> Dana wrote:
>
> ok... there to preach the merits of consumer-driven health care?
>
In their own way they already have it - not the UK, of course - but
France, Germany, Holland, Switzerland ... they all have their own
brand.
And, at the end of the day there's no magic bullet for every country -
ok... there to preach the merits of consumer-driven health care?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> >
> > oh yeah? where are you moving to?
> >
>
> Prolly Europe.
>
>
~|
Want to reach the C
> Dana wrote:
>
> oh yeah? where are you moving to?
>
Prolly Europe.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/
oh yeah? where are you moving to?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > That is not what concerns most folks. The real issue is whether
> procedures
> > we consider routine today under the private insurance system will be
> > rationed tomorrow under a public
> RoMunn wrote:
> That is not what concerns most folks. The real issue is whether procedures
> we consider routine today under the private insurance system will be
> rationed tomorrow under a public system, like they are in all public
> systems.
> As for the rising cost of care, we'll see which sy
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Dana wrote:
> But I will admit to my own brand of skepticism on this. I foresee an
> unfunded mandate for individuals to buy coverage. This is not what I hoped
> for. I found this amusing, and yes, I know it is on the Huffington Post.
> Deal. I think you might ag
what is this we you speak of, kemo sabe?
what is your definition of over-utilization?
I did not see that in the press conference, unless you are talking about
where he said "we are looking into that"?
But I will admit to my own brand of skepticism on this. I foresee an
unfunded mandate for indivi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> eh. I'd call the "flag" address a PR faux pas -- a gift to people who need
> something to be outraged about.
As I said, democrats, including the white house, have committed a bunch of
unforced errors recently. the flag@ and email spamming go be
eh. I'd call the "flag" address a PR faux pas -- a gift to people who need
something to be outraged about. I don't see anything in your other link that
says these emails are from third-party lists? If so that is also not a good
thing, but in the absence of any evidence that this si what happened,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Vivec wrote:
> Baracks opponents are desperate. If he forgets to comb his hair they will
> use that fact to make a claim that he's negligent in office.
I would hardly call that desperate, this has been true for the
opposing party during each of the recent presiden
No, the Democrats are desperate, they were caught flat-footed by the furor
over the health care bill and they have committed a bunch of unforced
errors, including the email lists. And now word that they have pulled the
plug on f...@whitehouse.gov:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.h
Baracks opponents are desperate. If he forgets to comb his hair they will
use that fact to make a claim that he's negligent in office.
If it wasn't so true, it would be funny.
2009/8/17 Michael Grant
>
> Tempest. Meet teapot.
>
~
Tempest. Meet teapot.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Huh. So the WH captured email addresses from third party organizations and
> emailed them without permission. Funny, I thought there was a law against
> that. Oh right, there is a law against that.
>
>
> abbreviated:
Huh. So the WH captured email addresses from third party organizations and
emailed them without permission. Funny, I thought there was a law against
that. Oh right, there is a law against that.
abbreviated:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26169.html
The White House said Sunday night
14 matches
Mail list logo
