[CentOS] How to get status of notebook lid?

Hello, I am using CentOS 5.1 on a toshiba tecra 8000 notebook. That works great so far. The only thing I could not realize is to shutdown the notebook if closing the lid. Therefor I need the current status (open or close) of the lid, but I don't know how. Is there any way to get this status, maybe

Re: [CentOS] Xorg crashes centos 5.1

What binary drivers do you have and where did you get them from and what version are they? Give us the output of lspci -v. as in the line containing your type of video card. On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 19:54 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > From dmesg after the crash. > Xorg[12774] general protection rip:

[CentOS] Xorg crashes centos 5.1

From dmesg after the crash. Xorg[12774] general protection rip:2b3daaff218b rsp:7fff01440950 error:0 Anyone experiencing X11 crashes? I have an amd 6400+ centos 5.1 x86_64. This typically happens when I VNC in from home into my machine at work. My machine has nvidia card and I do run the binar

RE: [CentOS] depmod madness

I commend your honesty and candor, Artie. Few people in these public fora ever bother to admit they actually LEARNED something! :-) --Carol Anne > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Artie Ziff > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 3:20 PM >

Re: [CentOS] depmod madness

Hello, I close this issue as PEBKAC. :) I misinterpreted the -b argument to mean the special root file system's "modules" directory but instead I only needed to specify the root "/" of the target file system. depmod is happy. Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] depmod madness

> Do you want to run depmod against /lib/modules/2.6.16.23-custom ? Then, > > depmod -a /lib/modules/2.6.16.23-custom > > should do. If you add '-b foo', it will prepend the 'foo' to your > default version (`uname -r`) which is what you are seeing. > Thank you for your time to respond. Yes I

[CentOS] New phenom quad core and centos 5.1

Any one here tried the phenom (B3 stepping) and centos 5.1? Any issues? I would presume there are no issues, but thought I'd ask before moving on. I am considering getting a Phenom 9850. Wish the clock speed was higher at this point. Jerry ___ CentOS

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

I'm moving from qmail to the free version of Google Apps for my personal domain. I'm moving, and losing my FTOH solution (and they didn't care what I did...) It offers 100 free email accounts, 6.5g of storage per email account, calendars, contacts, google talk, docs and sites. Gmail mobile access f

Re: [CentOS] Re: list of epel packages

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:21:17PM +0200, David Hláčik wrote: > Or to be more specific, what i am trying to do is to remove epel repo and all > installed packages from that repo , how will i achieve it? Something like this: rpm -qa --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}|%{DISTRIBUTION}\n'

Re: [CentOS] Re: list of epel packages

On Monday 07 April 2008, David Hláčik wrote: > Or to be more specific, what i am trying to do is to remove epel repo and > all installed packages from that repo , how will i achieve it? > > Thanks again > > D. > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:20 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > >

Re: [CentOS] rsync question

Jeff Larsen wrote: On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: rsync does not create archives. Are you sure that the archive does not exist in the source directory? Is it just being rsynced along with everything else? Perhaps it is left over from previous backup

Re: [CentOS] rsync question

Alfred von Campe wrote: On Apr 7, 2008, at 13:07, Ray Leventhal wrote: I want to backup the /home tree to that box nightly via rsync (cronjob), so I tried this: rsync -avrogz /home/ /mnt/backup/ First, drop "rog" from the options, as they are implied with -a. Also, since you are not going

Re: [CentOS] Re: list of epel packages

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:21:17PM +0200, David Hláčik alleged: > Or to be more specific, what i am trying to do is to remove epel repo and > all installed packages from that repo , how will i achieve it? > > Thanks again > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:20 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:17 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:38 +0300, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > > sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. > > > > Also if I recall co

[CentOS] Re: list of epel packages

Or to be more specific, what i am trying to do is to remove epel repo and all installed packages from that repo , how will i achieve it? Thanks again D. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:20 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I know it has been solved many times, but how will i get a l

