Hi,
I have applied traffic shaping on firewall running CentOS 4.5.
eth1 is the device where I have done traffic shaping. I am now running some
monitoring tools such as polltc and tc-graph.pl. They generate graphs. These
graphs are updated every 10 seconds. They have been saved on the firewall it
On 9/18/07, mark pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm suprised that an SRC.RPM from the rhel5 repo needs a file from FC7.
Did you file this as a bug with EPEL?
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
hello,
I'm suprised that an SRC.RPM from the rhel5 repo needs a file from FC7.
I grabbed rpmdevtools from
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/
it rebuilds fine as EL5, but when I go to install it, it requires a version of
rpm-build higher than the C5 base version (4.4.2-37)
---
John Hinton wrote:
I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time.
1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters?
Yes but different version with varying levels of milter support.
2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound
vs. outbound?
Yes
I have several RHEL AS 4 systems, and when we get a vmcore, I would like to
view them in my centos box..
How can I do that? Is that even possible?
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
umair shakil wrote:
> Well, what should be the solution of this problem when i faced the
> problem
> reinstall the application, but havenot find the exact solution???
firstly, I am going to ignore all your emails from here on that are top
posted.
secondly, file a bugreport with a reproducer c
> I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are
> wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS
> and Windows systems.
Keep in mind virtualization software is moving pretty quickly. 8 months
ago Xen didn't migrate fully virtual hosts, now it does. In 5 years the
redic
Bazy wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello gentlemen and lady's,
>
>
> I am trying to filter ssh traffic regardless of the port the
> connection
> is opened on. I want to do the same for rlogin and telnet. I know it
> would be easier to use a proxy server and onl
Not going to happen for telnet
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Sr. Consultant10 West 24th Street #100-
- +
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:46:11PM -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
> BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as
> close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
If possible, that developer needs to be stopped. Although RHEL 5 is
apparently going to work that way, there is no s
Blackburn, Marvin spake the following on 9/18/2007 1:58 PM:
You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle.
However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
There is no "all versions of 4". There is just 4. The rest is just the point
in time at which they spin the updates
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:58 -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
> You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle.
> However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
> You might remind your developer about security updates. RHEL 4.4 is no
> longer supported by RH as update 5 is c
Running CentOS 4.4 and something drastic appears to have happened with
my display setup - application icons no longer appear in taskbar at
bottom of display (when minimized) but disappear off bottom right-hand
corner. So it's difficult to multi-task because I have to keep re-
opening applications -
You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle.
However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jim Perrin
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re
On 9/18/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone have cups v1.3.1 running on Centos5? If so, i'd like to roll
> my own srpm and install it. I'm currently running 1.2.x and want to update
> to 1.3.1 as it has a bug fix that i need.
> Any help appreciated.
> Thanks.
> Dave.
Ha
On 9/18/07, Blackburn, Marvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks!
> BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as
> close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
You might remind your developer about security updates. RHEL 4.4 is no
longer supported by RH as update 5 is current. I
Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
Thanks!
BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as
close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
Thanks for the heads up on the yum.
as soon as said RHEL 4.4 system does an `up2date -u`, it will be 4.5+
__
Thanks!
BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as
close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
Thanks for the heads up on the yum.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Fabian Arrotin
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:4
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:29 -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
> Cant find this version. Can some point me in the right direction.
>
I suppose that the valid reason you'll invoke is 'i have a driver disk
built for rhel4u4 and then i really need CentOS 4.4' ...
Ok, here it is : http://vault.centos.or
Dave spake the following on 9/18/2007 12:06 PM:
Hello,
Does anyone have cups v1.3.1 running on Centos5? If so, i'd like to
roll my own srpm and install it. I'm currently running 1.2.x and want to
update to 1.3.1 as it has a bug fix that i need.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.
Fedora 7
>>
>>
>> I have a working WinXP SP2 workstation with an unused partition on the
>> primary HDD. I'd like for the unused area to be used for dual booting
>> CentOS5 but am not sure what needs to be done (if anything) to the
>> config file for kickstart prior to booting with CD1 in the drive.
>>
>>
John Hinton spake the following on 9/18/2007 12:00 PM:
I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time.
