Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On 2018-03-02T15:24:29, Joshua Chen wrote: > Dear all, > I wonder how we could support VM systems with ceph storage (block > device)? my colleagues are waiting for my answer for vmware (vSphere 5) and > I myself use oVirt (RHEV). the default protocol is iSCSI. Lean

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Hi! Am 02.03.18 um 13:27 schrieb Federico Lucifredi: We do speak to the Xen team every once in a while, but while there is interest in adding Ceph support on their side, I think we are somewhat down the list of their priorities. Maybe things change with XCP-ng (https://xcp-ng.github.io).

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Dear all, I wonder how we could support VM systems with ceph storage (block device)? my colleagues are waiting for my answer for vmware (vSphere 5) and I myself use oVirt (RHEV). the default protocol is iSCSI. I know that openstack/cinder work well with ceph and proxmox (just heard) too.

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On 05.03.2018 00:26, Adrian Saul wrote: >   > > We are using Ceph+RBD+NFS under pacemaker for VMware.  We are doing > iSCSI using SCST but have not used it against VMware, just Solaris and > Hyper-V. > > > It generally works and performs well enough – the biggest issues are the > clustering for

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

ailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> Verzonden: 28-2-2018 13:53 Onderwerp: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: CentOS 7.5 (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4) https://wiki.centos.org/Dow

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

ists.ceph.com>" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> > *Verzonden: * 28-2-2018 13:53 > *Onderwerp: * [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? > > I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. > But

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

rk Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering >> KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/ >> T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl >> >> >> >> * Van: * Massimiliano Cuttini <m...@phoenixweb.it> >> * Aan: * "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.c

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Il 02/03/2018 13:27, Federico Lucifredi ha scritto: On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Max Cuttins > wrote: Hi Federico, Hi Max, On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: > > > Hi Federico, > > Hi Max, >> >> On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: >>> >>> This is true, but having something that just works in order to have >>> minimum compatibility and start to

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Hi Federico, Hi Max, On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: This is true, but having something that just works in order to have minimum compatibility and start to dismiss old disk is something you should think about. You'll have ages in order to improve and

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > * Verzonden: * 28-2-2018 13:53 > * Onderwerp: * [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? > > I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. > But I just see from the docs that need: > > *CentOS 7.5* > (which is not a

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

oun...@lists.ceph.com> On Behalf Of Max Cuttins Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:27 AM To: David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>; dilla...@redhat.com Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? Il 28/02/2018 18:16, David Turner ha sc

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Almost... Il 01/03/2018 16:17, Heðin Ejdesgaard Møller ha scritto: Hello, I would like to point out that we are running ceph+redundant iscsiGW's, connecting the LUN's to a esxi+vcsa-6.5 cluster with Red Hat support. We did encountered a few bumps on the road to production, but those got

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Hello, I would like to point out that we are running ceph+redundant iscsiGW's, connecting the LUN's to a esxi+vcsa-6.5 cluster with Red Hat support. We did encountered a few bumps on the road to production, but those got fixed by Red Hat engineering and are included in the rhel7.5 and 4.17

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

I wonder when EMC/Netapp are going to start giving away production ready bits that fit into your architecture At least support for this feature is coming in the near term. I say keep on keepin on. Kudos to the ceph team (and maybe more teams) for taking care of the hard stuff for us. On

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Hi Jason, That's awesome. Keep up the good work guys, we all love the work you are doing with that software!! Sam On Mar 1, 2018 09:11, "Jason Dillaman" wrote: > It's very high on our priority list to get a solution merged in the > upstream kernel. There was a proposal

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On 02/28/2018 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: Il 28/02/2018 15:19, Jason Dillaman ha scritto: On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini wrote: I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: CentOS 7.5 (which is not

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:11:21 -0500, Jason Dillaman wrote: > It's very high on our priority list to get a solution merged in the > upstream kernel. There was a proposal to use DLM to distribute the PGR > state between target gateways (a la the SCST target) and it's quite > possible that would have

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Hi Max, > On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: > > This is true, but having something that just works in order to have minimum > compatibility and start to dismiss old disk is something you should think > about. > You'll have ages in order to improve and get

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

It's very high on our priority list to get a solution merged in the upstream kernel. There was a proposal to use DLM to distribute the PGR state between target gateways (a la the SCST target) and it's quite possible that would have the least amount of upstream resistance since it would work for

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On another note, is there any work being done for persistent group reservations support for Ceph/LIO compatibility? Or just a rough estimate :) Would love to see Redhat/Ceph support this type of setup. I know Suse supports it as of late. Sam On Mar 1, 2018 07:33, "Kai Wagner"

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

I totally understand and see your frustration here, but you've to keep in mind that this is an Open Source project with a lots of volunteers. If you have a really urgent need, you have the possibility to develop such a feature on your own or you've to buy someone who could do the work for you.

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Il 28/02/2018 18:16, David Turner ha scritto: My thought is that in 4 years you could have migrated to a hypervisor that will have better performance into ceph than an added iSCSI layer. I won't deploy VMs for ceph on anything that won't allow librbd to work. Anything else is added complexity

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/ T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl *Van: * Massimiliano Cuttini <m...@phoenixweb.it> *Aan: * "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> *Verzonden: * 28-2-2018 13:53 *Onderwerp: * [ceph-users]

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Cuttini <m...@phoenixweb.it> Aan: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> Verzonden: 28-2-2018 13:53 Onderwerp: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need:

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

know the indians have a nice > >> saying > >> > >> "Everything will be good at the end. If it is not good, it is still not > >> the end." > >> > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Massimiliano Cuttin

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

gt;> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Massimiliano Cuttini [mailto:m...@phoenixweb.it] >> Sent: woensdag 28 februari 2018 13:53 >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> Subject: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? >> >> I was building ceph

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Max, I understand your frustration. However, last time I checked, ceph was open source. Some of you might not remember, but one major reason why open source is great is that YOU CAN DO your own modifications. If you need a change like iSCSI support and it isn't there, it is probably best, if

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Max Cuttins wrote: > > > Il 28/02/2018 15:19, Jason Dillaman ha scritto: >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini >> wrote: >>> >>> I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. >>> But I just see from

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On Feb 28, 2018 10:06 AM, "Max Cuttins" wrote: Il 28/02/2018 15:19, Jason Dillaman ha scritto: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini > wrote: > >> I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. >> But I just see from the docs that

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

Il 28/02/2018 15:19, Jason Dillaman ha scritto: On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini wrote: I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: CentOS 7.5 (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4)

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini wrote: > I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. > But I just see from the docs that need: > > CentOS 7.5 > (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4) > https://wiki.centos.org/Download > > Kernel 4.17 >

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

ri 2018 13:53 To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: CentOS 7.5 (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4) https://wiki.centos.org/Download

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

3 To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank? I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: CentOS 7.5 (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4) https://wiki.centos.org/Download K

[ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?

I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI. But I just see from the docs that need: *CentOS 7.5* (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4) https://wiki.centos.org/Download *Kernel 4.17* (which is not available yet, it is still at 4.15.7) https://www.kernel.org/ So I