and with that, its official.
crit is the most eclectic psuedonymic person i know!
On 10/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gert_Fr%C3%B6be
>
> On 10/12/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > shouldnt it? :) isnt that what i was going for :)???
> >
> >
Goldfinger rocked. The best Bond villian in the best Bond movie.
On 10/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gert_Fr%C3%B6be
>
>
--
"Lend our voices only to sounds of freedom. No longer lend our strength to
that which we wish to be free from, and we shal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gert_Fr%C3%B6be
On 10/12/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shouldnt it? :) isnt that what i was going for :)???
>
> thanks for real... so, who is Gert Frobe?
>
> On 10/11/06, Gert B. Frobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yeah.. it all seems a bit firehousy to me.
>
dude, i think you are onto something, oh how i miss the
"blink" tag :(
On 10/12/06, Gert B. Frobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a nice blinking "glow" from behind the hydrants would top it off
> nicely.
>
> w0rd
>
> On 10/12/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > worst part is... this
hmmm, whats the deal with splash pages? no one likes those anymore?
:) just wondering...
also, i hate the hydrants, and they will be shrinking to a much smaller size
on the page, no doubt...
thanks for the help!!! i truly appreciate...
On 10/12/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
shouldnt it? :) isnt that what i was going for :)???
thanks for real... so, who is Gert Frobe?
On 10/11/06, Gert B. Frobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah.. it all seems a bit firehousy to me.
>
> On 10/11/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ok, here is the next one...
> > whatchy'alls
I think a nice blinking "glow" from behind the hydrants would top it off
nicely.
w0rd
On 10/12/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> worst part is... this is me following EVERY single
> one of their instructions to a T.
>
> except they want the hydrants on the splash page shrunk.
>
> yeah. im
worst part is... this is me following EVERY single
one of their instructions to a T.
except they want the hydrants on the splash page shrunk.
yeah. im not sure, its their idea and i have to make it this way.
so, within those limits... what can i do :(
thanks.
not happy
tony
On 10/12/06, Erika
I like it but ditch the splash page. There's really no need for it. If
you have to keep it, ditch all the hydrants. Looks a bit clunky. Reminds
me of late 90's web design
Love the interior pages though.
Cheers,
Erika
--
~
None of the above?
I'd rather see the red clover-thingy as the bullet than a hydrant.
Hydrant means dog pee to me, and that does not make me hungry. If you
put them on a page with asparagus, I might actually gag.
the bullets should definitely be in a line, not staggered.
I don;t mind the fancy b
yeah.. it all seems a bit firehousy to me.
On 10/11/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ok, here is the next one...
> whatchy'alls think?
>
> the front image is here: (yes, the hydrants will be smaller, this was
> first run)
> http://www.station7restaurant.com/hydrant.cfm
>
> the inside pages
> the front image is here: (yes, the hydrants will be smaller, this was first
> run)
> http://www.station7restaurant.com/hydrant.cfm
Hate splash pages. Ditch it. :-)
> http://www.station7restaurant.com/ideas/brickTopInsidePages_ver2_textAsOutlines.jpg
This one with hydrants to the right of the
ok, here is the next one...
whatchy'alls think?
the front image is here: (yes, the hydrants will be smaller, this was first run)
http://www.station7restaurant.com/hydrant.cfm
the inside pages might be a combo or, or one of these...
http://www.station7restaurant.com/ideas/brickTopInsidePages_ver2_
hahaha :) go smoke some goodness and enjoy yer sleep mahn!
On 10/7/06, Mark Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> > :) thank ye mate!
>
> My pleasure! And now that Topalov has just crushed Kramnik to take a 5-4
> lead in the World Chess Championship, I can go to bed (in a somewhat
>
Tony wrote:
> :) thank ye mate!
My pleasure! And now that Topalov has just crushed Kramnik to take a 5-4
lead in the World Chess Championship, I can go to bed (in a somewhat
depressed state).
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
:) thank ye mate!
On 10/7/06, Mark Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> > still there?
> > i removed the this morning?
> >
> > :) help!!!
>
> My bad. When testing locally, I also placed the same block formatting on
> the image above it, and this is actually all that's required in
Tony wrote:
> still there?
> i removed the this morning?
>
> :) help!!!
My bad. When testing locally, I also placed the same block formatting on
the image above it, and this is actually all that's required in your
scenario. Put the display:block on the masthead image and then you
should be ab
still there?
i removed the this morning?
:) help!!!
