Re: [CentOS] How to create a printer that prints directly to a file?

2010/5/20 Bryan Berry > cornel, that worked perfectly, thanks for the tip > > welcome :) -- Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there was this one: "Matters of great concern should be treated lightly." Master Ittei commented, "Matters of small concern should be treated seriously." (Ghost

Re: [CentOS] Created a custom/minimal CentOS 5.x install ISO

On 05/20/2010 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/19/2010 02:37 PM, Digimer wrote: >> >> I've been googling for ways to do this, figuring it must be somewhat >> straight forward, but my google-fu is weak it seems. Can someone point >> me to a how-to or doc on rolling your own CentOS derivat

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

Thomas Dukes wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell >> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:29 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help >> >> Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

> I think that I am going to push at management that this is a non-issue > and not worth wasting any more time and see what they might say. I'd like to point out that the following sites don't work with https://domain.tld/ amazon.com usbank.com redhat.com etrade.com They all present certs for w

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:29 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help > > Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-19 a

Re: [CentOS] Created a custom/minimal CentOS 5.x install ISO

On 05/19/2010 02:37 PM, Digimer wrote: I've been googling for ways to do this, figuring it must be somewhat straight forward, but my google-fu is weak it seems. Can someone point me to a how-to or doc on rolling your own CentOS derivative ISO? You can look around for documents on revisor.

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On 05/19/2010 02:02 PM, Zack Colgan wrote: > The problem you are running into is that SSL sessions are negotiated > prior to the browser sending the virtual host name, so there is no > opportunity to redirect the client to the www URL before it's too late. > Aside from purchasing a second SSL cer

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> If you are starting from scratch and don't know your way around the >> linux system, why not use one of the 'appliance' style distributions >> like ClearOS (fairly new) or SMEserver (older but still works)? T

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:17 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help > > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:31 -0500, Les Mikesel

Re: [CentOS] A Directory/Subdirectories Disappeared - whichlog file to look for this kind of information?

Thanks for those who responded my question. I'll keep the information with in case I need them in the future. After discussing the logging with my system admins, we decided that we'll not turn them on (may be just the basic bash and csh history files) because they will possibility create lots

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/19/2010 4:52 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> >> Is there any *legitimate* reason why someone would want to *type* >> https://domainname.com in the location/address bar? There really should >> not be a reason to do that. > > How else would you

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On 5/19/2010 4:52 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > Is there any *legitimate* reason why someone would want to *type* > https://domainname.com in the location/address bar? There really should > not be a reason to do that. How else would you get there the first time? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > Is there any *legitimate* reason why someone would want to *type* > https://domainname.com in the location/address bar? There really should > not be a reason to do that. If people are doing this, then that means > there is some reason for it

Re: [CentOS] How to create a printer that prints directly to a file?

cornel, that worked perfectly, thanks for the tip On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2010/5/16 Bryan Berry > > I am trying to learn how to share printers using samba. I am doing most of >> my experiments at home w/ libvirt and where there are no printers. >> >> How ca

Re: [CentOS] Problems after update to 5.5

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 01:20 -0400, JohnS wrote: > I am just wondering if any of you guys with the udev hang problem have > tried: > rpm -e the new kernel? Then try to reinstall it via yum install. You > should delete the new kernel from /var/cache/yum first. > > Just a point in why I say that is

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

At Wed, 19 May 2010 15:29:51 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Zack Colgan > wrote: > > On 05/19/2010 04:08 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: > >> The problem I am running into is if they go to https://domainname.com > >> (straight to the secure site), I am not able to fi

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

Ski Dawg wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Zack Colgan > wrote: > >> On 05/19/2010 04:08 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: >> >>> The problem I am running into is if they go to https://domainname.com >>> (straight to the secure site), I am not able to find a solution that >>> will redirect them

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

At Wed, 19 May 2010 17:02:31 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On 05/19/2010 04:08 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: > > The problem I am running into is if they go to https://domainname.com > > (straight to the secure site), I am not able to find a solution that > > will redirect them to https://www.doma

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

At Wed, 19 May 2010 15:21:06 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Wed, 19 May 2010 14:08:59 -0600 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > >> > >>     ServerName domainname.com > >>     Redirect permanent / http://www.domainname.com/

Re: [CentOS] Generic RAID question

On May 19, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 05/19/2010 10:50 AM, James Bensley wrote: >> Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible? >> >> I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes >> of >> unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the

