BlowBack Part 1
---
Ms. Imus added: "One thing I want to say is, the hate mail that's
being sent to them must stop. If you want to send hate mail, send it
to my husband."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/arts/television/14imus.html
BlowBack Part 2
---
(CB
"One of the problems that I have been reading about is PC makers are selling
machines that have the minimum hardware to run whatever version of Vista is
installed on the PC."
Thats the exact reason why Apple doesnt want OS X to be put on crappy computers
from Dell, IBM, Gateway, etc.
Its c
Yeah I did make one. Resolution here is 1280 x 1024. I'll send you the
screenshot here shortly. I suggested blue because of the associations. You
might consider some color other than lavender tho. I can't quite put my finger
on why but I do get that association quite strongly.
>> From: Dana T
Yeah I did make one. Resolution here is 1280 x 1024. I'll send you the
screenshot here shortly. I suggested blue because of the associations. You
might consider some color other than lavender tho. or not...
>> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2007 20:48
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Any DHTML Geeks want to beta test/review something for me?
>
> Jim,
> I had a quick look yesterday, works well. My personal preference is to
> u
I just want to know where he got a 15 billion year old jar of peanut butter.
-Cameron
On 4/14/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/50013/
>
> There's just no way to argue against such iron-clad logic.
>
> I feel like I've wasted some many years of my life
> Nick wrote:
> You are assuming Gel is honourable ;)
>
Well, we'll find out.
Call me goofy but racism is absurd and, therefore, humorous. Remember
that asshat that was posting for awhile who, during Katrina, said the
solution was, "if it's black and it moves shoot it"?
See now that's funny unt
Boy, isn't he red-faced after the peanut butter recall due to "new
life" in the peanut butter :)
On 4/14/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/50013/
>
> There's just no way to argue against such iron-clad logic.
>
> I feel like I've wasted some many years
man.
you ever have a peanut butter & mushroom sandwich?
i swear there is some thing in the peanut butter.
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7.
Free Trial. http://w
You are assuming Gel is honourable ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 5:42 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Imus On Nappy Headed Hoes
>
> > Gel Wrote:
> > An honourable person would have offered his damned resignation
That's crap.
Why would you resign for inadvertently offending people with a phrase
you didn't know was hurtful.
It would be one thing if he said something he knew was offensive that he
thought wasn't being broadcast, but it turns out it did, then that would
be a reason to resign.
> -Original
> Gel Wrote:
> An honourable person would have offered his damned resignation when he
> realised what he had said.
>
Your comments here have offended me. We all await your letter of resignation.
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickl
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/50013/
There's just no way to argue against such iron-clad logic.
I feel like I've wasted some many years of my life.
Jim Davis
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-
On 4/14/07, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An honourable person would have offered his damned resignation when he
> realised what he had said.
So, if you offend someone, you will resign from your job?
There is no law that states you have a right NOT to be offended.
Free speech is free spe
An honourable person would have offered his damned resignation when he
realised what he had said.
On 4/14/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm defending honor by reminding you of intent. He didn't say it
> > maliciously or to offend; he said it to amuse his audience. It did
> >
Right.
You equate honor with calling women nappy headed hoes.
You have no idea of the 'intent'.You expected him *not* to apologize?
How do you know what his 'intent' was?
A: Yeah those white bitches are rough, they got tattoos and all!
B: Yeah! Thems some rough honkey hoes for real Ha! Ha! Ha!
W
Jim,
I had a quick look yesterday, works well. My personal preference is to use
"drag & drop" rather than moving the divs around by selecting a position but
saying that I like the way yours moves them around the page. The opacity option
is really neat, I'd forgotten you could do that!
Andrew G
Here's my own take on the study. I went to Mathmatica's site and read more on
the study. With the design Mathmathica used, its a very strong strong study.
Unfortunately they could not control for SES. With that caveat, these results
should put the issue mostly to rest, abstinence only sex ed doe
I'm defending honor by reminding you of intent. He didn't say it
maliciously or to offend; he said it to amuse his audience. It did
offend so he apologize. Honorable people will accept that.
On 4/14/07, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROFL!
>
> How is this in anyway applicable to Imus?
>
> R
ROFL!
How is this in anyway applicable to Imus?
Referring to a woman as a HOE on the air isn't offensive?
Are you trying to imply that it is a far stretch of the imagination that
Imus could know that calling a black woman a Hoe,any woman a hoe, could be
seen as offensive?
Is he a rapper? Was he
> Jerry wrote:
> French people, in the city
Americans don't know that in Japan you don't stick your chopsticks up
in a bowl of rice. Or that it's impolite to wear you shoes into
somebody's house. Or how to bow properly.
The point is, people do things every day that offends someone else for
one
21 matches
Mail list logo
