Re: Web site check

> Well, "that" was a tossed up page for an old client who think he can make a > ton of money off the phrase. I laughed at him but he was insistent and > since he pays his bills on time, a rarity these days, I threw it up there > for him. > The customer is never wrong. ~

Re: Web site check

Well, "that" was a tossed up page for an old client who think he can make a ton of money off the phrase. I laughed at him but he was insistent and since he pays his bills on time, a rarity these days, I threw it up there for him. But apparently his site along with all the others I have done rece

Re: Web site check

Yeah, I wondered why you asked us to check something about that... Until Later! C. Hatton Humphrey http://www.eastcoastconservative.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Maureen w

Re: Web site check

Ah, thank you much. Excellent tool. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote: > > You can also test this using http://browsershots.org or other tools - > > > http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/design/effectively-testing-your-website-in-multiple-browsers/ > ~~

Re: Web site check

Thanks everyone. Unfortunately, my intern had uploaded the wrong index.html file. That was for a different project. Could you check again? http://clients.vyndyco.com/grants/ ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http:/

Re: Web site check

You can also test this using http://browsershots.org or other tools - http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/design/effectively-testing-your-website-in-multiple-browsers/ Until Later! C. Hatton Humphrey http://www.eastcoastconservative.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a larg

Re: Web site check

Emailed screenshot. Until Later! C. Hatton Humphrey http://www.eastcoastconservative.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Anyone here with a version of Intern

Re: Web site check

It is and it's left align to where the Image and R are off the page. . On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Anyone here with a version of Internet Explorer before IE9 that can check a > website for me? > > http://clients.vyndyco.com/grants/ > > It's built in Twitter Bootstrap and

Web site check

Anyone here with a version of Internet Explorer before IE9 that can check a website for me? http://clients.vyndyco.com/grants/ It's built in Twitter Bootstrap and the client says he is seeing everything vertical down the page instead of in place. ~~~

Re: Site Check Please

thx, I'll have a go at this later, larry >On 9/24/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Then Casey Dougall wrote:: > >On that note, I've made a few alterations that will fix this (at least >to some degree), but first a couple of other minor points. > >You can use the shorthand method on

Re: Site Check Please

thx, I'll mae those changes. larry > >I also missed something else rather obvious regarding your contentSkip >links and it's blowing up in IE (surprise surprise). You have a mistake >in your stylesheet in the way you are referencing the links. You >currently have > >#contentSkip { > co

Re: Site Check Please

Larry Lyons wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go > through this site I've been working on. Any comments appreciated: > > http://www.surfatas.com/index.cfm I also missed something else rather obvious regarding your contentSkip links and it's bl

Re: Site Check Please

Mark Henderson wrote: > See http://www.htmldog.com/guides/cssintermediate/multivalue/> Here is URL I meant to post: http://www.htmldog.com/guides/cssintermediate/backgroundimages/> Mark ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarte

Re: Site Check Please

On 9/24/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go through this >> site I've been working on. Any comments appreciated: >> >> http://www.surfatas.com/index.cfm Then Casey Dougall wrote:: >>better do some work on your

Re: Site Check Please

check the backgroud image after - Industrial Waste Water looks like it needs to be 2 pixels higher. like the look though On 9/24/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hit Send too soon. > > > > > >The biggest issues I see are with the white-s

Re: Site Check Please

Hit Send too soon. > > > >The biggest issues I see are with the white-space at the bottom and > >the elements moving.. especially if you go below 800x600, the > menu elements start to drop down. Price of using a liquid layout with divs of a certain size and images. I was originally going to

Re: Site Check Please

>> I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go through this >> site I've >> been working on. Any comments appreciated: > >Testing using FireFox 1.5.0.7 > >Site elements are usable and understandable, colors are nice and easy >on the eyes. > >I like the way the layout flows when

Re: Site Check Please

> I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go through this > site I've > been working on. Any comments appreciated: Testing using FireFox 1.5.0.7 Site elements are usable and understandable, colors are nice and easy on the eyes. I like the way the layout flows when resizing..

