Estimados Todos, les comento que hace unos días configure un servidor
apache. Con un sitio web, pero para sorpresa mía solo este sitio se lo
puede ver en los navegadores Konkeros, Mozilla, Firefox pero al mismo
sitio no se lo puede ver en los algunos navegadores como el explorer 6 y
7. Alguien
El Friday 14 March 2008 07:49:41 pm Alexander López Lapo escribió:
Estimados Todos, les comento que hace unos días configure un servidor
apache. Con un sitio web, pero para sorpresa mía solo este sitio se lo
puede ver en los navegadores Konkeros, Mozilla, Firefox pero al mismo
sitio no se lo
2008/3/14, César Sepúlveda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El Friday 14 March 2008 07:49:41 pm Alexander López Lapo escribió:
Estimados Todos, les comento que hace unos días configure un servidor
apache. Con un sitio web, pero para sorpresa mía solo este sitio se lo
puede ver en los navegadores
William L. Maltby wrote:
...
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
really useful voice reader capability.
Broken? How?
I've printed many pages from acroread 8.x
Mogens
--
Mogens
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:41:11 +0100
Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Broken? How? I've printed many pages from acroread 8.x
I have heard the same thing mentioned before as well, but acroread 8.x is also
working fine for me, on several different computers and printers.
I wonder if it
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:41 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
...
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
really useful voice reader capability.
Broken? How?
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:32 +1100, James Gray wrote:
James
--
Q: What lies on the bottom of the ocean and twitches?
A: A nervous wreck
I had to say thank you for that one! Made me laugh out loud at 05:40
with only one cup of coffee ingested.
--
Bill
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 05:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:41 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
...
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not
William L. Maltby a écrit :
Is there an alternative?
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
really useful voice reader capability.
I'm using CentOS 5.1 for all our desktops in public
Jake Grimmett schrieb:
If I could ask question about 10Gbit ethernet
We have a 70 node cluster built on Centos 5.1, using NFS to mount user home
areas. At the moment the network is a bottleneck, and it's going to get worse
as we add another 112 CPUs in the form of two blade servers.
To
On Friday 14 March 2008 10:43, Kay Diederichs wrote:
Jake Grimmett schrieb:
If I could ask question about 10Gbit ethernet
We have a 70 node cluster built on Centos 5.1, using NFS to mount user
home areas. At the moment the network is a bottleneck, and it's going to
get worse as we
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very good point never thought of that. Acrtually this
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
redundant power supplies connected to redundant UPS's.
Therese Trudeau wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very good point never
Once you get a handle on what you are after check back with me, I have a
bunch of Raid controllers I picked up from a systems dealer who went out
of business. Some LSI's ICP, ICP says they are an Adaptec company and a
couple of other off brands... May be able to save you a few bucks, all
are
Therese,
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a desktop
machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You can use dump/restore to backup the logical
That is true, buy high quality stuff up front for fewer problems down
the road. Not a sure bet, but a better one. In the half dozen systems
I've been running at home for the past several years none of them
have suffered a hardware failure of any kind(fortunately). I've been
running PC Power
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Therese Trudeau wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very
This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending more on redundancy then
if you just called Dell and ordered another computer.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri Mar 14 09:31:00 2008
Subject: RE:
Just for fun, the first hit on a google for redundant atx power supply
http://www.directron.com/tc400r8.html
Seems you can just plop one into your std atx chassis . . .
i have never understood how something with a single feed can be termed
'redundant'
That's a very good point never thought of that. Acrtually this RAID 1 setup
I'm planning
is for my desktop machine, problem is is's not built like a server so there
is not the traditional
slid in bay for a second PS as do many 1 and 2u rack servers have. Unless
there is some
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to
help if your PS fails.
That's a very good point never thought of that.
This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending more on redundancy
then if you just called Dell and ordered another computer.
I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home computer than to
design a system with redundancy.
However that new conputer I would order from Dell
Yeah, that PS appears to have only one outlet (unless i'm not seeing it in the
photo),
most redundant PS's have seperaate outlets for a Y power cable one for each
supply.
