[CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-10 Thread Ian Murray
In my haste for help, I stupidly hit reply and changed the subject which I thought was enough for a new message, not giving much thought for the threading, etc. So apologies for the hijack, although I would think it fairly obvious that it wasn't deliberate or obvious to me... or a big deal reall

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Mike A. Harris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Blizzard wrote: > I set up a CentOS desktop computer for my brother and his kids. When > Firefox 3.5 came out he decided to download and install it like he > would Windows (he doesn't yet understand the repository system). He's > been telling me th

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I have Firefox 3.5 (the mozilla.com version) on CentOS 5.3 using an > Intel card and it has caused X to restart on a couple of occasions. > > I am shifting back to the 3.0 version in the repo. A great test page for the bug it is right on Cen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > The whole thread put shortly (the way I see it) goes like this: > > * A community member shouts "Because of recent dev-internal events, I don't > trust the developers any more, I want the project changed so that I can > regain > my trust!" That's not at all what I s

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John > Thomas wrote: >> Ron Blizzard wrote: >>> Firefox 3.5 and *some* CentOS 5.3 computers (an Xorg graphics card >>> incompatibility issue?) -- it goes beyond the RPM package released by >>> >> For the record, I have been using Michael Harris

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted File Storage

2009-08-10 Thread Matty
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of > sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts > and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want > to store it i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 10 August 2009 22:12:41 Ron Blizzard wrote: > Again, what does > community input have to do with the mechanical process of turning > "upstream" code into a 100% binary compatible distribution? Nothing, of course. :-) There seem to be only two things such "input" would provide: (1) the

Re: [CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Please stop hijacking threads. If you want to ask a question, well, then hit the button for "new message". Thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list Cen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 10 August 2009 21:12:11 James B. Byrne wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:23:57 +0100 Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > Unfortunately, governments are typically not made of experts, but of > > opportunists. Name one president of > entity here> that has been elected because he has a PhD in polit

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread William Warren
Lanny Marcus wrote: > On 8/10/09, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> I set up a CentOS desktop computer for my brother and his kids. When >> Firefox 3.5 came out he decided to download and install it like he >> would Windows (he doesn't yet understand the repository system). He's >> been telling me that

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Ron: My Desktop is dual boot. M$ WinXP Home and CentOS 5.3 (32 bit). I > rarely use M$ Windows, but yesterday I needed to use it, and I was > offered an Update for Mozilla Firefox. What was offered was not 3.5. > It was 3.0.13 as I recall. I u

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John Thomas wrote: > Ron Blizzard wrote: >> Firefox 3.5 and *some* CentOS 5.3 computers (an Xorg graphics card >> incompatibility issue?) -- it goes beyond the RPM package released by >> > For the record, I have been using Michael Harris' 3.5 Firefox without > any i

[CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-10 Thread Ian Murray
I have a system who's normal activity is running Xen 3.3.1 with Centos 5.3 as the DomU. I had reason to connect an IDE drive to the single IDE interface that this board has. I was getting slow performance. hdparm -t revealed that the thoughput was down to just 2.7 MB/sec. After some tweaking (

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 8/10/09, Ron Blizzard wrote: > I set up a CentOS desktop computer for my brother and his kids. When > Firefox 3.5 came out he decided to download and install it like he > would Windows (he doesn't yet understand the repository system). He's > been telling me that it works fine, even though I wa

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread John Thomas
Ron Blizzard wrote: > Firefox 3.5 and *some* CentOS 5.3 computers (an Xorg graphics card > incompatibility issue?) -- it goes beyond the RPM package released by > For the record, I have been using Michael Harris' 3.5 Firefox without any issues at all and with some speed benefits. I hope Mr. Harr

Re: [CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 8/10/09, RedShift wrote: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 13:56, RedShift wrote: >>> I've installed the JDK 1.5 and used alternatives --config java to use the >>> 1.5 JDK from Sun. However, the same compilation error still occurs. How >>> do I tell rpmbuild or the .spec

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:43:22 -0500 "John R. Dennison" wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:33:29PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:37:42 -0400 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes, it is, but there is also a 'Server Install CD', which might be > > better.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Goodwin
Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:37:42 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:26, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> >>> If you've got limited access, the best way to install CentOS is >>> probably to download the very small Netinstall ISO -- then

