Robert Spangler a écrit :
Check out this site. It's a tutorial fro IPTables.
http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html
Funny you send me this link. I know Robbie Workman as an ex-fellow
Slackware user.
And I also know some basic iptables (no system-config-* in Slackware
:oD). My
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
So I thought I'd get a head start for next week -
I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and
limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via
SCSI card.
I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental bac
On Saturday 15 March 2008 09:09:31 Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
> I would use dump, but samba connections are not device files.
>
> How about rsync? The tape library is LTO3 with hardware compression
> available. Google searching just now doesn't make rsync directly to tape
> too hopeful.
>
> What ar
So I thought I'd get a head start for next week -
I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and
limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via
SCSI card.
I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental backup of
the samba mounts,
I have also found that there are a small handful of hosts that seem to
spit out a line or two of log output once in a while on the server,
but have not yet identified a pattern.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008, mouss wrote:
>Jeff Larsen wrote:
>>
>>
>>Taking a different approach than others...
>>
>>Load them back into Outlook Express on a Windows box. Open a gmail
>>account and enable it for IMAP access. Configure Outlook Express for
>>gmail/IMAP and copy the messages to gmail folder
Jeff Larsen wrote:
Taking a different approach than others...
Load them back into Outlook Express on a Windows box. Open a gmail
account and enable it for IMAP access. Configure Outlook Express for
gmail/IMAP and copy the messages to gmail folders. Configure T-Bird on
CentOS for gmail/IMAP and
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Max Hodgson wrote:
I use Dell 124T tape loaders with Centos. The controlling device on mine is
separate to the data device.
Turned out to be at least the need for a new scsi card, which I obtained.
I also used a new machine. But your experience below did lead me to
revi
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Back to this problem again. I did a new mkfs.ext3 and ran more than a
week before hitting this again:
Mar 14 04:12:29 linbackup1 kernel: md3: rw=0, want=14439505280, limit=1465143808
Mar 14 04:12:29 linbackup1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md3): ext3_readdir:
directo
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> ...
> > I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
> > it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
> > really useful voice reader cap
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I dont really think you can get much easier than CVS if you need
> > centralized management over a network. If it never gets off the
> > machine then there is RCS. If those aren't simple enough... I don't
> > think an
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Can this be related to being on a 3-member RAID1 that normally runs
with one device misssing? I've run a different one that way for a
couple of years on earlier kernels.
Well, I also found this one:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/6455/focus=6908
Is your ma
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can this be related to being on a 3-member RAID1 that normally runs
> with one device misssing? I've run a different one that way for a
> couple of years on earlier kernels.
Well, I also found this one:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/6455/focu
On 3/11/08, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 12 March 2008 04:04:03 Jim Perrin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Error: php-pecl-apc conflicts with php-mmcache
> > > Error: Missing Dependency: php = 4.3.9 is needed by pack
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:32, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires
> opening a series of ports. I've configured the app to use ports 7000 to
> 7010 (TCP and UDP). When running system-config-securitylevel-tui, the
> last line enables to def
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> > Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> 'fsck -y' seems to fix it up, but it keeps happening. Is this likely
> >> to be leftover cruft from the hardware issues or are there problems
> >> in ext3/raid1/sata drivers? The way backuppc stores
On Wed, March 12, 2008 12:59, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I was editing a file in gvim when I inadvertently pressed some key combination
> that caused the vim window to disappear from the desktop.
...
>
> Questions:
>
> What key combination places the window with focus into another workspace?
>
A. ||
Hello Barry,
could you email me please, I try to email you and it was returned.
Sincerely,
Christopher
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I can't install a french spell checker in Thunderbird. There's a link in
Thunderbird's preferences, to download new dictionaries, but it's dumb.
So I downloaded the dictionary manually (spell-FR.xpi) and installed it
in Thunderbird using the 'Extensions' dialog. But the installed
dictiona
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
'fsck -y' seems to fix it up, but it keeps happening. Is this likely
to be leftover cruft from the hardware issues or are there problems
in ext3/raid1/sata drivers? The way backuppc stores data with
millions of hardlinks in the ar
John R Pierce wrote:
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On 3/10/08, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not goi
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external firewire
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
> yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
> triple with Windows.
> >>> Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
> >>> let the built in time machine tool do
>>> If you are a graphic designer, I'm curious what you use the
>>> CentOS box for (or why you use Windows and not Mac :-)
>>
>> Good question when I started out I had windows so that's
>> what I bought - Adobe windows versions. I'm considering
>> migrating to Mac though because Adobe just start
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
>>> Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
>>> let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external firewire
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> >> Ah I figured someone would ask that. I use pretty much all
> >> major adobe products, Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, just
> >> about the entire suite.
