CentOS 7.9 system. My 2 servers at home have been spewing this error
message every few minutes to /var/log/messages. But there's no preceding
message to tell me what's being suppressed. From googling for this, I
understand that the failure to log the real message is a bug in the v3
series
>
>
> > I have only changed GRUB_DEFAULT from "saved" to "0"
> >
> > I have also run
> >
> > /usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/centos/grub.cfg
>
> I may be wrong here but IIRC, using grub2-mkconfig as described in the
> Grub docs didn't work for me when I tried to use it years ago.
>
> I
> Here is the contents of the entire
>
> cat /etc/default.grub
>
> GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
> GRUB_DEFAULT=0
> GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true
> GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console"
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="crashkernel=auto
>
Here is the contents of the entire
cat /etc/default.grub
GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
GRUB_DEFAULT=0
GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true
GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console"
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="crashkernel=auto
rd.md.uuid=066ffecb:69137a0b:4e579b4f:dfbf1696
Am 14.03.23 um 12:30 schrieb Rob Kampen:
OK,
found out the problem as to why it doesn't boot any kernel except 36.2
the system reports that it cannot find
vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64
or any one of the others, except for vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7.x86_64
hence a manual selection
I had something like this happen some years ago on a workstation with
2-disk (software/Linux) RAID 1. Turns out one of the disks had been ejected
from the raid array. It was that ejected disk that was getting the updates,
but since it was no longer in the array it wasn't being booted, but rather
OK,
found out the problem as to why it doesn't boot any kernel except 36.2
the system reports that it cannot find
vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64
or any one of the others, except for vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7.x86_64
hence a manual selection from the grub menu when in front of the
Change it to
GRUB_DEFAULT=0
(I encountered the same issue week ago with a workstation booted for three month with an older
kernel because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143438 , and solved it this way)
Regards,
Petko
On 3/14/23 10:51, Rob Kampen wrote:
Can I edit
This issue has been around for some months, but other things keep
crowding out a fix.
uname give me
3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 21 11:57:15 UTC 2021
yet I have
3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64
3.10.0-1160.81.1.el7.x86_64
3.10.0-1160.83.1.el7.x86_64
3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64
Am 08.10.22 um 16:24 schrieb Leon Fauster:
Hey folks, I wonder if anyone also suffers from the following:
I updated the BIOS/Firmware of a DELL notebook from 1.8 to 1.9. and
after this the latest C9S
kernel-5.14.0-171.el9.x86_64
can't be booted anymore (secure boot on) but the two older
Hey folks, I wonder if anyone also suffers from the following:
I updated the BIOS/Firmware of a DELL notebook from 1.8 to 1.9. and
after this the latest C9S
kernel-5.14.0-171.el9.x86_64
can't be booted anymore (secure boot on) but the two older ones do boot:
kernel-5.14.0-165.el9.x86_64
-3.10.0-1160.el7.src.rpm
Regards,
Marco Passerini
From: CentOS on behalf of Phil Perry
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 5:46:15 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel rebuild failling on Centos 7: missing libbpf-devel
and dwarves rpm too old
:15 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel rebuild failling on Centos 7: missing libbpf-devel
and dwarves rpm too old
On 19/04/2022 15:56, Passerini Marco wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm trying to rebuild the kernel specifically on Centos7 from src.rpm but
> some packages are
On 19/04/2022 15:56, Passerini Marco wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild the kernel specifically on Centos7 from src.rpm but some
packages are missing or too old. I managed to get them and compile on Centos8
though. Any advice?
# yumdownloader --source kernel.src
# rpm -ivh
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild the kernel specifically on Centos7 from src.rpm but some
packages are missing or too old. I managed to get them and compile on Centos8
though. Any advice?
# yumdownloader --source kernel.src
# rpm -ivh ./kernel-4.18.0-348.20.1.el7.src.rpm
# rpmbuild -bb
Hi guys.
When kernel - I think - broadcasts messages, spits to
console, I wonder how one controls that message format.
I specifically think of what 'dmesg' offers for time parts
of the message, eg. '--reltime' - so the same only
persistent/default behavior.
many thanks, L.
On 13/02/2022 12:16, Hooton, Gerard wrote:
The Ethernet interface stops working intermittently, once a day.
I get the following message in /var/log/messages
Feb 13 04:19:47 pc001 kernel: e1000e :00:1f.6 eno1: Reset adapter
unexpectedly
I ran the following command :
ethtool -i eno1
driver:
The Ethernet interface stops working intermittently, once a day.
