Sir,
One of specialities is working with the SE Asia Firms and from my converstions
with them your rate seems to be an anomally since I have had to put out
subcontracting bids for other developers to help when I am swamped,most of my
replies have been in the $20-30 range. Also Sir you do not ha
Interesting, $40/hr is really not a ton cheaper than what a lot of U.S.
developers will work for. We have paid anywhere from $40-60/hr for CF
developers. I personally have worked for anywhere from $30-80/hr, just
depended on the job, my schedule, and many other factors.
I have had trouble with b
I'm running an offshore ColdFusion developer from Jakarta, that is
south east Asia.
My company's rate is US$40/man/hour, i think it's not that cheap :)
Currently we have 0 customers that won't pay us.
Infact, we never ask for down payment cause we're 100% sure that our
client will benefit from o
Sorry for the Multiple Post , PC locked up and I was not sure Original Posts
went in!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198
Here is the problem I face most of the clients I have had recently have not
paid me as you may recall the nasty spat online for $150. Well the guy he says
I billed 165 hours never paid me for ONE hour of work, the next client I get
then promptly pays me for one week but take 20 hours off the nex
Here is the problem I face most of the clients I have had recently have not
paid me as you may recall the nasty spat online for $150. Well the guy he says
I billed 165 hours never paid me for ONE hour of work, the next client I get
then promptly pays me for one week but take 20 hours off the nex
Here is the problem I face most of the clients I have had recently have not
paid me as you may recall the nasty spat online for $150. Well the guy he says
I billed 165 hours never paid me for ONE hour of work, the next client I get
then promptly pays me for one week but take 20 hours off the nex
Create a filter to automatically delete posts from such a firm. At
least then you won't have to deal with that stress.
Maureen wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 6:35 AM, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Seriously... learn from the experience with whoever burned you today, maybe
>> share
On Feb 1, 2008 6:35 AM, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously... learn from the experience with whoever burned you today, maybe
> share your experience with some close friends and family in PRIVATE just to
> get it off your chest.. and move on.
That's easy to say. But I had a v
J W wrote:
> Counterpoint #2: Unless you have money for a lawyer and run through small
> claims, your more than likely SOL. We need more protection that just trying
> to hire a lawyer. How much $$$ do you have to shell out for lawyers to MAKE
> a uplholdable contract/agreement. Remember its still
> After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just
> about
> ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
> f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.
Why not use the Better Business Bureau? After all, their motto is
"Start with
Trust." If you have a bad experience with
Don't get me mixed up with the original poster. I never said I wanted a
website like that. What I did say is there has to be ACCOUNTABILITY for BOTH
sides. We need to find a solution for THAT.
Jeff
On Feb 1, 2008 12:33 PM, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Complacency? Not hardly, I'
Which is fine. We agree to disagree. Likewise with yours.
On Feb 1, 2008 12:15 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've said what I have to say. If you don't agree that's fine with me.
> Good luck with your endeavors.
>
> -Cameron
>
> J W wrote:
> > There still needs to be account
Complacency? Not hardly, I'm just not willing to jump on one sided
complaining and say "Yeah... you go get em!" I also don't care to hear the
other side of the argument publicly because it just turns into
back-and-forth bickering and makes both sides look stupid to people who
weren't involved and d
I've said what I have to say. If you don't agree that's fine with me.
Good luck with your endeavors.
-Cameron
J W wrote:
> There still needs to be accountability on the company.
>
> Counterpoint #1: I disagree. How the heck do your make a decision to TRUST
> someone that you barely know. Heck
There still needs to be accountability on the company.
Counterpoint #1: I disagree. How the heck do your make a decision to TRUST
someone that you barely know. Heck even if you know them, trust them, they
can still burn you. See "Holmes on Homes" for many examples of deception of
trust. Different
J W wrote:
> We can complain when we are burned, or have the attitude that you need to
> "learn your lesson and move on". The 6 million dollar question is. How do we
> make it right?
I would argue that the lessons to be learned have to do with:
1) How you make the decision to work with someone (o
In addition to clients, I have quite a few vendors I'd like to go on
and on bitching about.
Sometimes I find it's good to write this stuff down. And then destroy
those words in some manner of your choosing. (Shred them / burn them /
whatever )
I think all my problems related back to a co
I don't do a whole hell of consultant work but I do on occasion. Complacency
like this gets me all fired up though.
So the gist I am reading here is:
Yeah its OK for companies to BURN you. You should go sulk in a corner,
reflect on how it went bad and move on. Try not to let it happen again. No
co
> Seriously... learn from the experience with whoever burned you today, maybe
> share your experience with some close friends and family in PRIVATE just to
> get it off your chest.. and move on.
+1
I'm trying to get my boss to invest in some laser-tag time for our
team after this month's... month
ose friends and family in PRIVATE just to
get it off your chest.. and move on.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 7:50 PM
To: CF-Jobs-Talk
Subject: Re:
> After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
> ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
> f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.
Why do I recall seeing this thread some time back?
~|
Ad
> What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
> review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
> the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
> resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
> properly.
The way I understand i
Some of the issues I have encountered in the past is temp tech jobs
recruiting for other contractors an the other subcontractor being the
worst link in the chain.
I started working on a project once with about 50 people and most
contractors rapidly dropped off because of harsh treatment with
Sometimes it's best just to learn from your bad experiences and just
move on. Spending too much time stewing (in public) can be very
counter-productive.
-Cameron
Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
> After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
> ready to build a new site that
Checkbox criteria would definitely make it much better.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
> Trevor:
>
> That's an interesting idea. I'll admit the idea crossed my mind,
> but I
> quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity.
> Since many
> consultants
Trevor:
That's an interesting idea. I'll admit the idea crossed my mind, but I
quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity. Since many
consultants are individuals, or their business name is their name, it would
end up being finger-pointing. If we could come up with a way to m
What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
properly.
On 1/31/08, Joseph Smuzynski
It sounds like a lawsuit trap to me.
The only way to keep it factual is if you moderate posts and control
what people say. Once you do that, then you are no longer protected
under "safe harbor" provisions.
All that said, even if you're "in the right" in terms of free speech,
that won't p
*cough* liability *cough*
Seeing as how it is anonymous, companies would come after the site
owner for anything they feel is untruthful (you know, the beyond the
shadow of a doubt type thing). Be careful trying to recreate a
judicial court.
On Jan 31, 2008 5:05 PM, Joseph Smuzynski <[EMAIL PROTECT
This site sounds like it will take all of your time doing moderation.
One of my friends started a similar site but with mechanics.
Also you might run into problems with profitableness, because the best
advertising/sponsoring could come from someone who might have people
on your site who hate t
31 matches
Mail list logo