Guess it's not that redundant.
yes - although i would never use a Y cable - Dual PSU's need 2 feeds
from seperate
This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending
more on redundancy then if you just called Dell and ordered
another computer.
I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home
computer than to design a system with redundancy.
However that new conputer I would order
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
desktop machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You can use dump/restore to backup the logical volumes
Therese Trudeau wrote:
This is getting OT and you are going to end up spending
more on redundancy then if you just called Dell and ordered
another computer.
I agree with you in that it's cheaper to buy another home
computer than to design a system with redundancy.
However that
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:29 -0400
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
desktop machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You can use
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:29 -0400
ACTUALLY I totally forgot. I absoluteluy can not use software raid. Because I
use Adobe products. Adobe products do not install
well on software raid systems, and tend to crash on software raid beacuse of
their
Tom Brown wrote:
Yeah, that PS appears to have only one outlet (unless i'm not seeing
it in the photo),
most redundant PS's have seperaate outlets for a Y power cable one
for each supply.
Guess it's not that redundant.
yes - although i would never use a Y cable - Dual PSU's need 2 feeds
I see everyone's point about acrobat reader - but I run 50+ machines
of Cent 4.5 and run remote desktops on all of them - I think the
latest (8.*) version of Adobe Acrobat is miles and miles better than
the bloated pig we used to have to use. I don't have issues with it
remotely either. I find it
Tom Brown wrote:
Just for fun, the first hit on a google for redundant atx power supply
http://www.directron.com/tc400r8.html
Seems you can just plop one into your std atx chassis . . .
i have never understood how something with a single feed can be termed
'redundant'
Yes, that
Peter Farrell a écrit :
Compile it man! Set the flags so everything goes under
/usr/local/mysql. What's the big deal?
Er... I think you wanted to reply to someone else. Because I share
your viewpoint.
Cheers,
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
Therese Trudeau wrote:
ACTUALLY I totally forgot. I absoluteluy can not use software raid. Because I
use Adobe products. Adobe products do not install
well on software raid systems, and tend to crash on software raid beacuse of
their activation process. If I go raid, I absolutely need a
Therese Trudeau wrote:
What do you think of alternative back up systems, such as a tape
backup with
bare metal restore software? I'd go that route instead if I could fine a
solution which
would allow me to restore to different hardware, i.e. if my motherboard dies
and I need to buy a
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:12:45 Niki Kovacs wrote:
Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
Installing an old mysql into the latest centos is not the best way
either. Why not installing the whole database into the new mysql? Unless
it's using functions that are not available/compatible with mysql5, it
On Friday 14 March 2008 15:14, Peter Farrell wrote:
I see everyone's point about acrobat reader - but I run 50+ machines
of Cent 4.5 and run remote desktops on all of them - I think the
latest (8.*) version of Adobe Acrobat is miles and miles better than
the bloated pig we used to have to use.
No, read this:
my previous thread...
Sorry, I can't access your Windows Live Hotmail inbox . . .
Ah haha sorry was not paying attention, it's here: :)
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096054.html
_
on 3-14-2008 5:37 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
Adaptec makes both true HW raid and re-sells fakeraid cards. I guess they
wanted a piece of both pies. But 3ware only makes HW raid cards AFAIK.
How well do you think the adaptecSATA raid cards stack up against the Areca
and 3ware RAID
Sorry, I can't access your Windows Live Hotmail inbox . . .
Ah haha sorry was not paying attention, it's here: :)
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096054.html
OOPS - I need some more coffee this am - HERE is the correct thread:
I have two home workstation machines.
One is Centos, and one is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
possible
to have the same type of RAID cards on both machines, because easier to
manage and if I ever decide to sell or give away one machine, I can pull
the raid card and use
on 3-14-2008 6:31 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
That is true, buy high quality stuff up front for fewer problems down
the road. Not a sure bet, but a better one. In the half dozen systems
I've been running at home for the past several years none of them
have suffered a hardware failure
Hi,
I'm using the preconfigured firewall that comes with CentOS 5. I
configure it with system-config-securitylevel-tui, close all ports
except SSH, and then open only the ones I need.
Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires
opening a series of ports. I've
on 3-14-2008 7:33 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a desktop
machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You
Therese Trudeau wrote:
I have two home workstation machines.