On 10/6/06, Mark Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> > mark, good idea, but no go.
> >
> > still has that gap :(
> >
> > hmmm.
> >
> Hi Tony
>
> Did you also remove the offending break just above that image? Works for
> me
ours is clear yellow and comes with a different horizon.
>yes... you dont?
>
>On 10/5/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdF
Tony wrote:
> mark, good idea, but no go.
>
> still has that gap :(
>
> hmmm.
>
Hi Tony
Did you also remove the offending break just above that image? Works for
me locally here.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarter
mark, good idea, but no go.
still has that gap :(
hmmm.
http://www.davisrealty.com/
here is the url to look at it again...
thanks!
tony
On 10/6/06, Mark Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > im going back to transitional.
> >
> > :) unless someone can explain why that image isnt butti
On 10/5/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> all taken care of :) whatcha think now?
It looks great. Very nice.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion informati
> im going back to transitional.
>
> :) unless someone can explain why that image isnt butting up to
> the top of that white line?
Without actually testing any code here (I don't have time right now but
I will look again later if you have no joy), try setting the image to
block for starters.
zackly, i could care less what they want, if they want it, cool, ill
do it, but its GONNA COST 'em!
tw
On 10/5/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sweet
> from 50 to 75 we go.
> even though its dumber, slower & gonna look worse..
>
> On 10/5/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > time =
sweet
from 50 to 75 we go.
even though its dumber, slower & gonna look worse..
On 10/5/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> time = money
>
> simple equation.
> if its gonna take you more time, then charge MORE MONEY.
>
> simple as that friend
>
> On 10/5/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
l Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:50 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: design critique
>
> strict is fine, in IE, but not FF, can you help me with whats wrong?
>
> thanks!
>
> tony
>
> On 10/4/06, Sandra Cla
time = money
simple equation.
if its gonna take you more time, then charge MORE MONEY.
simple as that friend
On 10/5/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> design question..
> about pricing..
>
> would you guys charge more or less if you where required to work
> inside some one elses frame
design question..
about pricing..
would you guys charge more or less if you where required to work
inside some one elses frame work, like a shopping cart.
so that the origional design promised to the client would be limited
due to the choice they made in host/cart company...
i was bout to bag a
yes... you dont?
On 10/5/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> much better. DO you guys really get white grass like that?
>
> >all taken care of :) whatcha think now?
> >
> >thanks to EVERYONE!!!
> >
> >On 10/5/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
>
>
~
much better. DO you guys really get white grass like that?
>all taken care of :) whatcha think now?
>
>thanks to EVERYONE!!!
>
>On 10/5/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly U
hmm me too and maybe it *is* because ut seems headerlike. Perhaps you gop make
it transparent and smaller and superimpose it on the admittedly goergeous
graphic.
>Personally I'd also drop the "Welcome Home" at the bottom or perhaps lighten
>it more (as watermark). It's pinned the bottom of the
I think "welcome home" is a good idea. But visually I'd like it better if there
was some space between it and the bottom of the page. Possibly a somewhat small
font too.
Dana
>actually its meant to be the footer... :) but i know what you mean, i
>struggled with that
>last night... maybe ill jus
fixes a lot of IE6 breaks.
Sandra Clark
==
http://www.shayna.com
Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:50 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: design crit
all taken care of :) whatcha think now?
thanks to EVERYONE!!!
On 10/5/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It suffers from my main complaint with real estate sites. It doesn't
> say where it is located. I also agree with the comment that the
> dividing line needs to be longer, and I wou
> It's attractive, no doubt about that.
thank ye!
>
> Personally I find things a little off-balance: 50% of your layout is
> essentially the masthead. Us Davis's aren't like that - we're a "to the
> point" kind of people. ;^)
those effin' davis'
>
> The fact that you have to remind them to "r
actually its meant to be the footer... :) but i know what you mean, i
struggled with that
last night... maybe ill just remove it?
On 10/4/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with both comments. Or instead of making it longer you could move it
> down a bit so that it is more in t
done :) and thanks for the input !
On 10/4/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love it.
>
> Only one comment.
> the white line dividing right from left is too short. I want it to go
> down farther vertically.
>
> On 10/4/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi there.
> >
> > whatch
esday, October 04, 2006 10:14 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: design critique
>
> hi there.
>
> whatcha think of this new layout?
>
> http://www.davisrealty.com/
>
> thanks.
