Depends on how you've declared your account -
Business accounts pay less in surcharges and different taxes than
residential lines do. However, they cost more per month. Go figure.
Hatton
~|
This list and all House of Fusion r
I'm looking at Voicewing from Verizon. $30 on top of my DSL of $30 for a total
of $60 a month. $30 or more less than what I'm paying now. The question is on
taxes, surcharges and the like. Same, more or less?
~|
Find out how CFT
Eh. Every once in a while I have to throw out one of those completely
out of character comments. Keeps em guessing. ;)
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:32:55 -0500, Erika L. Walker-Arnold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /me suddenly worries about Deanna
>
> >>| -Original Message-
> >>| From: Dean
Gee. a weather thread and I missed a chance to mention New Mexico :)
Actually it's been a bit cool and rainy here. But mostly at night.
It's 46 right now. I was out doing stuff this afternoon and it was
pleasantly sunny wearing a long-sleeved Tshirt and light jacket. I'd
guess we have been running
Low 77 High 85 everyday 24/7/365...bundled up? how do
you do that?
tee hee
Katie
--- Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its currently 63 here in DC. It felt like Los
> Angeles here on New Years, I
> was able to go out wearing a light jacket instead of
> being totally bundled
> up.
>
> E
/me suddenly worries about Deanna
>>| -Original Message-
>>| From: Deanna Schneider
>>|
>>| And painful too. Especially when you're naked. Oh wait. Did I say
>>| that. Shh. I do NOT have an ice pellet fetish. ;)
~~
To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Weather (RE: Anybody using IP Phones?)
> >
> > global warming sucks doesnt it :)
> >
> > we are chillin at a balmy 61 here in salisbury, good stuff!
> >
> > tw
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:01:32 -0500
This type of weather is actually normal for Kentucky. Below 0 one week, 60s the
next, then below 0 again.
That is similar to the weather in the plains of Montana, one of the places of
my childhood. One could have a blizzard from the north that dumps several
inches of snow one day, then a few
This type of weather is actually normal for Kentucky. Below 0 one week, 60s
the next, then below 0 again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 4:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Weather (RE: Anybody
global warming sucks doesnt it :)
we are chillin at a balmy 61 here in salisbury, good stuff!
tw
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:01:32 -0500, Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its currently 63 here in DC. It felt like Los Angeles here on New Years, I
> was able to go out wearing a light jacket in
Its currently 63 here in DC. It felt like Los Angeles here on New Years, I
was able to go out wearing a light jacket instead of being totally bundled
up.
Except for one week of fairly cold weather, its been downright mild this
year.
Happy New Years everyone
Sandy
~
> ...ICE PELLETS!!???
> What the heck is an ICE Pellet!??
> That just sounds Dangerous.
And painful too. Especially when you're naked. Oh wait. Did I say
that. Shh. I do NOT have an ice pellet fetish. ;)
~|
Special thanks to
Low 20s?
That ain't nothing. We got down to below 0 at one point here in Kentucky.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 3:35 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Weather (RE: Anybody using IP Phones
It's been in the 60's here the last several days ... And this is exactly
how I like it. Warm enough to work outside without a coat, but cold
enough in the evening to light a fire. :)
We had a few weeks of cold though, low 20's. GrrBrrr!!! You all can have
that weather!
Cheers,
Erika
>>| -Ori
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:55 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>>
>> All part of the fun of living in the midwest, and I wouldn't trade it for
>> anything.
>>
>>
>> > Oh it is, i
Yeah, its really pretty fun.
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> All part of the fun of living in the midwest, and I wouldn't trade it fo
Oh we get the ice storms too, had one the week before Christmas, kept a lot
of people from getting anywhere.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Pho
Ahh. Yes, that makes sense. We had to wait whilst everything was turned
off ours. DSL, Distinctive ring, etc. After that it was fine.
/me sends a whole batch a fresh blueberry muffins ...
Cheers,
Erika
--
>>| -Original Message-
>>| From: N
They're all over my lawn this morning. Damn ice rabbits.
- Jim
Angel Stewart wrote:
>...ICE PELLETS!!???
>What the heck is an ICE Pellet!??
>That just sounds Dangerous.
>
>-Gel
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Campbell
>
>I'll trade you high-quality IP telephony for your weather anyd
All part of the fun of living in the midwest, and I wouldn't trade it for
anything.
> Oh it is, it is. Almost as bad as black ice. Hit some of that this
> weekend. Four wheel drive means nothing to black ice. Even the
> eighteen-wheeler was skidding sideways. And then there are the snow
> snakes
Oh it is, it is. Almost as bad as black ice. Hit some of that this
weekend. Four wheel drive means nothing to black ice. Even the
eighteen-wheeler was skidding sideways. And then there are the snow
snakes. Elusive buggers. And quicksnow. Drifting snow that covers the
roads and swallows whole SUVs.
Angel Stewart wrote:
> ...ICE PELLETS!!???
> What the heck is an ICE Pellet!??
> That just sounds Dangerous.
>
> -Gel
>
I guess that means that you don't know how Chicago-ans use a lawn chair
in the middle of winter.
--
2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant.
Ron Artest: Extremely flaw
...ICE PELLETS!!???
What the heck is an ICE Pellet!??
That just sounds Dangerous.