Re: [CentOS] Created a custom/minimal CentOS 5.x install ISO

Subject should have been "How to *create* a ...", not "created". Sorry. :) On 10-05-19 05:37 PM, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to try rolling a somewhat stripped down and customized > CentOS DVD. This is particularly interesting to me now that CentOS 5.5 > is 2 DVDs. I dare not call it

[CentOS] Created a custom/minimal CentOS 5.x install ISO

Hi all, I'd like to try rolling a somewhat stripped down and customized CentOS DVD. This is particularly interesting to me now that CentOS 5.5 is 2 DVDs. I dare not call it a new distro as I suspect I will be the only one to use it. ;) I've been googling for ways to do this, figuring it

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Zack Colgan wrote: > On 05/19/2010 04:08 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: >> The problem I am running into is if they go to https://domainname.com >> (straight to the secure site), I am not able to find a solution that >> will redirect them to https://www.domainname.com, so tha

Re: [CentOS] trying to rebuild an old nvidia driver

Akemi wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:05 PM, wrote: >> Let me start by saying that no, I can't get a new card for my user. > > No problem with that. > >> So, I've got the 96 nvidia driver. I've rebuilt it several times before, >> and Nvidia's installer's always worked fine. Actually, I have th

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 19 May 2010 14:08:59 -0600 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> >>     ServerName domainname.com >>     Redirect permanent / http://www.domainname.com/ >> > > You don't really need this -- you can just add the line below to your existi

Re: [CentOS] trying to rebuild an old nvidia driver

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:05 PM, wrote: > Let me start by saying that no, I can't get a new card for my user. No problem with that. > So, I've got the 96 nvidia driver. I've rebuilt it several times before, > and Nvidia's installer's always worked fine. Actually, I have the 73 on my > system, a

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:08 -0600, Ski Dawg wrote: >> I found one site that said to make a change to the apache conf file, >> which I have done. The change that I made is adding: >> >>     ServerName domainname.com >>     Redirect permanent /

[CentOS] trying to rebuild an old nvidia driver

Let me start by saying that no, I can't get a new card for my user. So, I've got the 96 nvidia driver. I've rebuilt it several times before, and Nvidia's installer's always worked fine. Actually, I have the 73 on my system, and just updated to 5.5, and no problem. HOWEVER, I last rebuilt my user'

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On 05/19/2010 04:08 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: > The problem I am running into is if they go to https://domainname.com > (straight to the secure site), I am not able to find a solution that > will redirect them to https://www.domainname.com, so that the ssl > certificate matches and they won't get the "Th

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

At Wed, 19 May 2010 14:08:59 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Part of our website has secured access with an SSL certificate. The > problem we are running into is that the certificate is for > www.domainname.com, so when they go to domainname.com (without the > www. in

[CentOS] CentOS 5.5 - VMware Fencing in Cluster

I'm trying to use the newly integrated fence_vmware script within luci. I add it as a shared device and assume it is setup right (it is added as a device but it doesn't seem to do any connection test). When I try and add my shared fencing device as the primary device to a node it says it is upd

Re: [CentOS] apache redirection

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:08 -0600, Ski Dawg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Part of our website has secured access with an SSL certificate. The > problem we are running into is that the certificate is for > www.domainname.com, so when they go to domainname.com (without the > www. in front), the users

[CentOS] apache redirection

Hello everyone, Part of our website has secured access with an SSL certificate. The problem we are running into is that the certificate is for www.domainname.com, so when they go to domainname.com (without the www. in front), the users are getting a "This connection is untrusted" warning, because

Re: [CentOS] yum install

On 5/19/2010 1:29 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> A similar problem was reported recently on the yum list and turned out >> to be one of the xml libs replaced by a non-distribution openoffice >> install. Does 'rpm -Vv libxml2' show anything missing or broken? >> > rpm -Vv libxml2 > > S.5./us

Re: [CentOS] yum install

> > A similar problem was reported recently on the yum list and turned out > to be one of the xml libs replaced by a non-distribution openoffice > install. Does 'rpm -Vv libxml2' show anything missing or broken? > rpm -Vv libxml2 S.5./usr/bin/xmlcatalog S.5./usr/bin/xmllint

Re: [CentOS] yum install

On 5/19/2010 1:04 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have centos 5.4 and trying the command "yum install yum-utils", it > gives me an error. I tried the "yum clean all" > and the did the command again with same message. > > I only have [base] and [updates] in the repo. > > yum install yum-utils > Loaded