> >>
> >> I have two home workstation machines. One is Centos, and one
> >> is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in tim
on 3-14-2008 9:43 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
although I would be heartbroken and a
UPDATE:
The problem seems to be on the client side, because when I do this:
logger -p local5.info test
the file does show up properly on the syslog-ng host. Anyone have an
idea why the other processes that write to local5 on the client are
not logging to the remote host?
> local5.*
>> Ah I figured someone would ask that. I use pretty much all
>> major adobe products, Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, just
>> about the entire suite.
>>
>> I have two home workstation machines. One is Centos, and one
>> is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if possible
>> to have t
Wow, I could have saved all that typing
Great ideas, Les.
You were the one that introduced me to Clonezilla (unknowingly) some time ago
in another thread.
I had been using a Hirens boot disk, but Clonezilla is better.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA
Scott Silva wrote:
_
The software raid implementation in windows is a far cry from the linux
version. Windows can't boot from their "dynamic" arrays, linux can.
When did that start - or are you just looking at the non-server
ve
Now, this is getting OT, but I like to rebuild my XP boxes about every 6
months. That's more than the 3 times in four years.
I have a base image, though, so I just dump it down, and then add the new
things I would like to have my on my existing image, and do whatever updates
are necessary, then
Ok, I can't quite figure out how to make this work. I want to
simultaneously log everything for facility local5 in a local file and
a remote syslog-ng server. local7 is working fine getting the
boot.log log entries transferred over to the syslog-ng server, but not
so much with local5. Local log
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> > Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
> > yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
> > triple with Windows.
>
> Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
> let the built in tim
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external fir
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06:18AM +, Jake Grimmett wrote:
> I'm probably not going to feed 10Gb to the individual blades, as I have few
> MPI sers, though it's an option with IBM and HP blades. However IBM, and
> Dell offer a 10Gbit XFP uplink to the blade servers internal switch, and
> thi
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
although I would be heartbroken and a little peeved, I could just fire up
Alex White a écrit :
It means you've opened 7000 through to 7010 for udp and tcp.
OK thanks. I just took a peek in /etc/sysconfig/iptables, and indeed.
Cheers,
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
>> Unfortunately I can't use software RAID1 because of this:
>>
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096063.html
>
> First, you should probably get your applications from a company that
> doesn't hate its customers... But aside from that, this restriction
> should only apply
Therese Trudeau wrote:
>
> >>> That brings up a last question on possiblity of either a
> >>> 3ware or acrea RAID 1 cards. I'm wondering how long I would
> >>> be able to order
> >>> a replacement RAID card from either of 3ware or areea.
> >>> Anyone know if 3ware or acrea stock identical rep
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:08 +0100
Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the preconfigured firewall that comes with CentOS 5. I
> configure it with system-config-securitylevel-tui, close all
> ports except SSH, and then open only the ones I need.
>>> You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
>>> desktop machine.
>>>
>>> You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
>>> Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
>>>
>>> You can use dump/restore to backup the
> Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
> enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
> I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
> although I would be heartbroken and a little peeved, I could just fire up my
> lappy an
On 14/03/2008, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Does that mean that I have opened ports 7000 to 7010? Or only ports 7000
> and 7010? I'm not quite sure how to read this.
Could you use something like nmap to check the open ports?
Alan.
___
C
on 3-14-2008 8:22 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
That brings up a last question on possiblity of either a
3ware or acrea RAID 1 cards. I'm wondering how long I would
be able to order
a replacement RAID card from either of 3ware or areea.
Anyone know if 3ware or acrea stock identical
Therese Trudeau wrote:
I have two home workstation machines.
One is Centos, and one is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
possible
to have the same type of RAID cards on both machines, because easier to
manage and if I ever decide to sell or give away one machine, I can pull
the r
Hi,
I'm using the preconfigured firewall that comes with CentOS 5. I
configure it with system-config-securitylevel-tui, close all ports
except SSH, and then open only the ones I need.
Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires
opening a series of ports. I've config
> What do you think of alternative back up systems, such as a tape
>> backup with
>> bare metal restore software? I'd go that route instead if I could fine a
>> solution which
>> would allow me to restore to different hardware, i.e. if my motherboard dies
>> and I need to buy a different brand
on 3-14-2008 7:33 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a desktop
machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You c
Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
May I know the name of the library management program? KOHA?
No, PMB. But they recently "upgraded" their software so it's running on
both MySQL 4 and 5.
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
on 3-14-2008 6:31 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
That is true, buy high quality stuff up front for fewer problems down
the road. Not a sure bet, but a better one. In the half dozen systems
I've been running at home for the past several years none of them
have suffered a hardware failure
>> I have two home workstation machines.
