Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-02 Thread Sam
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Grussgott wrote: > > Interesting that you're equating Obama with Cicero, one of the Roman empire's > great leaders. Ha that's funny. Did you mean Caesar was a great dictator? Since Cicero wasn't a leader. > It's a good comparison given they're both lawyers and

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-02 Thread Larry Lyons
Unfortunately there are a lot of historical parallels here. For instance look at the double dip recession of 1936-1937. At the time the country in a weak recovery, very much like now. Economic production, profits, and wages had regained their 1929 levels. Unemployment remained high, but it was

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread PT
That politics hasn't changed? On 8/1/2011 10:46 PM, Sam wrote: > > What have we learned in 2,066 years? > "The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, > public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be > tempered and controlled, and the assistance to forei

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Grussgott
Interesting that you're equating Obama with Cicero, one of the Roman empire's great leaders. It's a good comparison given they're both lawyers and politicians as well as great speakers, and you're right to ascribe that quote to Obama's actions even if his words say different. He's definitely

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Sam
What have we learned in 2,066 years? "The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Grussgott
don't > re-nice the Jerry bot. > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Grussgott wrote: > >> >> Nobody? The Tea Party won. Anyone?? >> >> The lefties are calling this deal a Satan sandwich and i guess the right >> would say that the great socialis

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Jerry Barnes
"Why bother. " My sentiments exactly, Dana-bot. J - (03/16/2006) Because this massive of accumulation of debt was predicted, because it was foreseeable, because it was unnecessary, because it was the result of willful and reckless disregard for the warnings that were given and for the fundamen

Re: Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Dana
lots, and you and I can act out all the parts. Why bother. Esp if we don't re-nice the Jerry bot. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Grussgott wrote: > > Nobody? The Tea Party won. Anyone?? > > The lefties are calling this deal a Satan sandwich and i guess the right > woul

Satan Sandwich

2011-08-01 Thread Grussgott
Nobody? The Tea Party won. Anyone?? The lefties are calling this deal a Satan sandwich and i guess the right would say that the great socialist caved under the tea party pressure and gave up some of the great society. No cheers or jeers