;
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's it! I warned you. Anymore nonsence Liberal
rumors and I'd bring back the Rush quotes :)
Enjoy.
"I'm not kidding you. There is more animosity aimed
That's it! I warned you. Anymore nonsence Liberal
rumors and I'd bring back the Rush quotes :)
Enjoy.
"I'm not kidding you. There is more animosity aimed at
this Scott Peterson guy because of the lies he told
the girlfriend, than what he has allegedly done to his
wife and child."
"I believe a l
al Message -
From: John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:00:10 -0400
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i also like powell, and think he should run for office.
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wedne
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We're not bullies. The UN approved severe
> consequences
> > if Iraq did not comply. They changed their mind in
> the
> > end and we didn't.
>
> They were UN sanc
I posted the link to the story 6/30
http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=m:5:13157:118228
Here's the link again
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/ft1.htm
-sm
--- Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Wrong again. When he made his State of the Union
> speech last year, he
> >specif
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're not bullies. The UN approved severe consequences
> if Iraq did not comply. They changed their mind in the
> end and we didn't.
They were UN sanctions, not US sanctions. Our going to war, because
the UN was cho
>Wrong again. When he made his State of the Union speech last year, he
>specifically mentioned the Iraqi attempts to buy yellow cake uranium,
>that was after he knew full well that there were no such attempts.
It turns out there may have in fact been attempts by Iraq to secure yellowcake from Nige
No missile is getting past my anger barrier, just try it. :-)
Michael T. Tangorre
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 5:27 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Um Doug, I don't
Do you mean No Dong?
No wonder he builds such big missiles :)
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um Doug, I don't think your statement regarding
> North Korea is
> accurate. The Nodong II missle does have enough
> range (just barely) to
> hit US territory. There is another var
China also has missiles that can reach the US territory, So does Russia - Why
do we not consider them a threat?
Not my problem if Kim Jong has Nodong! :)
Then again, there are those who would not particularly miss LA, right?
Besides, some of my statements are not intended to be authorities, b
Um Doug, I don't think your statement regarding North Korea is
accurate. The Nodong II missle does have enough range (just barely) to
hit US territory. There is another varient, Nodong III that can
possibly hit LA.
Nodong - perhaps a comment on Kim Jong Il - dictator of North Korea?
larry
On Wed
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your position now is that a country cannot even
> seek WMD? Well when do we
> invade Syria, Iran, China, India, France, Russia,
> Argentina, Colombia and
> Pakistan? Are they not also a threat to the US?
China, India, Pakistan, France and Russia ha
From: Doug White
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
For your information, Korea is not threatening to use WMD, they are only
offering it for sale as international trade, to raise money with which to feed
its starving populace.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
If a country is a known threat and seek WMD's they
will need to be stopped. Many nations now have nuclear
weapons; the one we're most worried about is Korea
because they threaten to use it. Prove you are not a
threat and we'll let you be.
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never said none, I said "I am talking about the
> invasion of Iraq by Shrub,
> and most countries did not act. " which is proven by
> my figuires above. Nice
> try.
Sorry, I mixed it up with another message saying there
were no countries.
> I also n
Not true, we've debunked all the lies.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait one second, Bush made those claims and made
> them with full
> knowledge they were not true. Myself and others have
> presented ample
> evidence that was the case. So try another one.
>
> --- "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1) The verdict is still out on whether or not he's
>> "proven" that to
>> the masses.
>>
>> 2) As much as I hate to admit it, a great number of
>> "the masses" are
>> morons either because they're apathetic or because
>> they lack the
>> capaci
His wife has some problems, if I recall. Some say he shuns the spotlight to keep it from too brightly shining on her.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
His wife is afraid he&
i'm sure he's also concerned about that. but someone has to be first...