Re: Site Check Please

On 9/24/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go through this > site I've been working on. Any comments appreciated: > > http://www.surfatas.com/index.cfm > > Fair warning, some of the links don't work in places (they'

Site Check Please

Hi Guys, I'd appreciate it if you could take a couple of minutes and go through this site I've been working on. Any comments appreciated: http://www.surfatas.com/index.cfm Fair warning, some of the links don't work in places (they're to come later). thx, larry

Site check

I would like to hear your opinion on http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/demo/eduroam.nl/ I would especially like to know how it looks in mobile devices. I have tested it with the IE in Windows PPC and with a Palm, but I do not have access to Symbian, Motorola Linux devices, Opera Mobile and all

Re: site check, thanks

gt; > > On 2/25/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/25/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why are you asking for a site check while there are several validators > > > > available that can > tell you there are stil

Re: site check, thanks

Tony Weeg wrote: > > can you check again? ive made some changes that i think are a step closer > to that accessibilty and cross-browser layout exactness that i was looking > for originally :) It is better, but right on the first page I still can't get to the links in the menu using tab keys. Not

Re: site check, thanks

And just for the record, how in the HELL is that making a site harder to use? No one using IE or FF has any problems using it. tw On 2/25/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > My name is the CF-Community list, and I have a VERY hard time > of realizing sarcasm, and the art of being facet

Re: site check, thanks

Hi, My name is the CF-Community list, and I have a VERY hard time of realizing sarcasm, and the art of being facetious. I will quickly strike down that which I do not understand or believe in. Dude, if you can't see the tongue-in-cheekedness of the shit I write well, I guess I ned to do a better

Re: site check, thanks

That's the lamest fucking reason I've ever heard for making a site harder to use. On 2/25/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what same thing? onClick? > i just used that for shits and giggles, no real reason, i get tired of > > tw ~~

Re: site check, thanks

gt; >what browser are you using? > > Firefox. But it turns out that I had Javascript disabled as the result of a > failed Greasemonkey experiment. And all those fancy onXXX event handlers > don't work without Javascript. > > Why are you asking for a site check while there

Re: site check, thanks

/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why are you asking for a site check while there are several validators > > > available that can > tell you there are still problems to be solved? The > > > issue with all the onXXX event handlers is right there i

Re: site check, thanks

Tony, you can do the same thing with some CSS and a list. No javascript needed. larry On 2/25/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/25/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why are you asking for a site check while there are several validators > >

Re: site check, thanks

On 2/25/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are you asking for a site check while there are several validators > available that can > tell you there are still problems to be solved? The > issue with all the onXXX event handlers is right there in the accessib

Re: site check, thanks

>what browser are you using? Firefox. But it turns out that I had Javascript disabled as the result of a failed Greasemonkey experiment. And all those fancy onXXX event handlers don't work without Javascript. Why are you asking for a site check while there are several validators a

Re: site check, thanks

probably lynx :) On 2/24/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what browser are you using? > > tw > > On 2/24/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jerry Johnson wrote: > > > > > > Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu > > > > There is a menu? It is

Re: site check, thanks

what browser are you using? tw On 2/24/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerry Johnson wrote: > > > > Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu > > There is a menu? It is all death for me, no menu, no links, nothing. You > might want to add a href to

Re: site check, thanks

Jerry Johnson wrote: > > Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu There is a menu? It is all death for me, no menu, no links, nothing. You might want to add a href to your a's. (If you need to use onclick, add an onkeypress as wel.) Jochem ~~~

Re: site check, thanks

soon as us.weegs have time :) tw On 2/24/06, Ken Fused <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When are you going to put something up on weeg.us? > > Ken > > ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198061 Archives: htt

Re: site check, thanks

When are you going to put something up on weeg.us? Ken ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198057 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/

Re: site check, thanks

Looks fine to me, nice site. On 2/24/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bon idee'! > all done. > > thanks. > tony > > On 2/24/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so you're all set? > > > > Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu > > at least (so it fa

Re: site check, thanks

bon idee'! all done. thanks. tony On 2/24/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so you're all set? > > Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu > at least (so it fails over to a usable menu on text-only browsers, > screen readers, etc) > > On 2/24/06, Tony <

Re: site check, thanks

so you're all set? Know its early on this, but you might put in alt tags for the top menu at least (so it fails over to a usable menu on text-only browsers, screen readers, etc) On 2/24/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why? > i thought you could read minds. > > feck. so let down. > > doesnt

Re: site check, thanks

why? i thought you could read minds. feck. so let down. doesnt matter anyway, i figured out the problem :) but here it is anyway... http://www.drawbridgevillas.com thanks anyway, for real yo tw On 2/23/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > need the url. > > On 2/23/06, Tony <[EMAIL PRO

Re: site check, thanks

need the url. On 2/23/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi there. > > can you all check this in your various assortment of browsers, and let me know > if the text is displaying well. they are saying that it looks "vertical"? > > thanks. > tony > > ~~~

