On 2012/05/06 05:49, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> Hello all, it seems that cegcc is quite dead, or people who use it
> are happy with it (just like me).
Did you know that I published cegcc with gcc 4.6.3 and other updates?
I started the 4.7 update, but ran into so many merge conflicts that I
postponed
Hello all, it seems that cegcc is quite dead, or people who use it are happy
with it (just like me).
I'm building my code for WinPhone7 and everything worked out of the box. I
mainly use cegcc for code with att-style asm, or I use gnu assembler. I compile
static libs with it and link it with re
