t;To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:04 PM
>Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> > > > Surely that is essentially christian? Like saying Church of England?
> > >
> > > AUG!
>
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:04 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> > > Surely that is essentially christian? Like saying Church of England?
> >
> > AUG!
> > NO. not like that at all
> > there is no ch
> > Surely that is essentially christian? Like saying Church of England?
>
> AUG!
> NO. not like that at all
> there is no church of the US because its unconstitutional
Just a bit of history here - the Church of England was created by Henry
the Eigth so that he could divorce one of his wives - th
Maureen,
from here, it looks very south.
;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:19 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> Kansas...not a so
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_417000/417996.stm
About Kansas legislation
Benjamin
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was:
Kansas passed a law ... but I'm not sure of the status of it.
H.
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Is it correct that there are
http://www.pacel.com
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
>--
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fleischer, Beth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:34 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> >
I don't think there is pressure. But if a candidate was openly not
religious or followed a non -Christian religion he would probably not get far.
At 07:39 PM 12/19/2001 +, you wrote:
>OK. So there is a pressure on the president to behave in a 'christian' way,
>whether or not those are his be
Kansas...not a southern state. Someone who suggested that here in Georgia
would be laughed all the way to the state line.
At 02:46 PM 12/19/01, you wrote:
>i know its been a hot topic in the south - folks dont' want their kids
>taught this, but i don't think its at the state level but at the s
(703) 393-2659
Web: http://www.ebstor.com
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:42 PM
> To: CF
://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:42 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understa
-Original Message-
> From: Fleischer, Beth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> I wish
>
> no will, the religious right is too hung up on folks
cool. thats what I thought. I suppose there is pressure here too for the
prime minister to be.
will
-Original Message-
From: Fleischer, Beth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 19:44
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
there is pre
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Is it correct that there are certain US state(s) where the Theory of
Evolution cannot be taught at school? Or is that another popular
misconception?
will
-Original Message-
From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
10:42 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> Is it correct that there are certain US state(s) where the Theory of
> Evolution cannot be taught at school? Or is that another popular
> misconception?
>
> will
>
> -Or
there is pressure for the president to be religious himself.
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> OK.
-
> From: Fleischer, Beth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> I wish
>
> no will, the religious right is too hung up on folks needing to be
> religous
>
:34
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
I wish
no will, the religious right is too hung up on folks needing to be
religous
in order to be moral for that to have happened.
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> I wish
>
> no will, the religious right is too hung up on folks needing to be
> religous
> in or
CTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 19:32
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
AUG!
NO. not like that at all
there is no church of the US because its unconstitutional
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, D
- the majority of folks are christian, just different types.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:29 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> At 08
t; Sent: 18 December 2001 21:53
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> WHAT?
>
> no the president doesn't have to be a christian - that violates our
> countries freedom of religion rights.
>
> I don't t
AUG!
NO. not like that at all
there is no church of the US because its unconstitutional
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:01 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never unders
Cheers Erika :)
Hows it going?
will
-Original Message-
From: Erika L Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2001 17:11
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>>|From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>|
>>|Can a
Yes, but how many of them are Neo-pagans? It all goes back to definition.
Lets take what I have seen as the average Neo-Pagan:
A female who is from a Jewish family who has little or no religious
background and is looking for something spiritual but doesn't want what her
parents rejected. I'd h
s on Sunday because it's such a
positive and uplifting vibe.
Michael Corrigan
Programmer
Endora Digital Solutions
www.endoradigital.com
630/942-5211 x-134
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: RE:
Hence the reason I posted the second link... it includes Neo-Pagan (which is
based on a census from CoG)
Hatton
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:42 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (
At 08:43 AM 12/19/01, you wrote:
>Just for grins, here's another version with more interesting results
>
>http://www.adherents.com/adh_dem.html
from the site: Neo-pagan (incl. Wiccans) 768,400
Heck, there are that many just on alt.pagans arguing about what pagan
means.
_
At 08:43 AM 12/19/01, you wrote:
> > I think the majority religion in the US is none.
>
>I did a search with Ask.com just for grins and came across this page:
>
>http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/us.html#People
>
>"Religions: Protestant 56%, Roman Catholic 28%, Jewish 2%, other 4%
While the constitution states the government cannot put a religious test on
candidates, the people voting still can.
At 09:42 AM 12/19/2001 +, you wrote:
>Thanks Howard, I think that answered my question very effectively. In
>essence then, the constitution specifies that there should be NO r
> I think the majority religion in the US is none.
I did a search with Ask.com just for grins and came across this page:
http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/us.html#People
"Religions: Protestant 56%, Roman Catholic 28%, Jewish 2%, other 4%, none
10% (1989)"
It's interesting to n
At 08:14 AM 12/19/01, you wrote:
>Constitutionally I think the point has been made that there is to be no
>religious requirement. However, I think the point should also be made that
>you get votes from people that you appeal to, and since Christianity is the
>majority religion in the US, that's w
some attention needs to be paid.
Hatton
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:57 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> At 11:27 AM 12/18/01, you wrot
Great. Thanks for the link Maureen, very useful.
will
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 05:57
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
At 11:27 AM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>Can an American citizen (not
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 03:35
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
I'm surprised nobody mentioned this bit of the Constitution:
Article Six, Section 3: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and
Just a question. :)
Has there been an actively non-religious president, or perhaps that is a
contradiction?
will
-Original Message-
From: Fleischer, Beth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2001 21:53
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
At 11:27 AM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>Can an American citizen (not you yet Phil) confirm that the President MUST
>be a Christian (i.e. is it a part of the constitution)? Has the US ever had
>a non-Christian president?
>
>Cheers
>
>Will
The only requirements to be president is that you must have been
I'm surprised nobody mentioned this bit of the Constitution:
Article Six, Section 3: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and the members of the several State legislatures, and all executive and
judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States,
shall be bound
-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Some other differences are the issuing of sacraments like when the
Eucharist is said at a mass, the communion bread is meant to be infused
(wrong word but can't think of the proper one ) with the Holy Spirit
and becomes t
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Gnosticism was around in B.C. so it can't be derived from Catholicism.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06592a.htm
As far as I know, Martin Luther was the very first Protestant and later on
the Church of England was f
ssage-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 22:01
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
At 09:57 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>Michael, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't another major difference is
>that Catholism
At 09:57 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>Michael, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't another major difference is that
>Catholism teaches that salvation is a combination of faith and good works --
>you must do good works to get into heaven? Whereas protestants believe that
>you are saved by faith alone?
>
same Church.
H.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Or is Christianity and Episcopalian both forms of Catholicism? Honest...
which did come first?
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:50 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Right, but they worship Christ, thereby making them Christians. How
they worship and their interpretation of the Bible is wha
me to that.
H.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> Can an American citizen (not you yet Phil) confirm that the
> President MUS
Vinny DiDonato [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:16 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> Not that I'm really religious, but I was raised Roman Catholic and
never
> considered myself Christia
well...by my principals it IS wrong.
Sometimes you have to sacrifice for the bigger good.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:50 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never und
ginal Message-
> From: Nick McClure [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> You are correct. But the fact that it separated a group and counted them
> as
&g
roman catholics ARE christians.
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Swain [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> nopenot joking, just asking a q
er 18, 2001 7:28 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
> Can an American citizen (not you yet Phil) confirm that the President MUST
> be a Christian (i.e. is it a part of the constitution)? Has the US ever
> had
> a n
It would have been racist if they counted as less than a person because of
race.
They were actually counted as less than a person because they were slaves,
or owned by other people. Not a good reason, I know, but less race-based
at that time than economic and social.
People of many races wer
My understanding is that all who believe in Jesus are Christians and
can be
sub-divided into various groups including Catholics, Protestants, etc.
Great, we've got a tree structure of Christianity. Next we'll be
debating
if it should go into an array, a structure or stored as XML.
At 12:58 PM 12/18/01, Jacob wrote:
>Or is Christianity and Episcopalian both forms of Catholicism? Honest...
>which did come first?
Christianity is by definition the worship of Christ, which predated all the
churches, sects, and denominations established by the followers of Jesus
and his disci
:)
At 02:24 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>What? All catholics are Christian...
>
>Howie
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Vinny DiDonato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:16 P
"You are CORRECT, Ma'am!!!"
Michael Corrigan
Programmer
Endora Digital Solutions
www.endoradigital.com
630/942-5211 x-134
- Original Message -
From: Maureen
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'
What? All catholics are Christian...
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Vinny DiDonato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
Not that I'm really religious, but I was raised Roman Catholic and never
considered myself Christian.
-V
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
At 11:53 AM 12/18/01, Philip Arnold wrote:
>Thinking about that brought something to mind
>
>A few years back when Satanic Verses came out, there was a load of
>shouting about it being Blasphemy... The British definition of blasphemy
>is 'any contemptuous, reviling, scurrilous or ludicrous matter
At 11:38 AM 12/18/01, Nathan wrote:
>Are you Joking?
>
>How about John F. Kennedy? Religion: Roman Catholic
I'm fairly certain that Catholics consider themselves to be Christian.
__
Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
PIII 800
ber 18, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> ok, I quit, you win. I'm not going to keep this up. It's
> going into a dark
>
> place where nothing should go.