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > If you are starting from scratch and don't know your way around the > linux system, why not use one of the 'appliance' style distributions > like ClearOS (fairly new) or SMEserver (older but still works)? These > are based on CentOS code

[CentOS] yum install

I have centos 5.4 and trying the command "yum install yum-utils", it gives me an error. I tried the "yum clean all" and the did the command again with same message. I only have [base] and [updates] in the repo. yum install yum-utils Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cach

Re: [CentOS] Generic RAID question

On 05/19/2010 10:50 AM, James Bensley wrote: > Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible? > > I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of > unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around > this by say only using as much space as

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

Les Mikesell wrote: > Unless maybe it was downloaded to a VFAT partition - but that's a > generic problem with dvd images. > well, FAT is a problem regardless of OS or wordsize, it flat out doesn't support files greater than 4GB ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Generic RAID question

> Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible? > > I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of > unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around > this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest > drive or is t

[CentOS] Generic RAID question

Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible? I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest drive or is there anyway

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On 5/19/2010 12:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 05/19/2010 05:15 PM, Todd Denniston wrote: >> We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? >>> wo

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

Karanbir Singh wrote, On 05/19/2010 01:11 PM: > On 05/19/2010 05:15 PM, Todd Denniston wrote: >>> We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the >>> CentOS one >>> is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? >> would have been nice if the split wou

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 05/19/2010 05:15 PM, Todd Denniston wrote: > >>> We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the >>> CentOS one >>> is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? >>> >> would have been nice if the split would have

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On 05/19/2010 05:15 PM, Todd Denniston wrote: >> We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the >> CentOS one >> is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? > > would have been nice if the split would have been below 32 bit MS tool limits. > which

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

From: Tony Molloy > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: >> We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), >> the CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this >> reasonable and correct? >> ** the md5sum checks out, and RHN lists the size as 3,

[CentOS] Nautilus: Error: Not on the same filesystem

There appears to be a new bug in Nautilus in Centos 5.5 when trying to move and delete files. Error "Not on the same file system" while moving. A google search found this: http://centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=26205&forum=37 -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.me

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wednesday 19 May 2010 17:24:49 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the > > > CentOS one is 4602MB (***) spl

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: > > Hi > > > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the > > CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and > > correct? Any ide

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: > Hi > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the > CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and > correct? Any ideas why would there be such a discrepancy if they are > built from

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

Anthony Caetano wrote, On 05/19/2010 10:46 AM: > Hi > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the CentOS > one > is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? would have been nice if the split would have been below 32 bit MS tool limits. >

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Anthony Caetano wrote: > Hi > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the CentOS > one > is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs.  Is this reasonable and correct?  Any > ideas > why would there be such a discrepancy if they are built fro

[CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

Hi We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? Any ideas why would there be such a discrepancy if they are built from the same (or very similar) source? Regards Anthony Caetano ** t

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

On 10-05-19 10:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote: > >> >> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending >> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and >> this windoze box uses the Centos

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Digimer wrote: >> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: >>> Just installed from scratch 5.5 >>> >>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending >>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the inter

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote: > > Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending > this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and > this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway. I've had to swap out

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

On 5/19/2010 8:42 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote: > I had to install 5.5 from scratch and now I have to rebuild my home > networking system. > > I haven't had to mess with this stuff in over 5+ years and I'm sure there may > be better ways of doing it now. > > My liunx box acts as firewall/gateway fo

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:42 AM, wrote: > I had to install 5.5 from scratch and now I have to rebuild my home > networking system. > > I haven't had to mess with this stuff in over 5+ years and I'm sure there may > be better ways of doing it now. > > My liunx box acts as firewall/gateway for 2

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

> I had to install 5.5 from scratch and now I have to rebuild my home > networking system. Oy! > > I haven't had to mess with this stuff in over 5+ years and I'm sure there > may be better ways of doing it now. Unless you're dealing with many systems all the time, that's the way it always is. I g

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

El mié, 19-05-2010 a las 09:42 -0400, tdu...@sc.rr.com escribió: > I had to install 5.5 from scratch and now I have to rebuild my home > networking system. > > I haven't had to mess with this stuff in over 5+ years and I'm sure there may > be better ways of doing it now. > > My liunx box acts a

[CentOS] Networking setup/help

I had to install 5.5 from scratch and now I have to rebuild my home networking system. I haven't had to mess with this stuff in over 5+ years and I'm sure there may be better ways of doing it now. My liunx box acts as firewall/gateway for 2 other pcs. I was using a script from the Linux IP Mas

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

Digimer wrote: > On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > Digimer wrote: > >> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: > >>> Just installed from scratch 5.5 > >>> > >>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending > >>> this message as the the Cent

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

*Try dbench.* * * * http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxinfo/v3r0m0/index.jsp?topic=/liaag/journalingfilesystem/publicjournal12.htm * * * * OR* * * *http://linuxhelp.150m

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

On 05/19/2010 06:14 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Matt Keating > >>> I don't usually use iozone (I usually use bonnie++) so take this with >>> a grain of salt, but those speed look suspiciously like cache speeds. >>> Bump the size (-s parameter) up to twice your real RAM size. >>> >> Will

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Digimer wrote: >> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: >>> Just installed from scratch 5.5 >>> >>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending >>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the inter

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

From: Matt Keating >> I don't usually use iozone (I usually use bonnie++) so take this with >> a grain of salt, but those speed look suspiciously like cache speeds. >> Bump the size (-s parameter) up to twice your real RAM size. > Will give that a try - 16gb file incoming Or maybe do a: sync

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

> I don't usually use iozone (I usually use bonnie++) so take this with a > grain of salt, but those speed look suspiciously like cache speeds. Bump > the size (-s parameter) up to twice your real RAM size. > > -- > Benjamin Franz > ___ > CentOS mailing l

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

On 05/19/2010 02:44 AM, Matt Keating wrote: > 2010/5/6 Matt Keating: > >> Thanks for all the updates. Will look into iozone and the advice given >> about the rest. >> > Either I'm doing/reading something wrong or a 1TB SATA 7200 RPM drive > is faster than 4x300GB SCSI 10K RPM drives in ra

[CentOS] LVS IPv6 Support

Hello Folks, regarding linuxvirtualserver.org, experimental v6 Support for ipv6 was integrated into kernel 2.6.28-rc3, does anyone know if those patches have been backported to the centos kernel? Thanks! Juergen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] VNC failed to initialize HAL

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:13 PM, John Doe wrote: > From: sync > > **(gnome-volume-manger:30626):WARING**: manager.c/912:failed to > initialize HAL! > > service haldaemon status? > > Maybe it is the haldaemon problem. I google the "What is the hald service used for?" The answer is the following

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

Digimer wrote: > On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: >> Just installed from scratch 5.5 >> >> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending >> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and >> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gate

Re: [CentOS] /etc/inittab

From: Thomas Dukes > Where can I get a 5.2, 'stock' > inittab file not in a rpm so I can use a > rescue disk to create this file? Or > if possible, could someone please post > their's for me? rpm -qf /etc/inittab => initscripts => http://vault.centos.org/5.2/updates/i386/RPMS/initscripts-8.

Re: [CentOS] VNC failed to initialize HAL

From: sync > **(gnome-volume-manger:30626):WARING**: manager.c/912:failed to initialize > HAL! service haldaemon status? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010/5/6 Matt Keating : > Thanks for all the updates. Will look into iozone and the advice given > about the rest. Either I'm doing/reading something wrong or a 1TB SATA 7200 RPM drive is faster than 4x300GB SCSI 10K RPM drives in raid 10. Both of the results below were from iozone, running the fo

Re: [CentOS] setup firewall with 3 nic cards

Hi Jerry, Just a general remark. When deploying a firewall, it is advisable to have (atleast for input, better for all) to have the general policy set to drop, and only allow in what you expect to be coming in. If you put a "-j log" line as a final line for each section, you'll see every packet

Re: [CentOS] Bug in freeradius 1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 rpm

lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes: > Ian Forde writes: > > I upgraded one of my servers to CentOS 5.4 today. The freeradius > > service (radiusd) didn't start up due to permissions errors. I tracked > > it to the permissions on the /etc/raddb/certs/ directory being set to > > 640 rather than

Re: [CentOS] How to remove USB dependency form the boot process.

On 19.5.2010 9.12, Vijay Shanker Dubey wrote: > Hi friend, > > I have just installed the centos 5.3 on my server machine. It looks for > a USB media to boot. But I am not able to figure it out what i have done > wrong. Is there any way i can remove this dependency. Or I have to > reinstall the OS a