"Jerry I've read your posts... I don't expect you to have a sense of
humour."
It's very selective.
I laughed for 10 minutes this morning from a line in the "A Letter from a
Progressive to Obama" thread.
Here it is:
"However... you didn't know when to stop. You continued to pander to the
right
P.S. Currently... no.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
> theorem is the bees knees bitches."
> You think "This guy is f**king retarded. Brahmagupta theorem runs shit
> dog."
> You tackle him. Stomp on
Jerry I've read your posts... I don't expect you to have a sense of humour.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
> theorem is the bees knees bitches."
> You think "This guy is f**king retarded. Brahmagupt
You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
theorem is the bees knees bitches."
You think "This guy is f**king retarded. Brahmagupta theorem runs shit dog."
You tackle him. Stomp on his face.
Then you're all like "Yo that triangle blowing ass clown just tried
to assassin
I like it but it should read:
stomped BY the establishment like a troublesome protester at a Rand Paul rally
line monster:P
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I don't remember. Maybe the woman who lost to Reid?
>
> I just loved the way the Rand Paul stomping was already i
I don't remember. Maybe the woman who lost to Reid?
I just loved the way the Rand Paul stomping was already in the lexicon.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Who were they talking about?
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> >
> > My favorite quote of th
Your MOM!
zing!
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Dude,
> what are you on?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Medic wrote:
> > This is actually the most brilliant little behavioral loop hole.
> >
> > You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
>
Who were they talking about?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> My favorite quote of the day from around the interwebs:
>
> "She was the "fringe" Republican, always written off, always bullied by the
> establishment, who had been adopted by a brand new political movement an
My favorite quote of the day from around the interwebs:
"She was the "fringe" Republican, always written off, always bullied by the
establishment, who had been adopted by a brand new political movement and
stomped the establishment like a troublesome protester at a Rand Paul
rally."
~~~
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> "If she was an assassin, they were *way* too late."
>>
>> Doesn't mean one shouldn't attempt to stop it.
>>
>
> This is actually the most brilliant little behavioral loop hole.
>
> You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pytha
Dude,
what are you on?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Medic wrote:
> This is actually the most brilliant little behavioral loop hole.
>
> You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
> theorem is the bees knees bitches."
> You think "This guy is f**king retarded. Bra
>
> "If she was an assassin, they were *way* too late."
>
> Doesn't mean one shouldn't attempt to stop it.
>
This is actually the most brilliant little behavioral loop hole.
You're at a restaurant and the guy across from you is all "Pythagorean
theorem is the bees knees bitches."
You think "This
"I think tackling the woman was reactionary, not preventative."
Of course it was reactionary. They saw her take off running towards the car
with her placard after standing there acting strangely for who knows how
long. They reacted.
If it were preventative, they would have tackled her before t
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM, denstar wrote:
>
>> There was no real action until it was obvious she had a sign (which
>> both her hands were holding).
>
> That wasn't covering a dagger?
Hell, she could have been concealing a nuke in her bodice! Ju
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM, denstar wrote:
> There was no real action until it was obvious she had a sign (which
> both her hands were holding).
That wasn't covering a dagger?
> If she was an assassin, they were *way* too late.
The right thing to do would've have been to step back, give h
I think tackling the woman was reactionary, not preventative.
There was no real action until it was obvious she had a sign (which
both her hands were holding).
If she was an assassin, they were *way* too late.
A different angle would probably help.
:Den
--
Nothing is as approved as mediocrit
I agree with you 100% on this one.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Let me repeat:
>
> Charging (that's right, charging) the car was stupid.
>
> Tackling the woman was not stupid.
>
> Stomping on the woman's head was stupid.
>
> Anyone with an iota of sense would underst
"You maintain and believe that the guy who put his foot on the downed woman was
in the right, and used no more force than he needed to, and had the right
intentions in mind, and did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG?"
Obviously, you didn't read my posts.
Let me repeat:
Charging (that's right, charging)
I get Judith and Judah and Judy confused.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> That's exactly why I use a pen name in this forum. There were just
> too many Judiths when I joined.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> Yea...that always gets me. My brain o
That's exactly why I use a pen name in this forum. There were just
too many Judiths when I joined.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Yea...that always gets me. My brain only registers 'Jerry' and then
> when the post does not seem to mesh with what 'Jerry' my brain chose,
ere was 2 Jerry's...I just saw the last name on the
> emails hehehe...I thought he was replying to himself hehehe
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:58 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Updat
LOL...I just realized there was 2 Jerry's...I just saw the last name on the
emails hehehe...I thought he was replying to himself hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:58 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Update o
So, Jerry, just to be clear:
You maintain and believe that the guy who put his foot on the downed woman
was in the right, and used no more force than he needed to, and had the
right intentions in mind, and did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG?
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>
"I have a thing against jack booted thugs."
You must really hate the SEIU then.
"Mind you, I couldn't tell from the video whether the dude's boots were
really jack boots or whether he was just acting that way. All the behavior
shown in that video toward the woman is violent and horrifying. I st
o_0
yeah but...umm...
:-|
On 28 October 2010 21:08, Maureen wrote:
>
> Apology accepted.
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Sam wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm sorry I mocked you. I hate violence and never hurt anyone
> > unless I'm hit first, even than I try hard not to do damage.
> > But I never
Apology accepted.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> OK, I'm sorry I mocked you. I hate violence and never hurt anyone
> unless I'm hit first, even than I try hard not to do damage.
> But I never hit a girl, even after getting hit. I don't even wish Dio
> mourners to hurt those West
OK, I'm sorry I mocked you. I hate violence and never hurt anyone
unless I'm hit first, even than I try hard not to do damage.
But I never hit a girl, even after getting hit. I don't even wish Dio
mourners to hurt those Westerborough fools.
Just a mellow guy.
When you stated republicans attacked
Yeah..I knew a lot about them. One was the ex of a family member.
The other was a former neighbor.
The first one was sentenced to 70 years to life for various crimes and
died in prison.
The second one was shot and killed fleeing arrest.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I missed
I missed the protestant part.
So you knew a lot about these men. Do tell.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Sam wrote:
> I was not laughing at you suffering, I found the claim humorous
> because not only is it so far out there but you claimed it happened
> more than once.
>
>
> Why did they beat
I was not laughing at you suffering, I found the claim humorous
because not only is it so far out there but you claimed it happened
more than once.
Why did they beat you?
How did you know they were republican?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> My "claim" was nothing more tha
Well, if he mentioned begging for it, then it obviously falls in the first
meaning, believing there was an assault, which makes his statement only
possible from a jerk. So I guess that solved that mystery.
But I have to run. I got roped into putting together a puzzle tonight with a
random old per
My "claim" was nothing more than a statement of fact. I have been
severely assaulted twice. Both times by men who were white,
protestant and Republicans.
Sam found my suffering funny, even accused me of begging for it.
You can assume whatever you want. It doesn't change the facts.
On Thu, Oc
I cannot and will not speak for Sam, but I read that either as finding the
beating funny, or finding your claim unreal and funny.
Since I personally tend to try to go with the least annoying option whenever
possible when reading into the statements of others, I assumed the latter.
On Thu, Oct
I explained that to you.
It's too funny because: I can see you begging for the beating, but I
just can't see a republican doing it.
It's funny because it's so improbable you either:
1) made it up
2) really, really really begged for it
3) think union thugs with tea-party signs are republicans
I
Sam to cf-community in the Bad NPR thread Oct 22
You get beat up by republicans? That's too funny.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/thread.cfm/threadid:32588#329706
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I did no such thing and you know it.
> I mean the other you knows
I did no such thing and you know it.
I mean the other you knows it.
About those meds...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> just as much as your tin foil hat is on too tight.
>
> You chortled with glee because someone of an opposing political
> ideology was assaulted. How
just as much as your tin foil hat is on too tight.
You chortled with glee because someone of an opposing political
ideology was assaulted. How different is that from what the
brownshirts did? Right now its only a matter of degree from what I've
seen of your behavior.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:03
Are you off your meds again?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I was talking about you. Your joking and glee at the assault is pure
> brownshirt behavior. That's the amazing thing - your blatent condoning
> of a physical assault simply because you disagreed with her. Wh
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > Kristallnacht 2012?
> >
>
> Worst.Concert.Ever.
>
Kristallnacht (the real one) was obviously awfulan evil event that was a
harbinger for many evil events to come.but that being said, it cannot be
denied that "Kristallnacht" is a ri
>
> Kristallnacht 2012?
>
Worst.Concert.Ever.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-commu
I was talking about you. Your joking and glee at the assault is pure
brownshirt behavior. That's the amazing thing - your blatent condoning
of a physical assault simply because you disagreed with her. What's
next for you Kristallnacht 2012?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> When di
When did you complain about Gladney?
Got to love the selective outrage.
BTW, nobody said the guy was right to step on her.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> And that gives those brownshirts an excuse for assault?
>
> Simply amazing
>
~
I saw inhumane treatment.
Of course, I was also against water-boarding POWs (or whatever they are).
We're better than that, is my motto. Do unto others, yadda yadda.
Heh. "we" and "they"... I was stirring the pot.
Have I *ever* defended, justified, or condoned inhumane treatment?
Regardless
And that gives those brownshirts an excuse for assault?
Simply amazing
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> Maybe people see in others what they themselves feel. We would jump
>> to the political activist conclusion, because t
What doi you see here: Dirty pricks?
http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/18/did-seiu-pay-media-matters-to-cover-up-the-gladney-beating/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, denstar wrote:
> Maybe people see in others what they themselves feel. We would jump
> to the political activist
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, denstar wrote:
>
> Maybe people see in others what they themselves feel. We would jump
> to the political activist conclusion, because that's what we'd do,
> they jump to assassination because that's what they'd do.
You see a girl than can do no wrong, I see an
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> " If you are claiming any sort of equivalence anywhere in this you are a
> filthy prick."
>
>
> Back to the name calling, albeit it was conditional name calling.
>
> It's sad. Usually, you're a little better than that.
I have a thing agai
Don't listen to him, Judah. It's not your fault.
Sometimes, mommies and daddies just can't get along...
Speaking of memories (in another thread), there's lots of folk who
don't come 'round no more. Guess that's life. Hope they're well.
She was clearly carrying a sign (with both hands), and t
No he's not.
He's been like that since he got here. Probably the main reasons GG left.
Anyway, she charged the car and the sign clearly went into the
passenger window where Paul was sitting. They grabbed her and pulled
her away from him. She then ran around the car and charged him a
second time,
" If you are claiming any sort of equivalence anywhere in this you are a
filthy prick."
Back to the name calling, albeit it was conditional name calling.
It's sad. Usually, you're a little better than that.
J
-
During my 11 years in congress, I have consistently opposed federal funding
for
"No. She is not 'charging' the car."
Whatever. You can see what you want.
In the end, she was approaching the car at a rapid pace carrying a stick and
trying to stick it in the car.
It was stupid.
It was not stupid to tackle her.
It was stupid to put a foot on her head and hold her down wit
No. She is not "charging" the car. She is running up to it to get a
photo of her and the sign next to the candidate. You can see both
hands on the sign. If you are claiming any sort of equivalence
anywhere in this you are a filthy prick. They grabbed her, shoved her
down and stomped on her head. Y
Here's a link of her charging the car. Stupid on all ends of this affair.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yiLeud-sxrM
J
-
I think that I'm a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more
about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I'll
t
Actually, new video shows her charging the car with the sign she was
carrying flying through the window Paul was sitting next to.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I think you need to go read a dictionary, Rick.
>
> The woman did not, and was not planning to "attack" Ran
I think you need to go read a dictionary, Rick.
The woman did not, and was not planning to "attack" Rand Paul.
She was trying to "photobomb" him by getting him in a photo with a piece of
paper.
Although in other circumstances her action might be ironically called an
"attack", when you see actua
>So catch this, the Teabagger that stomped on the head of the woman at the
>Rand Paul rally said the HE want an apology from the woman HE stomped on.
>Wow.
>
>
>
>Eric
The guy doing the stomping should apologize to the woman, but she should also
apologize to Rand Paul for attempting to attack a
So catch this, the Teabagger that stomped on the head of the woman at the
Rand Paul rally said the HE want an apology from the woman HE stomped on.
Wow.
Eric
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.co
57 matches
Mail list logo