>> One is Centos, and one is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
>> possible
>> to have the same type of RAID cards on both machines, because easier to
>> manage and if I ever decide to sell or give away one machine, I can pull
>> the raid ca
>> Sorry, I can't access your Windows Live Hotmail inbox . . .
>
> Ah haha sorry was not paying attention, it's here: :)
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096054.html
OOPS - I need some more coffee this am - HERE is the correct thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/c
on 3-14-2008 5:37 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
Adaptec makes both true HW raid and re-sells fakeraid cards. I guess they
wanted a piece of both pies. But 3ware only makes HW raid cards AFAIK.
How well do you think the adaptecSATA raid cards stack up against the Areca
and 3ware RAID
>> No, read this:
>>
>> my previous thread...
>>
>
> Sorry, I can't access your Windows Live Hotmail inbox . . .
Ah haha sorry was not paying attention, it's here: :)
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096054.html
___
>>> You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed
>>> for a desktop machine.
>>>
>>> You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the
>>> first two. Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your
>>> good to go.
>>>
>>> You can use dump/restore to backup
On Friday 14 March 2008 15:14, Peter Farrell wrote:
> I see everyone's point about acrobat reader - but I run 50+ machines
> of Cent 4.5 and run remote desktops on all of them - I think the
> latest (8.*) version of Adobe Acrobat is miles and miles better than
> the bloated pig we used to have to u
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:12:45 Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
> > Installing an old mysql into the latest centos is not the best way
> > either. Why not installing the whole database into the new mysql? Unless
> > it's using functions that are not available/compatible with mysql5,
Therese Trudeau wrote:
I have two home workstation machines.
One is Centos, and one is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
possible
to have the same type of RAID cards on both machines, because easier to
manage and if I ever decide to sell or give away one machine, I can pull
the
Therese Trudeau wrote:
What do you think of alternative back up systems, such as a tape
backup with
bare metal restore software? I'd go that route instead if I could fine a
solution which
would allow me to restore to different hardware, i.e. if my motherboard dies
and I need to buy a different
Therese Trudeau wrote:
ACTUALLY I totally forgot. I absoluteluy can not use software raid. Because I
use Adobe products. Adobe products do not install
well on software raid systems, and tend to crash on software raid beacuse of
their activation process. If I go raid, I absolutely need a har
Peter Farrell a écrit :
Compile it man! Set the flags so everything goes under
/usr/local/mysql. What's the big deal?
Er... I think you wanted to reply to someone else. Because I share
your viewpoint.
Cheers,
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
Tom Brown wrote:
Just for fun, the first hit on a google for "redundant atx power supply"
http://www.directron.com/tc400r8.html
Seems you can just plop one into your std atx chassis . . .
i have never understood how something with a single feed can be termed
'redundant'
Yes, that do
>> ACTUALLY I totally forgot. I absoluteluy can not use software raid.
>> Because I use Adobe products. Adobe products do not install
>> well on software raid systems, and tend to crash on software raid beacuse of
>> their activation process. If I go raid, I absolutely need a hardware raid
>
Compile it man! Set the flags so everything goes under
/usr/local/mysql. What's the big deal? What was that about 'making my
server dirty'? That's crazy talk. We've got similar apps that hook
together tomcat, rmi and mysql 4.1 - we can't change versions for a
variety of reasons - but when I added
>>> That brings up a last question on possiblity of either a
>>> 3ware or acrea RAID 1 cards. I'm wondering how long I would
>>> be able to order
>>> a replacement RAID card from either of 3ware or areea.
>>> Anyone know if 3ware or acrea stock identical replacement
>>> cards for their SATA
I see everyone's point about acrobat reader - but I run 50+ machines
of Cent 4.5 and run remote desktops on all of them - I think the
latest (8.*) version of Adobe Acrobat is miles and miles better than
the bloated pig we used to have to use. I don't have issues with it
remotely either. I find it q
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:29 -0400
ACTUALLY I totally forgot. I absoluteluy can not use software raid. Because I
use Adobe products. Adobe products do not install
well on software raid systems, and tend to crash on software raid beacuse of
their activation
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:29 -0400
> >
> >
> >> You are definitely making your life more difficult then is
> >> needed for a desktop machine.
> >>
> >> You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out
> >> of the first two. Make a software RAID1 out of th
Therese Trudeau wrote:
>
> > You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed
> > for a desktop machine.
> >
> > You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the
> > first two. Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your
> > good to go.
> >
> > You can u
Tom Brown wrote:
Yeah, that PS appears to have only one outlet (unless i'm not seeing
it in the photo),
most redundant PS's have seperaate outlets for a Y power cable one
for each supply.