One is Centos, and one is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
possible
to have the same type of RAID cards on both machines, because easier to
manage and if I ever decide to sell or give away one machine, I can pull
the
on 3-14-2008 8:22 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
That brings up a last question on possiblity of either a
3ware or acrea RAID 1 cards. I'm wondering how long I would
be able to order
a replacement RAID card from either of 3ware or areea.
Anyone know if 3ware or acrea stock identical
On 14/03/2008, Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that mean that I have opened ports 7000 to 7010? Or only ports 7000
and 7010? I'm not quite sure how to read this.
Could you use something like nmap to check the open ports?
Alan.
___
CentOS
Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
although I would be heartbroken and a little peeved, I could just fire up my
lappy and
You are definitely making your life more difficult then is needed for a
desktop machine.
You said you have 4 hard disks. Make a software RAID1 out of the first two.
Make a software RAID1 out of the second two and your good to go.
You can use dump/restore to backup the logical volumes on
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:08 +0100
Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
Hi,
I'm using the preconfigured firewall that comes with CentOS 5. I
configure it with system-config-securitylevel-tui, close all
ports except SSH, and then open only the ones I need.
Therese Trudeau wrote:
That brings up a last question on possiblity of either a
3ware or acrea RAID 1 cards. I'm wondering how long I would
be able to order
a replacement RAID card from either of 3ware or areea.
Anyone know if 3ware or acrea stock identical replacement
cards
Unfortunately I can't use software RAID1 because of this:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/096063.html
First, you should probably get your applications from a company that
doesn't hate its customers... But aside from that, this restriction
should only apply to the
Alex White a écrit :
It means you've opened 7000 through to 7010 for udp and tcp.
OK thanks. I just took a peek in /etc/sysconfig/iptables, and indeed.
Cheers,
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
although I would be heartbroken and a little peeved, I could just fire
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06:18AM +, Jake Grimmett wrote:
I'm probably not going to feed 10Gb to the individual blades, as I have few
MPI sers, though it's an option with IBM and HP blades. However IBM, and
Dell offer a 10Gbit XFP uplink to the blade servers internal switch, and
this
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external
Ok, I can't quite figure out how to make this work. I want to
simultaneously log everything for facility local5 in a local file and
a remote syslog-ng server. local7 is working fine getting the
boot.log log entries transferred over to the syslog-ng server, but not
so much with local5. Local
Now, this is getting OT, but I like to rebuild my XP boxes about every 6
months. That's more than the 3 times in four years.
I have a base image, though, so I just dump it down, and then add the new
things I would like to have my on my existing image, and do whatever updates
are necessary,
Scott Silva wrote:
_
The software raid implementation in windows is a far cry from the linux
version. Windows can't boot from their dynamic arrays, linux can.
When did that start - or are you just looking at the non-server
Wow, I could have saved all that typing
Great ideas, Les.
You were the one that introduced me to Clonezilla (unknowingly) some time ago
in another thread.
I had been using a Hirens boot disk, but Clonezilla is better.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine
Ah I figured someone would ask that. I use pretty much all
major adobe products, Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, just
about the entire suite.
I have two home workstation machines. One is Centos, and one
is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if possible
to have the same type
on 3-14-2008 9:43 AM Therese Trudeau spake the following:
Explain your definition of a mission critical desktop. Does the entire
enterprise stop functioning if this desktop stops?
I am THE tech support for my company, but my desktop could die right now, and
although I would be heartbroken and a
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Ah I figured someone would ask that. I use pretty much all
major adobe products, Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, just
about the entire suite.
I have two home workstation machines. One is Centos, and one
is Windows (the one I use Adobe on). I'd prefer if
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external firewire or
network
UPDATE:
The problem seems to be on the client side, because when I do this:
logger -p local5.info test
the file does show up properly on the syslog-ng host. Anyone have an
idea why the other processes that write to local5 on the client are
not logging to the remote host?
local5.*
If you are a graphic designer, I'm curious what you use the
CentOS box for (or why you use Windows and not Mac :-)
Good question when I started out I had windows so that's
what I bought - Adobe windows versions. I'm considering
migrating to Mac though because Adobe just started a
new
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Don't bother. If you are a serious Adobe designer get
yourself a Mac and dual boot it between OS X and CentOS or
triple with Windows.
