Not even close to being the same thing. Comparing circumcision with
clitoral mutilation is like comparing a hangnail to a amputation.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I bet you would have similar feelings if your labia or clitorus were cut
> off...
>
> -Original Mes
So would that be Isnotreal *grin*
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:58 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election
No to realists!
It's another name for get rid of Israel.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at
No to realists!
It's another name for get rid of Israel.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Eric Roberts wrote:
>>
>> That's because conservatives have moved so far to the right that everyone
>> else looks liberal when compared to them.
>>
>
> Or they've become theoris
The map please.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> ok, sure, we aim to please.
>
> Here you go. The reason they are talking the "64,000 illegal aliens
> registered to vote" shit is that it inspires gullible fools like you
> to send the republican party money:
>
> http://newmexi
Considering that was one of the many laws repealed in the south because it
disenfranchised voters...history would disagree with you.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:09 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: How states are rigging t
Who said because of having an id? I sure didn't. I said there was a
history of government spying on the people. Please read before opening
mouth Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re:
I am against disenfranchising voters, I just don't agree that
requiring an ID disenfranchises voters.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Nothing has been debunked except the members of this list are unified in
> their stand against disentrancing voters.
>
> -Original M
I fail to see how that is government spying on people becasue they
have a state issued ID. Try again.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> You dont remember the illegal domestic wiretaps under the Bush
> administration that Obama has continued?
>
> -Original Message
Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> That's because conservatives have moved so far to the right that everyone
> else looks liberal when compared to them.
>
Or they've become theorists just like liberals have always been:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2077943,00.html
It'd be nice if we got
That's because conservatives have moved so far to the right that everyone
else looks liberal when compared to them.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 05:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election
I bet you would have similar feelings if your labia or clitorus were cut
off...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 02:05 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Sign of the Apocalypse: Jews, Muslims sue to block referendum
on circumcision
Nothing has been debunked except the members of this list are unified in
their stand against disentrancing voters.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 11:51 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 electio
You dont remember the illegal domestic wiretaps under the Bush
administration that Obama has continued?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:10 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election
What rece
ok, sure, we aim to please.
Here you go. The reason they are talking the "64,000 illegal aliens
registered to vote" shit is that it inspires gullible fools like you
to send the republican party money:
http://newmexicoindependent.com/70180/susana-martinezs-pac-fundraises-off-immigrants-drivers-li
You do realize that in most circumstances, a driver's license is
suitable to use as an ID, right?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> driving does not require an id, ma'am. Just a driver's license, and I
> have one of those. No points, no warrants.
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:45 A
Whatever, just send me the map that gets me out of this twilight zone episode.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> no. it is the privilege to drive. The map is not the terrain Sam, did
> you miss the memo on that?
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> A drivers
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> The AG that Bush fired tried to make a case and could not find a case
> that could honestly be made. He said so and whoops, got fired,
> allegedly for other reasons. I refer you to the Inspector-General's
> report I cited earlier and which you do n
no. it is the privilege to drive. The map is not the terrain Sam, did
you miss the memo on that?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> A drivers license is and ID.
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> driving does not require an id, ma'am. Just a driver's licen
If you weren't such a horses ass I would take offense.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> yeah I guess that was to Sam, sorry. Although now that I realize that
> it was Sam saying it I am no longer surprised that it isn't sticking
> in his craw. Nothing sticks in Sam's craw. Yo
A drivers license is and ID.
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> driving does not require an id, ma'am. Just a driver's license, and I
> have one of those. No points, no warrants.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion A
Is this a proposal? If so it works for me, I think. Maybe not as a
requirement but instead as an available alternate authentication
method. Because it WOULD increase the amount of data the government
has on its citizens; many people currently do not have their
fingerprints on file and do not want
> 1) Bush fired AG's
The AG that Bush fired tried to make a case and could not find a case
that could honestly be made. He said so and whoops, got fired,
allegedly for other reasons. I refer you to the Inspector-General's
report I cited earlier and which you do not appear to have read. This
is no
yeah I guess that was to Sam, sorry. Although now that I realize that
it was Sam saying it I am no longer surprised that it isn't sticking
in his craw. Nothing sticks in Sam's craw. You at least appear to be
thinking about stuff, even if we disagree.
> You talking to Sam or me? I don't know enou
not familiar with Wisconsin. I am interested in the issue and will
look later if I have time but that currently seems unlikely
> On fraud in general. Clerical errors will happen. Look what happened in
> Wisconsin with Prosser versus Kloppenburg.
>
> ID's maybe able to help reconcile the number
you know that outside the United States this line of thinking is
called "neo-liberal, right?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> For a group that is for less government, they sure seem to want more of it.
> They want voter id's, they want to regulate who can and can't get ma
driving does not require an id, ma'am. Just a driver's license, and I
have one of those. No points, no warrants.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> How do you drive without an ID?
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> hmm. I have not had an ID for over a year n
one thing to check... AES was once and possibly still is considered
military and subject to export restrictions. I *think* I read that
this restriction had been eased, but the results I get on a fast
google are contradictory -- possibly, if the restriction was lifted,
because some of them predate
she moved. I remember your name but not much about yabut welcome back.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Will Swain wrote:
>
> Good thanks. :)
>
> How about you - you still in the UK? Croydon area wasn't it?
>
> w
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.co
My guess is that Washington Post supposedly vetted him, and the Secret
Service took their word for it. The SS agents who did so obviously
never watched Air Force One with Harrison Ford, or the episode of
Stargate SG-1 where the terrorists pretending to be reporters took
over.
On Fri, Jun 24, 201
+10 for leaving us alone. I despise having to deal with
governments, even after many years of working for and with them. Or
perhaps because of that.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:02 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Yeah, weird.
>
> Why can't those idiots get together and protect everyone, all the time?
>
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> This has been debunked ad nauseum. At this point, you're arguing just to
> argue.
>
What's been debunked? You're arguing for more bureaucracy, more
process, and more government; liberals always try that.
The real question is when does process inhibit liberty? I would
Sam wrote:
>
> Isn't requiring an electric bill more punitive than an ID for a
> homeless person or any family member not having utilities in their
> name?
>
Yup, which is why nobody requires it.
What is required is some type corroboration which the bill suffices as.
~~
Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> Not knowing about the legal status IS a pretty big deal, considering
> the types of checks the Secret Service are _supposed_ to be running.
>
Eh. They'll end up accidentally running him down soon anyway, so why
check any deeper?
~~~
PT wrote:
>
> And with 1.21 you can time travel! Don't think they aren't working on it.
>
On Thurs, Jan 23, 2094 at 2:13 PM, Gruss Gott Wrote:
Yeah, uh, "working on it
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.am
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> Knowing and ignoring or deciding legal status is not relevant or
> dangerous is one thing.
>
> Not knowing about the legal status IS a pretty big deal, considering
> the types of checks the Secret Service are _supposed_ to be running.
And with 1.21 you can time travel! Don't think they aren't working on it.
So close
On 6/23/2011 10:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> acknowledge. With 1 GW of directed energy at your disposal, you could knock
> down almost anything.
~~
Knowing and ignoring or deciding legal status is not relevant or
dangerous is one thing.
Not knowing about the legal status IS a pretty big deal, considering
the types of checks the Secret Service are _supposed_ to be running.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I believe that th
I believe that the point was stupid. Security is there to prevent
threats, not ensure adherence to some ideological standard of
correctness. If he was not a threat then no matter how tight the
security might be they might not have noticed any other
characteristics he might have.
On Thu, Jun 23,
Yeah, weird.
Why can't those idiots get together and protect everyone, all the time?
OR...better yet.just leave us all alone :)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> And the conservative agenda stops at birth.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 PM, G Money wrote:
> >
>
> > A
And the conservative agenda stops at birth.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
>
> (throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn baby!)
~~
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
> child, which would fit with the liberal agenda.
Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
(throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn
"Stupid waste of time and energy, because it will never pass."
