
> > ===
> >
> > I am w
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Once you put some code under a OSI compliant license, you cannot
> give someone else exclusive rights anymore.
That is not correct.
The copyright holder can give the code to Microsoft and say, "Here, use
this in the next version o
On Fri 19 Aug 2005 00:32:53 NZST +1200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> As the program claims to use the GPL, such note would not be legal
> and commercial use cannot be limited to a single company.
> Once you put some code under a OSI compliant license, you cannot
> give someone else exclusive rights a
Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Once you put some code under a OSI compliant license, you cannot
> > give someone else exclusive rights anymore.
>
> That is not correct.
>
> The copyright holder can give the code to Mi
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri 19 Aug 2005 00:32:53 NZST +1200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > As the program claims to use the GPL, such note would not be legal
> > and commercial use cannot be limited to a single company.
>
> > Once you put some code under a OSI compliant lice
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in
there:
===
Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
for distribution on Solaris are to be settled wit
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in
> >> there:
> >>
> >>===
> >>Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
> >>for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
> >>Technology].
> >>
> Looks like you did not get my point: why should there be a need
> to use a non GPL variant?
I can think of a simple reason: to grant rights which the GPL doesn't
grant, in return for some cash for further development. There probably
are other valid reasons too.
[cdrecord license:]
> As you ar
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As you are on this list for a long time, I would expect that you know
> > that a company was named only because this company did violate the GPL.
>
> The version of cdrecord shipped by named company was clearly marked as
> modified, only you would exp
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in
there:
===
Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms
for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve
Technology].
===
15 matches
Mail list logo
