> >>>
> >>> I have a new variable request; bottom temperature. It is the
temperature of the ocean floor (or the last level of a multi level
ocean dataset). I searched and was unable to find it or a variable
with "bottom" or synomyn as a level. I welcome being pointed
ype. Since there is no
other way to define a purely quality control variable, the use of "status_flag" is too general for
strictly quality control variables. By having a method to define a variable as strictly quality control the
results of quality control tests can be applied to the
/mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution*
* W
on.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
ses like the ones currently under discussion, and
therefore we should change the schema. Do others agree with this
approach, or does anyone have a better idea?
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archiva
resist it. Saw a nice
definition for port - 'The side of a platform that is on the left
when one is facing forward.'
Cheers, Roy.
I have now retired but will continue to be active through an
Emeritus Fellowship using this e-mail address.
---
side of a platform that is on the left
when one is facing forward.'
Cheers, Roy.
I have now retired but will continue to be active through an
Emeritus Fellowship using this e-mail address.
----
*From:* CF-me
tude-upward is a
right-handed coordinate system. I suppose this is the yaw
rotation - but is that the opposite sign from yours? Best wishes
Jonathan
On 9/3/18 12:51 PM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear Roy and Nan I agree that if there are existing names
whose sign convention is undefined we c
I second Roy's suggestion; existing names have undefined directionality,
and new names have explicit directions. This seems like the only way to
move forward. If there's a difference of opinion on which direction
should be in the new name, we can easily create a pair for each term.
What would the
g the directionality for variables lacking the attribute.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 8/3/18 2:03 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Hi Roy -
Yes, I've been looking at that page quite a bit lately, and I
think it backs up
what I'm saying.
If you are standing on that fuselage (may we never),
d by the instrument.
FYI a very quick search of the data products we produce:
* pitch with nose up positive: 6
* roll with right side down positive: 6
* yaw with clockwise positive: 1
* sway with toward left side positive: 1
* surge with toward bow positive: 1
* heave with up positive:
ot;pitch axis", is an imaginary line running horizontally
across the platform and through its center of gravity. In pitch motion, the leading edge of the platform moves
vertically upwards while the rear moves vertically downwards, and vice versa. The quantity with standard name
platform_pitch_rate
g
as heave now, it should still be heave in 20 years.
Cheers - Nan
On 7/30/18 1:39 PM, Kenneth Kehoe wrote:
A less specific definition would allow the use now, and a more
specific definition can be added later if needed.
--
***
* Nan Galb
>>> Just so we can see a couple of examples of pulling all this >>>
together, I've written out the full revised definitions of >>> platform
platform_pitch_angle and platform_pitch_rate below. >>> >>>
platform_pitch_angle (degree) 'Standard names for &
ch the "front" or longitudinal
axis of the platform is pointing with high frequency variations (e.g. the effect of
surface waves on a ship) removed. (This is not necessarily the same as the direction in
which the platform is travelling, called platform_course).'
On 7/26/18 9:34
ntity with standard name
platform_pitch_rate is the change per unit time in the quantity with standard name platform_pitch_angle.'
The roll and yaw definitions would be constructed similarly.
The pitch/roll/yaw names are still under discussion. I'd welcome further
comments on these.
Best
lacement
of a platform over a measurement time interval
They leave out some detail but capture the relative nature of the quantities.
(In my mind, the primary detail being left out is the 'net zero' nature of the
quantities, which gets back to defining the 'moving-mean' sea l
definitions. I also agree with using the existing
orientation Standard Names for ADCPs and that the
'platform' definition wording could make this
clearer. However, such an enhancements should be
submitted as
lready use pitch roll and
yaw for these
instruments on surface moorings, and I hope (and assume) this is legal.
Thanks - Nan Galbraith
On 5/25/18 8:53 AM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
Dear Steve,
One of the reasons I was interested in your definitions was your
perspective on the datum (i.e. ze
o including the word wind, *direction_of_surface_downward_stress*.
(On a side note, I have no idea why there's a 'correction' variable -
what can that
mean?)
As far as the Seadatanet terms, I know they exist, but I'm not sure what
their relationship
is to the CF vocabulary.
ready
there using different
terms.
Thanks - Nan Galbraith
* This standard name seems related, but it has a definition that isn't
clear to me at all:
|wind_mixing_energy_flux_into_sea_water (||W m-2):|
||'Wind is defined as a two-dimensional (horizontal) air velocity
vector, with
>> >> and the scalar value swtd can be 0.5 degC, 1.0 degC, etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In this case, I need standard names working with
temperature,
>> >> >> sigma_theta and
>> >> >> sigma_t:
>> >> >>
Many thanks,
Neill
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution*
* Woods Hole, MA 02543
: dimensionless (1)
Thanks
Brian
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution*
* Woods Hole
and on existing
names. I'd welcome comments to improve them.
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44
1235 778065
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX,
term to refer to
day-in-year, but this doesn't seem to be a proper usage.
>>
>> Grace and peace,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On 3/16/17 3:36 PM, John Helly wrote:
>>> Sorry to jump in here but isn't this just the Julian day?
>&
le that
represents the day of the year on which an event happened (integers from 0 to
366). This value is recorded every year for a number of years. I have a couple
of questions about how best to do this:
1. What is the best standard name to use for the day of t
thers (mostly period and direction) are still "under
discussion" on the "CF proposal page". Any news on that topic?