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 3:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
His wife is afraid he'll be assassina
4 10:52 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>
>
> I have trouble lumping Powell in with Bush, as its
> widely known that he was
> not enthusiastic about invading Iraq. It would seem
> drastically out of
> character for Powell to knowingly say somethin
okay, I am beginning to believe that Sam is actually a Bush "insider", maybe
even Shrub himself. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
--- "Lar
--- G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> The grandest example that always sticks out in my
> mind is that of Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.
> Not long after championing the moral cause against
> Clinton, he admitted to cheating on his wife in
> pretty much the same fashion. What a sle
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Well 30 did.
>
> Yeah, out of 194 countries in the wor
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The DUI charges and videos are legit. Given Bush's
> behavior, the
> speculation regarding Dry Drunk syndrom fit.
The part of the article you refer to are based on
speeches written by speechwriters. It's pure left wing
crap.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wrong again. When he made his State of the Union
> speech last year, he
> specifically mentioned the Iraqi attempts to buy
> yellow cake uranium,
> that was after he knew full well that there were no
> such attempts.
Based on Wilsons report. Wilson
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Well 30 did.
>
> Yeah, out of 194 countries in the world today.
> Wow a less than 1/6th
> endorsement..yeah.yipee I guess the
> other 164 are evil
First you said none and I said 30. Now 30 isn't enough
for you. Do you want
--- "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) The verdict is still out on whether or not he's
> "proven" that to
> the masses.
>
> 2) As much as I hate to admit it, a great number of
> "the masses" are
> morons either because they're apathetic or because
> they lack the
> capacity for com
ns the day.
Then again, i could be painting an over-rosey picture of the whole situation due to my admiration for the man.
- Original Message -
From: Doug White
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
I tend to agree, bu
-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
i also like powell, and think he should run for office.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
something, you just won't let any of the facts get in
> the way, huh. Clearly a case of the far right and far left meeting and
> becoming one.
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:09 PM
> To: CF-C
i also like powell, and think he should run for office.
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
I have trouble lumping Powell in with Bush, as its widely known that he wa
o: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
I do not think that Kerry would have lied multiple times about WMD's,
direct support of Al-Queda, trying to procure yellow cake uranium etc.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ---
The Dept of State announced that Powell will NOT be attending the Republican
National Convention!
No reason given.
- Original Message -
From: G
I have trouble lumping Powell in with Bush, as its widely known that he was
not enthusiastic about invading Iraq. It would seem drastical
Facts? Who bothers with facts?
But, But, that makes all his posts seem so interesting! :-)
Much more so that all the Rush re-runs, huh?
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout
Sam,
In case you haven't caught on yet, when it comes to Bush, Larry doesn't worry
about the fact
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:40 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
Try this article. Start looking and reading the links it references.
Interesting stuff.
www.inthesetimes.com.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast U
Bush, and probly regrets accepting his post. His moderate views have gone largely ignored on both sides, to the detriment of the rest of us IMHO.
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
slants it to the left a bit, however the
sources are from unclassified and declassified documents and present a
fairly objective view.
_
From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:23 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
Not
-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Says who, I've been able to back up everything I've said with outside
verifiable evidence. Unlike some.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:09:38 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam,
> In case you haven't
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
I claimed it was a rumor. But the DUI charges are no rumour nor is that
video.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:07:46 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice rumor. Watc
: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
I have no problem with the man partying in his past, but his hypocrisy
during the last election of denying it and then being so holier than
thou later on pissed me off.
the
r. Blair, i got the shakes something bad this morning"
> - Original Message -
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:38 AM
> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>
> The DUI charges and videos are legit. Given Bush's beha
m thing is probably a bit out there, i think it's hilarious to consider.."Sorry i snapped at you, Mr. Blair, i got the shakes something bad this morning"
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:38 AM
Subj
;t worry
> about the facts -- he adjusts them to fit his intense dislike of the man.
>
> Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>
> Given his admitted problems with drinking, and the rumoured cocaine
> use, one of the thing
The DUI charges and videos are legit. Given Bush's behavior, the
speculation regarding Dry Drunk syndrom fit.