Probably not. On the PC perspective, the situation gets a lot trickier when
you add in Muslims.
Just weird that someone would even try it.
Anyway, it's good to seem Muslims and Jews cooperating on something.
J
-
Ninety percent
The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
child, which would fit with the liberal agenda. I suspect some
weiner misses the tip of his weener, is mad at mommy and daddy because
of it, so he wants to foist his rage on the rest of the world.
Stupid waste of time and energy
"Thus states, countries, and cities should have a good record of who is
possibly a voter."
"Should" and actuality do not necessarily meet when it comes to bureaucracy
on any level.
"They might even ask you to have a neighbor or 2 vouche for you in case you
don't have such bill."
This doesn't w
I'm a slow learner, so they tell me...
:)
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Sam...when will you learn, you cannot bring common sense into
> political discussions
>
>
> *waits for the 'It's different' defense *
>
~
Sam...when will you learn, you cannot bring common sense into
political discussions
*waits for the 'It's different' defense *
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Isn't requiring an electric bill more punitive than an ID for a
> homeless person or any family member not having u
Isn't requiring an electric bill more punitive than an ID for a
homeless person or any family member not having utilities in their
name?
And then there's the scheduling your vote around neighbors that can
vouch for you?
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> If you walk into
What recent history?
Please show me one documented case where the gov't 'spied' on someone
becasue they had a state issued ID.
On the flip side: How it paranoia to want to verify someone is who
they claim to be when they are casting a vote (arguably the single
most important thing we, as citizen
Is it paranoid when recent history supports that? There has been more
government interference into our lives...more illegal intrusions into our
privacy ever since Bush took office than during any time in our history.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent:
For a group that is for less government, they sure seem to want more of it.
They want voter id's, they want to regulate who can and can't get married,
they want to determine what a woman can and can't do with their body, they
want to limit the substances we can take into our bodies without getting
Hrm...what is more paranoid? Wanting to require people show ID in
order to vote, or thinking that having an ID means the government can
spy on you?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>> "A conservative would argue for AT LEAST state's rights in this c
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "A conservative would argue for AT LEAST state's rights in this case
> because, at the end of the day, it's about being true to principles."
>
> It's strictly a state's rights issue right now. That is why all of the laws
> differ from each other. That is not to say that
Timothy Geithner to the House Small Business Committee on Wednesday:
We're not doing it because we want to do it, we're doing it because we see
no alternative to a balanced approach to reduce our fiscal deficits. If you
don't touch revenues and you leave in place the tax cuts for the top 2
pe
"A conservative would argue for AT LEAST state's rights in this case
because, at the end of the day, it's about being true to principles."
It's strictly a state's rights issue right now. That is why all of the laws
differ from each other. That is not to say that one day it will not become
a fed
Aren't we talking about State laws?
.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Eric Roberts wrote:
>>
>> It's liberals that are against this and conservatives that are for it Gruss.
>>
>
> Mmm I dunno Eric, that doesn't make sense.
>
> A conservative would argue for AT LEAST stat
Back in the states now. It was Croydon, yes!
Doing very well thanks! :)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Will Swain wrote:
>
> Good thanks. :)
>
> How about you - you still in the UK? Croydon area wasn't it?
>
> w
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Which model dlink enclosure?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:webmas...@sstwebworks.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Small Home SAN
I bought the D-Link enclosure and a 720 GB drive a couple of years ago
and it's a tank... very durable
I bought the D-Link enclosure and a 720 GB drive a couple of years ago
and it's a tank... very durable and reliable
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Scott Raley wrote:
>
> Any recommendations on what you are using in your home office for SAN
> storage? I've seen Netgear and Dlink on sale at Tig
Any recommendations on what you are using in your home office for SAN
storage? I've seen Netgear and Dlink on sale at Tiger but they both have
mixed reviews.
Thanks
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amaz
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> http://theoatmeal.com/blog/miracle_whip
>
Oh that is just tasty. I know I should recycle that container now, but no
way am I squeezing out all that...
~|
Order the Adob
60 matches
Mail list logo