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:33:29PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:37:42 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > Yes, it is, but there is also a 'Server Install CD', which might be > better. Many of the 'server' (deamon) RPMs are NOT on CD 1 of the CD > set (instead it ha

[CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
I set up a CentOS desktop computer for my brother and his kids. When Firefox 3.5 came out he decided to download and install it like he would Windows (he doesn't yet understand the repository system). He's been telling me that it works fine, even though I was skeptical due to my experience with Fir

[CentOS] Execution from ip-up.local

2009-08-10 Thread Ed Warner
-- On Mon, 8/10/09, Ed Warner wrote: > From: Ed Warner > Subject: Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10 > To: centos@centos.org > Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 5:39 PM > > I tried your suggestions without > success. ip-up.local is executable in > > a bash console and if I do so, I get this messag

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

2009-08-10 Thread Ed Warner
> I tried your suggestions without success. ip-up.local is executable in > a bash console and if I do so, I get this message: "iptables v1.3.5: > invalid mask '255' specified Try 'iptables -h' for more information. > A subent mask of 255? In my opinion it should be something like > /24 or 255.255.2

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:37:42 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:26, Ron Blizzard wrote: > > If you've got limited access, the best way to install CentOS is > > probably to download the very small Netinstall ISO -- then do a > > network install. That way you

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Actually, as Johnny already said, you can use the LiveCD itself to do > a netinstall. However, in that case, you will still download the > packages from the Internet as they are installed. I'm sorry, I should have made myself clear. I

Re: [CentOS] How to Contribute to CentOS was: CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:04:10AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 06:52:09AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > >> Here as well, we differ -- CentOS at its core is about boring, and > >> stable and conservative as a core value. You are in the wrong place > >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > Nonetheless, it is very evident from the heated exchanges on this > mailing list that there exists a substantial divergence on which > path to take from here.  It seems to me insupportable that the past > practices of a small coterie of init

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:26, Ron Blizzard wrote: > If you've got limited access, the best way to install CentOS is > probably to download the very small Netinstall ISO -- then do a > network install. That way you save having to download all the updates > right after installing. Actually, as

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread James B. Byrne
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:23:57 +0100 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > Unfortunately, governments are typically not made of experts, but of > opportunists. Name one president of entity here> that has been elected because he has a PhD in political > sciences/history/law/whatever, or because he had enough ha

Re: [CentOS] error --- > any idea ?? Kernel: Additional sense: Invalid command operation code

2009-08-10 Thread Ramón T . B .
Years ago, I had a similar problem. The point was the HD drivers. The interface was Serial ATA (SATA) and the driver  supporting it, was SCSI kind, not ATA. It is surprising the problem still persist nowadays, except if you had compiled your ouw kernel with the wrong driver indication. I'm not

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > Ok, I may have botched that one. I have been routinely using the fedora > Live-cd's to install from. Wildblue is a satellite  system and I only > get 17 gig's/30 days and I spread that among four other members of the > household. > > I will h

Re: [CentOS] Execution from ip-up.local

2009-08-10 Thread Olaf Mueller
Ed Warner wrote: > I tried your suggestions without success. ip-up.local is executable in > a bash console and if I do so, I get this message: "iptables v1.3.5: > invalid mask '255' specified Try 'iptables -h' for more information. A subent mask of 255? In my opinion it should be something like /2

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Goodwin
Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> >>> You can do a netinstall via the LiveCD too. This is identical to doing >>> the install via the netinstall CD. >>> >> Which again

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > You can do a netinstall via the LiveCD too. This is identical to doing > > the install via the netinstall CD. > > Which again means lots of new downloads for him while inst

Re: [CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread RedShift
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 13:56, RedShift wrote: >> I've installed the JDK 1.5 and used alternatives --config java to use the >> 1.5 JDK from Sun. However, the same compilation error still occurs. How do I >> tell rpmbuild or the .spec to use the Sun JDK? >

Re: [CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 13:56, RedShift wrote: > I've installed the JDK 1.5 and used alternatives --config java to use the 1.5 > JDK from Sun. However, the same compilation error still occurs. How do I tell > rpmbuild or the .spec to use the Sun JDK? I believe it should be using JDK 1.5. >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Curt Mills
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johnny Hughes wrote: > You can do a netinstall via the LiveCD too. This is identical to doing > the install via the netinstall CD. Which again means lots of new downloads for him while installing over the 'net. I feel for the guy, having been on slow dialup with lots of noi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/10/2009 06:23 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > Ok, I may have botched that one. I have been routinely using the fedora > Live-cd's to install from. Wildblue is a satellite system and I only > get 17 gig's/30 days and I spread that among four other members of the > household. Is there a local LUG ?

