Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

Thanks for the answers, pointers and help. Haste makes not only waste, but exposes inexperience, as it has done here. (my own, of course) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux

Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > A pretty good discussion of this just occurred over on the beowulf mailing > list. See . Thanks! It seems I should just stop looking, not cost effective for my purposes. Sigh nate

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

Ray Leventhal wrote: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management -> Server -> Settings -> Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't in

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:41:48PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: > - > >>Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on > >>the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management -> > >>Server -> Settings -> Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary > >

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:28:28PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

On Friday, June 13, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all, I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

- Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management -> Server -> Settings -> Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CL

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:28:28PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: > I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into > the following instruction: > > - > Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on > the server, please make sure you enab

[CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

Hi all, I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management -> Server -> Settings -> Email. ISPConfig wi

Re: [CentOS] Network FS w/o user setup

Johnny Hughes wrote: You would then need to setup "Samba Authentication" for your Linux Client machines. The best method to do that depends on your business, who you have to interface with, what services you are running on the network, etc. I run a Samba PDC (using LDAP as a backend) with

Re: [CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 at 10:52am, nate wrote Anyone have experience with any? I've been having a real hard time finding info on any cards that actually support this under linux. (most of the cards work but I don't see drivers that actually offload the TCP stack) I have seen some comments where ke

[CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux

Anyone have experience with any? I've been having a real hard time finding info on any cards that actually support this under linux. (most of the cards work but I don't see drivers that actually offload the TCP stack) I have seen some comments where kernel developers don't like the idea as well.

RE: [CentOS] assigning "best" gateway via DHCP

>This is a good idea, thanks. So, I'm assuming that you mean something >like this? > >http://tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/ Yeah, I don't know how "sexy" the solution would be, but you could poll for throughput/availability with a script, then rewrite the iptables rule for example taking th

Re: [CentOS] assigning "best" gateway via DHCP

Joseph L. Casale wrote: What might I do Linux-wise to create a "system" that looked at multiple gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least congested? Anyone have any good suggestions in this department? Your assumption is that the level of congestion would remain unch

Re: [CentOS] Network FS w/o user setup

Ted Miller wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Ted Miller wrote: Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same files from the client? Clients will

[CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Nicholas wrote: Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? We have been offered a pass through the process by the LSB, but there has not been demand for it. I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? One assumes y

[CentOS] Key Card Access software

We have http://www.cansec.com/ based prox readers and port servers but the software is a joke. It doesn't run as a service, so the server must be logged in at the console. Anyone use anything Linux based they can vouch for? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mail

AW: Re: [CentOS] OT: HP Autoloader Issue

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I spent a good chunk of time trying to get an HP LTO Autoloader to > work with Amanda only to later find out it was faulty. Aside from HP > who has a brutal system for repairing hardware, does anyone know where > I might be able to send it for repair? > Joseph, Maybe

RE: [CentOS] assigning "best" gateway via DHCP

>What might I do Linux-wise to create a "system" that looked at multiple >gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least >congested? > >Anyone have any good suggestions in this department? Your assumption is that the level of congestion would remain unchanged for the length o

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability

Hi Bent, Have you tried the latest bz32 kernel from Johnny? > > > I have kind of lost faith in RH kernels as far as NFS performance is > concerned - and yes, I know that the bz32 issue is supposedly > solved in 5.2 but until we can positively c

Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed

Hi Balaji Again the log info that you have provided is too little atleast for me to diagnose. Would be better if you could attach the /var/log/messages from corviewprimary and corviewsecondary servers. Also, just to remind you that GULM uses only /etc/hosts so make sure you have the entries

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability

> I have an issue with a new cluster setup where the nodes are RHEL5.1(with > the latest 5.2 kernel), when i try to write NFS data, the nodes scale Have you tried the latest bz32 kernel from Johnny? I have kind of lost faith in RH kernels as far a

Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed

Dear All, I have getting the following messages alone from the log file Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: Stopping lock_gulmd: Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: shutdown succeeded Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: ESC[60G Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulm

Re: [CentOS] RPM creation question

Clint Dilks wrote: For those who care - On FC6 / CentOS 4 - To Disable this you must hack the script as far as I can tell. I am told that on New Versions of Fedora (and I assume CentOS 5) that you can add %__jar_repack %{nil} to the top of the spec file. Why cant you twiddle with __os_inst

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Nicholas wrote: Correction: RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Yes. But we may not call it so, as CentOS is *not* certified by the Linux Foundation. But the LSB tests should run without any problem on If anyone wa

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > But the LSB tests should run without any problem on CentOS 5. Ralph pgp6TWV2FTtE0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Nicholas wrote: > Correction: > > RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Yes. But we may not call it so, as CentOS is *not* certified by the Linux Foundation. But the LSB tests should run without any problem on If anyone wants to sponsor that - feel free to contact

[CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability

Hi All, I have posted this messgage yesterday in the Beowulf mailing list, and did not get any responses, as i have tried different Centos kernels to see if the behaviour changes or not, and it did not change much, I am posting it here, I hope no one minds, and thanks in advance for any pointers

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:06 AM, GS R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > Nicholas wrote: > > Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. > > > And what, pray tell, is LSB? > > Linux Standard Base (LSB)* - http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB* > > _

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

Victor Padro wrote: Proxmox VE is the *only *virtualization platform which can do all of the following on one physical host: * Container Virtualization (OpenVZ) * Full virtualization (KVM) * Para-virtualization (KVM) We encourage everybody to test Proxmox VE and give feedback, fo

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Morten Nilsen wrote: Nicholas wrote: Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. And what, pray tell, is LSB? Linux Standard Base (LSB)* - http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB* begin:vcard fn:GS R n:R;Gowrishankar email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Quality Ana

Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed

The log info that you have provided is not enough to decide on the problem that you are facing. Could you please post the entire log and the cluster.conf file along with it. Thanks GS R Balaji wrote: Dear All, I am using CentOS4 Update 3 Cluster Suite for i386 Architecture and my linux ker

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Morten Nilsen wrote: And what, pray tell, is LSB? http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB About the Linux Standard Base (LSB) The Linux Standard Base delivers interoperability between applications and the Linux operating system. Currently all major distributions comply with the LSB and ma

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Correction: RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Nicholas wrote: Hi all, Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? In case you need to know, I am compiling a li

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?

Nicholas wrote: Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. And what, pray tell, is LSB? -- Cheers, Morten :wq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos