Hi Sam,
Replies are inline.
Gruss
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What makes you think any country would let them form a new
government in Saudi Arabia?
They're not looking for permission.They're planning the same thing
in Saudi Arabia as they did in
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're not looking for permission.They're
planning the same thing
in Saudi Arabia as they did in Afghanistan
And what did we do in Afghanistan? Do you think the
Taliban could reform in Afghanistan? No. How about
Saudi Arabia? I doubt it.
- in fact
Hi Sam,
I think we've established that it's a complicated issue.
I think where we differ is that you feel the US military actions have
been successful at stopping terrorism.My point would be that it
cannot be stopped as long as we have something someone else wants and
they're will to use lethal
I thought you said they wanted to take over the Saudi
Arabian government and once there is a country to
attack the world will join together as in Afghanistan.
If they remain in hiding and rely on terrorism, and I
believe that to be the case, then it will drag on and
we have something to agree on.
The US has maintained a military presence in the Middle East for 40
years primarily to guarantee a stable oil supply. The doesn't mean to
take the oil - just to make sure it's flowing and available for
purchase; markets hate uncertainty.
Consider what happened in the first 2 weeks of August 2004:
Aren't you supposed to post your sources for these things when you copy
and paste?
:-)
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The US has maintained a military presence in the Middle East for 40
years primarily to guarantee a stable oil supply. The doesn't
Maybe he works for FoxNews and is just making it up.
- Original Message -
From: Angel Stewart
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: It's for the oil
Aren't you supposed to post your sources for these things when you copy
and paste?
:-)
-Gel
[Todays
Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:35:01 -0400
Subject: RE: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aren't you supposed to post your sources for these things when you copy
and paste?
:-)
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
And we believe the BBC why exactly?
No, seriously, all of the content is my original writing - the ideas,
however, are a summary of lots of sources I can send you if you'd
like.and I did quote the BBC News are a source!
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
erm, whom do we believe?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:15:25 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And we believe the BBC why exactly?
No, seriously, all of the content is my original
Fox Mulder?
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
erm, whom do we believe?
Dana
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fox Mulder?
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
erm, whom do we believe?
Dana
[Todays Threads]
[This Message
Because Mr. Bin Laden wants something we have - Saudi Arabia. Being a
Muslim, Mr. Bin Laden would like a new government in the country that
contains the 2 most holy cities in Islam, Mecca and Medina.
I disagree. Bin Laden wants an Islamic empire stretching from Spain to Pakistan and down to
the way I understand it.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:00:32 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because Mr. Bin Laden wants something we have - Saudi Arabia. Being a
Muslim, Mr. Bin Laden would
a true
picture. :)
_
erm, whom do we believe?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:15:25 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And we believe the BBC why exactly?
No, seriously, all of the content
]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:15:06 -0400
Subject: RE: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple, non-related news sources compiled together with other information.
I KNOW that just about every news agency has their own biases and agendas.
They also feed off of each others news
I think bin Laden is offended by Saudi ties to the US, which he sees
as morally corrupt.
Of course the Saudis are interested in internal stabilty, as are most
regimes. They do face an internal challenge from the Muslim version of
the religious right.
Absolutely, every government wants internal
agreed.
I'd deplore either of those eventualities but if enacted by an elected
government... I mean, you either believe in the system or you don't.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:54:17 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF
Should he have footnoted?
Hi Dana,
It would be impossible for me to footnote since I didn't include
anybody's content.I originally wrote them just to organize my own
thoughts on things, and I wrote 2: one on fiscal policy (America the
Bankrupt) and the second on foreign policy (Iraq: the real
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Bin Laden would like a new government in
the country that
contains the 2 most holy cities in Islam, Mecca and
Medina.
Al Qaeda had a country they could hide in and now
thatÂ’s gone. What on earth makes you think any country
would let them form a new
20 matches
Mail list logo