I get the following message in /var/log/messages
Feb 13 04:19:47 pc001 kernel: e1000e :00:1f.6 eno1: Reset adapter
unexpectedly
I ran the following command :
ethtool -i eno1
driver: e1000e
version: 4.18.0-365.el8.x86_64
Il 2022-01-14 15:30 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
No .. none of the CentOS Kernels were EVER binary compatible with any
RHEL kernel.
CentOS Linux has always been (now also including CentOS Stream 8 and
9) a completely separate 'closed' build system.
We use the SAME source code to build things,
. We do not use proprietary code to
produce or apply the kpatches.
I can only speculate on whether RHEL kpatches would work on a CentOS
kernel, but my assumption is that they would not due to how they are
signed.
Is (well, was) the CentOS kernel identical at binary level to the RHEL
one?
If so
to
produce or apply the kpatches.
I can only speculate on whether RHEL kpatches would work on a CentOS
kernel, but my assumption is that they would not due to how they are
signed.
Is (well, was) the CentOS kernel identical at binary level to the RHEL one?
If so, the same kpatch should be applicable
speculate on whether RHEL kpatches would work on a CentOS
kernel, but my assumption is that they would not due to how they are
signed.
Is (well, was) the CentOS kernel identical at binary level to the RHEL
one?
If so, the same kpatch should be applicable to both RHEL and CentOS (the
old one
the
> developers of that. Just curious, as, if it is paid, it is stripped off
> as part of CentOS composition, but if it is not paid, open source, then
> it would "just work", or not?
RHEL's kernel live patching uses upstream open source kpatch. The
sources to the kpatches are d
--On Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:10 PM -0500 Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
We never had it in CentOS in the past, but I'm just curious: is live
patching proprietary piece of RHEL? I know there are several solutions,
way back there was paid one called splice, my Boss's son was one of the
developers
On 1/13/22 1:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 1/13/22 09:32, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
In layman's language summary: RedHat Enterprise features (including
"live" kernel patching) are to be expected _only_ in RedHat Enterprise
"binary replica" distributions, which CentOS Stream is not.
I don't
On 1/13/22 09:32, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
In layman's language summary: RedHat Enterprise features (including
"live" kernel patching) are to be expected _only_ in RedHat Enterprise
"binary replica" distributions, which CentOS Stream is not.
I don't think that's true, exactly. As far as I
On 1/13/22 12:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 1/7/22 12:18, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 1/7/22 09:39, Gionatan Danti wrote:
is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511
My understanding of live kernel patching is that the feature allows
On 1/7/22 12:18, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 1/7/22 09:39, Gionatan Danti wrote:
is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511
My understanding of live kernel patching is that the feature allows
systems to update specific individual kernel
Il 2022-01-07 19:07 Brian Stinson ha scritto:
There are 2 things to note here about kernel live patching:
- We do not provide patch files in CentOS Stream (or previously in
CentOS Linux, for that matter). We've always recommended RHEL as a
better fit for folks that have hard requirements on this
On 1/7/22 10:36, Kenneth Porter wrote:
If Stream is to be the next RHEL, wouldn't you want to test this kind
of thing so the RHEL subscribers don't have to?
Red Hat does not rely on end-users to test their software. (And that's
definitely not what Stream is for.)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:36 PM Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> On 1/7/2022 10:07 AM, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > - We do not provide patch files in CentOS Stream (or previously in
> > CentOS Linux, for that matter). We've always recommended RHEL as a
> > better fit for folks that have hard requirements on
On 1/7/2022 10:07 AM, Brian Stinson wrote:
- We do not provide patch files in CentOS Stream (or previously in
CentOS Linux, for that matter). We've always recommended RHEL as a
better fit for folks that have hard requirements on this sort of
workflow.
If Stream is to be the next RHEL, wouldn't
On 1/7/22 09:39, Gionatan Danti wrote:
is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511
My understanding of live kernel patching is that the feature allows
systems to update specific individual kernel functions, and is primarily
useful for
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:39 AM Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
>
> I know that I can enable it via cockpit or the command line, but are
> kernel patch files really available or do they require an active RHEL
> subscription?
>
> Thanks.
