But since you don't think that reporter is biased, how about:
David Golove, a New York University law professor who specializes in
executive-power issues, said Bush has cast a cloud over ''the whole
idea that there is a rule of law," because no one can be certain of
which laws Bush thinks are vali
is that what the Washington Times does? Regardless, Sam, it's an
article not a retraction
On 2/10/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DUH. It's a clarification. The house debated the issue and added it to
> a bill. The WT was just covering the news.
>
> On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
?
Is this link supposed to prove the legality of signing statements
according to you? Did you read it?
``This shows that the Supreme Court is alert to this dispute -- that
the Supreme Court reads the newspapers," Fein said."
Incidentally a reference in a dissenting opinion, even at the supreme
c
DUH. It's a clarification. The house debated the issue and added it to
a bill. The WT was just covering the news.
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how to tell you this, Sam. That's a news story not a retraction
>
> On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Done
> > htt
I already posted this but you ignored it.
Go on and tell me how biased this guy is :)
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/15/scalias_dissent_gives_signing_statements_more_heft/
Scalia's dissent gives 'signing statements' more heft
By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | July
Couldn't find an unbiased source could ya.
:)
nice spin though
ta
Dana
On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you no knowledge of our laws?
> If no new laws are passed to change an existing law then it remains valid.
> So your job is to prove all the presidential signing notes are illega
I don't know how to tell you this, Sam. That's a news story not a retraction
On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done
> http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070210-120724-4310r_page2.htm
>
>
> On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > RoMunn wrote:
> > > The White House backe
Done
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070210-120724-4310r_page2.htm
On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > The White House backed Pelosi and called the whole thing a non-story, which
> > Fox News reported.
> >
>
> Interesting that you link Fox News and the Whi
And again:
14) "'Stupid' means one thing: "threatening to the interests of the
Democratic Party." The more Conservative the Republican, the more
vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be."
On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what do you call yourself ... so
14) "'Stupid' means one thing: "threatening to the interests of the
Democratic Party." The more Conservative the Republican, the more
vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be."
On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > hah, you wouldn't understand :
My favorites are: 16, 15, 6, 5, 2
plus
"Why not go to war just for oil? We need oil. What do Hollywood
celebrities imagine fuels their private jets? How do they think their
cocaine is delivered to them?"
On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > WillBo wrote:
> > this is supposed to p
Have you no knowledge of our laws?
If no new laws are passed to change an existing law then it remains valid.
So your job is to prove all the presidential signing notes are illegal
for your case to stand or a new law was passed outlawing them. Good
luck.
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the issue?
While ``not illegal or unauthorized,'' the actions ``were
inappropriate'' because they didn't ``clearly show the variance with
the consensus of the intelligence community,'' Gimble said.
There were no known ties between al Qaeda and Iraq so this group
looked into it. Don't you w
> RoMunn wrote:
> The White House backed Pelosi and called the whole thing a non-story, which
> Fox News reported.
>
Interesting that you link Fox News and the White House ... Freudian
slip or common knowledge?
The original story was reported by the Washington Times so we'll wait
for the retracti
> RoMunn wrote:
> Rosenberg were, in fact, spies for the Soviets who gave them the atom bomb.
> They were traitors. But somehow that doesn't stop the angry Left.
>
So what do you call yourself ... someone who believed what Bush told
you ... the moronic right? Cause I never bought it. And ... Al
I am discounting the DOJ link because it was written by someone paid
to support administration policies. I'm looking for an article in a
journal or case law. I realize that Guantanamo is something different
legally but morally it really isn't - it's another instance of
presidential arrogance and di
The White House backed Pelosi and called the whole thing a non-story, which
Fox News reported.
On 2/9/07, Gruss wrote:
>
> OOPS! Let's wait for the conservative media retractions - they're
> always bitching about them so I'm sure they'll be immediately
> forthcoming:
> ---
I think Ann is more amusing than anything, but I'll give you a good one:
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg- executed as traitors for giving the secret of
the atomic bomb to the Soviets. For years the American Left held them up as
martyrs to the cause of liberty, saying they were scapegoats, they were
inno
See Sam's earlier post for the DOJ link, which clearly states that the idea
is controversial, but is legally consistent with the President's
Constitutional authority as chief of the Executive branch.
This idea doesn't apply at all to Guantanamo. The legal argument about
Guantanamo is what manner o
even better -- the computer could be hacked and the hacker exposed to
pornography. You gotta love Florida.