And do you work for a Oxy-Contin drug addict?
larry
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:19:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are way out there.
> You work for Michael Moore?
Wrong again. When he made his State of the Union speech last year, he
specifically mentioned the Iraqi attempts to buy yellow cake uranium,
that was after he knew full well that there were no such attempts.
Second he mentioned the precision machined tubes as being centrifuges,
knowing full well tha
> >> Well 30 did.
> Yeah, out of 194 countries in the world today. Wow a
> less than 1/6th
> endorsement..yeah.yipee I guess the other 164
> are evil
Bush said they were... "If you're not with us you're against us".
That's paraphrased, I don't remember the exact quote -- it
>> Well 30 did.
Yeah, out of 194 countries in the world today. Wow a less than 1/6th
endorsement..yeah.yipee I guess the other 164 are evil
>> Yeah. Duh.
>> It's like letting everyone run around with whatever
>> weapons they want because the cops have them.
So you
There's less of Larry's opinion in that email than there is of other
people's.
> You are way out there.
> You work for Michael Moore?
> -sm
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Given his admitted problems with drinking, and the
>> rumoured cocaine
>> use, one of the things going
He doesn't have the same stance.
> Nice spin :)
> My point is you claim you don't trust Bush because of
> war. If Kerry has the same stance on the war, why
> support him?
> -sm
> --- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
>> <[EMAIL PROT
>> >> Bush is a leader and times like this we need a
>> leader.
>>
>> Bush is a leader in title only. He has not proven to
>> me that he has the
>> qualifications to hold the same hallowed office too
>> many other competent men
>> have.
>>
> But he has proven it to the masses.
1) The verdict is
-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Dude, are you going senile?
How many times do we have to go over this?
Bush didn't lie about any of those.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think that Kerry would have lied mul
Nice rumor. Watching hatred at work is a wonderful thing. The next four
years are going to be shear hell for you.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Given his adm
> i think it is more than just liberals, but I could
> be wrong.
>> You are.
You are seriously telling me that the only people that are opposed to Bush
are liberals?
>
> i know that you are not saying that Bush is anymore
> truthful than Kerry? Are
> you? they are both liars for sure.
Bl
I guess you don't know the connotation of Machiavelli's name then...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=machiavellian
they give this definition:
2. Suggestive of or characterized by expediency, deceit, and cunning
But moreover when people say it, the connotation is usually along the
lines
You are way out there.
You work for Michael Moore?
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given his admitted problems with drinking, and the
> rumoured cocaine
> use, one of the things going around the rumour mill
> sites is that Bush
> may be suffering from dry drunk syndrome - t
Nice spin :)
My point is you claim you don't trust Bush because of
war. If Kerry has the same stance on the war, why
support him?
-sm
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you think Bush screwed
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Iraq": UN should have acted as soon as Saddam
> > violated the terms of the end
> > of the Gulf War.
> >> Yeah but they didn't did they?
> No they didnt. We should have then threatened to
> pull our troops out, and
> stop enforcing the no-fly-zone
Dude, are you going senile?
How many times do we have to go over this?
Bush didn't lie about any of those.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think that Kerry would have lied multiple
> times about WMD's,
> direct support of Al-Queda, trying to procure yellow
> cake
And?
--- "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> I'd definately be all over Kerry like a cheap
> suit
> >> if he screws up as
> >> royally as Bush has done.
> >>
> >> larry
>
> > If you think Bush screwed up by going to war and
>
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think it is more than just liberals, but I could
> be wrong.
You are.
>
> i know that you are not saying that Bush is anymore
> truthful than Kerry? Are
> you? they are both liars for sure.
Blanket statements mean less than nothing to me.
Sounds
Given his admitted problems with drinking, and the rumoured cocaine
use, one of the things going around the rumour mill sites is that Bush
may be suffering from dry drunk syndrome - the obsessiveness, sudden
turn of moods, fits of swearing and absolute certitude. Combined with
the language problems
I guess Bush's cocaine days could explain a lot about our bushisms. :)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you think Bush screwed up by going to war and Kerry
>> said he would have also gone to war, what's the
>> difference?
> I don't see your argument. If your argument is that they
> are no
> different, then why
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think Bush screwed up by going to war and Kerry
> said he would have also gone to war, what's the
> difference?
I don't see your argument. If your argument is that they are no
different, then why wouldn't you
Bush's.
larry
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:15:48 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who's cocaine days? Bush or Kerry?
>
> > Better yet how about what he did during his alcohol and
> > cocaine days.
>
> > larry
>
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:08 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey
> > <[EMAIL PR
I do not think that Kerry would have lied multiple times about WMD's,
direct support of Al-Queda, trying to procure yellow cake uranium etc.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd definately be al
> "Iraq": UN should have acted as soon as Saddam
> violated the terms of the end
> of the Gulf War.
>> Yeah but they didn't did they?
No they didnt. We should have then threatened to pull our troops out, and
stop enforcing the no-fly-zone. Which may have caused an uproar in the Int'l
communi
Who's cocaine days? Bush or Kerry?
> Better yet how about what he did during his alcohol and
> cocaine days.
> larry
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:08 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On other occasions, Kerry has said he was not actually
>> > in Cambodia but rather "near" t
PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:33 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>>
>> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I'd definately be all over Kerry like a cheap suit
>> &
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd definately be all over Kerry like a cheap suit
>> if he screws up as
>> royally as Bush has done.
>>
>> larry
> If you think Bush screwed up by going to war and Kerry
> said he would have also gone to war, what's the
> difference?
http://w
-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I'm not defending Bush, I'm attacking Kerry.
I think being a chronic liar is worse than tripping
while speaking publicly. But that's me.
> in the face of so much overwhelming opp
Yep, I much happier that he makes bad decisions and then sticks to them
until the end. Yep, it's a good thing he doesn't waffle.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:33 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subj
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd definately be all over Kerry like a cheap suit
> if he screws up as
> royally as Bush has done.
>
> larry
If you think Bush screwed up by going to war and Kerry
said he would have also gone to war, what's the
difference?
Then again Kerry sup
Better yet how about what he did during his alcohol and cocaine days.
larry
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:08 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On other occasions, Kerry has said he was not actually
> > in Cambodia but rather "near" the country. In an
> > interview with the Provide
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
>
> Hey, all shit aside... if Kerry fucks up like Bush has, I will be the
> first to jump all over it :-)
>
> Michael T. Tangorre
>
> _
>> Bush is a fortunate son, and the families of the
>> american soldiers are the
>> un-fortunate ones who have to bury their children
>> and fathers and mothers
>> and brothers and sisters because of his actions.
>>
> Bush is a leader and times like this we need a leader.
Bush is a self-serving e
> Vague?
> More recently, in a profile of Kerry that appeared in
> the Washington Post in June 2003, Kerry revealed that
> he kept an old camouflage hat from the war in a secret
> pocket in his briefcase. "My good luck hat," Kerry
> told the paper. "Given to me by a CIA guy as we went
> in for a sp
I toe corrected. :)
> Yeah, it's "toe". As in they draw the line in the sand of
> where you
> should be and you step up to defend it, you don't hang
> back.
> -Kevin
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:26:38 -0700, Charlie Griefer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-toe2.htm
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only considered that by Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and
> Sam Morris and perhaps Tom
> DeLay.
>
> Everyone else believes him and his administration to
> be war criminals.
When you say everyone else do you mean Al Fraken,
Terry McCauliff and Doug White?
-
--- Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam -
>
> your post proves my point about blindly following
> the party line.
How is that?
We know for fact Kerry lies, agreed?
I asked what Bush lies. Are you refering to reasons
for the Iraq war? Those are not lies.
-sm
> You're saying that K
Bush is a leader and times like this we need a leader.
-sm
Only considered that by Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and Sam Morris and perhaps Tom
DeLay.