>
> its not totally done, and the site will be inside the main area when im
> through, bu
It suffers from my main complaint with real estate sites. It doesn't
say where it is located. I also agree with the comment that the
dividing line needs to be longer, and I would justify the text
describing the properies instead of centering it.
On 10/4/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi t
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:14 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: design critique
>
> hi there.
>
> whatcha think of this new layout?
>
> http://www.davisrealty.com/
It's attracti
I agree with both comments. Or instead of making it longer you could move it
down a bit so that it is more in the middle. I think you could also use some er
whitespace (bluespace?) below the welcome home. It feels like you can scroll
down more and you can't. If there will eventually be a footer
I love it.
Only one comment.
the white line dividing right from left is too short. I want it to go
down farther vertically.
On 10/4/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi there.
>
> whatcha think of this new layout?
>
> http://www.davisrealty.com/
>
> thanks.
>
> its not totally done, and the s
Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: design critique
hi there.
whatcha think of this new layout?
http://www.davisrealty.com/
thanks.
its not totally done, and the site will be inside the main
hi there.
whatcha think of this new layout?
http://www.davisrealty.com/
thanks.
its not totally done, and the site will be inside the main area
when im through, but what about hte overall look/feel?
thanks!
--
'Never have anything in your life that you can't walk out on in thirty
seconds fla
s it' text in that second 'banner'... I'd like to see a short
'WHAT WE DO IN PLAIN AS PLAIN CAN BE TERMS' sort of jump out at you thing.
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 6:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Desig
Well, the last time I looked at the site the main picture was a woman cooking.
I said at the time, and still think, that your emphasis should not be on the
cook. The carrots look great, honest, and I am not really someone that gets
into cooking. I haven't clicked any links or looked at any code
boy your mood just keeps opn getting darker, doesn't it...
> Yes, it highlights the radioactive theme started in the a-bomb cloud.
>
> On 3/19/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > nice gradient behind the logo. It does make me think of something
> cooking. I also like the artwork much
Yes, it highlights the radioactive theme started in the a-bomb cloud.
On 3/19/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice gradient behind the logo. It does make me think of something cooking. I
> also like the artwork much better -- I really think this should be about the
> food, not the
cool, thank ya. so... better than last time?
tw
On 3/19/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice gradient behind the logo. It does make me think of something cooking. I
> also like the artwork much better -- I really think this should be about the
> food, not the cook. Good color sche
nice gradient behind the logo. It does make me think of something cooking. I
also like the artwork much better -- I really think this should be about the
food, not the cook. Good color scheme
Dana
>hi there.
>here is the near final version of the dinner company site...
>
>all the page headers a
hi there.
here is the near final version of the dinner company site...
all the page headers are not done, so just look at the front page (ill
be working on them so they *may* be up when you look)
http://www.mydinnercompany.com/new/index.cfm
thanks!
tony
~
Am I the only one that thinks this design is fabulous? I really really
like it. It's clean, beautiful, and you can tell that once real
information is in there, that it will be clear and the important stuff
stands out. It looks very professional, non-threatening, very
welcoming. I like the s
i stay away from companies that validate their css and html
and xhtml and asdkljasdofiu
too much of that is just well, i dont know... too much for me.
if ie and ff can see it, well, thats enough for me.
the majority speaks, and the majority purchases and the majority
does the majority of things.
Don't give up on it by any means.
I do really like the "softer" feel, the rounded corners, etc. The
sharp, boxy, text based technical websites are somewhat offputting to
non-techs. It is a great approach. The colors are just a little too
soft for me, even given the goal.
When evaluating tech comp
some oregano, some darvocet, and the ncaa seletion special.
it was a creative dump while playing pacific poker last night.
tw
On 3/13/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Next, the extended R in revolution looks like a street light. Turned
> > off. My mind has you turning the light o
> Next, the extended R in revolution looks like a street light. Turned
> off. My mind has you turning the light on, and highlighting the "e".
> as in "e-" like in e-mail, e-business, etc.
Interesting, my take on the extended "r" is faucet. But that may be
that we've recently started planning a bat
Next, the extended R in revolution looks like a street light. Turned
off. My mind has you turning the light on, and highlighting the "e".
as in "e-" like in e-mail, e-business, etc.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c
je pass the pipe dude... its gettin to yarrr head
:) tw
On 3/13/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me the first cognative clash is the name revolution and the cloverleaf
> logo.
>
> The logo looks like a fan blade, which makes the name lean towards the
> definition of rev
For me the first cognative clash is the name revolution and the cloverleaf logo.