[CentOS] list of epel packages

Hi! I know it has been solved many times, but how will i get a list of all installed packages from EPEL repository? I know for rpmforge it is rpm -qa package=*rf* . Thanks! David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote: >Jun Salen wrote: >>Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>>What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange >>>with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? >>> >>>Thanks! >>>jlc >> >>I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users,

Re: [CentOS] java-1.6.0-openjdk packages for testing

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 13:35 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, William L. Maltby > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Johnny, > >>> > >>> Thought I'd try these out for you. Looks like a prerequisite is > >>> missing? > >>

Re: [CentOS] xfs and centosplus kernel

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: >On Friday 04 April 2008, Fong Vang wrote: >> I read that XFS has problems with 4K Stack size for Linux on 32-bit >> systems. How did we address this in the centosplus kernel? Since what >> release of CentOS was this problem resolved? > >I just wanted

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > >> > >> Why do you need anything special

Re: [CentOS] Setting clock rate on CentOS kernel

Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Ben Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using a 32 bit server installation (no graphical stuff) on a Dell Poweredge 2650. I'd like to compare performance of a 100 Hz kernel against a 1KHz kernel. It reads like it's simple enough to set the

Re: [CentOS] rsync question

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been trying to wrap my head around this for a bit, done my googling > and archive searching but I still can't seem to 'get' it. > > Here goes: > > I've a spare drive in my CentOS5.1 box, which (for tes

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

On Sun, Apr 06, 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>What about Zimbra or Scallix? >> > >Zimbra looks impressive! Anyone here running it? We have Zimbra running with several hundred mail users on a CentOS 4.5 system (it wouldn't run on CentOS 5 when we started the project). It works well, but does not

Re: [CentOS] rsync question

On Apr 7, 2008, at 13:07, Ray Leventhal wrote: I want to backup the /home tree to that box nightly via rsync (cronjob), so I tried this: rsync -avrogz /home/ /mnt/backup/ First, drop "rog" from the options, as they are implied with -a. Also, since you are not going over a (potentially sl

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:38 +0300, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. > > Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it > failed although

[CentOS] rsync question

Hi folks, I've been trying to wrap my head around this for a bit, done my googling and archive searching but I still can't seem to 'get' it. Here goes: I've a spare drive in my CentOS5.1 box, which (for testing now) I mount manually under /mnt/backup I want to backup the /home tree to that

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 + beryl + 1440x900 -thanks!

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Masters IT Gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a graphic card mobile intel 945gm/gu express. I > have problems too when I want to change resolution to 1440x900, the menu > doesn't show that option the max is 1280 or something like that, well I you > could open my

[CentOS] Centos 5.1 + beryl + 1440x900 -thanks!

Hi to all, maybe someone could help me out, I have installed beryl in centos 5 following directions on internet, configuring repos from fedora core 6 and I successfully installed it but the problem I have apparently is that it only works when my resolution is 1024x768 or less, I have a Toshiba sate

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

The same that i was wondering, VPN Exchange??? Instead of Zimbra there is another email server that runs good and provide nice features? Im new to linux but I am getting close day to day. Thanks for all! George from Uruguay. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [CentOS] Setting clock rate on CentOS kernel

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Ben Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last evening I updated my Cent 5 server to 5.1. All went flawlessly, and > it rebooted with the new kernel just fine. > > How do I set the clock rate on the new kernel? According to > documentation it can be done, but everyth

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

Jason Pyeron wrote: Why do you need anything special to support mobile users these days? Most internet-enabled phones will do IMAP and SMTP over ssl just like everybody else. If the server and phone both support the IMAP IDLE command, you get real-time push email, otherwise you have to poll fo

Re: [CentOS] xfs and centosplus kernel

On Monday 07 April 2008, Alan Bartlett wrote: > On 07/04/2008, Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only way I know of is to look at your kernels .config (typicall found > > at /boot/config-$(uname -r)). grep for 4KSTACK. If it's not set it's 8K > > (afaik). > > Correct. For example,

[CentOS] Setting clock rate on CentOS kernel

Last evening I updated my Cent 5 server to 5.1. All went flawlessly, and it rebooted with the new kernel just fine. How do I set the clock rate on the new kernel? According to documentation it can be done, but everything I read is rather vague. Check out section 3 at the URL below: http://wiki.c

