Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread Gruss Gott
> Dana wrote: > yes, it all boils down to whether we are talking about FAQ the page of > a site, or whether what is meant is a question for the FAQ page, > doesn't it? I am having to clarify the meaning of what I am trying to > edit here. "FAQ" may be special. It seems to me that the plural of "F

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> I've always been taught that if you have two rodents, > they're mice, but > if you have two pointing devices, they're mouses. > But my point was mostly that it sounds more right to me to > say "I wrote > two FAQs" than "I wrote two FAQ". That's all. I would expect that to be correct because FA

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread Dana
yes, it all boils down to whether we are talking about FAQ the page of a site, or whether what is meant is a question for the FAQ page, doesn't it? I am having to clarify the meaning of what I am trying to edit here. Dana On 5/9/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've always been taught th

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Doom
I've always been taught that if you have two rodents, they're mice, but if you have two pointing devices, they're mouses. But my point was mostly that it sounds more right to me to say "I wrote two FAQs" than "I wrote two FAQ". That's all. --Ben Jerry Johnson wrote: > If you can ever understand

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
If you can ever understand how to pluralize everything (in English), please teach me. I think the rules were written by slightly unstable people, very late at night, who were drinking. Alot. One example I always love: If you have three fish of the same species, you have fish. If you have three f

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Doom
I wrote three different FAQ for three different websites? If I'm using FAQ as a collective noun (which it seems to me it has become) the shouldn't I pluralize that? --Ben Eric Carlisle wrote: > Both are wrong. :-) > The acronym is Frequently Asked Questions. There's no need to pluralize > the

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-06 Thread Cameron Childress
On 5/5/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this just definitely wrong? Has it > become less wrong in the current age of acronyms? FAQ's? FAQs? Unless you are asking "Who do these questions belong to?" it should be FAQs or even just FAQ (the "s" is contained in the

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-06 Thread Howie Hamlin
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/strange/news-article.aspx?storyid=036683 ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Messag

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-06 Thread Gruss Gott
> Dana wrote: > Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this just definitely wrong? Has it > become less wrong in the current age of acronyms? FAQ's? FAQs? > It bugs the crap out of me! Everyone makes typos (typo's), but using the apostrophe to pluralize is working to be wrong. It's like saying, "should

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-06 Thread Howie Hamlin
Add "there" to list 2. --- On Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:47 PM, Charlie Griefer scribed: --- > > i have 3 pet peeves as far as writing goes... > > 1) improper use of you're/your > 2) improper use of their/they're > 3) improper use of apostrophe's in plurals :D > > hands down, FAQs > ~~~

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-06 Thread Eric Carlisle
Both are wrong. :-) The acronym is Frequently Asked Questions. There's no need to pluralize the abbreviation. Just use FAQ. Definitely don't use an apostrophe to pluralize. My 0.02, Eric Dana wrote: >Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this just definitely wrong? Has it >become less wrong in the

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-05 Thread Dana
-Original Message- > > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:48 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Apostrophe s as plural > > > > i have 3 pet peeves as far as writing goes... > > > > 1) improper use of you

RE: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-05 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:48 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apostrophe s as plural > > i have 3 pet peeves as far as writing goes... > > 1) improper use of you're/your &g

Re: Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-05 Thread Charlie Griefer
i have 3 pet peeves as far as writing goes... 1) improper use of you're/your 2) improper use of their/they're 3) improper use of apostrophe's in plurals :D hands down, FAQs On 5/5/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this just definitely wrong? Has it > become les

Apostrophe s as plural

2005-05-05 Thread Dana
Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this just definitely wrong? Has it become less wrong in the current age of acronyms? FAQ's? FAQs? thanks again for playing focus group Dana ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk a