>Thanks!!
>You deserve extra special muffins for that!
Yeah, what a great idea! I was going to try and pick up some of those Asimov
books at my local used book store, but this is even better!
--- Mary Jo
~|
Upgrade to
My children's school system actively *discourages* rote learning of
basic math facts. No times tables by heart, etc.
Instead, about 4 years ago they adopted Turk, a supplemental program,
as the math curriculum.
the e-mail tag on the District Math "Director's" e-mail? "Learning
stops when memoriza
> Sam wrote:
> From 2002 2005 it goes up. Are you trying to say Kyoto has done more
> harm than good? I'm not, just that it might not be the solution.
>
No, I'm telling you what the data mathematically says but you don't
the education to understand what I'm telling you.
I'll try it one last tim
Sorry if I offended anyone, I'm a little grumpy. I think I need a banana.
A lot of folks here seem to take this very serious while I'm just
having fun with the spirit of debate. That doesn't mean I'm trolling,
just look to have a discussion that will create research and we'll all
gain from it. I fi
Nanoengineered concrete could cut CO2 emissions
http://www.huliq.com/8556/nanoengineered-concrete-could-cut-co2-emissions
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIA
hehehehehe
You playing with that fuzzy math?
This nice images CLEARLY shows it's gone up, down, up, down, up
http://www.eea.europa.eu/pressroom/newsreleases/Images/ghg2006_1.jpg
Kyoto was signed in 1998 and implemented in 2002.
>From 2002 2005 it goes up. Are you trying to say Kyoto has done m
Sadly, math is a dying skill.
Your 1990 example is pretty funny. There are classes like that. I
used to be a math teacher many years ago. You would be surprised at
what text books incorporate these days. One example was sweat shops
in Honderas and the profit the American owners were making.
~
> Sam wrote:
> I think it says it went up .3% but transportation went up .6% from the
> year before. If you look at the graph, you'll see it's starting to
> looks like a hockey stick :)
>
The data clearly shows that, overall, the rate of increase of GHG has
slowed decade over decade. In other wor
Hate is such a striong word :)
Here's some more fun reading
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
OK, the Mars thing is stupid, but a lot of it is good stuff.
On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam,
>
> I hate to tell you this, but...you aren't debunking a thing. It's a
> fact that comm
I think it says it went up .3% but transportation went up .6% from the
year before. If you look at the graph, you'll see it's starting to
looks like a hockey stick :)
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What this data says and the graph shows is that Kyoto is, in fact,
> working.
> Sam wrote:
> http://www.eea.europa.eu/pressroom/newsreleases/GHG2006-en
>
What this data says and the graph shows is that Kyoto is, in fact,
working. Specifically this statement contains that fact:
"Emissions of CO2, the most problematic GHG, were 4.4% above 1990
levels for the EU-15. Compared
Sam,
I hate to tell you this, but...you aren't debunking a thing. It's a
fact that committees are of[ten wrong, but the error they are prone to
is inertia and over-conservatism. So when a committee of scientists
makes a categorical statement, I'm inclined to think there 's some
evidence.
That ne
On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with unproven opinions, neat.
If I can debunk an unproven opinion with another unproven opinion than
I've made my point.
> heh, you're on the religious side of this argument. you've got no
> science on your side.
No, I'm asking for scientific
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You see to be arguing this. I don't see you making points about taking a
> measured and cautious approach to reducing human's contribution to CO2. All
> I see is attempts to refute that it is even happening.
Just the other day I mentioned Los
"The summary actually is a semipolitical document negotiated by delegates from
150 governments. Evidently, the IPCC, which prides itself on being strictly
scientific and policy-neutral, wants to make its report politically correct."
Nope, not by just posting it. But it might if I knew who said
I haven't even seen the report! But this editorial implies that the
fact that is it s a consensus document means that it is political!
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought my posting this:
>
> "The summary actually is a semipolitical document negotiated by
> delegates from 150 gov
Yes please :)
On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm saying do nothing, just that Kyoto might not be the answwer.
>
> I'm going to assume that you meant to say "I'm [not] saying do nothing..."
>
>
~|
Upgrade
It's always our fault :)
On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And we've (the US) have had a huge hand in that by backing out.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create po
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11676
On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ::eye roll:: either break out some actual science or shut up, Sam.
>
> On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A true worshiper
> >
> >
~~
> No, I'm showing that all the facts your arguments are based on are
> actually unproven opinions.
with unproven opinions, neat.
