On 2012/05/06 05:49, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> Hello all, it seems that cegcc is quite dead, or people who use it
> are happy with it (just like me).
Did you know that I published cegcc with gcc 4.6.3 and other updates?
I started the 4.7 update, but ran into so many merge conflicts that I
postponed
Hi,
I have updated my cegcc fork to gcc 4.6.3, here's my release
2012-03-13:
http://max.kellermann.name/projects/cegcc/
http://max.kellermann.name/download/xcsoar/devel/cegcc/
Max
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current
On 2011/12/29 01:17, Ismail Khatib wrote:
> got the following error; I've also tried to do a fresh checkout, but
> got the same error:
[..]
> fatal: reference is not a tree: 2c5a5ea1a5f0eb9711d44033e754ef02a3962852
> Unable to checkout '2c5a5ea1a5f0eb9711d44033e754ef02a3962852' in
> submodule path
Hi,
the build 2011-12-23 of my cegcc fork comes with gcc 4.6.2 and
binutils 2.22. For the first time, gcc's link time optimization (LTO)
works on Windows CE!
http://max.kellermann.name/projects/cegcc/
http://max.kellermann.name/download/xcsoar/devel/cegcc/
Max
---
Hi,
I have spent some time on rebasing the cegcc-binutils branch on
upstream version 2.21.1. That was a big knot which became smaller and
smaller each time I rebased incrementally on a new release.
Fortunately, many of the cegcc patches were merged upstream, and
disappeared from my rebasing branc
On 2011/10/12 19:46, Vincent Torri wrote:
> in addition, it would be nice to merge these 2 projects. Less duplicated
> work, I think
If I get bored one day, I'll try to extract the micro-changes that
were applied to mingw32 to turn it into cegcc. And then submit those
to mingw-w64 or gcc. But t
Hi,
another cegcc upgrade: I have replaced gcc 4.4.x with gcc 4.5.3. That
rebase caused a good amount of merge conflicts, which I attempted to
solve without really knowing the code base. The end result seems to
work well. The TEXT section of the XCSoar binary shrinks from 1,686
kB to 1,582 kB,
Hi,
I have upgraded gcc to 4.4.6 in my cegcc git repository:
http://git.xcsoar.org/cgit/max/cegcc-build.git/
Binaries:
http://max.kellermann.name/download/xcsoar/devel/cegcc/
The XCSoar project heavily depends on cegcc/mingw32ce to build its
Windows CE/Mobile executables, and C++11 support w
On 2010/12/18 01:26, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Or, it would be possible to produce list of all commits on branch,
> manually filter out merge commits from it, and then pass to some
> "mass cherry-pick" tool. Of course, there will be conflicts, so that
> tool must behave like rebase - stop on cnfli
Hi,
good to see some activity over here again. I'm a developer on the
XCSoar project, which ultimately needs mingw32ce to compile for
Windows CE targets, so this project is vital for us. Unfortunately, I
didn't have any chance to free some time to work on mingw32ce/cegcc so
far.
I have imported
On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> svn if you like.
Hi Danny & Pavel,
I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
doing i
On 2010/01/29 18:06, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 23:14 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> > When I attempt to force WINVER=0x410, the linker bails out with
> > "undefined reference to `TransparentBlt'".
>
> Does the change that I just committed
Hi,
I am missing the function TransparentBlt() with mingw32ce 0.59.1.
wingdi.h provides the prototype only if WINVER>=0x410, but MSDN states
TransparentBlt() is available since CE 4.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa453778.aspx
wingdi.h defaults to WINVER=0x400, and doesn't bother to
Hi cegcc folks,
I'm a new developer on the XCSoar project (www.xcsoar.org). We try to
support all PocketPC versions. The fellow developer who maintains the
XCSoar PPC2000 port claims that cegcc cannot produce binaries for that
platform. This forces us to use EVC, including all the pain attached
14 matches
Mail list logo