Guess it's not that redundant.
yes - although i would never use a Y cable - Dual PSU's need 2 feeds
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:29 -0400
>
>
>> You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
>> desktop machine.
>>
>> You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
>> Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
>>
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> >>> This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending
> >>> more on redundancy then if you just called Dell and ordered
> >>> another computer.
> >>
> >> I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home
> >> computer than to design a system with redundanc
> You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
> desktop machine.
>
> You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
> Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
>
> You can use dump/restore to backup the logical vol
>>> This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending
>>> more on redundancy then if you just called Dell and ordered
>>> another computer.
>>
>> I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home
>> computer than to design a system with redundancy.
>> However that new conputer I
Therese Trudeau wrote:
>
> > This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending
> > more on redundancy then if you just called Dell and ordered
> > another computer.
>
> I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home
> computer than to design a system with redundancy.
> However
Yeah, that PS appears to have only one outlet (unless i'm not seeing it in the
photo),
most redundant PS's have seperaate outlets for a Y power cable one for each
supply.
Guess it's not that redundant.
yes - although i would never use a Y cable - Dual PSU's need 2 feeds
from seperate PDU
> This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending more on redundancy
> then if you just called Dell and ordered another computer.
I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home computer than to
design a system with redundancy.
However that new conputer I would order from Del
>> Just for fun, the first hit on a google for "redundant atx power supply"
>>
>> http://www.directron.com/tc400r8.html
>>
>>
>> Seems you can just plop one into your std atx chassis . . .
>>
>>
>
> i have never understood how something with a single feed can be termed
> 'redundant'
Yeah, that
> You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
> (provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
>
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
>>>
>>> That's a very good po
>> That's a very good point never thought of that. Acrtually this RAID 1 setup
>> I'm planning
>> is for my desktop machine, problem is is's not built like a server so there
>> is not the traditional
>> slid in bay for a second PS as do many 1 and 2u rack servers have. Unless
>> there is som
Just for fun, the first hit on a google for "redundant atx power supply"
http://www.directron.com/tc400r8.html
Seems you can just plop one into your std atx chassis . . .
i have never understood how something with a single feed can be termed
'redundant'
___
This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending more on redundancy then
if you just called Dell and ordered another computer.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Fri Mar 14 09:31:00 2008
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Recommend
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Therese Trudeau wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very go
> That is true, buy high quality stuff up front for fewer problems down
> the road. Not a sure bet, but a better one. In the half dozen systems
> I've been running at home for the past several years none of them
> have suffered a hardware failure of any kind(fortunately). I've been
> running PC Po
Therese,
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a desktop
machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You can use dump/restore to backup the logical volumes
Once you get a handle on what you are after check back with me, I have a
bunch of Raid controllers I picked up from a systems dealer who went out
of business. Some LSI's ICP, ICP says they are an Adaptec company and a
couple of other off brands... May be able to save you a few bucks, all
are
Therese Trudeau wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very good point never thou
>>> You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
>>> (provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
>>>
>>
>> Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
>> help if your PS fails.
>>
>>
>
> redundant power supplies connected
>> You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
>> (provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
>
> Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
> help if your PS fails.
That's a very good point never thought of that. Acrtually t
> Adaptec makes both true HW raid and re-sells fakeraid cards. I guess they
> wanted a piece of both pies. But 3ware only makes HW raid cards AFAIK.
How well do you think the adaptecSATA raid cards stack up against the Areca
and 3ware RAID cards? I'm going to buy two raid cards over the weeken
On Friday 14 March 2008 10:43, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Jake Grimmett schrieb:
> > If I could ask question about 10Gbit ethernet
> >
> > We have a 70 node cluster built on Centos 5.1, using NFS to mount user
> > home areas. At the moment the network is a bottleneck, and it's going to
> > get wor
Jake Grimmett schrieb:
If I could ask question about 10Gbit ethernet
We have a 70 node cluster built on Centos 5.1, using NFS to mount user home
areas. At the moment the network is a bottleneck, and it's going to get worse
as we add another 112 CPUs in the form of two blade servers.
To h
William L. Maltby a écrit :
Is there an alternative?
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
really useful voice reader capability.
I'm using CentOS 5.1 for all our desktops in public li
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 05:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:41 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote:
> > ...
> > > I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
> > > it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:32 +1100, James Gray wrote:
> James
> --
> Q: What lies on the bottom of the ocean and twitches?
> A: A nervous wreck
I had to say thank you for that one! Made me laugh out loud at 05:40
with only one cup of coffee ingested.
--
Bill
__
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:41 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> ...
> > I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
> > it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
> > really useful voice reader capability.
>
> Broken? H
98 matches
Mail list logo
