le to get a clearer picture of just how distorted the political new
is by the time it gets to us.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:ow...@threeravensconsulting.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: More dishonorable tactics by the
rry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:45 PM
> >> To: cf-community
> >> Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
> >>
> >>
> >> And if the situation were reversed? It would be "by
;>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:45 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
>>
>>
>> And if the situation were reversed? It
"No one has tried to pin Grayson's remarks on the 'left' or the Democratic
party. Yet this kid is seen as the voice of the 'right'."
Grayson's party was not mentioned one time in the thread.
Larry did add a post calling out a Republican by party for tactics. Go
figure.
"Funny (in a sad, predi
t Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:52 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
>
>
> Funny (in a sad, predictable kind of way) how the actions of one
> Republican is viewed as 'this is what the
That is because he has been championed by the right and held up as a model
republican activist.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
No one
That's because this seems to be the norm with Republicans, but not with
democrats.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:52 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
Funny (in
see his post about Grayson earlier today...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:45 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
>
>
> And if the situati
s
wrote:
>
> He was sure championed by them when he faked the video about Acorn...i am
> surprised Fox didn't offer him a job.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:04 PM
> To: cf-communit
No, what do they say about consistency?
It's tough to use in a haiku?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> well you know what they say about consistency.
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah...go see his post about Grayson earlier tod
2010 4:45 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
>
>
> And if the situation were reversed? It would be "by the left" and not
> "by a jerk who happens to identify and work for the left."
>
> All to often I've s
Yeah...go see his post about Grayson earlier today...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:45 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
And if the situation were reversed? It would
That is true, I'll give you that as currently it is 0 out of 3 doing the
right thing.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
Great poin
I didn't know you swing that way Jerry ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:21 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
Hey.
I would back my posterior in rigorous intelle
to:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
Not only that, but if you consider this an attack "by the right" then
you also have to consider the warning the reporter got to be "by the
right&q
He was sure championed by them when he faked the video about Acorn...i am
surprised Fox didn't offer him a job.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics b
>
> (Plus it lets them add another "u" in the middle of a word
> all unexpected-like.)
>
I know. It's unfortunate that people who speak American rarely speak English
as well.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://
c [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right...
To|too|two is to Larry what your|you're is to Sam.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Larry C. Lyons
wrote:
>
> And if the situation were
To Canadians, they are all the same.
They really want to spell it "tou", since they all sound the same as the
middle of the word "about".
(Plus it lets them add another "u" in the middle of a word all
unexpected-like.)
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> To|too|two is to Larry
To|too|two is to Larry what your|you're is to Sam.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> And if the situation were reversed? It would be "by the left" and not
> "by a jerk who happens to identify and work for the left."
>
> All to often I've seen the right wingnuts practic
Hopefully not by me.
What others do should not (and I hope does not) affect how I handle the same
situation.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> And if the situation were reversed? It would be "by the left" and not
> "by a jerk who happens to identify and work for the l
And if the situation were reversed? It would be "by the left" and not
"by a jerk who happens to identify and work for the left."
All to often I've seen the right wingnuts practice do as I say not as I do.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> i wouldn't consider that "by the
ight credit only for their
> douche moves, in which case you're really no better than they are.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:04 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More dishonorable
Hey.
I would back my posterior in rigorous intellectual competition against
anyone's.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> > i wouldn't consider that "by the right", but instead "by a jerk who
> happens
> > to identify and work for the right."
> >
> > If, on the other
f course, you're going to give the right credit only for their
douche moves, in which case you're really no better than they are.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More
> i wouldn't consider that "by the right", but instead "by a jerk who happens
> to identify and work for the right."
>
> If, on the other hand, the right starts to champion him, then in my mind
> they would become conflated.
When it comes to this situation, I'm going to have to defer to the
comed
i wouldn't consider that "by the right", but instead "by a jerk who happens
to identify and work for the right."
If, on the other hand, the right starts to champion him, then in my mind
they would become conflated.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.co
27 matches
Mail list logo