The logo looks like a fan blade, which makes the name lean towards the
definition of revolution meaning a circular motion. But the fan blade
has no elements of movement or motion in the image. Which makes me
feel a PO
well, i just wanted to throw together a new, more eye pleasing design,
and appeal to a different audience. truly, not one single sale has come
from the site, but everytime someone asks me about my site
and sites that I have done, i want to show them something that i am proud
of, that is good desig
It _is_ very soft and feminine - which isn't necessarily a bad thing if
you're wanting to attract the crowd that's afraid of technology.
The links in the top right are too squished - they need some space above and
below each line. Also, I wouldn't include a beta lab in a marketing site.
I'm assumi
stuff. I mean this isn't bad if it
was like a day spa or something.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:48 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: the plumbers pipes are about to start working...
hi there.
working on a new site for my own business. finally its time
whatcha think?
http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/interface_begin_3_12_2006.jpg
the blue line @ the top will extend out in all directions, and the content area
will take up 750 px of space, and it will be a center oriented de
I know I let myself in for that one.
larry
On 3/8/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The more things change, the more things stay the same :)
>
>
> On 3/8/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No it must be something from your end. The date on my machine is
> > correct
The more things change, the more things stay the same :)
On 3/8/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it must be something from your end. The date on my machine is
> correct. In 1969 I was still an obnoxious brat.
>
> larry
>
> On 3/8/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Huh. Weird, it's gone now.
Welcome back. :)
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> No it must be something from your end. The date on my machine is
> correct. In 1969 I was still an obnoxious brat.
>
> larry
>
> On 3/8/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm off here - but I think my favor
No it must be something from your end. The date on my machine is
correct. In 1969 I was still an obnoxious brat.
larry
On 3/8/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm off here - but I think my favorite thing with the old design
> was that yellow color. It was warm and inviting, v
Everyone else has already gone in depth ... My answer was perfect
considering all the other's already wonderful answers. Do I really need
to go into detail and repeat what the others have said?
Not trying to be difficult at all, just confused ...
Cheers,
Erika
Maybe I'm off here - but I think my favorite thing with the old design
was that yellow color. It was warm and inviting, very down-home, nice,
warm, fuzzy, etc.
I think that the info could be better organized on the old site, though.
I think if you somehow combined the way you organize the in
Tony,
the site would work in about 5 or 10 years when myDinnerCompany is a
multinational firm with hundreds of franchises. It has the same
corporate feel. The older one "felt" better and is closer to the image
the company wants to project.
larry
On 3/8/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nothi
Reminds me of the Mad TV sketch about the TV game show called "Vague".
"You know how it works. I ask you some questions, you give me some
answers, and you might win some of this stuff!" and they pan over to a
stack of boxes wrapped in plain brown paper. :P
> nothing like some good ol' fashioned
nothing like some good ol' fashioned vaguity :)
thanks.
tw
On 3/8/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Little of both :)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
> --
>
> ##| -Original Message-
> ##| From: Tony
> ##|
> ##| so is it layout + colors
Little of both :)
Cheers,
Erika
--
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Tony
##|
##| so is it layout + colors that are not jiving?
##| or just the colors?
~|
Message: htt
so is it layout + colors that are not jiving?
or just the colors?
believe me, i trust y'alls opinions, and it doesnt hurt
me to hear anything.
:) tw
On 3/8/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Real. I don't like the new one either. It is the first design you've
> posted that I absolu
Real. I don't like the new one either. It is the first design you've
posted that I absolutely shuddered at. As far as design for topic goes.
I liked the first one as well. Clean, simple, "foody".
K.I.S.S. principle.
:)
Just because you like purple, doesn't mean 80% of your audience likes
purple
i forgot about this one, was that a jab? or real :)
tw
On 3/6/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes.
> --
>
> ##| From: Tony
> ##|
> ##| ug i hate the old one :( too simple, 5th grader-ish i thought.
> ##|
> ##| wow. am i that of
good ideas dre. ill be doing that , thats a good idea.
thanks.
tony
On 3/6/06, DRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the first one as well. It was easier on the eyes and made me want to
> look around more than the other.
>
> What do you ask them when you show it to them? I've found "Do you like
they will go on the next version, tonight.
tw
On 3/6/06, Robyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd get rid of the picture of the people and put instead a picture of
> some of the food, or a stock image of people or food... It's the first
> thing that jumped out at me, too.