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bob Goodwin wrote: > Robert wrote: >> Bob Goodwin wrote: >> >>> I just downloaded the Centos 5.3 live-cd and booted the resulting disk. >>> I do not see an icon to install from the cd! >>> >>> Did i get the wrong thing? I have a fixed allocation of bandwidth and >>> hate to waste 700+ megs! >>

Re: [CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread RedShift
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:25, RedShift wrote: >> I have found a few references on the errors with some conclusive information >> on the tomcat mailinglist [4], stating that dbcp won't build with a java 6 >> compiler. >> >> So at this point my mind is blank,

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted File Storage

2009-08-10 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>If you want to backup the directory while it is still encrypted (not >mounted), look for encfs. > >But I prefer luks myself (uses dm-crypt). I see, looking at all of these, it looks like luks uses built-in modules and tools whereas the others need fuse or something like it. The luks option looks

Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM

2009-08-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
mcclnx mcc wrote: > That is NOT true. I have been tried like www.sun.com and www.oracle.com and > it work fine. > > --- 09/8/10 (一),Ross Walker 寫道: > >> 寄件者: Ross Walker >> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM >> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list" >> 副本: "CentOS mailing list" >> 日期: 2009年

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted File Storage

2009-08-10 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:23:48PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of > sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts > and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want > to s

Re: [CentOS] Execution from ip-up.local

2009-08-10 Thread Ed Warner
> Message: 22 > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:09:58 +0200 > From: Olaf Mueller > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Execution from ip-up.local > To: centos@centos.org > Message-ID: <1587893.ojvorq4...@weidenwinde.istari.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > John R Pierce wrote: > > > Ed Warner wro

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted File Storage

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel De Marco
I use encfs, http://www.arg0.net/encfs, and it's working fine. Daniel. * Joseph L. Casale [08/10/2009 13:26]: > Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of > sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts > and output files, I need it back

[CentOS] Encrypted File Storage

2009-08-10 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want to store it in a tar file type archive as when it needs to be accessed and hav

Re: [CentOS] Integrate shell scripts into Nautilus ?

2009-08-10 Thread Barry Brimer
Quoting Niki Kovacs : > Hi, > > I'd like to integrate a handful of shell scripts into my Nautilus file > browser, for example to be able to resize a selection of images with one > click via ImageMagick, or convert videos easily. After a bit of > Googling, I found out that folks seem to do this by

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Goodwin
Robert wrote: > Bob Goodwin wrote: > >> I just downloaded the Centos 5.3 live-cd and booted the resulting disk. >> I do not see an icon to install from the cd! >> >> Did i get the wrong thing? I have a fixed allocation of bandwidth and >> hate to waste 700+ megs! >> >> Bob >> >> > IMO,

[CentOS] How to Contribute to CentOS

2009-08-10 Thread R P Herrold
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 06:52:09AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: >> That is the 'rap' as to Axel's archive, and >> why people end up frustrated using it and moan and groan about their >> ignorance and NOT READING our clear warnings on the wiki's >> Repositories

[CentOS] Integrate shell scripts into Nautilus ?

2009-08-10 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, I'd like to integrate a handful of shell scripts into my Nautilus file browser, for example to be able to resize a selection of images with one click via ImageMagick, or convert videos easily. After a bit of Googling, I found out that folks seem to do this by placing scripts into ~/.gnome2

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Robert
Bob Goodwin wrote: > I just downloaded the Centos 5.3 live-cd and booted the resulting disk. > I do not see an icon to install from the cd! > > Did i get the wrong thing? I have a fixed allocation of bandwidth and > hate to waste 700+ megs! > > Bob > IMO, if you're on a dial-up or other slow c

Re: [CentOS] Greasemonkey question

2009-08-10 Thread John Doe
From: Boris Epstein > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Brian Mathiswrote: > > I think this is FAR off-topic. So far that Google would be a much > > better place to ask, or maybe the greasemonkey site. > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Boris Epsteinwrote: > >> 1) How does one create a webpage

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread John Doe
From: Bob Goodwin > I just downloaded the Centos 5.3 live-cd and booted the resulting disk. > I do not see an icon to install from the cd! > Did i get the wrong thing? I have a fixed allocation of bandwidth and > hate to waste 700+ megs! AFAIK, the live CD is just a live CD; not an install CD.

