Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Robert wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Robert wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Gruss wrote: >> >>> >>> Along with another F.B.I. agent, and with several C.I.A. officers >>> present, I questioned [Zubaydah] from March to June 2

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Robert wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Gruss wrote: > >> >> Along with another F.B.I. agent, and with several C.I.A. officers >> present, I questioned [Zubaydah] from March to June 2002, before the >> harsh techniques were introduced later in Aug

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Gruss wrote: > > Along with another F.B.I. agent, and with several C.I.A. officers > present, I questioned [Zubaydah] from March to June 2002, before the > harsh techniques were introduced later in August. > Again, what is most interesting about all this stuf

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Gruss Gott
> RoMunn wrote: > Sorry, Gruss, but this fact sheet is dead wrong. I have no idea what you're talking about. What I love though, is your horrific defense of torture and the Bush administration. For it is an argument you have zero chance of winning. And you don't realize that. Majestic! You m

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
so here are some more tidbits: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0602/S00121.htm This bit appears to confirm that Bush thought the West Coast plot was foiled in 2002: --- "Hambali recruited several key operatives who had been training in Afghanistan. Once the operatives were recruited, they met

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Robert wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Robert wrote: > > >> Sorry, Gruss, but this fact sheet is dead wrong. Hambali was not captured >> until August 2003: >> >> >> http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2003%20News%20archives/August/17n/Hambali%

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Robert wrote: > Sorry, Gruss, but this fact sheet is dead wrong. Hambali was not captured > until August 2003: > > > http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2003%20News%20archives/August/17n/Hambali%20Captured%20Just%20in%20the%20Nick%20of%20Time.htm > > So le

Re: Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Robert Munn
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Gruss wrote: > > > http://www.slate.com/id/2216601/ > > Surprised, aren't you Robert? I mean with their track record of > truth, how could they have lied to you again? > Sorry, Gruss, but this fact sheet is dead wrong. Hambali was not captured until August 2003

Surprise! LA Foiled Attack? Lie.

2009-04-23 Thread Gruss Gott
What clinches the falsity of Thiessen's claim, however (and that of the memo he cites, and that of an unnamed Central Intelligence Agency spokesman who today seconded Thessen's argument), is chronology. In a White House press briefing, Bush's counterterrorism chief, Frances Fragos Townsend, told r