> Reminds me of the religion vs science arguments often taking place on this
> list.
heh, you're on the religious side of this argument. you've got no
science on your
I thought my posting this:
"The summary actually is a semipolitical document negotiated by
delegates from 150 governments. Evidently, the IPCC, which prides
itself on being strictly scientific and policy-neutral, wants to make
its report politically correct."
would have cast doubt on the accuracy
No, I'm showing that all the facts your arguments are based on are actually
unproven opinions.
Not by providing unproven opinions you are not!
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduko
| | |
--
how are you proving anything of the kind? You say that everyone who
disagrees with you is an idiot or has some private agenda, and post an
editorial that does the same. Let me channel Larry for a moment. Peer
Reviewed research. Give me some.
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I'm show
> I'm saying do nothing, just that Kyoto might not be the answwer.
I'm going to assume that you meant to say "I'm [not] saying do nothing..."
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
"Again, nobody ever said do anything."
You see to be arguing this. I don't see you making points about taking a
measured and cautious approach to reducing human's contribution to CO2. All I
see is attempts to refute that it is even happening.
I interpret that as; if it is not happening then w
> Again, nobody ever said do nothing.
> We're supposed to take dramatic actions because of this so called
> imminent threat, getting rid of gasoline, closing factories, using our
> food supply to power cars, what if it's BS.
Then we have clean(er) cars, no gasoline, factories that aren't
massiv
No, I'm showing that all the facts your arguments are based on are
actually unproven opinions.
Reminds me of the religion vs science arguments often taking place on this list.
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A true worshiper
>
> Again kettle and pot, you are not arguing you ca
::eye roll:: either break out some actual science or shut up, Sam.
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A true worshiper
>
>
> On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > well ya according to scientist there is a 5% or so chance that you
> > could be right. it could happen I suppose. Sto
http://www.eea.europa.eu/pressroom/newsreleases/GHG2006-en
It's complicated but this chart shows it having the opposite effect.
http://org.eea.europa.eu/documents/newsreleases/Images/ghg2006_1.jpg
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nick wrote:
> > OK wait, Kyoto task governments
I am just trying to understand his point. If he has one.
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dana wrote:
> > so let's see, we as the leading cause of emissions should do nothing
> > because (according to whatever warped non-evidence you have for this)
> > whatever Europe is doing
> Sounds to me like Kyoto isn't working
If the countries that signed are not enforcing the policies, it is not
the treaty that has failed but the signatories.
And we've (the US) have had a huge hand in that by backing out.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that woul
> A true worshiper
Raven. Crow.
(Ian already used Pot/Kettle)
:-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience
A true worshiper
Again kettle and pot, you are not arguing you case. You are just trying to
brow beat everybody to agree with you by providing opinions that agree with you.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
-
Again, nobody ever said do nothing.
We're supposed to take dramatic actions because of this so called
imminent threat, getting rid of gasoline, closing factories, using our
food supply to power cars, what if it's BS. Then we screwed up.
Remember the Ice age of the 70's?
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <
> Nick wrote:
> OK wait, Kyoto task governments with forcing business to lower emissions by
> certain levels, the emissions haven't gone down
Has increase slowed?
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integr
A true worshiper
On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well ya according to scientist there is a 5% or so chance that you
> could be right. it could happen I suppose. Stopped clocks and all.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion
OK wait, Kyoto task governments with forcing business to lower emissions by
certain levels, the emissions haven't gone down, businesses aren't planning
to do so, and the governments aren't forcing them.
Sounds to me like Kyoto isn't working, maybe if bombed countries until
either they lowered emis
going on a cruise tomorrow!
bringing Brian Lumleys Mythos Omnibus Volumes 1 &2.
cant wait to read about Deep Ones & mighty Cthulhu, while tranversing
the Atlantic.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integ
I'm saying do nothing, just that Kyoto might not be the answwer.
On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so let's see, we as the leading cause of emissions should do nothing
> because (according to whatever warped non-evidence you have for this)
> whatever Europe is doing is not solving the
It means forcing industry to change hasn't helped.
OR just a random unsupported thought.
That the proper changes have not been put into place yet.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduko
| | |
--
> Sam wrote:
> It means forcing industry to change hasn't helped.
>
How so? Explain mathematically how that's true.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
h
We know humans increase CO2, we don't know if that's changing the weather.
And we don't know that it is NOT changing the weather either.