Everyone else believes him and his administration to be war criminals. Liars,
thieves, and the committers of various and sundry felonies against the Am
Howie Hamlin
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
What's even funnier is when conservatives come back with something about Clinton. Hello? Shouldn't we be discussing Bush and Kerry?
[Todays Threads]
[This Mess
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Iraq": UN should have acted as soon as Saddam
> violated the terms of the end
> of the Gulf War.
Yeah but they didn't did they?
> The gulf war was not between the US
> and Iraq, but the
> "civilized" world and Saddam. So the world should
> have act
Sam -
your post proves my point about blindly following the party line.
You're saying that Kerry has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to
be a liar...but Bush has not?
Sam Morris wrote:
>--- Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Tangorre, Michael wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>
I heard he was all hat, no cattle
http://www.allhatnocattle.net/
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of h
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of hat was GW Bush wearing when he was
> missing for 9 months?
For nine months he wore this:
http://www.hatcountry.com/catalog/images/ShapeableRaffia2.jpg
He was only missing for three months, then he was
wearing this:
http://www.pimphats.c
--- Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> But if they're caught in a lie while in office...I
> think they should be
> voted out. Doesn't mean the challenger isn't
> lying...but if we don't
> vote out lying incumbents then there is no
> motivation for it to sto
Beer hat, of course!
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
What kind of hat was GW Bush wearing when he was missing for 9 months?
- Original Me
What kind of hat was GW Bush wearing when he was missing for 9 months?
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Vague?
More recently, in a profile of Kerry that appeared in
Vague?
More recently, in a profile of Kerry that appeared in
the Washington Post in June 2003, Kerry revealed that
he kept an old camouflage hat from the war in a secret
pocket in his briefcase. "My good luck hat," Kerry
told the paper. "Given to me by a CIA guy as we went
in for a special mission
Actually, I previously laughed at Kerry's gaff at the DNC speech where
he said that he would "double the special forces to engage in terror
campaigns...anti-terror campaigns." I thought that slip was funny. And
he pronounced the "American Idea" as "American Idear" which set me on
edge.
-Kevin
On
Yeah, it's "toe". As in they draw the line in the sand of where you
should be and you step up to defend it, you don't hang back.
-Kevin
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:26:38 -0700, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-toe2.htm
>
> i wasn't curious enough to goo
--- John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually Im not defending Bush, Im attacking Kerry.
I think being a chronic liar is worse than tripping
while speaking publicly. But thats me.
> in the face of so much overwhelming opposition
What are you talking about here? So many Liberals?
-sm
http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-toe2.htm
i wasn't curious enough to google it until now...but it seems that
sticking one's foot in the party's face would actually be correct :)
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>I'm registered independent because I can't blindly say I'm
>>Republican or
>>Democrat. I
What's even funnier is when conservatives come back with something about Clinton. Hello? Shouldn't we be discussing Bush and Kerry?
- Original Message -
From: Charlie Griefer
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: today's Kerryi
maybe there will be a new tv show: "Fawlty Intelligence"...
Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e232)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Well, there you have it.
>On other occasions, Kerry has said he was not actually
>in Cambodia but rather "near" the country. In an
>interview with the Providence Journal-Bulletin that
>appeared in April, 1994, Kerry said "Christmas Eve I
>was up getting shot at somewhere near Cambodia." The
>accou
> I'm registered independent because I can't blindly say I'm
> Republican or
> Democrat. I can't toe (tow?) the party line and blindly
> vote for (or
> support) whoever happens to be running on "my party's"
> ticket.
It's tow -- as in trailor / weight, etc...
Toe would be sticking your feet in t
> On other occasions, Kerry has said he was not actually
> in Cambodia but rather "near" the country. In an
> interview with the Providence Journal-Bulletin that
> appeared in April, 1994, Kerry said "Christmas Eve I
> was up getting shot at somewhere near Cambodia." The
> account of Kerry's servic
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
