RE: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread cameronc
d truthfully, the last thing I want govt. is meddling with my retirement plans. Marlon > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:schmidt@;hungrycow.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:28 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on social security > >

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Kevin Schmidt
I understand, I have to pay the taxes, I just don't agree with it. - Original Message - From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:34 AM Subject: RE: More on social security >

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Deanna Schneider
You know, what everyone seems to be forgetting here is that social security isn't just about retirement. Social security provides benefits for children whose parents die (my hubbie got SS payments when his mom died when he was 4), individuals whom for whatever reason have a disability that keeps th

RE: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Nick McClure
10:28 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on social security > > I am a decent person, I help people out all the time. I donate my time > to > the local homeless shelter, give food to the foodbank, and other various > charities. I go to town meetings and you want to

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Kevin Schmidt
F-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:15 AM Subject: Re: More on social security > Its called being a decent personyou are decent how can you just say ahh > fuckem if they for whatever reason arent able to make it after retirement?? > Shit hap

RE: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Timothy Heald
re..well i dont know that, but i cant really see it as being "American" ideals to let the guy become homeless and live on the street. - Original Message - From: "Timothy Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread William Wheatley
really see it as being "American" ideals to let the guy become homeless and live on the street. - Original Message - From: "Timothy Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:28 AM Sub

RE: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Timothy Heald
Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: More on social security HAHA thats true Phoeun but you'll learn us americans dont like that crap we'd rather ship our parents off to a home cause we dont want them cramping our style. Though there are people who still do res

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread William Wheatley
ge - From: "Phoeun Pha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: RE: More on social security > Personally, I think Social Security only works well in a society where > people do not take care

Re: More on social security

2002-10-22 Thread Marlon Moyer
Yes Cameron, if SS was a retirement plan, privatization might be a good idea. Unfortunately, like I said before, SS is a tax to fund a social program. Therefore giving people the ability to invest "their" contributions isn't a great idea. What would be the impetus to invest correctly when yo

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread cameronc
ail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:marlon@;mcmoyer.com] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:47 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on social security > > > Cameron, I agree with you that social security isn't the answer to

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Harkins,Patrick
well we can always hope that kelsey got a new job! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cameronc@;mindspring.com] > Subject: RE: More on social security > > > You're argument hold no water > > My spelling and grammer apparently also "h

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Phoeun Pha
I wonder...if we were only taxed on goods we buy, maybe we would have more money to spend more goods! -Original Message- From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:marlon@;mcmoyer.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:47 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: More on social security Cameron, I agree with

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread cameronc
Inc. --- cell: 678-637-5072 aim: cameroncf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cameronc@;mindspring.com] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:35 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: More on social security > > > >

3.4 trillion WAS RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Phoeun Pha
http://www.probe.org/docs/c-balance.html -Original Message- From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:phoeunp@;entelligence.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:30 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: More on social security I assume that they would be in the small numbers, and they can be supported by

Re: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Marlon Moyer
ting is a long term consideration. > >-Cameron > >- >Cameron Childress >Sumo Consulting Inc. >--- >cell: 678-637-5072 >aim: cameroncf >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Marlon Moyer [mailto

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Candace Cottrell
And I could also use that money that would've gone to SS for a brand new car :) It's more of an obligation really. -Original Message- From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:marlon@;mcmoyer.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:20 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: More on social security

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Phoeun Pha
nment spent but can't account for??? hm? 3 trillioN!!! -Original Message- From: BethF [mailto:dawg@;alaska.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:30 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: More on social security > Personally, I think Social Security only works well

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread cameronc
ing Inc. --- cell: 678-637-5072 aim: cameroncf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:marlon@;mcmoyer.com] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:20 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on social security > > > > > > > >It

Re: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread BethF
> Personally, I think Social Security only works well in a society where > people do not take care of their elders very well. And I mean on the family > level. Me, I have to take care of my mom till the day she dies! It's kinda > like an honor system. She raised and took care of me so that I wi

RE: More on social security

2002-10-21 Thread Phoeun Pha
bject: Re: More on social security > > >It's not an easy problem to solve, but the argument that private investing >could somehow return a lower % than SS is invalid in every possible way. > > Jeez Cameron, what kind of financial planner have you been talking with. How c