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell
I'll trade you high-quality IP telephony for your weather anyday :)
Compare:
Trinidad: http://www.wunderground.com/global/TD.html
Chicago:
http://www.wunderg
2 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
What do you mean they can't port the number?
They are porting ours ... ??
Cheers,
Erika
--
>>| -Original Message-
>>| From: Nick McClure
>>|
>>| Von
py to
catch that one.
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> What do you mean they can't port the number?
>
I'll trade you high-quality IP telephony for your weather anyday :)
Compare:
Trinidad: http://www.wunderground.com/global/TD.html
Chicago:
http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=Chicago%2C+IL
- Jim
Angel Stewart wrote:
>*grumbles and mutters about backward Trinidad
What do you mean they can't port the number?
They are porting ours ... ??
Cheers,
Erika
--
>>| -Original Message-
>>| From: Nick McClure
>>|
>>| Vonage.com doesn't provide distinctive ring functions.
>>| Infact they can't
>>| even port th
*grumbles and mutters about backward Trinidad 800 number service*
^_^
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold
Another thing we have, which works fabulously, is a number in the UK.
Now our UK resellers and friends can all call us here in the states, and it's a
local call f
Vonage.com doesn't provide distinctive ring functions. Infact they can't
even port the number if it is enabled.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:15 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Anybody
Another thing we have, which works fabulously, is a number in the UK.
Now our UK resellers and friends can all call us here in the states, and
it's a local call for them.
Only costs us $5.00 a month.
Cheers,
Erika
~|
Special tha
m: Matthew Blatchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> Static IP's are only if you get multiple phonesat least on
> LingoI wouldn't be surprised if Vonage used a simil
thew Blatchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> Static IP's are only if you get multiple phonesat least on
> LingoI wouldn't be surprised if Vonage used a similar setup
Our Vonage router has two outlets for Phone lines.
I don't know about distinctive rings (we used to have it with our bell
south line) - but I would assume if you had two different phone sets
plugged in, you would get 2 distinctive rings :)
We have an 800 number as well, and it's set to one of our
directly off a Cable Modem.
It only get complicated when you want to use multiple phone lines...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Adkins, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
We're using Vonage and have two lines. One phone and one fax.
We use it on our DHCP Cable line with no problems whatsoever.
I can't answer any of your other questions, but just wanted to let you
know we're working on DHCP.
Cheers,
Erika
--
>>| --
tly off a Cable
Modem.
It only get complicated when you want to use multiple phone lines...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Adkins, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
&
Message-
From: Matthew Blatchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 12:48 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
I use Lingo phonesthey seem to have an issue when multiple phones
are usedthey explained to me that a switch and multiple static IPs
I hadn't heard that, but it does make sense.
Guess that requires multiple bridges as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Blatchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 12:48 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
don't
work. One phone seems to work fine...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:41 AM
Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
> Well, if you disconnect your phone wh
gt; Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> I've considered it. But one of the things I actually use the phone for
> is to call my cable company when the network is down. That could get
> tricky if the phone runs over the
gt; Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> I've considered it. But one of the things I actually use the phone for
> is to call my cable company when the network is down. That could get
> tricky if the phone runs over the
nal Message-
> From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 8:57 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> I have been looking at it for the residential plan, since I use DSL.
> Just curious if it will work with cordle
y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:19 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
>
> You might ask them about porting your existing number - I was able to
> port my numbers directly into Packet8's system. It takes some time to
&
I'm using Vonage, one thing I've had problems with is getting my number
transferred over, that has been a major issue.
However that is going to depend on your location, different telcos operate
in different ways. While the laws say that have to, there are other
obstacles that are in the way.
I us
I've considered it. But one of the things I actually use the phone for
is to call my cable company when the network is down. That could get
tricky if the phone runs over the network connection.
-Kevin
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:05:17 -0500, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're going over our
> The DTA-310 has one phone jack that can support up to three phones. You
> could buy a multiple analog jack extension connector and plug it into
> the DTA-310 phone jack.
That is something you'll run into called REN (ringer equivalent
number) and is a limitation of the DTA.
In my case I simply
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 8:57 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Anybody using IP Phones?
I have been looking at it for the residential plan, since I use DSL.
Just curious if it will work with cordless phones?
Have the one main phone and all the other lines be the normal cordless
the Packet8 phones?
-Original Message-
From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Anybody using IP Phones?
> I use Digital Phone from Time Warner and I love it. The only thing I
> miss is 3-way calling.
> I use Digital Phone from Time Warner and I love it. The only thing I
> miss is 3-way calling. My co-worker uses Vonage and has never
> complained he recommended it to me when he found out I was using Time
> Warners which is about 2 times as much but vonage doesn;t have the
> area code I need yet
I use Digital Phone from Time Warner and I love it. The only thing I
miss is 3-way calling. My co-worker uses Vonage and has never
complained he recommended it to me when he found out I was using Time
Warners which is about 2 times as much but vonage doesn;t have the
area code I need yet so I am ho
> We're going over our bills and looking for ways to cut back. One thing that
> looks interesting is IP Phone service like Vonage.com The basic plan is
> nearly $40 cheaper than our current service for mostly the same features.
>
> Anybody using it (or something like it)? Thoughts?
I'm using t
51 matches
Mail list logo