>
Dear all,
is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
I know that I can enable it via cockpit or the command line, but are
kernel patch files really available or do they require an active RHEL
subscription?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
On 05.08.21 19:56, Jerry Geis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:40 AM Jerry Geis wrote:
I am trying to install on a NUC7C with 32G of eMMC showing up as /dev/sdb
Is there a way I can tell the kernel boot line or command line to MASK
/dev/sdb ?
Make it look like it does not exist ? It has
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:40 AM Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to install on a NUC7C with 32G of eMMC showing up as /dev/sdb
> Is there a way I can tell the kernel boot line or command line to MASK
> /dev/sdb ?
> Make it look like it does not exist ? It has windows pre-installed - I
> dont
I am trying to install on a NUC7C with 32G of eMMC showing up as /dev/sdb
Is there a way I can tell the kernel boot line or command line to MASK
/dev/sdb ?
Make it look like it does not exist ? It has windows pre-installed - I
dont want to mistake it.
Thanks
Jerry
On Mar 8, 2021, at 07:37, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the latest kernel listed by rpm agrees with uname:
>
> [raub@testbox ~]$ rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-4.18.0-193.el8.x86_64
> kernel-4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64
> [raub@testbox ~]$
It appears as though you don’t have all the
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:30 AM Phil Perry wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2021 04:11, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > Running CentOS Linux release 8.3.2011
> >
> > According to uname my kernel is 4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64, but when
> > I check which version of kernel-devel is available,
> >
> > yum info
On 08/03/2021 04:11, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Running CentOS Linux release 8.3.2011
According to uname my kernel is 4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64, but when
I check which version of kernel-devel is available,
yum info kernel-devel
I get that
Source : kernel-4.18.0-240.15.1.el8_3.src.rpm
Running CentOS Linux release 8.3.2011
According to uname my kernel is 4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64, but when
I check which version of kernel-devel is available,
yum info kernel-devel
I get that
Source : kernel-4.18.0-240.15.1.el8_3.src.rpm
Why is the version of kernel-devel available
On 2/6/20 6:12 AM, Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 2/4/20 11:33 PM, Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS wrote:
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version
of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 2/4/20 11:33 PM, Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version
of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items compiled for
CentOS-7 on CentOS-8.
The kernel does not rely on
On 2/4/20 11:33 PM, Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version
>> of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items compiled for
>> CentOS-7 on CentOS-8.
>
> The kernel does not rely on userspace
>
> Kernel 3.10 in C7 is way to old to reliably support the 4.18 based C8
> runtime.
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version
> of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items compiled for
> CentOS-7 on CentOS-8.
The kernel does not rely on userspace libraries.
--
Dimitri Zelenkin
Devexperts, Inc
On 2/4/20 4:03 AM, Akshar Kanak wrote:
> Dear team
> Is it possible of downgrade the kernel in Centos 8 to any kernel from
> Centos 7 (or even latest kernel from Censto 7 Series) ?
> Has this been disabled intensionally or it will not work all together
>
No, CentOS-8 uses different shared
Dear team
Is it possible of downgrade the kernel in Centos 8 to any kernel from
Centos 7 (or even latest kernel from Censto 7 Series) ?
Has this been disabled intensionally or it will not work all together
Thanks and regards
Akshar
___
CentOS
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 08:12:50PM -0800, John Pierce wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 8:01 PM Fred Smith
> wrote:
>
> > Looking to buy a new usb-attached RAID box for nightly backups, and
> > I see that many of them now support usb 3.1 with UASP.
> >
>
> I'd rather have a NAS that supports
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 8:01 PM Fred Smith
wrote:
> Looking to buy a new usb-attached RAID box for nightly backups, and
> I see that many of them now support usb 3.1 with UASP.
>
I'd rather have a NAS that supports NFS and/or SMB and lives on ethernet,
so any host on your LAN can use it as
Looking to buy a new usb-attached RAID box for nightly backups, and
I see that many of them now support usb 3.1 with UASP.
Looking at add-in usb 3.1 cards (my motherboard is probably too old,
and only supports usb 3.0) to go with it, but don't know if the old
kernel RH/Centos uses supports UASP.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:57 AM Heath Nye
wrote:
> please remove from from this list
>
at the bottom of every message is this link...
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
there's unsubscribe instructions on there.
___
CentOS mailing list
please remove from from this list
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:49 AM Gokan Atmaca wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm using centos 7. At uncertain times I suddenly get the following
> error. The system is panic. Then it restarts automatically. I have
> updated the package ( pkla-check-auth ) but the problem
Hello
I'm using centos 7. At uncertain times I suddenly get the following
error. The system is panic. Then it restarts automatically. I have
updated the package ( pkla-check-auth ) but the problem persists. My
virtualization environment is KVM. (Host Centos7 , Guest Centos7.
