Re: [ceph-users] PGP signatures for RHEL hammer RPMs for ceph-deploy

This is odd. We are signing all packages before publishing them on the repository. These ceph-deploy releases are following a new release process so I will have to investigate where is the disconnect. Thanks for letting us know. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Derek Yarnell

Re: [ceph-users] PGP signatures for RHEL hammer RPMs for ceph-deploy

It looks like this was only for ceph-deploy in Hammer. I verified that this wasn't the case in e.g. Infernalis I have ensured that the ceph-deploy packages in hammer are in fact signed and coming from our builds. Thanks again for reporting this! On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Alfredo Deza <

Re: [ceph-users] PGP signatures for RHEL hammer RPMs for ceph-deploy

download. Suggestion: run yum > --enablerepo=Ceph-noarch clean metadata > > Thanks, > derek > > On 1/5/16 1:25 PM, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> It looks like this was only for ceph-deploy in Hammer. I verified that >> this wasn't the case in e.g. Infernalis >> >

New "make check" job for Ceph pull requests

Hi all, As of yesterday (Tuesday Dec 22nd) we have the "make check" job running within our CI infrastructure, working very similarly as the previous check with a few differences: * there are no longer comments added to the pull requests * notifications of success (or failure) are done inline in

Re: Issues installing on CentOS 7.1

We released 1.5.30 yesterday and had some issues with the repo metadata for CentOS, should now be resolved, can you try again and let me know if that is not the case? On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luis Pabon wrote: > Just wanted to check if it is me or something else is

Re: Issues installing on CentOS 7.1

Oh and also worth pointing out that we don't do RHEL builds anymore (existing rhel repos are no longer getting updated), so in this case "el7" is the right one to use. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Alfredo Deza <ad...@redhat.com> wrote: > We released 1.5.30 yesterday

Re: Stable release HOWTO: hunt for lost page

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > On 14/12/2015 15:40, Abhishek Varshney wrote: >> Hi Loic, >> >> I have revived the page at >> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO_triage_incoming_backport_pull_requests >> from

Re: [ceph-users] v9.2.0 Infernalis released

ary) > * build: make_dist_tarball.sh (Sage Weil) > * build: many cmake improvements > * build: misc cmake fixes (Matt Benjamin) > * build: misc fixes (Boris Ranto, Ken Dreyer, Owen Synge) > * build: OSX build fixes (Yan, Zheng) > * build: remove rest-bench > * ceph-authtool: f

Package requirements for upcoming Infernalis Repository

Hi all, I am in the process of getting the new Infernalis repository and going over the notes I had when the Hammer repository was created includes a few packages that didn't come from a Ceph build and had to be added manually. I don't know which of these packages are still needed for

Re: [ceph-deploy] Ambiguous Debug Message

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Alfredo Deza <ad...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When I ran: >> >> $ sudo ./ceph-deploy --username ceph install ce

Re: pulpito slowness

- Original Message - From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org To: Alfredo Deza ad...@redhat.com Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:56:12 PM Subject: pulpito slowness Hi Alfredo, After installing pulpito and run from sources

Re: debian jessie gitbuilder repositories ?

- Original Message - From: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net To: Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com Cc: ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, se...@ceph.com Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:19:49 AM Subject: Re: debian jessie gitbuilder repositories ? On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Alexandre

Re: s3-tests development

- Original Message - From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com To: Andrew Gaul and...@gaul.org Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Alfredo Deza ad...@redhat.com Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:11:45 PM Subject: Re: s3-tests development - Original Message - From: Andrew

Re: s3-tests development

- Original Message - From: Andrew Gaul and...@gaul.org To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Alfredo Deza ad...@redhat.com Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:26:23 PM Subject: Re: s3-tests development On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:11:45PM -0500, Yehuda

Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse

1.2.1 was just released bringing parity for both RPM/DEB and the PyPI versions. You should now be able to get it either way. Let me know if you are still seeing the same issues. - Original Message - From: ghislain chevalier ghislain.cheval...@orange.com To: Alfredo Deza ad

Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse

...@inktank.com [mailto:alfredo.d...@inktank.com] De la part de Alfredo Deza Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 19:42 À : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Cc : ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Objet : Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse If you use the `-v` flag you will get very verbose output. On Mon, Feb

Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse

What version of the agent are you using? And when it fails, how does the log output look? On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, ghislain.cheval...@orange.com wrote: Hi all, Context : Ubuntu 14.04 TLS firefly 0.80.8 I sent this post in ceph-users (identical subject) because I recently

Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse

: alfredo.d...@inktank.com [mailto:alfredo.d...@inktank.com] De la part de Alfredo Deza Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 15:18 À : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Cc : ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Objet : Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse What version of the agent are you using? And when

Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse

...@inktank.com] De la part de Alfredo Deza Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 16:59 À : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS Cc : Objet : Re: [Ceph-devel] radosgw-agent failed to parse That sounds suspicious because we haven't packaged a 1.2.1 release. The latest on PyPI is 1.2, which is the same in the master

Re: [ceph-users] v0.90 released

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage, Has the repo metadata been regenerated? One of my reposync jobs can only see up to 0.89, using http://ceph.com/rpm-testing. It was generated but we somehow missed out on properly syncing it. You should now

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.18 released

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy that includes a fix where enabling the OSD service would fail on certain distros. There is also a new improvement for creating a monitor keyring if not found when deploying monitors. The full changelog can be seen here:

Re: v0.67.11 dumpling released

) * doc: several doc updates (Alfredo Deza) * libcephfs-java: fix build against older JNI headesr (Greg Farnum) * librados: fix crash in op timeout path (#9362 Matthias Kiefer, Sage Weil) * librbd: fix crash using clone of flattened image (#8845 Josh Durgin) * librbd: fix error path cleanup when

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.14 released

Hi All, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy that helps prevent the environment variable issues that sometimes may cause issues when depending on them on remote hosts. It is also now possible to specify public and cluster networks when creating a new ceph.conf file. Make sure you

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.11 released

Hi All, This is a bug fix release of ceph-deploy, it primarily addresses the issue of failing to install Ceph on CentOS7 distros. Make sure you update! -Alfredo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.10 released

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. This release comes with a few improvements towards better usage of ceph-disk on remote nodes, with more verbosity so things are a bit more clear when they execute. The full list of fixes for this release can be

Re: some bugs when cluster name is not ‘ceph'

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:37 PM, yy y...@xspring.net wrote: Hi, we found some bugs when cluster name is not ‘ceph' in version 0.80.1, - diff --git a/src/ceph-disk b/src/ceph-disk index f79e341..153e344 100755 --- a/src/ceph-disk +++ b/src/ceph-disk @@ -1611,6 +1611,8 @@ def

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.9 released

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. There is a minor cleanup when ceph-deploy disconnects from remote hosts that was creating some tracebacks. And there is a new flag for the `new` subcommand that allows to specify an fsid for the cluster. The full

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.8 released

Hi All, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. The full list of fixes for this release can be found in the changelog: http://ceph.com/ceph-deploy/docs/changelog.html#id1 Make sure you update! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.7 released

Hi All, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. The full list of fixes for this release can be found in the changelog: http://ceph.com/ceph-deploy/docs/changelog.html#id1 Make sure you update! -Alfredo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [ceph-users] Problem installing ceph from package manager / ceph repositories

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Dan Van Der Ster daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote: Hi, On 10 Jun 2014, at 10:30, Karan Singh karan.si...@csc.fi wrote: Hello Cephers First of all this problem is not related to ceph-deploy , ceph-deploy 1.5.4 works like charm :-) , thanks for Alfredo

ceph-deploy 1.5.4 (addressing packages coming from EPEL)

Hi All, We've experienced a lot of issues since EPEL started packaging a 0.80.1-2 version that YUM will see as higher than 0.80.1 and therefore will choose to install the EPEL one. That package has some issues from what we have seen and in most cases will break the installation process. There

missing 0.81 from ceph.com/downloads/

It looks like we missed out on a step to get the 0.81 tarballs to ceph.com/downloads/ It just got uploaded. Apologies if you got bit by that! -Alfredo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.3 released

Hi All, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. The full list of fixes for this release can be found in the changelog: http://ceph.com/ceph-deploy/docs/changelog.html#id1 Make sure you update! -Alfredo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.2 released

Hi All, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. This release comes with two important changes: * fix usage of `--` when removing packages in Debian/Ubuntu * Default to Firefly when installing Ceph. Make sure you upgrade! -Alfredo -- To unsubscribe

Re: [ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.0 released!

A minor issue was found while attempting to activate OSDs that has just been fixed and released as ceph-deploy v.1.5.1 Even if you haven't encountered this particular issue I do recommend an upgrade anyway. Thanks! Alfredo On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alfredo Deza alfredo.d

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.5.0 released!

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. This release comes with a few bug fixes and a few features: * implement `osd list` * add a status check on OSDs when deploying * sync local mirrors to remote hosts when installing * support flags and options set

0.79 dependency issue on RPM packages

Yesterday we found out that there was a dependency issue for the init script on CentOS/RHEL distros where we depend on some functions that are available through redhat-lsb-core but were not declared in the ceph.spec file. This will cause daemons not to start at all since the init script will

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.4.0 released!