Re: [CentOS] Greasemonkey question

2009-08-10 Thread Robert
Boris Epstein wrote: > I have asked Google and thus far nothing came back that looks even > remotely promising... > > Boris. > This is the first I had heard of this add-on I found https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748 where I read Support for this add-on is provided by the develop

Re: [CentOS] error --- > any idea ?? Kernel: Additional sense: Invalid command operation code

2009-08-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:31, Agnello George wrote: > My system is CentOS release 4.4 (Final) [...] This will probably not fix your problem, but you should always update your system and keep it on the latest point release, in this case, 4.7, or very soon 4.8 which is going to be release. Th

[CentOS] Centos 5.3 live-cd install -

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Goodwin
I just downloaded the Centos 5.3 live-cd and booted the resulting disk. I do not see an icon to install from the cd! Did i get the wrong thing? I have a fixed allocation of bandwidth and hate to waste 700+ megs! Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

Re: [CentOS] Greasemonkey question

2009-08-10 Thread Boris Epstein
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > I think this is FAR off-topic.  So far that Google would be a much > better place to ask, or maybe the greasemonkey site. > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Sorry about going a bit off-topic (the q

Re: [CentOS] Greasemonkey question

2009-08-10 Thread Brian Mathis
I think this is FAR off-topic. So far that Google would be a much better place to ask, or maybe the greasemonkey site. On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry about going a bit off-topic (the question is not really > Linux-related) but here it goes nonethele

Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

2009-08-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
mcclnx mcc wrote: > > it have been almost one month. > > Any ideal when it will release? > > Thanks. > > > --- 09/7/17 (五),Karanbir Singh 寫道: > >> 寄件者: Karanbir Singh >> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time >> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list" >> 日期: 2009年7月17日,五,上午9:26 >> On 07/17/20

[CentOS] Greasemonkey question

2009-08-10 Thread Boris Epstein
Hello all, Sorry about going a bit off-topic (the question is not really Linux-related) but here it goes nonetheless: 1) How does one create a webpage with a Greasemonkey script that is installable? 2) Why does it happen that a Firefox installation in a user's account (i.e., the configuration wh

Re: [CentOS] BUG in httpd 2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2

2009-08-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 23:00, Mark Hedges wrote: > DBD::SQLite is not available in yum so I make it with CPAN. > > libapreq2 (Apache2::Cookie/Apache2::Request) is not > available in yum and does not run the tests right with the > CPAN installer as root so I make it from source. I believe both

Re: [CentOS] ASP Pages?

2009-08-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Warren Young wrote: > ML wrote: >> Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re- >> writing it for him > > There used to be a project called ChiliSoft ASP that did this, but it > appears that Sun bought them and then killed the product. > > As John R. Pierce noted, if

Re: [CentOS] ASP Pages?

2009-08-10 Thread Rich Huff
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:26 -0600, Warren Young wrote: > ML wrote: > > > > Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re- > > writing it for him > > There used to be a project called ChiliSoft ASP that did this, but it > appears that Sun bought them and then killed the

Re: [CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:25, RedShift wrote: > I have found a few references on the errors with some conclusive information > on the tomcat mailinglist [4], stating that dbcp won't build with a java 6 > compiler. > > So at this point my mind is blank, "now what?". Well, you can try to ins

Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

2009-08-10 Thread mcclnx mcc
it have been almost one month. Any ideal when it will release? Thanks. --- 09/7/17 (五),Karanbir Singh 寫道: > 寄件者: Karanbir Singh > 主旨: Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time > 收件者: "CentOS mailing list" > 日期: 2009年7月17日,五,上午9:26 > On 07/17/2009 01:07 PM, mcclnx mcc > wrote: > > > >  

Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM

2009-08-10 Thread mcclnx mcc
That is NOT true. I have been tried like www.sun.com and www.oracle.com and it work fine. --- 09/8/10 (一),Ross Walker 寫道: > 寄件者: Ross Walker > 主旨: Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM > 收件者: "CentOS mailing list" > 副本: "CentOS mailing list" > 日期: 2009年8月10日,一,上午9:26 > > On Aug 10, 2

Re: [CentOS] CentOS as a router

2009-08-10 Thread James B. Byrne
On Fri, August 7, 2009 12:07, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am setting up a small CentOS-5.3 host to act as a router. I have > the device configured and working. What I am trying to accomplish > now is configuring the firewall so as to protect both the router and > the LAN. Thank you for the replie

Re: [CentOS] ASP Pages?

2009-08-10 Thread Warren Young
ML wrote: > > Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re- > writing it for him There used to be a project called ChiliSoft ASP that did this, but it appears that Sun bought them and then killed the product. As John R. Pierce noted, if his site is actually using ASP

[CentOS] Building tomcat6, SRPM jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-7jpp.ep1.2.ep5.el5.src.rpm fails to build

2009-08-10 Thread RedShift
Hello all I'm trying to build tomcat6 from the SRPMs provided at [1], but I appear to have hit a wall. One of the dependencies of tomcat6-6.0.18-8.18.1.noarch [2] is jakarta-commons-dbcp-tomcat5 (provided by jakarta-commons-dbcp [3]). (I don't see why it's requiring tomcat5 components, maybe t

Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM

2009-08-10 Thread Ross Walker
On Aug 10, 2009, at 8:56 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > > I have No problem to use following comma nd: > > # wget -O - --progress=dot > "http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os > " > --08:55:27-- http://mirrorlist.centos.org/? > release=5&arch=i386&repo=os > Resolving mirrorlist.c

Re: [CentOS] can NOT update CENTOS use YUM

2009-08-10 Thread mcclnx mcc
I have No problem to use following comma nd: # wget -O - --progress=dot "http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os"; --08:55:27-- http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os Resolving mirrorlist.centos.org... 204.15.73.243, 72.232.223.58 Connecting to mirrorlist.ce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Marcus Moeller wrote on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:08:45 +0200: > Maybe these should just not comment on > a thread like this. Yeah. And that's why I wrote very early on that this list isn't the right place ;-) Just one comment that someone gets in the wrong throat and the whole thread and purpose of

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread David Hrbáč
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): > So we begin to actively drive away people now who say they appreciate > the distribution or others who are actively trying to help? > > Sorry, please make it clear that this is *YOUR POINT* of view and not of > all the people who are "making CentOS happen" at the momen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Ralph Angenendt
R P Herrold wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Bob Taylor wrote: > > > Personally, it disgusts me. > > > Have I said I don't appreciate it? > > Yes, actually -- I call b*llsh*t -- you who have done nothing > are here, and eat without charge at our table, and 'it > disgusts' you So we begin to

Re: [CentOS] How to Contribute to CentOS was: CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 06:52:09AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: >> Here as well, we differ -- CentOS at its core is about boring, and >> stable and conservative as a core value. You are in the wrong place >> if you think otherwise. It makes a fine BASE to build on, as Dag's >> ar

Re: [CentOS] error --- > any idea ?? Kernel: Additional sense: Invalid command operation code

2009-08-10 Thread John R Pierce
cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2009/8/10 Agnello George > > > Hi All > My system is CentOS release 4.4 (Final) and for the last few days > my system si getting rebooted ... i really cant find out any > reason why ... but on the messages found in the v

Re: [CentOS] error --- > any idea ?? Kernel: Additional sense: Invalid command operation code

2009-08-10 Thread cornel panceac
2009/8/10 Agnello George > Hi All > My system is CentOS release 4.4 (Final) and for the last few days my system > si getting rebooted ... i really cant find out any reason why ... but on > the messages found in the var/log/ ...here is what i got . > > Aug 10 04:31:34 spam2 kernel: FAILED > Aug 1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-10 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi all, > Well, I know I have benefited from the discussion because I understand the > challenges that face the CentOS team with regards to security updates whilst > they are rebuilding a point release. As has been pointed out to me, we're > between a rock and a hard-place and it isn't just a simp