Problem Guest VM)
Hi,
We have just upgraded to centos 8 at my lab, and are looking to install
the kernel-rt. When we were on centos 7, we were tracking the repo at
mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/rt. However, there doesn't seem to be an rt
directory for mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8.
Is the realtime kernel housed in
On 4/11/19 2:21 PM, Jyrki Tikka wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:38:04 -0700, Benjamin Smith
wrote
I drove to the site, picked up the machine, and last night found that the
problem wasn't anything to do with mdadm, but rather setting a partition to
GPT.
If you want to boot a BIOS based machine
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:38:04 -0700, Benjamin Smith
wrote
>I drove to the site, picked up the machine, and last night found that the
>problem wasn't anything to do with mdadm, but rather setting a partition to
>GPT. For some reason, you *cannot* have a partition of type GPT and expect
>Linux
On Apr 10, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
> For some reason, you *cannot* have a partition of type GPT and expect
> Linux to boot. (WT F/H?!?)
I believe you were trying to make use of a facility invented as part of the GPT
Protective Partition feature without understanding it
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 2:53:55 AM PDT Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
> > I think it's because you clobbered md0 when you did --zero-superblock on
> > sd[ab]1
> > instead of 2.
As mentioned in another reply, this was a typo in the email, not on the
machine.
I drove to the site, picked up the
> In article <6566355.ijnrhnp...@tesla.schoolpathways.com>,
> Benjamin Smith wrote:
>> System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID
>> configuration.
>>
>> md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition
>> md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home
>>
>> Installed kmod ZFS via
In article <6566355.ijnrhnp...@tesla.schoolpathways.com>,
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID
> configuration.
>
> md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition
> md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home
>
> Installed kmod ZFS via yum,
System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID
configuration.
md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition
md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home
Installed kmod ZFS via yum, reboot, zpool works fine. Backed up the /home data
2x, then stopped the sd[ab]2 partition with:
Hello Ed,
I tried that, for 2-3 newer kernels, didn't work (I actually posted that
link here yesterday or so).
btw: I haave the same problem with Centos/RHEL 7 kernels (as well as 6
ones).
You'd think there must be some kernel option to dodge the problem, so
far no luck.)
Ron
On
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, 8:08:39 PM EST, RC wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run CentOS release 6.10 (Final) on a Dell Inspiron M6700.
>
> 2.6.32-754.el6.x86_64 boots, and is whaat I am running now
> none of these, updated ones, won't boot:
>
> 2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64
>
I did that, it does nothing really.
I read in a forum, to use the kernel options: nefi noclflush
(https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15186)
That helps somewhat but when gnome/xorg starts, it again hangs/freezes
the background shows on one monitor, but that's about it
Ron
On 1/29/19
On Jan 29, 2019, at 8:08 PM, RC wrote:
> I run CentOS release 6.10 (Final) on a Dell Inspiron M6700.
>
> 2.6.32-754.el6.x86_64 boots, and is whaat I am running now
>
>
> none of these, updated ones, won't boot:
>
> 2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64
>
> 2.6.32-754.6.3.el6.x86_64
>
>
Hello,
I run CentOS release 6.10 (Final) on a Dell Inspiron M6700.
2.6.32-754.el6.x86_64 boots, and is whaat I am running now
none of these, updated ones, won't boot:
2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64
2.6.32-754.6.3.el6.x86_64
2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64
2.6.32-754.10.1.el6.x86_64
They all show
On 20/11/18 14:32, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi guys
>
> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that
> kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome.
> After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
>
> Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter
> Something has gone
On 20/11/18 14:58, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:32:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>>
>> hi guys
>>
>> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel
>> upgrade process might somewhat troublesome.
>> After that upgrade UEFI boot fails
On 20/11/2018 13:58, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:32:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
hi guys
I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel
upgrade process might somewhat troublesome.
After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:32:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>
> hi guys
>
> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel
> upgrade process might somewhat troublesome.
> After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
>
> Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 08:47 -0500, Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote:
> On 11/20/18 8:45 AM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:42 +, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> > > > hi guys
> > > >
On 11/20/18 8:45 AM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:42 +, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> >> hi guys
> >>
> >> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I
> >> wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:42 +, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> > hi guys
> >
> > I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I
> > wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi guys
>
> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I
> wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat
> troublesome.
