On 02/09/2015 02:22 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Ran into this as well. Thanks for the quick-fix howto!
As a friendly suggestion to all who run any elrepo packages, and
especially the nvidia and fglrx packages, you really should be following
the elrepo mailing list, where the dropping of support for s
On 02/08/2015 11:14 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
.. What made my decision to add
nidia to my bad hardware manufacturers list was: not long ago they stopped
releasing new binary drivers (compatible with new kernels/glibc) for some
old cards I have my department. The machines, though old, still serve
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Ned Slider
> Sent: den 8 februari 2015 12:12
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia Mod Update
>
> Yes, just to reiterate:
>
> yum erase
On 02/07/15 23:06, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update
> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package.
> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a
> test system any way, I let
On Sun, February 8, 2015 9:33 am, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/15 14:24, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> On 02/08/15 07:45, Ned Slider wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/02/15 12:33, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
>>> No, you don't have the package kmod-nvidia-340xx installed. You have
>>> kmod-nvidia VERSION 340.65.
On 02/08/2015 10:33 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/02/15 14:24, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
No problem Pete.
Now you are on the correct branch you will continue to get updates to
that 340.xx driver as and when nvidia release them. IIRC, nvidia said
they would continue to support the 340.xx legacy bran
On 08/02/15 14:24, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
>
> On 02/08/15 07:45, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>> On 08/02/15 12:33, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
>> No, you don't have the package kmod-nvidia-340xx installed. You have
>> kmod-nvidia VERSION 340.65. In the first example, the package NAME is
>> kmod-nvidia-340xx
On 02/08/15 07:45, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/02/15 12:33, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
No, you don't have the package kmod-nvidia-340xx installed. You have
kmod-nvidia VERSION 340.65. In the first example, the package NAME is
kmod-nvidia-340xx (the -340xx is part of the package name, NOT the version).
On 08/02/15 12:33, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
>
> On 02/08/15 06:12, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>> On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote:
>> Yes, just to reiterate:
>>
>> yum erase kmod-nvidia
>> yum install kmod-nvidia-340xx
>> reboot
>>
>> You will then be on the correct driver branch and will get the
>> a
On 02/08/15 06:12, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote:
Yes, just to reiterate:
yum erase kmod-nvidia
yum install kmod-nvidia-340xx
reboot
You will then be on the correct driver branch and will get the
appropriate driver updates going forwards, no changes to yum necessary.
_
On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update
>> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package.
>> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update
> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package.
> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a
> test system
12 matches
Mail list logo