So lets take a look at the alternate options.
Human CO2 is a significant contributor to Global Warming. We do nothing.
Downside: We suffer greatly when the
> Sam wrote:
> We know humans increase CO2, we don't know if that's changing the weather.
>
That's right and true. But then you ruined your streak by going on to
imply that because emissions didn't go down (if that's true) this
meant Kyoto wasn't working.
In truth, that fact means nothing.
It means forcing industry to change hasn't helped.
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "That they didn't go down? Hello?"
>
> And the conclusion you are drawing from this fact is what? McFly
~|
Upgrade to Ado
> Dana wrote:
> so let's see, we as the leading cause of emissions should do nothing
> because (according to whatever warped non-evidence you have for this)
> whatever Europe is doing is not solving the problem?
>
How do we know that? The fact that emissions didn't go down says
nothing whatsoever
We know humans increase CO2, we don't know if that's changing the weather.
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's a REALLY interesting response on both points. The first one,
> that humans are the definitively the cause of Global Warming, I agree
> with: there is no proof.
>
Ex-secretary of state wows with pinstripes
For the man who has everything, a pinstripe suit. But not just any
pinstripes personalized pinstripes. Former Secretary of State George
Shultz was the guest of honor Friday at the U.S. Institute of Peace
dinner at the Hay-Adams Hotel in Washington. The
well ya according to scientist there is a 5% or so chance that you
could be right. it could happen I suppose. Stopped clocks and all.
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Why is everything so clear-cut to you?"
> > Kettle meet Pot, Pot
I read it years ago. I thought it was pretty damn funny.
--Ben
Ian Skinner wrote:
> you could also start with a collection of his essays ans short stories, just
> to get the flavor.
>
>
> Who's here that has read Asimov's practice Doctorial Thesis. One of the
> funniest things I ever read.
so let's see, we as the leading cause of emissions should do nothing
because (according to whatever warped non-evidence you have for this)
whatever Europe is doing is not solving the problem?
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Why is
> Ian wrote:
> "That they didn't go down? Hello?"
>
> And the conclusion you are drawing from this fact is what? McFly
>
Exactly - there's so many analytical problems with that statement I
was surprised to hear it. Until ...
~~
"That they didn't go down? Hello?"
And the conclusion you are drawing from this fact is what? McFly
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduko
| | |
-
"C code. C code run. Run code run.
> Sam wrote:
> I'm thinking it's a Dilbert moment.
>
DILBERT'S MOM: "... but Doctor ... is he going to be alright?? Is he
going to have a normal life???"
DOCTOR: "I'm afraid not not ma'am. He's got the knack. He's going to
be an engineer."
DILBERT'S MOM:" NOOO!"
~
> Sam wrote:
> > "By the way, Europe's CO2 emissions have gone up since Kyoto."
> > And that means what?
>
> That they didn't go down? Hello?
>
That's a REALLY interesting response on both points. The first one,
that humans are the definitively the cause of Global Warming, I agree
with: there is
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ha! That's funny because I make my living explaining to others how to
> do just that. So, no, people don't usually explain that to me,
> because it's my job to explain it to them.
>
> Ironic, huh?
I'm thinking it's a Dilbert moment.
~
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Why is everything so clear-cut to you?"
> Kettle meet Pot, Pot meet Kettle.
This thread is about how insane you must be not to think humans cause
global warming. I'm just pointing out it's NOT CLEAR-CUT.
DUH!
> "By the way, Europe's CO2 emissi
> Sam wrote:
> Did anyone ever explain to you
> about thinking outside the box?
>
Ha! That's funny because I make my living explaining to others how to
do just that. So, no, people don't usually explain that to me,
because it's my job to explain it to them.
Ironic, huh?
~~~
I haven't read it, but I read something he wrote about it. It
apparently took them a long time to get the joke?
On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you could also start with a collection of his essays ans short stories, just
> to get the flavor.
>
>
> Who's here that has read Asi
"Why is everything so clear-cut to you?"
Kettle meet Pot, Pot meet Kettle.
"By the way, Europe's CO2 emissions have gone up since Kyoto."
And that means what?
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduko
There a very similar service called bookmooch that is worth checking out as
well: http://www.bookmooch.com/ It was created by the guy who created
Lyris. Similar setup, you earn/cash in points.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007
I have no idea. Now, I'm going to go play with my new iBook, which is a
Mac, which were named after raincoats.
--Ben
PS Don't ask about the iBook. It's pretend.
Dana wrote:
> my favorite question -- which computer is named after a fruit?
>
> On 2/2/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is so cute; it's like the third grade version of economics.
Why is everything so clear-cut to you? Did anyone ever explain to you
about thinking outside the box?
By the way, Europe's CO2 emissions have gone up since Kyoto.
On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam is just parro
Sorry. Saying you can't read in a text-based community...
I just assumed you were going for irony.
--Ben
Tony wrote:
> no really.
> i cant read.
>
> i can read small short bits of stuff, but thats about it.
>
> i lose interest within minutes, and have trouble going from
> one line to the next
> EriKa wrote:
> Now this is awesome! I have over 100 paperbacks I dont want anymore ...
It really is. And sending them is SUPER easy if you have a printer -
even for me who hates stuff like this. Just press print, wrap the
book, paste the stamps, dump in the mail box.
~
no really.
i cant read.
i can read small short bits of stuff, but thats about it.
i lose interest within minutes, and have trouble going from
one line to the next...
tw
On 2/2/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There, there. Let me call OG Readmore and set up an afterschool
> special.
> Dana wrote:
> check out the adjectives. Hell, check out the verbs ;) Bufflaoed?
> Panicky? Greatest? steadfast? Naw, no bias here.
>
Sam is just parroting the BigBusiness group think that's historically
been championed by the Republicans.
Change costs money and requires resources, usually resou
There, there. Let me call OG Readmore and set up an afterschool
special. It will all be all right.
--Ben
Tony wrote:
> i wish i could read.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powe
you could also start with a collection of his essays ans short stories, just to
get the flavor.
Who's here that has read Asimov's practice Doctorial Thesis. One of the
funniest things I ever read.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
You read Stephen King's "The Cell"? Just finished it...not his best work by
far, but naturally I was drawn to the plot line :)
On 2/2/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> all you negative people :P Get out of my thread ...
>
> I have the entire collection. (Among an entire Steven Ki
my favorite question -- which computer is named after a fruit?
On 2/2/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He's a copycat! What is that game show where they do "man-on-the-street"
> interviews and the contestants have to guess whether the person will know
> the answers to particular questi
I ended up sending a box of books to a developer in New Orleans, and about 7
boxes of books to Iraq.
But this _is_ a great thing.
On 2/2/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now this is awesome! I have over 100 paperbacks I dont want anymore ... I
> keep ALL my hardcovers and a few
i wish i could read.
On 2/2/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now this is awesome! I have over 100 paperbacks I dont want anymore ... I
> keep ALL my hardcovers and a few paperbacks, but some paperbacks are
> "disposable" in my mind.
> So this is perfect. I was just going to Freecy
you could also start with a collection of his essays ans short
stories, just to get the flavor.
On 2/2/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might have been a painting of "dogs playing poker", but it is still a
> painting by Peale.
>
> Even his bad stories are readable.
>
> But, I am n
Now this is awesome! I have over 100 paperbacks I dont want anymore ... I
keep ALL my hardcovers and a few paperbacks, but some paperbacks are
"disposable" in my mind.
So this is perfect. I was just going to Freecycle the lot, but this is much
better!
Thanks!!
You deserve extra special muf
highly recommended
On 2/1/07, Mary Jo Sminkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Asimov books are cool.
>
> Hhm, not sure when I will have free time to do some reading again, but always
> looking for something good and haven't read any of his stuff yet. What would
> you recommend for a newbie?
>
> MJ
you're serious? You didn't just put these in to troll? And you really
think these refute something?
*It may well turn out that George W. Bush's greatest service to the
country won't *involve terrorism or Iraq at all, but his steadfast
refusal to be buffaloed into joining t*he panicky consensus on
I actually suspect it's simpler than that. If these things ran on
regular ole batteries and were up for several weeks, even tually they
would run out of power and the lights would turn off. I suspect the
Boston ones were simply put up first - they looked innocent till all
the batteries died (aro
> WillBo wrote:
> > Shoot the messenger if you don't like the message.
>
> I didn't call you or American Thinker crazy and I actually did provide
> links to counter the claims of the link you provided. Links that point
> to real live peer reviewed science.
>
3 guys are in an airplane: A pilot, a
Albatross!
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-plat
> Sam wrote:
> So we use ethanol because it burns cleaner but uses up more energy,
> and now Mexico doesn't have enough corn to make tortillas. Did we
> solve a problem or create more.