Re: site check

awesome! maybe arial? tw On 12/13/05, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gergia, times, then some thing else. > just look at chris2.css to see. > > yeh he is good & his client list kicks ass. > also just gave me a coupon for me and my wife to a fancey schmacey dinner! > > ~~

Re: site check

gergia, times, then some thing else. just look at chris2.css to see. yeh he is good & his client list kicks ass. also just gave me a coupon for me and my wife to a fancey schmacey dinner! ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase you

RE: site check

What if the font was sans-serif such as the lettering on the window itself? Yes, this is an awesome illustration. Damn, I wish I could do that. M!ke -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:11 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: site

Re: site check

i dig it man. the illustration is great. i wish i could do shit like that. anyway, i think a thinner menu font and top font, might suit a bit better, as the writing in the illustration is a bit thinner of a font. i have no suggestion for which font, but something a but sleeker. make sense? tw

site check

hey guys. i am just roughing out a site for a friend he is an illustrator http://www.olearyillustration.com/default2.htm i no it is a little plain, mostly tables & a bit of css. wish i could do same things with divs as with tables, but i am just not getting it yet. again this is a first run rough

Re: Site Check

age - From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 11:53 AM Subject: Re: Site Check > Based on some early feed back, here is an alternate layout that I have > been tossing back and forth with the first one I posted.

Re: Site Check

Based on some early feed back, here is an alternate layout that I have been tossing back and forth with the first one I posted. http://www.sierraoutdoorrecreation.com/index3.cfm Original left aligned view http://www.sierraoutdoorrecreation.com/index2.cfm Color Plaet I have tryied to create. http

Re: Site Check Color Samples

day, February 06, 2005 10:22 AM Subject: Re: Site Check Color Samples > Here is my basic attempt at organizing my color theme. > http://www.sierraoutdoorrecreation.com/samples/colors.htm > > Ian Skinner wrote: > > >Well, I got my design layed out like I wanted, now I have attempted t

Re: Site Check

Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote: > > I don't think the type-face you have chosen is very readable. > > There's several typefaces designed just for the web: > > Georgia > Tehoma The name is Tahoma. It is designed to cram as much information as possible in an alert (for errors etc.). Don't use it,

RE: Site Check

##| From: Ian Skinner ##| ##| Ribs and hot fresh cookies. My tummy is growling already! :-) Just finished chilling the deviled eggs and we've got fried ravioli's and potato skins for a 3'oclock snack. Ribs are at 7:00 Cookies for dessert. Come over whenever you want ;) :D By the - just anot

Re: Site Check

Ian Skinner wrote: > Well, I got my design layed out like I wanted, now I have attempted to > color it. So does this work? Does it envoke a season? If so, what > season? In general winter, but the dark blue and brow doesn't match. I think the effect that you are looking for is that pale, filte

Re: Site Check Color Samples

Here is my basic attempt at organizing my color theme. http://www.sierraoutdoorrecreation.com/samples/colors.htm Ian Skinner wrote: >Well, I got my design layed out like I wanted, now I have attempted to >color it. So does this work? Does it envoke a season? If so, what season? > >http://www.s

Re: Site Check

Fine, just tempt me why don't you! Ribs and hot fresh cookies. My tummy is growling already! :-) Ian Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote: >I am in the middle of cooking goodies for the game later --- so when I >have time to sit down later, perhaps I can offer some more tips? >BBQ ribs are o

Re: Site Check

I don't especially like the different fonts on the front page. Given that most of the rest of the site is sans-serif, I would think about maintaining consistency, one way or the other. Once this design if finalized I will replicate it across the rest of the site. Since I started with our current

Re: Site Check

tte: http://www.carolthompsoncosmetics.com/IBS/SimpleCat/Shelf/ASP/Hierarchy/0403.html - Original Message - From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: Site Check > Unfortantly, your commen

RE: Site Check

I am in the middle of cooking goodies for the game later --- so when I have time to sit down later, perhaps I can offer some more tips? BBQ ribs are on and cookies are in the oven now - so I'm a couple hours away from solid computer time :D Cheers, Erika ##| -Original Message- ##| From: I

Re: Site Check

s a bit jarring. Rob - Original Message - From: "Erika L. Walker-Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 9:16 AM Subject: RE: Site Check > I just don't know. > I'm not in love with the blues. > I gu

