lly.
Jim Davis
> -Original Message-
> From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:08 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: site review part deux
>
> Bla! I liked the old one better. I think the exclamation point smacks
of
>
Ok, I've livened it up a bit. See now.
http://webmachineinc.com/
ps, its full flexy and youre probably right about the blog.
Thanks in advance. DRE
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE:
- I think Kevin
called it "architectural style."
-Deanna
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Turrettini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: site review part
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: site review part deux
>
>
> Ok, I've livened it up a bit. See now.
>
> http://webmachineinc.com/
>
> ps, its full flexy and youre probably right about the blo
Yup..I like that one,
It gives it more feeling :-)
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: site review part deux
Ok, I've livened it up a bit. See now.
Personally I preferred the original font. By the way I just noticed the
inc.com...I would leave off the .com myself as it makes be wonder about the
space before the inc and it's a needless distraction. I think most people
would gather that you are probably .com if you are online.
On the image, the
