On 28 April 2017 at 01:00, Lev Lazinskiy wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> Per the process outlined in the wiki[1]. I just joined the CentOS community
> and would like to request access to create personal home page. I plan on
> making some decent contributions to the wiki moving forward.
>
> username: LevL
Hi Folks!
Per the process outlined in the wiki[1]. I just joined the CentOS community and
would like to request access to create personal home page. I plan on making
some decent contributions to the wiki moving forward.
username: LevLazinskiy
[1]
https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3
Thank you!
чет, 30. јул 2015. 16.41 Alan Bartlett је написао/ла:
> On 30 July 2015 at 09:25, Жељко Миловановић
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
> > Serbian localization.
> >
> > Please, create my personal homepage.
> >
> > Than
On 30 July 2015 at 09:25, Жељко Миловановић
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
> Serbian localization.
>
> Please, create my personal homepage.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Željko Milovanović
Done. A home page has now been initialised for you.
Alan.
_
Hello,
my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
Serbian localization.
Please, create my personal homepage.
Thanks!
Željko Milovanović
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
Hi all,
>
> My name is John Webb, username "johnwebb"
I would like to contribute to WiKi on security topics, as well as general
issues such as accuracy of articles/descriptions, dead URLs etc.
Thanks,
Sydney/AU
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@c
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:53 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> By carrying two wiki, we avoid that workload, and can have a
>> self-serve model for getting commits in the 'projects.' one,
>> and the moderated approach on the vetted one.
>
> Bleh. And I mean rea
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ralph Angenendt
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:53 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> By carrying two wiki, we avoid that workload, and can have a
>> self-serve model for getting commits in the 'projects.' one,
>> and the moderated approach on the vetted one.
>
> Bleh. An
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian Mathis
wrote:
> 2) Follow the currently more popular "community" model that is in use
> in other OSS projects. That means the wiki is generally open to
> anyone with an account. This model would yield a larger community of
> people willing to contribute, at
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:53 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> By carrying two wiki, we avoid that workload, and can have a
> self-serve model for getting commits in the 'projects.' one,
> and the moderated approach on the vetted one.
Bleh. And I mean really Bleh. Putting documentation into two different
p
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> The second approach sounds like more of a slam than living in
>> a 'projects.' sub-domain to me.
> Which means that there will possibly more than one documentation per
> task, e.g. there could be a KVM tutorial in the moderated and one in
> the 'open'
Dear Russ,
> The second approach sounds like more of a slam than living in
> a 'projects.' sub-domain to me.
>
> A refactoring of the personal homepages will have to happen in
> any event, and perhaps we should simply have a './personal/'
> in the main wiki and move all such into it ... but this t
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:53 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
>
>> It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
>> guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
>> separate content systems seems redundant. Is ther
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
> It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
> guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
> separate content systems seems redundant. Is there a way to have a section
> (directory) of the wiki that i
From: "Ralph Angenendt", Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:22 AM
>On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
>> From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
>> issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
>> voracity of the reaction, by some, t
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
> From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
> issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
> voracity of the reaction, by some, to what they viewed as unacceptable
> content. It appears ther
From: "Ralph Angenendt", Monday, October 05, 2009 9:54 AM
>...
>Okay, than I did misunderstand that. Mind, that I'm not native speaker
>either.
>
>Then *everybody* please be not vague:
I think my last post might have fallen in to the vague category...
I was trying to say that as one of thos
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Phil Schaffner
wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on 10/05/2009 04:40 AM:
>> Um. Since when does it, when you want to make a fix? As said, there
>> are around 80 people who already are able to fix things all over the
>> place. Which does not require to send a mail anywh
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 10/05/2009 04:40 AM:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Could it be that entry to collaborate is not low enough to make it work ? If
>> you have too many rules, people might be afraid/unable to make the nece
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>
> Could it be that entry to collaborate is not low enough to make it work ? If
> you have too many rules, people might be afraid/unable to make the necessary
> fix. Especially if it requires sending a
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Could it be that entry to collaborate is not low enough to make it work ? If
> you have too many rules, people might be afraid/unable to make the necessary
> fix. Especially if it requires sending a mail and decision by committee.