[CentOS] Re: Apache Authorization Access Control - location of htpasswd in Centos 5.1?

on 4-6-2008 6:59 PM Pam Astor spake the following: > > > > I tried creating a password file by executing htpasswd -c > > /passwd/passwords > > > > famsite but apparently htpasswd is not in my path, I�m getting the > > > > �cannot create file /passwd/passwords famsite� error. > > > > > > Tha

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 08:49 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Jun Salen wrote: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? Thanks! jlc I use Zimbr

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 08:49 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Jun Salen wrote: > > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange > >> with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> jlc > > > > I use Zimbra OS Edi

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:43 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > >>> I use Zimbra OS Edition with more tha

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

Jason Pyeron wrote: I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users, Ajax and HTML capable and very easy to setup. Looks >professional in terms of interface. Good community too. The only problem is that it was bought by Yahoo >which is planning to buy by M$, but since OS version was GPL, then

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

John wrote: exactly how are you doing the install ? what sort of vmware do you have setup ? what kind of machine ? using a script / kickstart ? why are you using a physical media when vmware can directly install from iso. etc. And dont forget to mention how the install fails. How about use th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Akemi Yagi wrote: ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you have'nt actually mentioned how and when the install failed and with that message. I also read all his follow up messages. If I understood them correctly, he was going to use vmware to *test* whether or not med

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:17 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > > sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. > > ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 17:37 +0300, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > John wrote: > > > > Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad > > media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios > > had to be set to """Default Settings""" or ""APCI"" had to be turned >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you have'nt > actually mentioned how and when the install failed and with that message. > exactly how are you doing the install ? w

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:46 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement > > >I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users, Ajax and HTM

[CentOS] NFS, acls, proto, and "kernel: svc: unknown version"

Hi all, 1) My NFS3 clients don't display or obey existing non-POSIX ACLs on files of NFS3-mounted exports. 2) setfacl on the client throws error and fails : # setfacl -m u:stowler:rw testfile.text setfacl: testfile.text: Operation not supported 3) at time of client mount the server's /var/

[CentOS] NFS, acls, proto, and "kernel: svc: unknown version"

Hi all, 1) My NFS3 clients don't display or obey existing non-POSIX ACLs on files of NFS3-mounted exports. 2) setfacl on the client throws error and fails : # setfacl -m u:stowler:rw testfile.text setfacl: testfile.text: Operation not supported 3) at time of client mount the server's /var/log/me

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Ioannis Vranos wrote: Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you have'nt actually mentioned how and when the install failed an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Ioannis Vranos wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Now I am redownloading the CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD install image, and I will use the image itself first as a virtual DVD under vmware, and will try to verify the medium during install and see if it proceeds OK with installation. If it succeeds, I will burn

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Correction: Ioannis Vranos wrote: > John wrote: >> Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad >> media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios >> had to be set to """Default Settings""" or ""APCI"" had to be turned >> off. Also overclocked pro

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

John wrote: > > Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad > media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios > had to be set to """Default Settings""" or ""APCI"" had to be turned > off. Also overclocked processors will cause this also and bad ram

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Now I am redownloading the CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD install image, and I will >> use the image itself first as a virtual DVD under vmware, and will try >> to verify the medium during install and see if it proceeds OK with >> installation. >> >> If it succeeds, I will burn it to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On 07/04/2008, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ALSO ... if doing to VMWare, you can just point to the ISO file as a CDROM > and boot from it directly. > > Try to install from that and see if it passes the media test. > > That should help determine if the problem is a bad DVD image when

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 09:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > Anne Wilson wrote: > >> On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > >>> Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? What about Zimbra or Scallix? Both not Open Source

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Ioannis Vranos wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, inst

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Alan Bartlett wrote: > On 07/04/2008, *Ioannis Vranos* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > The same things happen with Scientific Linux 5.1 x86 installation > DVD, so perhaps it is a Red Hat EL 5.1 x86 DVD issue? > > > This has to be a hardware specific issue as t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote: >> Anne Wilson wrote: >>> On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation

Re: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

Jun Salen wrote: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? Thanks! jlc I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users, Ajax and HTML capable and very easy to setup. Looks professi

RE: [CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

>I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users, Ajax and HTML capable and >very easy to setup. Looks >professional in terms of interface. Good community >too. The only problem is that it was bought by Yahoo >which is planning to buy >by M$, but since OS version was GPL, then I assume that the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On 07/04/2008, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The same things happen with Scientific Linux 5.1 x86 installation > DVD, so perhaps it is a Red Hat EL 5.1 x86 DVD issue? This has to be a hardware specific issue as two distros fail to install. Perhaps if you were to post your hardware

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > >> Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > >> sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation > >> failed. > >> > >>

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

Steven Haigh wrote: On 07/04/2008, at 10:10 PM, Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? What about Zimbra or Scallix

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: >> Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed >> sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. >> >> Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install,

[CentOS] Re: MS Exchange Replacement

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange > with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > > Thanks! > jlc I use Zimbra OS Edition with more than 300 users, Ajax and HTML capable and very easy to setup. Looks professional in ter

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? Not open source, but I recently came across 'PostPath' - it claims to be the only 'True Drop-in Exchange Alternative

RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

> > Outlook calender/meeting functionality requires (in almost all the > solutions) a really non open source (proprietary and not compilable) > program to make use of the proprietary outlook/exchange interface called > MAPI. Most of the free versions of these mail systems use IMAP, with > will no

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > > > > > > > > What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with > that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > > > > Thanks! > > jlc > > -

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? What about Zimbra or Scallix? Both not Open Source Scalix uses Scalix Publ

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. > > Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it > failed although as I

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

On 07/04/2008, at 10:10 PM, Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? What about Zimbra or Scallix? Both not Open S

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with > > that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > What about Zimbra or Scallix? Both not Open Source Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SP

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed > sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. > > Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it > failed although as I said the media was verified.

[CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems

Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed. Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it failed although as I said the media was verified. ==> The same things happen with

Re: [CentOS] xfs and centosplus kernel

On 07/04/2008, Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only way I know of is to look at your kernels .config (typicall found > at /boot/config-$(uname -r)). grep for 4KSTACK. If it's not set it's 8K > (afaik). Correct. For example, with the base CentOS kernel: CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y Alan

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

On 4/7/08, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with > that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > > Thanks! > jlc > What about Open-Xchange they have two open source versions. It could be a challange to c

Re: [CentOS] xfs and centosplus kernel

On Friday 04 April 2008, Fong Vang wrote: > I read that XFS has problems with 4K Stack size for Linux on 32-bit > systems. How did we address this in the centosplus kernel? Since what > release of CentOS was this problem resolved? I just wanted to add that xfs has no special connection to the ce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 repo dow

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Thank you Lance. Would this affect mrepo at all? I'm trying to download the latest centos x64 rpm's, but mrepo seems to just hang. It may have done - but should be ok since it was fixed ?? Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerni

Re: [CentOS] DKMS

On Saturday 05 April 2008 22:13, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:02:08 Alan Bartlett wrote: > > (3) The CentOS-docs list. Anne, the last item I received was dated April > > 3rd. > > In the morning I'll go to the member prefs page and see if I can see what's > wrong. Thanks > Noth

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

js wrote: Shawn Everett wrote: On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? We're running the Community edition of Scalix. Easy to setup, easy to administrate.

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

Shawn Everett wrote: On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? Thanks! jlc Kollab is pretty decent although it's a bit particular to install. Shawn

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with > that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? > > Thanks! > jlc Kollab is pretty decent although it's a bit particular to install. Shawn

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

I personnaly like the combination: Postfix, Mailscanner, Group-Office. Group-office has the functionality i need (email, calendar, calendar sharing, tasks, filemanager, addressbooks, projectmanager etc... Yet is quite simple to setup and use... In the professional version there is also a synchron