Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-27 Thread Gruss Gott
> Dana wrote: > what's the actual problem? When you strip off the rhetoric and > conventional wisdom, it seems to me that the root of the problem is > that people do not have money to spend, That's not the problem - yet. Unemployment is at 6.1% which is the highest in a decade but not anything _b

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-27 Thread Dana
he company was involved in way too much fraud... changing dates, >> income, value of houses after papers are signed. Back in early 2004, she >> said that if this keep occurring that there will be a disaster in the >> future... >> >> -Original Message----- >>

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Loathe
; -Original Message- > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:19 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number... > > I would say that most people who can afford to pay their housing cost &g

RE: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Jacob
future... -Original Message- From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:19 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number... I would say that most people who can afford to pay their housing cost will pay, but there is always

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Dana
it still prevents you from borrowing again any time soon, so really there is little incentive for anyone who can see past the next five minutes to bail on a house if they can avoid it. As you say, blame is pointless, but there is more afoot here than a few irresponsible borrowers. Keynes: http://e

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Maureen
I would say that most people who can afford to pay their housing cost will pay, but there is always a group of bogus borrowers who will take advantage of easy credit to either live free . No money down and no equity in the house - walking away is easy. Not really sure what your point is about Key

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Dana
bottom line though, they cannot afford the payments? If people can afford to pay their housing costs usually they will, yes? If you agree with that statement, then ask yourself what Keynes would say. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem in the mortgage

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Maureen
The problem in the mortgage industry is that people applied for loans with an adjustable rate interest that had low initial rates, but now the higher rate and higher payments are kicking in and they can't afford the payments. Credit has tightened and they cannot no longer qualify for refinancing.

Re: We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Dana
can't keep the payments up. Does that sound right to you? On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Money quote from the Treasury in Forbes: > "It's not based on any particular data point," a Treasury spokeswoman told > Forbes.

We just wanted to choose a really large number...

2008-09-25 Thread Judah McAuley
Money quote from the Treasury in Forbes: "It's not based on any particular data point," a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. "We just wanted to choose a really large number." http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/09/23/bailout-paulson-congress-biz-beltway-cx_jz_bw_09