>
> My worries
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Brian Mathis
wrote:
What you currently have is the "lock model", and with few admins the
idea of opening up the system seems like a bad one because those
admins will need to deal with all those errors, but this is not
From: "Ralph Angenendt", Friday, October 02, 2009 6:11 AM
>We already have > 70 people who would be able to do so (no idea how
>many of these accounts are still in use). Do I see those going over
>pages? Rarely, it's nearly always the same persons.
I'm OK with helping to update/maintain the wik
>> +1
>
> -20
This continuing drama is beginning to remind me of the Miller "Great taste,
less filling" commercials of old (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_Lite)...
It's the same damn beer/CentOS people! ;) [?]
<<347.png>>___
CentOS-docs mailing list
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Will Fitch wrote:
>> Dear Russ.
>
>> It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
>> the right to fix errors in articles and if every minor change has to
>> be discussed over and over again on the ML, it's the dead of a vital
>> wiki.
>
>> T
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
> the right to fix errors in articles
There are around 80 people who have that right *right now*.
Ralph
___
CentOS-docs maili
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Brian Mathis
wrote:
> What you currently have is the "lock model", and with few admins the
> idea of opening up the system seems like a bad one because those
> admins will need to deal with all those errors, but this is not the
> case. As soon as it's open, you'l
> Dear Russ.
> It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
> the right to fix errors in articles and if every minor change has to
> be discussed over and over again on the ML, it's the dead of a vital
> wiki.
> Then you need a CMS instead, call it docs.centos.org and lea
Dear Russ.
>> Why not granting Edit rights (and I mean full Edit Group Access) to
>> anyone who has already contributed good stuff.
>>
>> Then there should be something like a Wiki Admin group which will
>> track changes and correct them || start discussion on the MLs if
>> necessary.
>
> because
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> herrold:
>> because creating a problem and fixing it ex post is harder
>> than not creating it in the first place
> Spam issues aside, that is the very concept of Wikipedia and other
> wikis, and als
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>
>> Why not granting Edit rights (and I mean full Edit Group Access) to
>> anyone who has already contributed good stuff.
>>
>> Then there should be something like a Wiki Admin group which will
>> track
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Why not granting Edit rights (and I mean full Edit Group Access) to
> anyone who has already contributed good stuff.
>
> Then there should be something like a Wiki Admin group which will
> track changes and correct them || start discussion on the MLs if
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 11:26:40AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>
> ...
> > P.S. Also develop a thick skin. :-) This could be a proving-ground for
> > technical writers in-training, and the constructive criticism can
> > sometimes be a bit heavy, but
Dear Russ,
>> Seriously, to me, I've been thinking about it the source of my
>> concern for the last couple of weeks, and the tension comes
>> down to 'core' v 'adjunct' and has a reasonably simple
>> resolution -- split the two, and put all non-core material in
>> a 'projects.centos.org' sub doma
From: "R P Herrold", Thursday, October 01, 2009 9:26 AM
>...
> Seriously, to me, I've been thinking about it the source of my
> concern for the last couple of weeks, and the tension comes
> down to 'core' v 'adjunct' and has a reasonably simple
> resolution -- split the two, and put all non-core m
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Agreed, and there have been discussions of opening the process. For now
> it's a meritocracy. Follow the process, become known to the community,
> make some good contributions, then ask for a higher level of access.
> Chances are it will be granted.
Steve Bonds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Phil Schaffner
> P.R.Schaffner-at-IEEE.org |CentOS| <...>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
>>> As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
>>>
>>> # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveB
Grrr, let me try with a non-empty mail :)
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Steve Bonds <05s0pq...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
>
> # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
> # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Pe
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Steve Bonds <05s0pq...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
>
> # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
> # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
> # the proposed location of y
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Phil Schaffner
P.R.Schaffner-at-IEEE.org |CentOS| <...>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
>> As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
>>
>> # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
>> # the proposed subje
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
> As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
>
> # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
> # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
> # the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s
As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
# your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
# the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
# the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
I'll branch out from here. Maybe. While I u
42 matches
Mail list logo
