Check this out
http://www.startrek.com/news/news.asp?ID=120418
best wishes,
-= Ed
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion.
If you want to be happy, practice compassion."
~The 14th Dalai Lama
~~
Structure your
I liked it.
H.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Voyager
Ok,
Saw the final episode last night. E how crap was that. Nice new
technology and all that, but that really was a poor ending
.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Voyager
I thought DS9 was the better of them all - a bit more of a serious series,
without the 'filler' episodes of TNG and Voyager. Sisko wa
d all that to
hell.
Still :)
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 August 2001 09:59
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Voyager
> Saw the final episode last night. E how crap was that. Nice new
> technology and all that, but that really
http://www.startrek.com/production/seriesv/multimedia.html
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
U
> I thought DS9 was the better of them all - a bit more of a serious series,
> without the 'filler' episodes of TNG and Voyager. Sisko was the best
> captain of them all.
DS9 was the most substantial of all of the ST series' - but I still don't
remember the ending... maybe it just didn't make an
I thought DS9 was the better of them all - a bit more of a serious series,
without the 'filler' episodes of TNG and Voyager. Sisko was the best
captain of them all.
As for Enterprise, I am sure it will still have the class of a ST series,
but its Scott Bakula for gods sake, at every point I
> Saw the final episode last night. E how crap was that. Nice new
> technology and all that, but that really was a poor ending.
Why do they always have to play about with time to end the series? In TNG
they had the 3 time periods, can't remember DS9 (how much of an impression
did it make?) an
> Something to bear in mind is that there are no paradoxes in the multiple
> universe paradigm. If you change something in the past, the future would
> you return to is a completely separate universe.
But we all know there's only 2 Universes... the one where they wear the
Cowboy hats and this on
Right -- the concept of "timelines".
Want more? Go read some old Robert Heinlein...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Gilchrist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Voyager Finale (was List Quality and Voyager finale)
So
tuff.
Todd
-
My God .. it's full of stars .. !
- Original Message -
From: "another programmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Voyager Finale (was List Quality and Voy
Cool... but how does an atom occupying 2 different points in _our_ universe
support a multiple universe theory?
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No .. you can't occupy the same space at the same time, but duh .. no one
, 2001 4:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Voyager Finale (was List Quality and Voyager finale)
No .. you can't occupy the same space at the same time, but duh .. no one
else can occupy the same space as yourself at the same time even without
time travel hehe. Speaking of theore
No .. you can't occupy the same space at the same time, but duh .. no one
else can occupy the same space as yourself at the same time even without
time travel hehe. Speaking of theoretical impossibilities, scientists a
while back "broke" a law of physics by forcing the same atom to occupy 2
diffe
14 matches
Mail list logo
