Re: Getting started with Eclipse

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Haskell
RAD 6 is AWESOME, if by awesome you mean bloated memory hog that sucks more than a 25 cent whore in broklyn. I actually installed a normal version of eclipse on my computer to use cfeclipse and do my CF (and all the other) coding on. Soon OHHH so soon everyone will be on cvs and the IBM protal tec

Re: Getting started with Eclipse

2006-01-16 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Steve Collins has an ISO CD image of a lot of the basic stuff you need with CFeclipse http://www.stephencollins.org/acme/. its worth lookin at. larry On 1/16/06, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm being forced to move to RAD 6 (IBM's WebSphere development environment > based on Eclipse 3

Re: Getting started with Eclipse

2006-01-16 Thread Bill Wheatley
:) I use the myeclipse package too it cost me like 20 bucks i think. Yea it's a little rough and i dislike not having word wrap but i've learned to adapt :) Actually with build in help it will pop up with code insight for most things you just have to let your mouse hover for a few milliseconds. ~

Getting started with Eclipse

2006-01-15 Thread Jim Davis
I'm being forced to move to RAD 6 (IBM's WebSphere development environment based on Eclipse 3) at the office and to make the transition as smooth as possible I've decided to try and get into Eclipse at home as well. I've got the core release and (of course) CF Eclipse. What other plug-ins do you