On 2/9/07, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/9/07, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6157857.html
> >
> > Police blotter: T
silly boy your search skills have let you down again. This says
Lincoln. We were looking for the president currently in power.
On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mal:@field([EMAIL
> PROTECTED](d1715400))
>
> On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
by the way... I am no longer at work now... did you you have any
actual evidence for this? Legal opinion by someone not employed by the
president would do fine. On Guantanamo especially.
>
> Dana
>
> On 2/9/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The President can't nullfiy a law, but he doe
> Sam wrote:
> hah, you wouldn't understand :)
>
Yes, your IQ is larger than your shoe size.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http:http://ad.doubleclic
OOPS! Let's wait for the conservative media retractions - they're
always bitching about them so I'm sure they'll be immediately
forthcoming:
--
After an apparent "leak" from the Bush administration's
Department of Defense to the Whit
SURPRISE!
Pre-War Intelligence Acts `Inappropriate,' U.S. Finds (Update6)
By Tony Capaccio
Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Defense Department officials prepared
pre-war intelligence reports that may have exaggerated links between
Iraq and al-Qaeda, the Pentagon inspector general said today.
Two offi
> WillBo wrote:
> this is supposed to pass as intelligence?
>
>
Yeah, for a minute there I thought there was going to be some insights
but it's just mindless bashing, us and them, factless drivel.
Yet another buffoon with an oversized pie hole.
~~~
hah, you wouldn't understand :)
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is supposed to pass as intelligence?
>
>
> > Enjoy :)
> >
> > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1286629/posts
~|
Upgrade to Ad
this is supposed to pass as intelligence?
> Enjoy :)
>
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1286629/posts
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
On 2/9/07, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6157857.html
>
> Police blotter: Teens prosecuted for racy photos
> By Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com
> Published on ZDNet News: February 9, 2007, 5:45 AM PT
> Teenagers taking risque photos of themselves a
Enjoy :)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1286629/posts
25) "The New York Times review blamed (Kitty) Kelley's gossip
mongering on "a cultural climate in which gossip and innuendo thrive
on the Internet." Kelley has been writing these books for decades, so
apparently, like the Texas A
> Sam wrote:
> That's total BS. She'd smoke you on any topic.
She'd smoke somethin', but seriously, all I'm asking is for someone to
describe what her genius insights are.
So what are they?
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Ex
On 2/9/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I miss the names things had back then.
>
> Kermit? Gopher? Jughead? Nybble?
>
> I miss real nerds.
Hah! My favorite was always PINE, a mail client that was an alternative to
ELM, which stood for "Electronic Mail". PINE stood for "PINE Is N
oh ;) my bad. I see the light now. I love Big Brother.
Dana
On 2/9/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The President can't nullfiy a law, but he does have the power to not
> anforce laws he feels are unconstitutional. what you call abuse of
> that power is perfectly legal.
>
> --
> -
The President can't nullfiy a law, but he does have the power to not
anforce laws he feels are unconstitutional. what you call abuse of
that power is perfectly legal.
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~|
Upgrade t
That's total BS. She'd smoke you on any topic. I personally don't care
for her shock-n-ohhh publicity tactics.
But I'm pretty sure you never argued against her points and won.
Why do you have to throw words like fascism in there? Last time we
talked about her I proved you were guilty of the labels
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mal:@field([EMAIL
PROTECTED](d1715400))
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm saying that abuse of the signing statement seems to me to be a
> symprom of arrogance.
>
> I have no idea whether this is what Lincoln did, but based on your
> trac
> Sam wrote:
> Newbie mistake :)
> Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even worse than Rush Limbaugh.
> They don't mind Michael Savage for some reason :-)
>
The problem with Coulter is that she sounds like a maniacal lunatic
and nobody that professes to like her has EVER even attempted to
d
Looks like a taller Cairn Terrier.
Shoulda gotten her a Great Pyrenees :)
sas
Scott A. Stewart
REAC/PASS-IT
(202)-475-8875
"Bruce Sorge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/09/2007 03:55 PM
Please respond to cf-community
To: CF-Community
cc: (bcc: Scott A. Stewart/REAC/HHQ
:) thats my girl!
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What a beautiful puppy...
