Marys marys I need some lovin!!!
On Nov 7, 2013 11:15 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> He said a threesome!
> On Nov 7, 2013 11:13 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
>>
>> Mary Magdalene or the Virgin Mary?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
>> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
He said a threesome!
On Nov 7, 2013 11:13 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> Mary Magdalene or the Virgin Mary?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Nowif
> > we're
Mary Magdalene or the Virgin Mary?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Nowif
> we're talking Mary...
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
> > You do
Well, that's what she'll tell you anyway.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Stay away form Mary dude...you could knock her up without even touching
> her.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
htt
I'd be down with Mary Mags, specially if she's played by Yvonne
Ellman.who could sing me a song when we're done (great voice).
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> The Virgin Mary or Mary Magdalene? Because the latter was a whore and I'm
> sure she'd be down.
>
> Sent fr
The Virgin Mary or Mary Magdalene? Because the latter was a whore and I'm sure
she'd be down.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>
>
> I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Nowif
> we're talking Mary...
>
>
>> On
Boom!
Omg I'm dyin ova hea!
On Nov 7, 2013 10:14 AM, "GMoney" wrote:
>
> Stay away form Mary dude...you could knock her up without even touching
> her.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I just don't think I could get into a
Stay away form Mary dude...you could knock her up without even touching her.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Nowif
> we're talking Mary...
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:
I just don't think I could get into a threesome with Jesus. Nowif
we're talking Mary...
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> You don't know what you're missing!
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons >wrote:
>
> >
> > Not into threesomes thanks.
> >
> >
> >
The more the merrier!!!
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 2:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: oh my gawd
You don't know what you're missing!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
&g
> You don't know what you're missing!
Truth
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/A
You don't know what you're missing!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Not into threesomes thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson
> wrote:
>
> >
> > who gets the middle spot?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, GMoney wrote:
> >
> > >
>
Not into threesomes thanks.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> who gets the middle spot?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> >
> > not from a religious point of viewmarriage is a triad.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Larry C. Lyo
who gets the middle spot?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> not from a religious point of viewmarriage is a triad.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons >wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not, I think that he's wrong in his first assumption and goes
> downhill
> > from t
not from a religious point of viewmarriage is a triad.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I'm not, I think that he's wrong in his first assumption and goes downhill
> from there. Marriage is between 2 entities not 3., unless that's legal
> whereever they're getting ma
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought that one was kind of sappy, but at least
> I could see the point of it. Of course there's going to be someone who
> just can't be happy with that.
>
It was posted by a seminarian. I don't think
When they post them on the internet, I always find them fair game to mock.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> The religious view of marriage, for most Christian religion anyway, is that
> marriage is a representation of the pure and unconditional love from God,
> exhibited by m
I'm not, I think that he's wrong in his first assumption and goes downhill
from there. Marriage is between 2 entities not 3., unless that's legal
whereever they're getting married.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:23 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> The religious view of marriage, for most Christian religion any
The religious view of marriage, for most Christian religion anyway, is that
marriage is a representation of the pure and unconditional love from God,
exhibited by man here on earth. They see it as a gift from God, and in it's
existence, a celebration of Him and his love.
So.these comments are
Interesting that this particular Christianist left comments disabled. I
guess that he didn't want any feedback from those who may disagree with him.
somehow that fits.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> http://triathletewithacollar.wor
http://triathletewithacollar.wordpress.com/2013/11/03/a-response-to-marriage-isnt-for-you/
Undoubtedly you've seen the "Marriage isn't for you" article floating
around the inter-tubes. I thought that one was kind of sappy, but at least
I could see the point of it. Of course there's going to be
rom: Erika L. Walker-Arnold
To: CF-Community
Sent: 1/13/2002 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
>>|From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>|
>>|Eri*K*a,
>>|
>>|that sounds positively KINKY (and fun!)
>>|
>>|oops, you mean eats as in EATS?
>>|ne
>>|From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>|
>>|Eri*K*a,
>>|
>>|that sounds positively KINKY (and fun!)
>>|
>>|oops, you mean eats as in EATS?
>>|never mind...
Benny, Benny, Benny ... thank heavens you are back!!! I needed company in
the gutter!
hugs and kisses!!
E with a K
---
Eri*K*a,
that sounds positively KINKY (and fun!)
oops, you mean eats as in EATS?
never mind...
bb
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold
To: CF-Community
Sent: 1/11/2002 5:29 AM
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
You mean, in addition to a line monster, we have a monster that eats
dy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:54 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
hmm errr Hello.
I might suggest hiding under the table...
Pizza stones and Muffin pans are flying around :-)
-Original Message-
From: Greenwood, Erin E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
hmm errr Hello.
I might suggest hiding under the table...
Pizza stones and Muffin pans are flying around :-)
-Original Message-
From: Greenwood, Erin E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
Um. Hello? Can
Um. Hello? Can anybody hear me? Or am I still in Coventry? Whatever I did,
I'm sorry and I won't do it again.
e
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:37 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
lines and m
mmunity
> Subject: RE: Oh My gawd!
>
>
> You mean, in addition to a line monster, we have a monster that eats list
> members!!
>
> *** running from monster ***
>
> First Benny, then Randy, who's next!
> AAAH
Yeah but thanks to Michael, I think the
List Member Monster is dead!!
Good Shooting Michael!
I barely escaped with my life...
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Oh My gawd
nal Message-
>>|From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>|Sent: 11 January 2002 13:25
>>|To: CF-Community
>>|Subject: Oh My gawd!
>>|
>>|
>>|Thanks Michael!!
>>|
>>|I am Back !! I can POST!!
>>|
>>|W hoo
__
Thanks Michael!!
I am Back !! I can POST!!
W hoo
Sorry I have not been able to post to
the group for some time now.
Kind of a kid with a new toy!!
__
Macromedia ColdFusion 5 Training from the Source
Step by St
31 matches
Mail list logo