If there was a point in that beyond "change carries risk" I didn't get it.
Yes, making tough choices is ... toug
> Shoot the messenger if you don't like the message.
I didn't call you or American Thinker crazy and I actually did provide
links to counter the claims of the link you provided. Links that point
to real live peer reviewed science.
Whatever.
oh and thanks for the Religion of Global Warming artic
> EriKa wrote:
> I have the entire collection. (Among an entire Steven King, Patricia
> Cornwell, John Grisham and Dick Frances collections to name a few) I enjoy
> the books. I have a library I'm proud of.
>
My wife is WAY into it too (no pre-order ... yet), although we don't
save any of our "lei
So we use ethanol because it burns cleaner but uses up more energy,
and now Mexico doesn't have enough corn to make tortillas. Did we
solve a problem or create more.
We can lower emmisions but if we play the game that the world ends in
ten years we might pick the wrong solution.
Do we even use Ira
> I see you pick and choose your scientists.
And you don't?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2
On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... links...
>
> > http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/resisting_global_warming_panic.html
>
> oh and look, as one would expect from a right-wing site, the hockey
> stick "myth" is exploded!
Shoot the messenger if you don't like the mes
> Sam wrote:
> They have not. Global Warming is common and real, mans causing it is a
> weak theory with no proof.
>
But, in the end, who cares who's to blame? It's happening and it's
going to have drastic consequences so we'd all be smart to act now and
act big; we may not get a second chance.
all you negative people :P Get out of my thread ...
I have the entire collection. (Among an entire Steven King, Patricia
Cornwell, John Grisham and Dick Frances collections to name a few) I enjoy
the books. I have a library I'm proud of.
I usually always look for bargains and try never to pay fu
*Math: 1950 - 2006 **
Last week I purchased a burger at Burger King for $1.58. The counter
girl took my $2 and was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from
my pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3
pennies, while looking at the screen on her register. I sensed
>nah, CostCo usually has them the first day or so at a substantially lower
>price.
Bigger problem IMO is that if you pre-order from Amazon, you have to pay
shipping...order put something else on the order to get it over $25. Anything I
don't need for several months is probably something I should
my bad. Credible links?
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.nysun.com/article/47920
> http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/resisting_global_warming_panic.html
>
> On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok I'll play... link?
> >
> > On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
you could do what i did, and unistal & re-instal iis.
that changed my whole scope of problems in 1 swift blow
On 2/2/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Elliot, the only part of your message that pertains to this list is
> "crazy thing", but it was used in the wrong context!
>
pssst Harry/Ron/Hermione dies.
ooops... sorry... Spoiler alert.
;-)
> I just did my pre-order. Anyone else? :)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~~
Street Smarts
On 2/2/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He's a copycat! What is that game show where they do "man-on-the-street"
> interviews and the contestants have to guess whether the person will know
> the answers to particular question? I love that show!
>
> Q: Who is the President
He's a copycat! What is that game show where they do "man-on-the-street"
interviews and the contestants have to guess whether the person will know
the answers to particular question? I love that show!
Q: Who is the President of the United States?
A: George Washington? I dunno.
On 2/2/07, Erika w
I like to wait a few days after for the mania to die down...
On 2/2/07, Erika wrote:
>
> I just did my pre-order. Anyone else? :)
>
>
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experi
... links...
> http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/resisting_global_warming_panic.html
oh and look, as one would expect from a right-wing site, the hockey
stick "myth" is exploded!
So much fun!!
Oh, here's one... http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11 ...Where
the actual science is no
http://www.nysun.com/article/47920
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/resisting_global_warming_panic.html
On 2/2/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok I'll play... link?
>
> On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They have not. Global Warming is common and real, mans causing it is a
"University rectors; professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law
and theology; directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy
institutes;"
That clause right there pretty much blows it wide open.
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not true.
> Qualified Nominators
ok I'll play... link?
On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They have not. Global Warming is common and real, mans causing it is a
> weak theory with no proof.
>
> On 2/2/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let's be fair. The UN doesn't hate our freedom, but they don't CARE about it
>
Sorry Elliot, the only part of your message that pertains to this list is
"crazy thing", but it was used in the wrong context!
seriously though, you'd probably get a better response from CF-Talk on this
one. :)
On 2/2/07, Elliott Kayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a CF 7.2 server and i
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
