On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> So what do you do when you're on vacation in the boonies and the
>> messenger pigeon comes with that "the world will collapse in on itself
>> if program X isn't doing Y by Z time"?
>>
>
> This is a little hard to follow. If what you're asking i
I hear both of you on remote development.
Traditionally I have preferred to have a mirror of the production site locally.
Regardless of how fast my connection is, I have always had a better
experience managing stuff locally than on the remote.I find the lag to
be annoying, and this may be because
>
> So what do you do when you're on vacation in the boonies and the
> messenger pigeon comes with that "the world will collapse in on itself
> if program X isn't doing Y by Z time"?
>
This is a little hard to follow. If what you're asking is what I think the
answer is that "I'm on vacation. Sorr
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> In over 10 years of doing it this way I can count the number of times I've
> been unable to connect to my dev servers on one hand... the one that only
> has two fingers and no thumb.
So what do you do when you're on vacation in the boonies and th
>
>
> I want the visual capabilities of Dreamweaver combined with a solid code
> editor.
>
This makes me shudder.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing
In over 10 years of doing it this way I can count the number of times I've
been unable to connect to my dev servers on one hand... the one that only
has two fingers and no thumb.
Heh, there is one bonus tho, for direct work, neh? Network problems!
~
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I want the visual capabilities of Dreamweaver combined with a solid code
> editor.
>
> I can't understand why people cry down Dreamweaver's visual editing.
> It saves a great deal of time when designing and laying out a website.
> It also helps tr
I want the visual capabilities of Dreamweaver combined with a solid code editor.
I can't understand why people cry down Dreamweaver's visual editing.
It saves a great deal of time when designing and laying out a website.
It also helps tremendously when you are trying to figure out how your
code o
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Paul Ihrig wrote:
>
> you can turn on/off the put dependent files in the preferances.
> i always leave it off, and don't allow put on save.
> i only upload to ftp by using Ctrl-Shift-U
> personally i love dw as a text editor, as well as visual editor.
>
> i use ul
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Justin Scott wrote:
>
>> Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office.
>
> If the nature of Java apps on the desktop is that they need to have the JVM
> settings tweaked before they run properly, then I would assert that Adobe
> made a poor decision to create CFBui
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> The thing I'm trying (and always have been trying) to avoid is having to run
> local versions of all my server software, which is why ftp with HS+5.5 has
> always worked so well. The dev and prod servers have identical setups so I
> don't run into
you can turn on/off the put dependent files in the preferances.
i always leave it off, and don't allow put on save.
i only upload to ftp by using Ctrl-Shift-U
personally i love dw as a text editor, as well as visual editor.
i use ultra edit because i can use column editing of block of text..
wish
Hey, that link's pretty handy actually.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> that's how I access all of my windows vm's.
>
>
> Here's something that might be useful:
>
> http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-map-a-ftp-to-a-drive-in-windows/
that's how I access all of my windows vm's.
Here's something that might be useful:
http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-map-a-ftp-to-a-drive-in-windows/
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> what's the downside of remoting?
>>
> Surely you've remoted into windows servers before
> Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office.
If the nature of Java apps on the desktop is that they need to have the JVM
settings tweaked before they run properly, then I would assert that Adobe
made a poor decision to create CFBuilder on top of Eclipse. I have no
problem tweaking the settings
h..I don't have that issue. I run several windows vm's on my desktop
which I access via vnc and it's just like sitting in front of real box. The
servers that I administer locally don't have a lag either through Remote
Desktop. The servers that are at a remote location do have a lag t
>
> what's the downside of remoting?
>
Surely you've remoted into windows servers before. You must know that it's a
great tool for doing admin etc but a horrible thing to have to actually do
any amount of work on.
~|
Want to rea
SLLOWW mouse response and keyboard press times...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> not really, you said you don't want to deal with multiple copies of source
> code, why do you want to deal with multiple copies of your IDE?
not really, you said you don't want to deal with multiple copies of source
code, why do you want to deal with multiple copies of your IDE? Seems like
that would be a licensing nightmare.
what's the downside of remoting?
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Are you joking?
> You
I hope so ...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Are you joking?
> You must be.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run
> > whatever ide on it
Are you joking?
You must be.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run
> whatever ide on it.
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > The thing I'm trying (
why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run whatever
ide on it.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> The thing I'm trying (and always have been trying) to avoid is having to run
> local versions of all my server software, which is why ftp with HS+5.5 has
> a
Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> Tweak it grasshopper, tweak it.
>> Eclipse is a dog out of the box, once you get the
>> JVM settings right it's smooth sailing.
>> Google: speeding up Eclipse (or cfbuilder)
>
> I can understa
that's because you're probably using Beta 1 or 2. Beta 2 expired Jan
1. time to d/w the most recent version.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
>> ca
gt; Google: speeding up Eclipse (or cfbuilder)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ras Tafari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:34 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
>
>
> cfbuilder is SLOWER than molass
The thing I'm trying (and always have been trying) to avoid is having to run
local versions of all my server software, which is why ftp with HS+5.5 has
always worked so well. The dev and prod servers have identical setups so I
don't run into "I don't know why it's not working, it worked on my mach
Set up the site as local only, and continue to FTP outside of
Dreamweaver. Also, you can turn off caching on the site.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Do you have a free, easy to implement suggestion?
