Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Sam
Scott Brown comes to mind On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:22 PM, G Money wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Michael Dinowitz < > mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > >> >> There are people who register Republican so they can influence the >> Republican party votes but they vote Democrat (or

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread G Money
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Michael Dinowitz < mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > There are people who register Republican so they can influence the > Republican party votes but they vote Democrat (or other) when the > chips are down. > Yes, I know, I think they are the worst kind of p

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Larry C. Lyons
still what were you referring to? it makes no sense in the context of what you were writing. Just trying to understand. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Sam wrote: > > You can skip over that one, carry n > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> >> there are times when no

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Sam
You can skip over that one, carry n On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > there are times when no matter how hard I try I cannot make any sense > out of what you write. for instance you stated: >> and everyone else want's them dead? > > WTF are you referring to? you are mak

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Larry C. Lyons
there are times when no matter how hard I try I cannot make any sense out of what you write. for instance you stated: > and everyone else want's them dead? WTF are you referring to? you are making less sense than usual. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:1

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Michael Dinowitz
There are people who register Republican so they can influence the Republican party votes but they vote Democrat (or other) when the chips are down. > You can still be a "conservative"...just make sure you never register as > Republican. ~~

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Sam
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > We have yet to hear Obama calling for intolerance towards people of > different religions, and everyone else want's them dead? > or questioning whether non believers are really > American in the first place, as have quite a few of the c

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Sam
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Vivec wrote: > > How do you compare Barack Obama's statement: > > Barack Obama, in his inaugural address, said that "our patchwork > heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians > and Muslims, Jews and Hindus – and non-believers. We are s

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Larry C. Lyons
We have yet to hear Obama calling for intolerance towards people of different religions, or questioning whether non believers are really American in the first place, as have quite a few of the current republican crop of candidates. Or for that matter say something like what Mike Huckabee, said "..

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Vivec
How do you compare Barack Obama's statement: Barack Obama, in his inaugural address, said that "our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus – and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end o

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Sam
Obama is as religious as anyone in that stupid story. It's all about how you paint the right, nothing to do with reality. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > I think there is a difference between being a 'Republican' and being a > 'conservative'. Just like there is a differ

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread G Money
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:21 AM, morgan l wrote: > > This is why I'll never be a "Conservative" no matter how much I agree with > 99% of the rest of their stance. > You can still be a "conservative"...just make sure you never register as Republican. A person with "conservative" views on gover

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Scott Stroz
I think there is a difference between being a 'Republican' and being a 'conservative'. Just like there is a difference between being a 'Democrat' and a 'liberal'. I think when it comes to fiscal policy, I would tend to be more conservative, but when it comes to social policy, I am definitely more

Re: FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread morgan l
This is why I'll never be a "Conservative" no matter how much I agree with 99% of the rest of their stance. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Interesting commentary about the recent speeches made by the 2 current > republican frontrunners. > > > http://www.guardian.co.u

FW: Republicans v secular America

2010-02-24 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Interesting commentary about the recent speeches made by the 2 current republican frontrunners. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/feb/23/republicans-religion-secular-america Republicans v secular America With blatant disregard for the first amendment, Republicans' intolera