Dag Wieers wrote:
You need a RHN entitlement. So that's hardly pushing.
Look at it from some other angels.
- It shows people we are helping to give back to upstream (and not just
reaping)
- It encourages people to help CentOS as well
- It shows Red Hat we are willing to help with Beta-test
Dag Wieers wrote:
Maybe we should ask the QA SIG if they are interested to have this
happen under their hood or not. In my opinion this is way to soon to
organize.
perhaps for 5.3, but if you thinking about this on the larger scale of
things its the sort of thing that could / should become a
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
We are not pushing the RHEL Betas by mentioning it on the wiki, are we ?
Putting it on the Download page, we most certainly are pushing it.
You need a RHN entitlement. So that's hardly pushing.
Look at it from some other angels.
Dag Wieers wrote:
I did no have anything to add. I do understand your point and I agree
with it partly. I normally do not ack on every email that I agree with.
Ok, it was just quite surprising that you went ahead and posted that
content anyway. To me, it was the start of a conversation and not
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
That's what this page was for, really:
http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute
Would this sort of a testing effort be better handled under the ageis of the
QA Effort rather than the Contribute page ? Most people who use CentOS and
Dag Wieers wrote:
That's what this page was for, really:
http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute
Would this sort of a testing effort be better handled under the ageis of
the QA Effort rather than the Contribute page ? Most people who use
CentOS and want to contribute dont have RHN access or wis
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Evening.
I dont understand the fascination with the RHEL beta's at all. They clearly
dont want it in the open space, so why are we pushing for that ?
I don't think that pushing RH's beta is such a bad idea as it will
help improving CentOS. But a
hi,
Marcus Moeller wrote:
I don't think that pushing RH's beta is such a bad idea as it will
help improving CentOS. But afaik there won't be any 'open' RHEL betas
in the near future.
If its not open, its not welcome in CentOS lands ( /opinion ) If people
want it promoted via CentOS channels,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Evening (Dag and Karan),
I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now
linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML
instead of the Wiki.
I would personally prefer to link to
Good Evening.
> I dont understand the fascination with the RHEL beta's at all. They clearly
> dont want it in the open space, so why are we pushing for that ?
I don't think that pushing RH's beta is such a bad idea as it will
help improving CentOS. But afaik there won't be any 'open' RHEL betas
i
Marcus Moeller wrote:
I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now
linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML
instead of the Wiki.
I've removed that content from the wiki page ( again ). Pending this
conversation thread we can work out what needs
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Evening (Dag and Karan),
I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now
linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML
instead of the Wiki.
I would personally prefer to link to the RHEL Betas from a (not yet
created) Test-driv
Good Evening (Dag and Karan),
I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now
linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML
instead of the Wiki.
I would personally prefer to link to the RHEL Betas from a (not yet
created) Test-driving RHEL SIG page instea
13 matches
Mail list logo
