Well, what do you expect from a man who was raised by Democratic liberals?
;-\
On 6/12/06, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one:
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/06/10/fallen_star_blames_self_gop_tactics/
>
> I'm sure there are others...
fice?
>
> Again, this is just questioning the facts as you have put them
> forward.
>
> You said he was NEVER legally elected.
>
> Are you also calling into doubt the second election?
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Maureen [mailto:[E
acts as you have put them forward.
>
> You said he was NEVER legally elected.
>
> Are you also calling into doubt the second election?
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:20 PM
> > To: CF-Community
&
> tBone wrote:
> So accusing a man of sending thousands of men, boys really, to their deaths
> for a personal gain motive isn't vindictive?
>
It may be, but it's attacking policy first and the person second.
Moreover, Bush is a policy maker. While I'm not in favor of the
personal attack, Bush is
What part of the constitution was violated?
I know the document pretty well, and I am failing to see it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow relat
I'd go with the Bush and the Limbaugh.
Don't know enough about Delay to vote.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
&g
oore. They are all tools.
> >
> > You know why no one is happy with our government? Because all
> government
> > sucks ass. That's why. However we as humans can not live and
> be productive
> > without some structure to stop us from stealing and killing to
emographic.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
>
> > tBone wrote:
> > Come on man, more does the same thi
> tBone wrote:
> You know why no one is happy with our government? Because all government
> sucks ass. That's why.
Ha! Awsome. Testify muh brutha.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208894
Archives: h
aterial support, or comfort, to the enemies of the
> United States.
>
> That is the definition of treason.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:27 PM
> > To: CF-Community
>
MITED government.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:41 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
> >
> > I don't know that I would define m
y
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
> I don't know that I would define myself as far left. I'm more of a
> radical, in that I hate all politicians, left and right. I don't
> despise Bush for being a neo-con, I despise him for what he and his
do we really need to go over the technical issues of presidential elections
again? if you don't like the electoral college, propose an amendment to the
constitution.
it is you who is seriously deluded. the only question the supreme court
addressed was the due process issue of Katherine Harris cert
I don't know that I would define myself as far left. I'm more of a
radical, in that I hate all politicians, left and right. I don't
despise Bush for being a neo-con, I despise him for what he and his
minions are doing to demantle this underpinings of this country
because I think their actions do
Yes it is.
He has not provided material support, or comfort, to the enemies of the
United States.
That is the definition of treason.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is
> tBone wrote:
> Come on man, more does the same thing, he's accused bush of treason and shit
> like that before.
>
Maybe, but I don't see it as the same due to the underlying policy
question. For example Pat Buchanan has recently said that Bush is
treasonous if he fails to enforce his constituti
Of the Fifty-nine Deceits, half are outright lies. As for being from
Flint, he was born in a hospital in Flint, so technically he can say
he's from there, I guess.
You've weasely assigned Coulters technique to Bush, DeLay and Limbaugh
as if it were true. That is not the case and sneaking it in as a
*to everyone else:*
I want to know, but I don't want to know, you know?
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accusing Bush of treason would not be a lie.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:20
Start with these two. I can give you more if you need.
Fifty-nine Deceits in Fahrenheit 9/11
http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf
Unfairenheit 9/11
The lies of Michael Moore.
By Christopher Hitchens
http://www.slate.com/id/2102723/
On 6/12/06, Maureen wrote:
> No, just a link will be fi
Accusing Bush of treason would not be a lie.
On 6/12/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Come on man, more does the same thing, he's accused bush of treason and shit
> like that before.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion
ought it from a news agency.
>
> Seriously. Two big things that have pushed you into loon job corner of
> late, first the "bush wasn't elected" comment, now this.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Mond
Come on man, more does the same thing, he's accused bush of treason and shit
like that before.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:20 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to R
She's always been a far left loon job, but at least she admits it.
On 6/12/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you serious?
>
> God this is as bad as some right winger defending Coulter or Limbaugh.
>
> Serious, he makes shit up. He is currently being sued for using a quote
> wrong f
> Sam wrote:
> Moore is a chronic liar.
He's a liar of omission; equal to George Bush, Tom Delay, or Rush
Limbaugh. In all cases these people distort the truth and/or build
arguments by omitting facts to meet their own ends.
Ann Coulter differs in that she specifically adds an attack on the
pers
t; comment, now this.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:07 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
> On 6/12/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/9/06, Maureen
On 6/12/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Maureen wrote:
>
> > Repeatedly claiming that Moore lies doesn't make him a liar. It only
> > makes you a shill of his opponents.
>
> Moore is a chronic liar. He's not even from Flint he's from Davison.
> Do I really have to post all his outr
On 6/9/06, Maureen wrote:
> Repeatedly claiming that Moore lies doesn't make him a liar. It only
> makes you a shill of his opponents.
Moore is a chronic liar. He's not even from Flint he's from Davison.
Do I really have to post all his outright lies again?