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. This release comes with two new features: the ability to add a new monitor to an existing cluster and a configuration file to manage custom repositories/mirrors. As always, you can find all changes documented in

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.3.5 released!

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. Although this is primarily a bug-fix release, the library that ceph-deploy uses to connect to remote hosts (execnet) was updated with the latest stable release. A full list of changes can be found in the

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.3.4 released!

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. This is mostly a bug-fix release, although one minor feature was added: the ability to install/remove packages from remote hosts with a new sub-command: `pkg` As we continue to add features (or improve old ones)

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.3.3 released!

Hi All, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. The most important (non-bug) change for this release is the ability to specify repository mirrors when installing ceph. This can be done with environment variables or flags in the `install` subcommand. Full

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.3.2 released!

Hi All, I'm happy to announce a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. The only two (very important) changes made for this release are: * Automatic SSH key copying/generation for hosts that do not have keys setup when using `ceph-deploy new` * All installs will now use

Re: Mourning the demise of mkcephfs

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dave (Bob) d...@bob-the-boat.me.uk wrote: The utility mkcephfs seemed to work, it was very simple to use and apparently effective. It has been deprecated in favour of something called ceph-deploy, which does not work for me. I've ignored the deprecation

Re: Mourning the demise of mkcephfs

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@42on.com wrote: On 11/11/2013 06:51 PM, Dave (Bob) wrote: The utility mkcephfs seemed to work, it was very simple to use and apparently effective. It has been deprecated in favour of something called ceph-deploy, which does not work

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.3.1 released

Hi All, There is a new (bug-fix) release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool for Ceph. There were a couple of issues related to GPG keys when installing in Debian and Debian-based distros that where addressed. A fix was added to improve moving temporary files to overwrite other files like

Re: [ceph-users] testing ceph

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Trivedi, Narendra narendra.triv...@savvis.com wrote: Bingo! A lot of people are getting this dreadful GenericErro and Failed to create 1 OSD. Does anyone know why despite /etc/ceph being there on each node? /etc/ceph is created by installing ceph on a node, and

Re: [ceph-users] Missing Dependency for ceph-deploy 1.2.7

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Luke Jing Yuan jyl...@mimos.my wrote: Hi, I am trying to install/upgrade to 1.2.7 but Ubuntu (Precise) is complaining about unmet dependency which seemed to be python-pushy 0.5.3 which seemed to be missing. Am I correct to assume so? That is odd, we still

Re: OpenStack and ceph integration with puppet

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote: On 09/10/2013 22:46, Loic Dachary wrote: On 08/10/2013 16:20, Don Talton (dotalton) wrote: Hi Loic, We utilize stackforge's puppet modules to do our heavy lifting, including p-openstack, p-cinder, p-glance. There are

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.2.7 released!

Hi all, Version 1.2.7 of ceph-deploy has been released, the easy ceph deployment tool. As always, there were a good amount of bug fixes into this release and a wealth of improvements. 1.2.6 was not announced as it was a small bug fix from the previous release. Installation instructions:

(guidelilines for) Unit Testing in Python

Hi all, Below was a summary for some general guidelines we are going to be following for unit testing the teuthology code with Python, hopefully it might be a good read as well :) This should be used as a general guideline as to what are the expectations when writing unit tests. Before Writing

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.2.5 released!

Hi all, There is a new release of ceph-deploy, the easy ceph deployment tool. There were a good amount of bug fixes into this release and a wealth of improvements. Thanks to all of you who contributed patches and issues, and thanks to Dmitry Borodaenko and Andrew Woodward for extensively testing

Re: Ceph-deploy (git from today) fails to create osd on host that does not have a mon

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Mark Kirkwood mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz wrote: On 05/09/13 17:56, Mark Kirkwood wrote: [ceph_deploy.osd][DEBUG ] Preparing cluster ceph disks ceph2:/dev/vdb:/dev/vdc [ceph_deploy.osd][INFO ] Distro info: Ubuntu 12.04 precise [ceph_deploy.osd][DEBUG ]

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.2.2 released!

Hi all, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy ceph deployment tool. Installation instructions: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy#installation This is the list of all fixes that went into this release which can also be found in the CHANGELOG.rst file in ceph-deploy's git

[ANN] ceph-deploy 1.2.1 released

Hi all, There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy ceph deployment tool. ceph-deploy can be installed from three different sources depending on your package manager and distribution, currently available for RPMs, DEBs and directly as a Python package from the Python Package Index.