>
>
> Scott A. Stewart
> REAC/PASS-IT
> (202)-475-8875
>
>
>
>
> Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 02/09/2007 03:48 PM
> Please respond to cf-community
>
>
> To: CF-Community
> cc:
almost like a larger sized yorkie huh... hah, i had never
heard of them... interesting... lily is a pure mutt, some pit
some lab... 100% sweetie
On 2/9/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cute dog. We bought our daughter an Australian Terrier last year for her
> birthday. Ugliest little
What a beautiful puppy...
Scott A. Stewart
REAC/PASS-IT
(202)-475-8875
Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/09/2007 03:48 PM
Please respond to cf-community
To: CF-Community
cc: (bcc: Scott A. Stewart/REAC/HHQ/HUD)
Subject:new lily pics
http://www.flickr.co
Cute dog. We bought our daughter an Australian Terrier last year for her
birthday. Ugliest little thing I have ever seen but my daughter love her so
I can't complain. I can't wait! I get my lab in about 8 weeks. Woo Hoo! Bird
Dog!! Gonna send him to hunting school this summer so he will be ready fo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonyweeg
:) what a photogenic little lady she has become!
--
'Never have anything in your life that you can't walk out on in thirty
seconds flat, if you spot the heat coming around the corner'
robert deniro - heat (1995)
i miss trumpet winsock :(
and having to hit some combo of keys at the right moment to self-induce
the modem handshake...
those were the days...
On 2/9/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I miss the names things had back then.
>
> Kermit? Gopher? Jughead? Nybble?
>
> I miss real nerds.
use of < > has been decided against, but good point.
Dana
On 2/9/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that you always want to refer to it in the tag form such as
>
> " tags are used to separate content"
>
> so capitalization shouldn't be an issue.
>
> On 2/9/07, Dana
so accuracy that looks wierd...ya I guess I did
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
> > different tag.
>
> I think you answered your own question
>
> ;-)
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just
> lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
> different tag.
I think you answered your own question
;-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
I would think that you always want to refer to it in the tag form such as
" tags are used to separate content"
so capitalization shouldn't be an issue.
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you are writing about an xml tag that is lower case (say book) and
> it begins a sentence, cou
I'm saying that abuse of the signing statement seems to me to be a
symprom of arrogance.
I have no idea whether this is what Lincoln did, but based on your
track record I am inclined to doubt it. Quit trying to change the
subject and stick to the guy who is in power now. If Congress passes a
law
If you are writing about an xml tag that is lower case (say book) and
it begins a sentence, could you capitalize it? Word wants to of
course, but you can over-ride that sure. Beyond that it looks wierd
lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
different tag. Has anyone run
I miss the names things had back then.
Kermit? Gopher? Jughead? Nybble?
I miss real nerds.
Of course, I don't miss by-the-minute connect fees on TymeNet
On 2/9/07, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/9/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the trip down memory lane
So you're saying it is OK for some Presidents to use it but not for
Bush because you don't like or trust him. Got it.
Does that mean Lincoln freeing the slaves was legal? Maybe?
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clinton did not have the signing statement down to the art form that Bush
Someome somehow somewhen mentioned a WD harddrive.
Thought this was a pretty amazing price for 1 TB
http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7127910
$449
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integrat
what's the content, Sam? What I am hearing is that you think I am a
Clinton fan and are saying that either a) it must be ok because he did
it or b) I am biased. I'm saying that to my understanding, Clinton did
not have the signing statement down to the art form that Bush does.
And that is just one
Oh yeah! You would have become hero to many members. Then of course there are
the wackos like me who prefer Neil Boortz.
Badnarik 2008!
>So I guess if I said Michael Moore, I would have new friends? LOL
~|
Upgrade to Adobe Co
He wasn't an anchorman there, that was investigative reporting for 60 minutes,
not as teh anchorman for the nightly news.
From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/9/2007 2:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The DNC embraces religion
Then why was Da
Because he still swears they're real.
He didn't get fired, his producer did.
On 2/9/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then why was Dan Rather to blame for the forged Bush documents???!?!
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusio
Anchormen are entertainers, they just spin the other way.
Did you hear Caferty ask Blitzer if Anna Nicole Smith was still dead yesterday?
Rush doesn't make up the news like the Fake News guy. He just adds
comedy to the real news.
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And yet
Then why was Dan Rather to blame for the forged Bush documents???!?!
On 2/9/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought they just read the teleprompter
>
>
>
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 2/9/2007 2:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
I thought they just read the teleprompter
From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/9/2007 2:27 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The DNC embraces religion
And yetRush describes himself as "America's Anchorman"
Hmmm. Anchormen usually report the n
> And yetRush describes himself as "America's Anchorman"
>
> Hmmm. Anchormen usually report the news, don't they?