Or use parallels or vmware and run all 3 at once when you want... and
let the built in time machine tool do backups to an external
John R Pierce wrote:
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On 3/10/08, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well
(provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown)
Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'fsck -y' seems to fix it up, but it keeps happening. Is this likely
to be leftover cruft from the hardware issues or are there problems
in ext3/raid1/sata drivers? The way backuppc stores data with
millions of hardlinks in the
Hi,
I can't install a french spell checker in Thunderbird. There's a link in
Thunderbird's preferences, to download new dictionaries, but it's dumb.
So I downloaded the dictionary manually (spell-FR.xpi) and installed it
in Thunderbird using the 'Extensions' dialog. But the installed
Hello Barry,
could you email me please, I try to email you and it was returned.
Sincerely,
Christopher
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, March 12, 2008 12:59, James B. Byrne wrote:
I was editing a file in gvim when I inadvertently pressed some key combination
that caused the vim window to disappear from the desktop.
...
Questions:
What key combination places the window with focus into another workspace?
A.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'fsck -y' seems to fix it up, but it keeps happening. Is this likely
to be leftover cruft from the hardware issues or are there problems
in ext3/raid1/sata drivers? The way backuppc stores data with
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:32, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires
opening a series of ports. I've configured the app to use ports 7000 to
7010 (TCP and UDP). When running system-config-securitylevel-tui, the
last line enables to define
On 3/11/08, Fajar Priyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 04:04:03 Jim Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Error: php-pecl-apc conflicts with php-mmcache
Error: Missing Dependency: php = 4.3.9 is needed by package
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can this be related to being on a 3-member RAID1 that normally runs
with one device misssing? I've run a different one that way for a
couple of years on earlier kernels.
Well, I also found this one:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Can this be related to being on a 3-member RAID1 that normally runs
with one device misssing? I've run a different one that way for a
couple of years on earlier kernels.
Well, I also found this one:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/6455/focus=6908
Is your
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Sean Carolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont really think you can get much easier than CVS if you need
centralized management over a network. If it never gets off the
machine then there is RCS. If those aren't simple enough... I don't
think any of the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
...
I use Adobe's acroread. Works very well. But don't get the 8.* series -
it's broken in printer interface and is a little bloated do to a not yet
really useful voice reader capability.
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Back to this problem again. I did a new mkfs.ext3 and ran more than a
week before hitting this again:
Mar 14 04:12:29 linbackup1 kernel: md3: rw=0, want=14439505280, limit=1465143808
Mar 14 04:12:29 linbackup1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md3): ext3_readdir:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Max Hodgson wrote:
I use Dell 124T tape loaders with Centos. The controlling device on mine is
separate to the data device.
Turned out to be at least the need for a new scsi card, which I obtained.
I also used a new machine. But your experience below did lead me to
Jeff Larsen wrote:
Taking a different approach than others...
Load them back into Outlook Express on a Windows box. Open a gmail
account and enable it for IMAP access. Configure Outlook Express for
gmail/IMAP and copy the messages to gmail folders. Configure T-Bird on
CentOS for gmail/IMAP
I have also found that there are a small handful of hosts that seem to
spit out a line or two of log output once in a while on the server,
but have not yet identified a pattern.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
So I thought I'd get a head start for next week -
I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and
limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via
SCSI card.
I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental backup of
the samba
On Saturday 15 March 2008 09:09:31 Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
I would use dump, but samba connections are not device files.
How about rsync? The tape library is LTO3 with hardware compression
available. Google searching just now doesn't make rsync directly to tape
too hopeful.
What are the
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
So I thought I'd get a head start for next week -
I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and
limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via
SCSI card.
I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental
Robert Spangler a écrit :
Check out this site. It's a tutorial fro IPTables.
http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html
Funny you send me this link. I know Robbie Workman as an ex-fellow
Slackware user.
And I also know some basic iptables (no system-config-* in Slackware
:oD).
90 matches
Mail list logo