> So far (the last 10 years or so) using ftp on a dev server has worked
> pe
Now that's funny sh*t right there. I don't care who you are ... ROFLMAO
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Justin Scott wrote:
> Every time I open Dreamweaver I feel like Clippy is going to jump out at
> me any
> moment ask say, "It looks like you're trying to build a web application,
> let
>
2010 12:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
Git for source control, quick and easy to move changes and branch and such.
Then for file management, depends on what systems you are running. If
I'm doing dev on a windows box and deployment on a windows box, go for
Git for source control, quick and easy to move changes and branch and such.
Then for file management, depends on what systems you are running. If
I'm doing dev on a windows box and deployment on a windows box, go for
SyncBack. Great free file sync tool and easy to set up exclusions so
you don't t
y break it.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Scott [mailto:jscott-li...@gravityfree.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
> Source control can be remote also. Set up a source control
> "server". Each developer h
Ah.. thought he was talking about the product in general..
I just use filezilla..
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:47 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at
> Source control can be remote also. Set up a source control
> "server". Each developer has a login and permissions to
> the code. This prevents a couple of things.
>
> The only caveat is that all developers need to be religious
> about updating their local code daily.
Yes, I'm aware it CAN be
>
> "It looks like you're trying to build a web application, let me help you
> with that!"
>
HAHAHA. You've just articulated my feelings perfectly.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them kn
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, morgan l wrote:
>
> Beta 3 is out, beta 2 is expired.
>
>
So I can't just use an update site, I need to actually download Beta 3...
That's kinda stupid considering it's built on eclipse/
~|
W
Nope beta 3 is out. Download it, uninstall whatever version you have (beta 1
or 2) and install 3
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:46 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
On Fri
> Tweak it grasshopper, tweak it.
> Eclipse is a dog out of the box, once you get the
> JVM settings right it's smooth sailing.
> Google: speeding up Eclipse (or cfbuilder)
I can understand having to tweak the JVM for ColdFusion server to get the
best performance out of it given your unique situa
11:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
> +1000 on that, either SVN or git.
> > source control dudeeliminates problems of multiple
> > local copies..you always know the version in source
> > control is current.
Source control is wonderful...
Beta 3 is out, beta 2 is expired.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons >wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
> > capabilities, via Aptana synch.
> >
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Tweak it grasshopper, tweak it.
> Eclipse is a dog out of the box, once you get the JVM settings right it's
> smooth sailing.
>
> Google: speeding up Eclipse (or cfbuilder)
>
>
NO ftp in cfbuilded is 100x slower than Dreamweaver as it op
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
> capabilities, via Aptana synch.
>
>
>
Beta doesn't start anymore :-(
Is this a real product we need to purchase now?
~~
> +1000 on that, either SVN or git.
> > source control dudeeliminates problems of multiple
> > local copies..you always know the version in source
> > control is current.
Source control is wonderful... in certain situations (usually where the code
base is relatively limited and you're wor
o: cf-community
Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
cfbuilder is SLOWER than molasses running up hill in january under a church
for reallz
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Beta 3 is a vast improvement over Beta 2
>
> -Original Message--
Friday, January 22, 2010 11:27 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
>
>
> I gave it a try a little while ago. I just couldn't get into it. Maybe I
> should have another go at it.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote
Beta 3 is a vast improvement over Beta 2
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Help me not hate Dreamweaver.
I gave it a try a little while ago. I just couldn't get into it. Maybe I
should
I gave it a try a little while ago. I just couldn't get into it. Maybe I
should have another go at it.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
> capabilities, via Aptana synch.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Me
I have CFStudio 5 already, the RDS/FTP can be a little wonky sometimes.
Thanks though!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> I might have a copy (Id have to looksee) ... but I do have CFStudio 5 if
> you
> want it.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
>
+1000 on that, either SVN or git.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> source control dudeeliminates problems of multiple local copies..you
> always know the version in source control is current.
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> I decided
Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
capabilities, via Aptana synch.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I decided I'd give DW CS4 the ole' college try on the new system I just put
> together. Every time I've tried in the past I've ditched it within hours.
>
I might have a copy (Id have to looksee) ... but I do have CFStudio 5 if you
want it.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I decided I'd give DW CS4 the ole' college try on the new system I just put
> together. Every time I've tried in the past I've ditched it within hours.
> Sinc
Do you have a free, easy to implement suggestion?
So far (the last 10 years or so) using ftp on a dev server has worked
perfectly for my needs. I'm often guilty of the "if it ain't broke don't fix
it" philosophy.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com>
from my experience, the ftp portion of DW has always sucked and always spiked
the processor. I don't think there's any way around it other than not using
the ftp portion.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I decided I'd give DW CS4 the ole' college try on the new system I just p
source control dudeeliminates problems of multiple local copies..you
always know the version in source control is current.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I decided I'd give DW CS4 the ole' college try on the new system I just put
> together. Every time I've tried in the
I decided I'd give DW CS4 the ole' college try on the new system I just put
together. Every time I've tried in the past I've ditched it within hours.
Since I can't find HS+ 5.5 install anywhere I think I'm stuck with DW this
time. The part that is driving me absolutely nucking futs is the whole "p
54 matches
Mail list logo