All I said is that Rush gets a bit of a pass because he occasionally
admits that he's an entertainer.
That he also calls himself America's Anchorman is--I
guess--unfortunately con
And yetRush describes himself as "America's Anchorman"
Hmmm. Anchormen usually report the news, don't they?
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't you get your news from the DailyShow :)
>
> haven't seen the Daily Show (with the exception of the occasional
> YouTube c
> Don't you get your news from the DailyShow :)
haven't seen the Daily Show (with the exception of the occasional
YouTube clips) since 2002...
:-)
No Cable TV = No Daily Show
FWIW though, Jon Stewart is the *first* to admit his show is a comedy
show, not a news show (ref:
http://www.youtube.com
Don't you get your news from the DailyShow :)
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> heh. Rush at least admits that he's an entertainer who sometimes
> stretches credulity to make a better story.
>
~|
Upgrade to Ad
And Rush does a Clinton impression that floors me every time.
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Newbie mistake :)
> > Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even worse than Rush
> Limbaugh.
> > They don't mind Michael Savage for some reason :-)
>
> heh. Rush at leas
Fusebox is going to get a facelift and we need your help.
Things are really starting to happen within Team Fusebox and one of the main
goals is to start off fresh with a new and improved website. New content,
new everything. Including a new look. Since for the most part, we are
programmers and not
Yeah - there are already a ton of ways to do this. Sounds kinda silly to me.
-Cameron
On 2/9/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251090,00.html
>
> LONDON " British tycoon Sir Richard Branson on Friday announced a $25
> million prize for the scie
Your playstation had a modem?
--Ben "not really that ignorant" Doom
G Money wrote:
> Thanks for the trip down memory lane. I remember when my PS/1 came equipped
> with an ultra-fast 2400 baud, full duplex modem.
~|
Upgrade to Ad
It reduces slowdowns.
Duane wrote:
> Spinning the brake defect as a free upgrade
>
> -Original Message-
>
> Yeah, and where's the Marketing Director during all this?
>
> "Those are speed holes"
> -Car salesman to Homer
~~~
> Can you say "Plant more plants"?
heh, my first thought "was somebody mail him a friggin' tree..."
:-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Upgrad
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251090,00.html
LONDON â British tycoon Sir Richard Branson on Friday announced a $25
million prize for the scientist who comes up with a way of extracting
greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
The Virgin Group chairman was joined by former Vice President A
And I'm saying I agree but there are plenty of cases where we're
positive. As in Colin Ferguson because he was tackled on the train
during the shooting. Many other cases but that's a good enough
example.
On 2/9/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not at all, all I am saying is that memo
the wxga+ option will be slightly better, but you will still lose lots of
vertical real estate with the D620. I would pick the 820 with the highest
resolution possible (WUXGA - effectively 1600x1200 resolution on a widescreen
display), but if that is too small for you i wouldn't go any lower th
Please! I have been trying to get the DLL installed for the past 2 days. If a
COM object will make it happen, I'm thrilled.
Contact me off of the list at russel . [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the spaces
before and after the first dot).
>I've always used the crystal report builder object as a COM
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, actually. I am dismissing his source as partial, Clinton
> Adminstration or not. And saying that if Clinton thought that signing
> statements were ok, correct me if I am wrong, but he didn't put them
> on everything did he?
You can't just dismiss it
I gotta agree
On 2/9/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'cause savage is funnyalmost pychotic...but funny.
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-plat
Craigslist.org and good ole word of mouth.
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Once we get settled in Raleigh, I'll probably be trying to get some
> side work, contracting stuff...
>
> How do you go about picking up that kind of work (I know it sounds
> stupid,
word of mouth has always been my schtick.
and being the only cf guy who can do graphic design
work, and host his own shit...
:) small towns are GOOD sometimes
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Once we get settled in Raleigh, I'll probably be trying to get som
one thought:
I have found quite a few interesting gigs on craiglist.org. The key
point there is understanding that telecommuting jobs have to be posted
somewhere, and there are limits to how many locations you can put an
identical post up in. So click around. I have found stuff on the
London, Wash
yes I agree. Success != being a millionare. Being a millionare might
be nice, but is not necessary for happiness. Especially since it seems
to make you froth at the mouth when you suspect that someone somewhere
is getting free healthcare ;)
After I sent Gruss that last email the next music I pulle
Hey all,
Once we get settled in Raleigh, I'll probably be trying to get some side
work, contracting stuff...
How do you go about picking up that kind of work (I know it sounds stupid,
but I'm not exactly a marketing major :)
Thanks
sas
Scott A. Stewart
REAC/PASS-IT
(202)-475-8875
Zaphod
If I may leach onto your request, I would love to see your code as well. We
also have many legacy Crystal Reports and I am always looking for alternatives
to access them.
Thanks in advance.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
--
I've always used the crystal report builder object as a COM object. It's
far from optimal, but it works. If you want, I can email you the code to do
it.
On 2/9/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To change the subject a little, I need the advice of the list.
>
> We, as in my departm
> Newbie mistake :)
> Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even worse than Rush Limbaugh.
> They don't mind Michael Savage for some reason :-)
heh. Rush at least admits that he's an entertainer who sometimes
stretches credulity to make a better story.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it
'cause savage is funnyalmost pychotic...but funny.
On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Newbie mistake :)
> Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even worse than Rush Limbaugh.
> They don't mind Michael Savage for some reason :-)
>
> On 2/9/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
> So I guess if I said Michael Moore, I would have new friends? LOL
no
same problem, opposite side of the aisle.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
This would be the same Ann Coulter that told a disabled American
Vietnam Veteran that "People like you caused us to lose that war."
and is the utter-er of quotes like:
"The presumption of innocence only means you don't go right to jail."
or
"My libertarian friends are probably getting a little
So I guess if I said Michael Moore, I would have new friends? LOL
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:37 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The DNC embraces religion
Newbie mistake :)
Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even wors
Newbie mistake :)
Ann Coulter is a bd word on this list. Even worse than Rush Limbaugh.
They don't mind Michael Savage for some reason :-)
On 2/9/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is typical of the party who embraced and hired countless communists in
> the 50's throughout vario
> That's just one of a million ways. Found out about that one too late
> to take advantage of it.
Yeah, I suppose that would work if I was at all interested in being a
lawyer, or an investment banker, or a consultant (not the hands in the
muck type, but the high level, sell the souls of the peopl
To change the subject a little, I need the advice of the list.
We, as in my department, has a huge number of Crystal Reports built. The one
directory I am working in has over 1,000. We need to offer many of these via
the department website. What technology should I use, ASP.net or CFReports?
> WillBo wrote:
> > I can tell you how to become a millionaire in 4 years. Want to hear more?
>
> The last tape ends with Gruss holding *your* last $29.95 check up to
> the camera so you can see how *he* made his million.
>
HA! That's a classic. No, there's many ways but here's one easy one
if
Oh, and a .NET developer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 11:08 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Considering a new laptop
>
> I'm a windows system administrator and a gamer, I don't think that
> would be
> the case.
> Bruce wrote:
> Because they are not "opinions" as you say, they are fact and she has her
> sources to back them up. And I find fact much more fascinating than fiction.
>
Facts don't mean shit if they're taken out of context of not proven to
be causal. I can organize documented facts to imply yo
I have ;) you just chose not to believe me. And now i have work to do.
On 2/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dana wrote:
> > ::eyeroll:: She is suing the insurance company. It isn't helping her
> > much right now though. If you are saying she should have had health
> > benefits, wel
I'm a windows system administrator and a gamer, I don't think that would be
the case.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 10:53 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Considering a new laptop
>
> > Nick wrote:
> > But why spend
> Ah, gotcha.getting my Iranians mixed up.
yeah, there's like... brazillions of them...
:-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Upgrade to Ado
> I can tell you how to become a millionaire in 4 years. Want to hear more?
the "more" comes on 5 VHS tapes that cost $29.95 + S&H. The
content of the tape is Gruss laughing and pointing at the camera for 4
hours.
The last tape ends with Gruss holding *your* last $29.95 check up to
the came
Ah, gotcha.getting my Iranians mixed up.
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I thought the Mossad (or Assad? Can't remember) was the key suspect? The
> > Israeli secret police.
>
> Mossad, and that was the nuke scientist a week or so ago.
>
> The diplomat is/was in Iraq,
> Dana wrote:
> ::eyeroll:: She is suing the insurance company. It isn't helping her
> much right now though. If you are saying she should have had health
> benefits, well, think about that.By local standards she has quite a
> good job.
>
You could right and I could be wrong - or maybe it's somewh
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