> After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
>
>
On 11/20/2018 07:32 AM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi guys
>
> I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that
> kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome.
> After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
>
> Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter
> Something has
hi guys
I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I
wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat
troublesome.
After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with:
Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter
Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed
: Invalid
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:53 AM lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>
> On 23/08/18 18:44, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:42 AM lejeczek via CentOS
> > wrote:
> >> hi guys
> >>
> >> did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this
> >>
> >> CentOS Linux
On 23/08/18 18:44, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:42 AM lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
hi guys
did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this
CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core)
CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core)
is that
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:42 AM lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>
> hi guys
>
> did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this
>
> CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core)
> CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core)
>
> is that "plus.1" a new naming
hi guys
did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this
CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core)
CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core)
is that "plus.1" a new naming convention or just one off?
regards, L
On 06/16/2018 02:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen via CentOS wrote:
> On 15 June 2018 at 21:07, Keith Keller via CentOS wrote:
>> On 2018-06-16, Johnny Hughes via CentOS wrote:
>>>
>>> You agreed to an EULA that says you will not distribute things that you
>>> get from that paid subscription. You
On 15 June 2018 at 21:07, Keith Keller via CentOS wrote:
> On 2018-06-16, Johnny Hughes via CentOS wrote:
>>
>> You agreed to an EULA that says you will not distribute things that you
>> get from that paid subscription. You can do it, and be in violation of
>> the terms of your subscription.
>
On 2018-06-16, Johnny Hughes via CentOS wrote:
>
> You agreed to an EULA that says you will not distribute things that you
> get from that paid subscription. You can do it, and be in violation of
> the terms of your subscription.
Is this enforceable with the GPLv2? IIRC someone who distributes
On 06/15/2018 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2018-06-14, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> It turns out you are absolutely right. You only have provide modified
>> source to users to whom you distribute derived work. Found it here:
>>
>>
On 2018-06-14, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> It turns out you are absolutely right. You only have provide modified
> source to users to whom you distribute derived work. Found it here:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
Not totally relevant to this
On 06/14/18 11:23, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 14 June 2018 at 12:16, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
The src.rpm for that kernel
On 06/14/18 11:16, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
I'm fairly certain
On 14 June 2018 at 12:16, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
>> > Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> > ...
>> The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
> > Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > ...
> The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
> >>>
> >>> I'm fairly certain you cannot
On 06/14/2018 08:00 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
I'm fairly certain you cannot download the SRPM for EUS kernels.
You might if you're a Red Hat customer paying for that
On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
I'm fairly certain you cannot download the SRPM for EUS kernels.
You might if you're a Red Hat customer paying for that
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
> > > The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
> >
> > I'm fairly certain you cannot download the SRPM for EUS kernels.
> > You might if you're a Red Hat customer paying for that product (but
> > don't take my
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:16:55PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
> > > You might be able to pay Red Hat for an Extended Update Support
> > > release of RHEL7 that has a similar version
> > > (kernel-3.10.0-514.51.1.el7) but support ends
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:16:55PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
> > You might be able to pay Red Hat for an Extended Update Support
> > release of RHEL7 that has a similar version
> > (kernel-3.10.0-514.51.1.el7) but support ends November 30 2018.
> >
> >
On 06/13/2018 02:33 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jun 13, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Ken Young wrote:
Is anyone on the mailing list aware of anyone who supports older versions of
CentOS kernels? Particularly, I am interested in getting security patches
added to kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.src.rpm.
On Jun 13, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Ken Young wrote:
> Is anyone on the mailing list aware of anyone who supports older versions of
> CentOS kernels? Particularly, I am interested in getting security patches
> added to kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.src.rpm. Please let me know.
As far as CentOS
Is anyone on the mailing list aware of anyone who supports older versions of
CentOS kernels? Particularly, I am interested in getting security patches
added to kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.src.rpm. Please let me know.
Regards,
Ken Y
___
CentOS
this is NVIDIA driver 390.30 on my Dell Precision 7510:
My GeForce 210 is slowly but steadily becoming a "legacy" card. Just try
to install the appropriate 340xx driver from NVidia.com manually, you
will notice that the installation fails with the stock CentOS kernel,
but it will succeed w
1 - 100 of 786 matches
Mail list logo