>
> Loathe wrote:
>
> >Du
your right on all points.
:) tw
On 3/6/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why you always ask more than one person. Design is so
> subjective. And why you often give the stakeholders opinion a little
> more weight. They have to live with it. I don't.
>
> But, you also need to do
I'd get rid of the picture of the people and put instead a picture of
some of the food, or a stock image of people or food... It's the first
thing that jumped out at me, too.
Loathe wrote:
>Dude, fat people don't sell.
>
~|
I like the first one as well. It was easier on the eyes and made me want to
look around more than the other.
What do you ask them when you show it to them? I've found "Do you like it?"
to be not so useful. Sometimes, I show somebody the site and then take it
away and ask them questions about it t
That's why you always ask more than one person. Design is so
subjective. And why you often give the stakeholders opinion a little
more weight. They have to live with it. I don't.
But, you also need to downgrade the stakeholders opinion a little bit,
since sometimes they equate "different" with "be
s'all good, i can take it :)
trouble is my wife loves it, and some of our clients
that we have shown love it :(
so, im not sure what to say.
feck
On 3/6/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, yeah.
>
> The current one IS simple, but so is your idea.
>
> The design of the current
For me, yeah.
The current one IS simple, but so is your idea.
The design of the current site does not get in the way of the message.
There is TOO MUCH information on the new one. I don't know where to
look. The text is too small, the picture is too small. You lost the
"punch".
The current colors
Yes.
--
##| From: Tony
##|
##| ug i hate the old one :( too simple, 5th grader-ish i thought.
##|
##| wow. am i that off?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c
ug i hate the old one :( too simple, 5th grader-ish i thought.
wow. am i that off?
tw
On 3/6/06, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the old one better, too. I'm vaguely annoyed that the width of the
> site changes from page to page. It's too "jumpy." And, the colors on thi
I like the old one better, too. I'm vaguely annoyed that the width of the
site changes from page to page. It's too "jumpy." And, the colors on this
one are less appetizing. The old site makes me think "bread and butter" and
this one makes me think "techno garble."
On 3/5/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED
, March 05, 2006 10:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Design Critique
>
> http://www.mydinnercompany.com/website%5Fideas/
>
> whatchy'alls think :)
>
> thanks.
> tony
>
>
>
>
~|
Mess
AIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 10:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Design Critique
> http://www.mydinnercompany.com/website%5Fideas/
> whatchy'alls think :)
> thanks.
> tony
s. isaac dealey 434.293.6201
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
I like the old one better. It felt more "homey". This one feels too
"corporate". The out of focus pixels/gradations don;t work for me. The
new colors are not as friendly. It doesn't feel as "hand crafted" as
the old one.
Sorry.
I really like the old one.
On 3/5/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Dude, fat people don't sell.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 10:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Design Critique
http://www.mydinnercompany.com/website%5Fideas/
whatchy'
http://www.mydinnercompany.com/website%5Fideas/
whatchy'alls think :)
thanks.
tony
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198925
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: ht
Yah, just keeping the rollover color would be good. I just found myself
clicking on the button for the page I was already on, and then wondering
what was up. (It was early - no coffee yet. go figure.)
On 2/17/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that makes sense... kinda keep the mouseover colo
nor annoyance. I
> love the rope texture around the yellow-green bar. That's good design.
>
> - Matt
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:32 PM
>
that makes sense... kinda keep the mouseover color? or change
the background of the menu item, while on that page?
tw
On 2/17/06, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the interior pages, I found myself wanting some kind of indication of
> which page I was on in the navigation. Other t
On the interior pages, I found myself wanting some kind of indication of
which page I was on in the navigation. Other than that, I like it.
On 2/16/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so this is what the client REALLY likes.
> so based on what you see... watcha think?
> click in to go inside t
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:32 PM
Subject: final design critique
> so this is what the client REALLY likes.
> so based on what you see... watcha think?
> click in to go inside the site
>
> http:
so this is what the client REALLY likes.
so based on what you see... watcha think?
click in to go inside the site
http://www.bennett-construction.com/new/
danke.
tw
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197
e. Something to tie it in with the feel of
> the company. Maybe you could make a subtle change for each section to
> make the border look like the current page's topic.
>
> I also didn't know they named a street after Ray Camden.
>
> M!ke
>
> -Original
Ray Camden.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 7:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: design critique
ok.
here is the revised flash interface/splash and then you can click on a
section to get to the content page layout to follow:
http://
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