> (I had to get a parting shot). :)
>
&
930
>fax: (703) 393-2659
>Web: http://www.ebstor.com
>http://www.pacel.com
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
>--
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:53 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> Actually, in that case you'd be speaking with your head up a
> horses @**. ;)
>
> At 01:51 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
> >In this case we&#
gt; -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:49 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> >
> >
> > As I don't want a dead CF
2001 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
The concept of giving, taking, preferring, or denying anyone ANYTHING
based
on race is by definition a 'racist practice'.
But does that also mean it's wrong?
Marcus
> You are correct. But the f
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I
The concept of giving, taking, preferring, or denying anyone ANYTHING based
on race is by definition a 'racist practice'.
But does that also mean it's wrong?
Marcus
> You are correct. But the fact that it separated a group and
> counted them as
> less than a person is a racist practice, I think
42-5211 x-134
> - Original Message -
> From: Larry Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:44 PM
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> I guess its one of those things you have to stand up for.
>
&g
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:47 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
&
To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> Than its probably better that you don't take it lying down. :)
>
> At 01:34 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
> >that's a pretty sh**ty joke Michael.
> >
> >l
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'
Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> Gnosticism was around in B.C. so it can't be derived from Catholicism.
>
> http://www.newadvent.org
You are correct. But the fact that it separated a group and counted them as
less than a person is a racist practice, I think.
At 12:32 PM 12/18/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >From what I recall from that is that it wasn't based on Racism but the
>opposite. It was one way for the North to prevent the
sage-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> >
> >
> > It is, just not the muffins your expecting. ;)
> >
&g
:-)
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> Actually, you have gnosticism wy back in the
To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> >From what I recall from that is that it wasn't based on Racism but the
> opposite. It was one way for the North to prevent the South from having
> a disproportionate number of representativ
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understan
o: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Correct, There have Christians, and a few Deists, and some that claim
no
affiliation.
One things the Constitution does say that leaned to racist side was
the way
the c
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:28 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> >
> >
> > Let loose the horsies of war!!!
> >
> > At 01:25 PM 12/18/01, yo
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never underst
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> What's the difference between a lay reader and a chaplain?
>
> At 01:21 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
> >Actually, the military recognizes Wicca, Nativ
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:23 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> >
> >
> > What's the difference between a lay reader and a chaplai
LOL!!! That was very funny!!
Michael Corrigan
Programmer
Endora Digital Solutions
www.endoradigital.com
630/942-5211 x-134
- Original Message -
From: Larry Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never under
Correct, There have Christians, and a few Deists, and some that claim no
affiliation.
One things the Constitution does say that leaned to racist side was the way
the census was counted.
It was called the three-fifths compromise. The south wanted their slaves
counted when it came to proportion
ndora Digital Solutions
www.endoradigital.com
630/942-5211 x-134
- Original Message -
From: C. Hatton Humphrey
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
Actually, the military recognizes Wicca, Nativ
ciates
> >716-839-2141 x336
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: RE: R
gt; > > > www.endoradigital.com
> > > > 630/942-5211 x-134
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: Todd
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: R
Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:01 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> Catholicism was first. Then, Martin Luther started the first
> "Protestant" church in Germany (called Protesta
been misdated to the
1st rather than todays date).
At 01:12 PM 12/18/01, you wrote:
>oh you do Michael, you just haven't met me yet!!
>
>;)
>
>will
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 18 December 2001 18:08
>To: C
& Associates
716-839-2141 x336
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> And wic
I have no idea why I remember this, but I remember a "Family Ties"
episode where something happened to, I think, Alex's little sister and
she was in the hospital and she might die. I guess Alex had something
to do with it so, feeling guilty, he went to the hospital chapel to
pray. While he w
the 4 that you mentioned.
Michael Corrigan
Programmer
Endora Digital Solutions
www.endoradigital.com
630/942-5211 x-134
- Original Message -
From: C. Hatton Humphrey
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never
oh you do Michael, you just haven't met me yet!!
;)
will
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2001 18:08
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
True, but its not in America. And while I kn
tist, Protestant, Lutheran, Methodist,
>Etc.
>
>Michael Corrigan
>Programmer
>Endora Digital Solutions
>www.endoradigital.com
>630/942-5211 x-134
> - Original Message -
> From: Nathan Stanford
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1
8/01, you wrote:
>Jedi is also a recognized religion in Britain - doh...
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:02 PM
>Subject: RE:
CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> Right, but they worship Christ, thereby making them Christians. How
> they worship and their interpretation of the Bible is what
di
Jedi is also a recognized religion in Britain - doh...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: Racism (was: I'll never underst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:58 PM
>Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
>
>
> > Or is Christianity and Episcopalian both forms of Catholicism? Honest...
> > which did come first?
> >
>
>
___
on and the Pope, in
>particular). So, the first Protestants were Luhterans.
>
>Howie
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:58 PM
>Subj
2141 x336
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> >
> >
> >
al Message -
From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Racism (was: I'll never understand...)
> Or is Christianity and Episcopalian both forms
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