1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters?
2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound
vs. outbound?
3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist o
Cant find this version. Can some point me in the right direction.
_
"He's no failure. He's not dead yet."
William Lloyd George
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello gentlemen and lady's,
I am trying to filter ssh traffic regardless of the port the connection
is opened on. I want to do the same for rlogin and telnet. I know it
would be easier to use a proxy server and only allow users to access the
web... b
Ray Leventhal spake the following on 9/18/2007 11:42 AM:
Hi folks,
I've been asked advice in an area that I'm not well versed and am hoping
for some help.
Having read a recent thread where booting to anaconda's kickstart wiped
a partition table unexpectedly (to the user...it did what it was
con
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:41:32PM -0400, Jerry Geis alleged:
> I wrote a small program to monitor keyboards found on /dev/input/event*
> It works great but I always get EAGAIN from my read() function. google
> says this is normal
> when open() is used and O_NONBLOCK mode.
Correct. EAGAIN is how
Hello,
Does anyone have cups v1.3.1 running on Centos5? If so, i'd like to roll
my own srpm and install it. I'm currently running 1.2.x and want to update
to 1.3.1 as it has a bug fix that i need.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.
___
CentOS ma
I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time.
1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters?
2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound
vs. outbound?
3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound?
4. If the above is true, doe
Hi folks,
I've been asked advice in an area that I'm not well versed and am hoping
for some help.
Having read a recent thread where booting to anaconda's kickstart wiped
a partition table unexpectedly (to the user...it did what it was
configured to do), I'm following the 'measure twice, cut once'
I wrote a small program to monitor keyboards found on /dev/input/event*
It works great but I always get EAGAIN from my read() function. google
says this is normal
when open() is used and O_NONBLOCK mode.
I know this is slightly offtopic but I was wondering if the centos gurus
that also
progra
Chuck Campbell wrote:
I ran the yum update, which updated the kernel along with other things.
When it ran, it removed my install kernel (2.6.18-8.el5xen). I now have
2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen and 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5xen. The 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen
kernel still works fine, but the 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5xen kerne
Feizhou wrote:
>
> Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not
> having a BBU
> and behave as if it did?
> >>> Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any.
> >> Well, I've now got BBUs on order for the three identical
> machines to
> >> see if that does anything to i
Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not having a BBU
and behave as if it did?
Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any.
Well, I've now got BBUs on order for the three identical machines to
see if that does anything to improve matters - I'll report back when
I've fitted
On 9/18/07, Chuck Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the subject of kernel updates:
> I had my install kernel (2.6.18-8.el5xen) and 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on the box.
> I was unable to originally boot the update (8.1.8xen) because of the 3ware
> driver issues (I needed to use a driver floppy at
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 08:18 +0800 15/9/07, Feizhou wrote:
> >>Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not having a BBU
> >>and behave as if it did?
> >
> >Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any.
>
> Well, I've now got BBUs on order for the three identical machines to
On 9/14/07, Brett Serkez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pretty sure thats configurable in SMB.CONF
> >
> > [global]
> > interfaces = [ (ip address or network interface or ip/mask or
> > broadcast/mask) ...]
>
> Researched this before I emailed originally, this doesn't do it.
> Even if I specif
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:30:53 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it
> seems to be okay. I've only used the writer portion for a few
> documents though. I've been fairly absent from that laptop today.
Where did you get it
On the subject of kernel updates:
I had my install kernel (2.6.18-8.el5xen) and 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on the box.
I was unable to originally boot the update (8.1.8xen) because of the 3ware
driver issues (I needed to use a driver floppy at install time).
I jumped through some hoops (which I am strugg
At 08:18 +0800 15/9/07, Feizhou wrote:
Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not having a BBU
and behave as if it did?
Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any.
Well, I've now got BBUs on order for the three identical machines to
see if that does anything to improve mat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -
>The WLAN DSL-Router should not be the problem. But which wlan-
>adapter (internally (PCI), USB... whatever) can be recommended for a
>work "out of is the box" with cent OS 5?
The Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG adapter works well. I believe that I had to get
RPMs from a
40 matches
Mail list logo