> If the survivors of these men use
Sam is merely pointing out the obvious. Michael Moore and Ann Coulter are
both professional partisans. Coulter's methods involve insult, invective,
and a good deal of Bible-thumping. Moore's methods involve distortion and
omission. He knows, just like she does, that red meat sells.
On 6/9/06, Mau
On 6/8/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Mooore uses outright lies to make his point.
Repeatedly claiming that Moore lies doesn't make him a liar. It only
makes you a shill of his opponents.
> Coulter uses nasty speech.
>
> I don't like her Coulter because of her methods but that does
These last two are still very harsh, but kind of funny, especially if you
know how much she hates Susan Sarandon and Cher (Witches of Eastwick).
Moreover, these women have put themselves in the limelight, and as
politicians and celebs know, once you become a public figure, the gloves
come off and e
On 6/8/06, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> It is a very simple question, Sam.
>
> Do you think it is OK?
"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to
divorce these harpies?
Not OK
Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and
appear in Playboy..."
borderline but
Michael Mooore uses outright lies to make his point.
Coulter uses nasty speech.
I don't like her Coulter because of her methods but that doesn't mean
I don't agree with her often.
Her point that these women, like Cindy Shehan, are using their victim
status to for fame and politics and I think it'
It is a very simple question, Sam.
Do you think it is OK?
> > > No, Sam, she didn't say "something like these four women could us
> > > their husband's deaths".
> > >
> > > She said:
> > >
> > > "And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to
> > > divorce these harpies? Now th
Michael Moore goes over the top to sell his movies, but that doesn't make
the content of his messages wrong. He could have easily made a valid point
in a respectful way but hey that doesn't get press.
Sam, either you hate this kind of extremist drivel, or you don't. Which is
it?
On 6/8/06, Sam <[
Well like I said I think she goes over the top to sell books, but that
doesn't make the content of her message wrong. She could have easily
made a valid point in a respectful way but hey that doesn't get press.
Kristen Breitweiser isn't so nice herself:
http://newsbusters.org/node/5745
On 6/8/06
She is the Right's counterpart to Michael Moore, a huckster who, as you say,
pushes an extreme viewpoint in order to sell books. I don't think she is
broken, though. I think she knows exactly what she is doing.
On 6/8/06, Gruss wrote:
>
>
> It's just incisive blather to get people worked up so th
> Maureen wrote:
> It
> bafffles me that anyone would give credance to anything that comes out
> of her mouth. She is the poster child for everything that is wrong
> with neo-conservative movement.
She's the epitome of demagoguery. She might as well be saying, "the
Jew is using the black man to
To put it succinctly: What a bitch.
On 6/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, Sam, she didn't say "something like these four women could us
> their husband's deaths".
>
> She said:
>
> "And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to
> divorce these harpies? Now
No, Sam, she didn't say "something like these four women could us
their husband's deaths".
She said:
"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to
divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd
better hurry up and appear in Playboy..."
"I've never seen
I have fully admitted in the past to be a bigot when it comes to
stupid people, and Ann Coulter is that the top of my list. It
bafffles me that anyone would give credance to anything that comes out
of her mouth. She is the poster child for everything that is wrong
with neo-conservative movement.
Using your lingo, did you just Rove her?
I'm not a supporter, she obviously says these things to sell books,
but she said something like these four women could use their husband's
deaths to campaign for Kerry and nobody can say boo to them. Maybe
she's right.
On 6/7/06, Maureen wrote:
> General c
General consensus on Ann the Man is that she has more between her legs
than silk panties, but I just always figured she was the love child of
Strom Thurmund and Phyllis Schlafly.
On 6/7/06, Skorp Croze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. She is a freaky freak.
>
> And the sad thing is, as heroin thi
work => word..damn I hate it when a joke is ruined by a misspelling
On 6/7/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know, that psuedo adam's apple might make it hard.no, not
> the right work.difficult to perform.
>
>
> On 6/7/06, Skorp Croze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know, that psuedo adam's apple might make it hard.no, not
the right work.difficult to perform.
On 6/7/06, Skorp Croze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. She is a freaky freak.
>
> And the sad thing is, as heroin thin and as hideaous a human being as
> she is, I'd still throw a grud
Aliases rok. :)
Skorp Croze wrote:
> Yep. She is a freaky freak.
>
> And the sad thing is, as heroin thin and as hideaous a human being as
> she is, I'd still throw a grudge-f*ck at her.
>
> On 6/7/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> from CNN:
>>
>> Coulter writes in a new book,
Yep. She is a freaky freak.
And the sad thing is, as heroin thin and as hideaous a human being as
she is, I'd still throw a grudge-f*ck at her.
On 6/7/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from CNN:
>
> Coulter writes in a new book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism,"
> that a group
from CNN:
Coulter writes in a new book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism,"
that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World
Trade Center act "as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."
She also wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands'
deaths so much
47 matches
Mail list logo
