who's betting that she hands him an aspirin and tells him where to shove it.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I only have sex with my wife and she knows I'm the one that really
> cares about them.
>
> .
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> probably b
you really did not read or listen to her testimony did you.
Professional ignorance so it would seem. No wonder you're a fan of
Limpdick.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> What Sam and the others seem to forget is that ora
well when you're not getting any even one is a lot.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You are correct since I don't use any.
> Saves me a bundle.
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> for you maybe.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Sam wrote:
I liked what one of the show's biggest sponsors said well after the
limpblob gave his Faux apology:
http://www.carbonite.com/en/blog/A-Message-from-Carbonite-CEO-David-Friend-Regarding-Ads-on-Limbaugh
A Message from Carbonite CEO, David Friend Regarding Ads on Limbaugh
March 02, 2012
UPDATE
A S
Actually, I have to say -- in this context "slut" is every bit as
devastating as the worst n-word-using insult. It essentially says you're a
whore if you have sex and ugly if you don't, and whether you do or not is
the most important thing about you or that anyone could comment on when you
speak u
On 3/3/2012 7:22 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Sam...
>
> Rush has apologised.
> He apparently thought he was being funny.
>
> Which is kinda what you were implying... :)
>
> "For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three
> hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose
I thought it was funny too.
Some folks mentioned here thought they were funny too but they missed the mark.
http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Sam...
>
> Rush has apologised.
> He apparently thought he was being funny.
>
> Which is kinda what
I only have sex with my wife and she knows I'm the one that really
cares about them.
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> probably because you're not getting any with that attitude towards women.
>
~|
Are you guys twins?
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Because ideological purity requires it.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/143027
WTF? Really? Again.
Taxpayers need to supply 5 condoms a day to law students that can
afford over aNn $50k a year education or they'll fill our jails with
felons?
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> even assuming it had been used to prevent pregnancy, it would be a
> cost-effectiv
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> What Sam and the others seem to forget is that oral contraception is
> also used for a number of other medical conditions, for a short list,
> try this link
> http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/thepill/a/otherbenorcontr.htm
But in the next
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Did she say the money was for condoms or contraception?
>
> It seems to me she's likely choosing a number that would cover whatever
> form of contraception was chosen. Pill/patch/condoms/IUD. $1000/yr might be
> completely reasonable for the pill
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Sam - how far are you willing to take this argument?
Not far at all.
> If a federal employee uses part of their income to buy condoms, isn't
> that technically using tax dollars to pay for contraception?
No. It's using your wages. Are you
I read the non apology on the Washington Post site. Inside of an hour
over 800 comments. The dittoheads were at least as foul as the
original viagra and oxycontin addled blob.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Sam...
>
> Rush has apologised.
> He apparently thought he was being fu
Sam...
Rush has apologised.
He apparently thought he was being funny.
Which is kinda what you were implying... :)
"For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three
hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words
in my analogy of the situation. I d
probably because you're not getting any with that attitude towards women.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You are correct since I don't use any.
> Saves me a bundle.
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> for you maybe.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 a
Because ideological purity requires it.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> even assuming it had been used to prevent pregnancy, it would be a
> cost-effective use of health dollars. Pregnancy is expensive. Unintended
> pregnancy is especially expensive. Why is this even an issue?
>
I think the answer to that goes back to the conservatives and lack of
education thread earlier...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
even assuming it had b
even assuming it had been used to prevent pregnancy, it would be a
cost-effective use of health dollars. Pregnancy is expensive. Unintended
pregnancy is especially expensive. Why is this even an issue?
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> What Sam and the others seem to forg
What Sam and the others seem to forget is that oral contraception is
also used for a number of other medical conditions, for a short list,
try this link
http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/thepill/a/otherbenorcontr.htm
Moreover Ms Fluke was not describing herself, but a friend who had
Endometriosis,
Did she say the money was for condoms or contraception?
It seems to me she's likely choosing a number that would cover whatever
form of contraception was chosen. Pill/patch/condoms/IUD. $1000/yr might be
completely reasonable for the pill in America ( I don't know if it is or
not.) And that needs
Sam - how far are you willing to take this argument?
If a federal employee uses part of their income to buy condoms, isn't
that technically using tax dollars to pay for contraception?
If an employee of a federal government contractor uses part of their
income to pay for an abortion, isn't that te
22 matches
Mail list logo
