Between the NDAA, Patriot Act and the National Defense Resources
Preparedness executive order, I'm not sure those things are as far away as
you seem to think.
As a matter of fact 1 has happened (Katrina), 2 has happened (NSA
warrantless wiretapping, NSA is mainly US military), 4 happened (Katrina
I read it. It goes a long way to answer my original question.
I wonder how many of those "I will NOT" are easy oaths to make because
we have the luxury of not being put in any of those positions in the
foreseeable future.
When it really comes down to it, I expect few to actually follow them i
I read it all and appreciate it. Not entirely sure that I agree with
every little piece, but good stuff to think upon. Thank you.
Judah
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> tl;dr?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusi
tl;dr?
2012/4/6 LRS Scout
> ---
>
> Oath of Enlistment
> I, _, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
> Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
> domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
> I will
---
Oath of Enlistment
I, _, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
I will obey the orders of the President of the Un
It depends. There are very strict conditions where the military can be
used in the US, including maintaining civil order, suppressing
rebellion, natural disasters etc. But you are using the phrase illegal
order in a very loose way. Illegal order if I remember correctly
refers to an order from a su
Hmmm, you must have missed the part where I said an illegal order.
It would be illegal to order soldiers to violate the constitutional rights
of citizens.
I feel it should be illegal to use the military domestically for anything
other than an invasion from an outside source.
Posse comitatus cov
Then they are violating the UMCJ and should be dealt with. Refusing to
obey a legal order strikes at the heart of military discipline. If
they do not want to follow orders then those bozos should not be in
the military.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:25 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> It'll split.
>
> I've k
It'll split.
I've known guys in the Army who actually believed that their should be a
military junta, and I've known oathkeeprs and others that wouldn't follow
an illegal order.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:39 PM, PT wrote:
>
> I have often wondered...when people have finally had enough and start
I have often wondered...when people have finally had enough and start
resisting, and the military eventually gets involved, who will the
military side with? The government? The people? Whichever side lets
them have their jollies?
I hope I never find out, but some generation is probably goin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya2TmSmbUQI
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-communit
11 matches
Mail list logo
