>You may consent to living in a police state, but I have every expectation
>that I can go about my daily business without my every move being observed
>and recorded by the police. It has nothing to do with being paranoid and
>everything to do with the government's role in society.
>
>
Why do you
> Casey wrote:
> 1 Square Mile is 3,097,600 yards, That would be alot of cops,at one for
> every 500 yards.
>
Dude. You're harshing the rage, man.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
George Orwell is already proud, man. Dunno what you're on about.
Nothing to worry about if you're not doing anything wrong right?
You're just fine with anti-social elements being locked up forever?
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 3:01 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> This is really going quite too far, IMHO. Ge
Yes.
2009/4/1 Paul Ihrig :
>
> is Autopilot an april fools?
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archi
is Autopilot an april fools?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/gro
On 5/22/07, R M eloquently stated:
> And so the loss of personal liberty is met, not with howls or catcalls, but
> with sarcasm.
Or cheers, even! Deserves only jeers, IMO.
Afloat in a boat rapping a rhyme I wrote...
Anyways, the local yokels just started this program, where the
cop cars are con
On 5/22/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> several hundred of these little things to create a virtual "Great Eye" that
> sees everything in a city, all at once, everywhere.
Lord Sauron has finally made it out Middle Earth and is here on...
er... Upper Earth?
-Cameron
~~
How long will the information be stored? And what will it be used for?
I guess there should be no 'Anti Stalking' legislation either, since
most movie stars are in public spaces when they are followed. And, if
they are in a public place, what's the harm in having someone stare at
them. No problem
You may consent to living in a police state, but I have every expectation
that I can go about my daily business without my every move being observed
and recorded by the police. It has nothing to do with being paranoid and
everything to do with the government's role in society.
On 5/23/07, James S
When was the last time you looked up paranoid in a dictionary?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2007 19:10
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: scary surveillance
It's cheaper and smaller, so you can have lots and lots of them flying all
ove
PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 May 2007 03:59
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: scary surveillance
And so the loss of personal liberty is met, not with howls or catcalls, but
with sarcasm.
On 5/22/07, Larry wrote:
>
> > I'm so gonna rant about this when I get a spare second...
> >
> >
>And so the loss of personal liberty is met, not with howls or catcalls,
>but with sarcasm.
Why is it a loss of personal liberty? You do things in public that you
would not do in front of an officer of the law? Breaking the law
because you do not fear being caught does not equal freedom. If on
>And so the loss of personal liberty is met, not with howls or catcalls, but
>with sarcasm.
>
>On 5/22/07, Larry wrote:
>--
>---
>Robert Munn
>www.funkymojo.com
What loss? If you are in the public forum then you have no expectations of
privacy. If it used a system that would spy into
> 1 Square Mile is 3,097,600 yards, That would be alot of cops,at one for
> every 500 yards.
Your maths are correct but your logic fails you.
The range of 500 yards is in all directions (a radius) so each officer would
be able to cover 3.14x500x500 or 785,398 sq yds so you would actually only
nee
And so the loss of personal liberty is met, not with howls or catcalls, but
with sarcasm.
On 5/22/07, Larry wrote:
>
> > I'm so gonna rant about this when I get a spare second...
> >
> > On 5/21/07, Robert M wrote:
> > >
> > > This is really going quite too far, IMHO. George Orwell would be
> > ap
On 5/22/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's the problem? You're in a public place, not somewhere where there is
> a reasonable expectation of privacy. Its not as if its hovering over your
> bed while you do kinky things to your pet sheep.
>
That was funny s$%#
and to quote the
ROFLMAO ...
On 5/22/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's the problem? You're in a public place, not somewhere where there is
> a reasonable expectation of privacy. Its not as if its hovering over your
> bed while you do kinky things to your pet sheep.
>
>
~~
> I'm so gonna rant about this when I get a spare second...
>
> On 5/21/07, Robert M wrote:
> >
> > This is really going quite too far, IMHO. George Orwell would be
> appalled.
> >
> >
> > http://www.thisislondon.co.
uk/news/article-23397459-de>
tails/%20Flying+saucer%20+police+spy+camera+takes+
i have a great eye.
its hazel, not brown.
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7.
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV
Archive:
http://www.
It's cheaper and smaller, so you can have lots and lots of them flying all
over the place, poking into every corner of a city. If you had enough
processing power, you could in theory use camera feeds from a network of
several hundred of these little things to create a virtual "Great Eye" that
sees
> This is really going quite too far, IMHO. George Orwell would be appalled.
What's the problem? It is cheaper than a helicopter, easier to fly than a
helicopter, less intrusive than a helicopter, and except for high speed
pursuit will do the same job.
It doesn't require an expensive pilot to fly
I'm so gonna rant about this when I get a spare second...
On 5/21/07, Robert M wrote:
>
> This is really going quite too far, IMHO. George Orwell would be appalled.
>
>
> http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23397459-details/%20Flying+saucer%20+police+spy+camera+takes+to+the+skies/article.do
yeah...
but it should be pretty easy to do a rf scan & completly foo bar that..
if that dosnt work a kid with a pelete gun & 5 bucks could take care of it.
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving featu
This is really going quite too far, IMHO. George Orwell would be appalled.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23397459-details/%20Flying+saucer%20+police+spy+camera+takes+to+the+skies/article.do
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~~
24 matches
Mail list logo