Re: Site Check

Unfortantly, your comments reflect my own feelings. I'm not in love with so much blue either, yes I'm going for winter what I think I need is a contrasting color or two, but I'm not sure what that would be. The add needs to go someplace, it used to be lower in the page, but our marketing peopl

RE: Site Check

I just don't know. I'm not in love with the blues. I gues you are going for winter? I don't think the blues match the banner picture ... And what's with that ad? Does it have to float over there on there on the right? It looks out of place ... ? Cheers, Erika ##| -Original Message- ##| F

Site Check

Well, I got my design layed out like I wanted, now I have attempted to color it. So does this work? Does it envoke a season? If so, what season? http://www.sierraoutdoorrecreation.com/index2.cfm ~| Find out how CFTicket can

Re: Site check

cool. later. tw On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:36:41 -0400, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fixed. Old error. :) > Thanks > > > - Original Message - > From: Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:27:28 -0400 > Subject: Re: S

Re: Site check

fixed. Old error. :) Thanks - Original Message - From: Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:27:28 -0400 Subject: Re: Site check To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mike. if i try to login and happen to enter the wrong login info... i get the same

Re: Site check

mike. if i try to login and happen to enter the wrong login info... i get the same site, in the bottom right frame? that shouldnt be how you intended to make it? right? tw On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:23:22 -0400, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone has a free moment to do a fast

RE: Site check

way!").  I hope to do that soon however, then it'll be back. Jim Davis From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 6:19 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site check >  If you'd like to return the favor I just uploaded the new version of >  

RE: Site check

That got it - works fine now. Jim Davis From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 6:22 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site check Interesting. Maybe if I set it specifically as cgi. then it'll work. Give me a sec. Can you try it now and see if it

Re: Site check

Interesting. Maybe if I set it specifically as cgi. then it'll work. Give me a sec. Can you try it now and see if it still throws the error? Thanks More information: The error I'm getting on the advertisement seems to be referrer-related: The error occurred while processing an element with a g

Re: Site check

On the list. Thanks On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 14:47:00 -0700, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks great. >   >  Perhaps a skosh more room between left and center columns. The "latest >  posts" thing on the home page looks like it could use a pixel or two >  of breathing room. >   >  Dana >

Re: Site check

. http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Content/ColdFusion/Guides/Locking/Index.cfm    >  Jim Davis >   >  From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >  Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 5:23 PM >  To: CF-Community >  Subject: Site check >   >  If anyone has a free mome

RE: Site check

More information: The error I'm getting on the advertisement seems to be referrer-related: The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (#left(HTTP_REFERER, 511)#), occupying document position (65:80) to (65:104) in the template file D:\HTDOCS\INCLUDES\TOPTEXT.CFM.

Re: Site check

looks great. Perhaps a skosh more room between left and center columns. The "latest posts" thing on the home page looks like it could use a pixel or two of breathing room. Dana On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:23:22 -0400, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone has a free moment to do a f

RE: Site check

m: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 5:23 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Site check If anyone has a free moment to do a fast run through the site, I'd appreciate it. I've changed over a number of things for better speed/throughput and I want to make s

Re: Site check

: Sunday, August 01, 2004 5:23 PM   Subject: Site check   If anyone has a free moment to do a fast run through the site, I'd   appreciate it. I've changed over a number of things for better   speed/throughput and I want to make sure I didn't miss anything.   www.houseoffusion.com   www.fusi

Site check

If anyone has a free moment to do a fast run through the site, I'd appreciate it. I've changed over a number of things for better speed/throughput and I want to make sure I didn't miss anything. www.houseoffusion.com www.fusionauthority.com Thanks -- Michael Dinowitz http://www.houseoffusion.com F

Re: Site check

PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:52 PM Subject: Site check > Ok, please give me any suggestions. Is this not the most boring site > you've ever seen? > > http://www.ccwebdev.com/ > > TIA > > Cand

Re: Site check

; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:52 PM Subject: Site check > Ok, please give me any suggestions. Is this not the most boring site > you've ever seen? > > http://www.ccwebdev.com/ > > TIA > > Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer > The Chi

Re: Site check

gt; Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:52 PM Subject: Site check > Ok, please give me any suggestions. Is this not the most boring site > you've ever seen? > > http://www.ccwebdev.com/ > > TIA > > Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer > The Children's Medical C

Site check

Ok, please give me any suggestions. Is this not the most boring site you've ever seen? http://www.ccwebdev.com/ TIA Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer The Children's Medical Center One Children's Plaza Dayton, OH 45404 937-641-4293 http://www.childrensdayton.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] __