absolutely not, Michael is pretty forgiving in managing his lists, but
CF-Jobs and CF-Jobs talk may need to be more actively and forcefully
moderated.
Steve Runyon wrote:
> Given how infrequently the lists are used correctly, would it make sense to
> combine CF-Jobs and CF-Jobs-Talk? I agree th
> absolutely not, Michael is pretty forgiving in managing his lists, but
> CF-Jobs and CF-Jobs talk may need to be more actively and forcefully
> moderated.
And the mistaken posts seem to me to generally be one-directional,
posted to cf-jobs rather than cf-jobs-talk. People who are actually
post
No. I do not want to see the CF-jobs talk littered with chatter and
garbage. its bad enough that people automatically respond to the list
without checking for the sender's email address. Combining the two
lists will really reduce the signal to noise ratio.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Steve Ru
Np, thanks all - I withdraw the question. :-)
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> No. I do not want to see the CF-jobs talk littered with chatter and
> garbage. its bad enough that people automatically respond to the list
> without checking for the sender's
CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to the original
posters email address, not to the cf-jobs list. In order to reply to the
cf-jobs list someone would have to write the cf-jobs email address in
specifically or have a bad email client. I'm setting the cf-jobs list to
reject a
As long as you put on there telecommuting as an option and salary
offered (rejecting letters like "DOB" or such), I'm all for it. :)
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to the original
> posters email address, not to the cf-jobs list. In order to r
"DOB" Depending On Birthdate? :) Probably good not to pay them
young'uns too much.
Matt
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Phillip M. Vector
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as you put on there telecommuting as an option and salary
> offered (rejecting letters like "DOB" or such), I'm all for it.
Ugh. Sorry. I'm posting with a 102 degree fever and taking care of a 5
year old. :)
DOE. Depending on Experience. Basically, tell us what you are willing to
pay. I hate countering the question of how much I'll accept with "How
much is your budget". :)
Matt Williams wrote:
> "DOB" Depending On
job in the post. Too funny, really.
:)
Thanks for looking at this!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:32 PM
To: cf-jobs-talk
Subject: Re: lists question
CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to
I'm totally against salary based on when you were born. :)
If you have some example forms and/or suggestions, please let me know. I'm
doing it both for people looking for work as well as people looking to hire.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Phillip M. Vector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> As lon
> I can't tell you how many posts I've seen over the years where the poster
> didn't even include the location of the job in the post. Too funny, really.
> :)
Good point - always find myself having to hunt through the post to
find the location and if they are requiring on site. If we make those
r
> Ugh. Sorry. I'm posting with a 102 degree fever and taking care of a
> 5 year old. :)
>
> DOE. Depending on Experience. Basically, tell us what you are willing
> to pay. I hate countering the question of how much I'll accept with
> "How much is your budget". :)
Might just want to reframe the re
That's a great idea Michael. I'm all for it.
regards,
larry
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Michael Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to the original
> posters email address, not to the cf-jobs list. In order to reply to the
> cf-jobs
13 matches
Mail list logo