Regards,
Elodie
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems
New electronics technicians setting up instruments, right?
I don't really think this is a CF problem. You apparently can guess the
date, it just
wasn't recorded by the instrument (otherwise, I'm guessing, you wouldn't be
thinking of using it in monthly stats).
My solution is to generate a date
ist
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanograph
01 requires two digits for the
time pieces [1], so that >> should be: >> >> "days since 1990-1-1
00:00:00" >> >> >> The parser I use isn't picky about this, but maybe
some are? >> >> BTW, as it's an example, we should probably throw
nde ascent
rate? Should I request a new variable,
"upward_platform_speed_wrt_ground"?
Many thanks for any assistance. I never even knew about CF
standard names until I started QC'ing data from our field program and
trying to create good data files!
Cheers,
Leslie
--
*****
ta Analysis Email:
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk <mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk>
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
\
--
***
* Nan Galbraith(508) 289-2444 *
* Upper Ocean
our
requirement is urgent.
----
*From:* CF-metadata on behalf of
Nan Galbraith
*Sent:* 14 June 2016 16:26
*To:* cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
*Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Wave Direction, Energy and Steepness
Sub-Proposal
Th
Standard names plus five new Standard names.
Based on the proposal of Elodie and Marta with further off-list
discussion by Chris Barker, nan Galbraith and myself.
Cheers, Roy.
*Changes to Existing Standard Name Definitions*
1. *sea_surface_swell_wave_from_direction *
*/Current Defin
edu"
CC: "m...@puertos.es"
Subject: [CF-metadata] Wave periods sub-proposal
Dear All,
What follows is a modification of part of the proposal initially
submitted by Elodie Fernandez following off-list work between
Elodie, Marta, Chris Barker, Nan Galbraith and myself. It inc
o the
wave height that would be recorded visually by a human observer during
that observation period' in the significant wave height definition.
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group
7;s how it's actually
measured/computed these days.
-CHB
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
ux_of_particulate_inorganic_nitrogen_in_sea_water
sinking_mass_flux_of_particulate_nitrogen_in_sea_water
(with a canonical unit : kg m-2 s-1)
There was only a remark from Roy who suggested to add "total" for
total_carbon (=organic+inorganic in its definition) and total_nitrogen
in name
t measures a
velocity component which isn't strictly vertical. We could give that a
different name (i.e. component parallel to the instrument orientation, with
again the need to indicate the sign convention somehow).
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Nan Galbraith -
D
ownward air
velocity is the vertical component of the 3D air velocity vector.
Thanks,
Ken
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic In
12 = 30.44 days, so if you use udunits to convert to anything
else, you won't end up where you think you will. The better practice
is to use days. It's not as "human readable", but it's the only way to
do proper conversions between time bases.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 9/17
gy_bounds=”0.0”, “3.0” ;
The CF examples are helpful but my case is different where in I have
just 1-time co-ordinate in my file. In the above case, what is the
best way to record time and climatology bounds?
Thanks,
Ajay
--
***
* Nan
ace, such as the reflected and incident radiation at an
interface./
Any specific suggestion on a definition based on the document (or on
anything else)?
Cheers - Nan
On 8/20/15 1:22 PM, Maarten Sneep wrote:
On 10/08/15 19:37, Maarten Sneep wrote:
On 07/08/15 21:15, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Hi All, an
that they don't need to be
defined in CF? Or should we add at least a minimal definition?
Thanks -
Nan
On 7/14/15 3:22 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Thanks for raising this, Maarten; we should fix the albedo definitions.
I use
surface_albedo regularly, but didn't actually have a def
I'll look into
that, and the same applies to CMIP conventions.
regards,
Martin
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan Galbraith
nimal definition?
Thanks -
Nan
On 7/14/15 3:22 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Thanks for raising this, Maarten; we should fix the albedo
definitions. I use
surface_albedo regularly, but didn't actually have a definition handy,
so went
googling.
This one's from wikipedia:
Albedo is the rat
n on observations).
I'm sure there are more, but these caught my eye. I'm not sure how to
change the descriptions, I don't know the history of these quantities
in the standard name list. Can someone advise how to proceed?
Best,
Maarten Sneep
--
for the 1.7 convention, this doesn't seem possible. The epoch and time count must both be
expressed either as UTC or as GPS time and the only "mixed calendar" options
introduce the above mentioned ambiguity.
Regards,
Tim Patterson
--
ely the
real world and is not standard. Therefore I'm still inclined towards abolishing
them. What do you think?
Best wishes
Jonathan
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Hi Roy -
Sure, determination is fine.
Thanks - Nan
On 6/15/15 1:07 PM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
Hi Nan,
'Determination'? - 'Estimate' sounds lik a guess to me.
Cheers, Roy.
From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] on beh
, producing
a value on the Practical Salinity Scale of 1978 (PSS-78).
If that's too much, I'll go with John's version, or Alison's ... yes, it
would be good
to wrap this up.
Thanks!
Nan
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Hi Alison and all -
Either of
ity quantities that do not match any of
the precise definitions should be given the more general standard name
of sea_water_salinity. Reference: www.teos-10.org
<http://www.teos-10.org/>; Lewis, 1980 doi:10.1109/JOE.1980.1145448.
--
*******
* N
Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail
erstood by udunits), I just need to
indicate the actual units via the units attribute.
So, I think we just need to extend this same thinking to
dimensionless quantities.
Apologies if I've misunderstood the issues...
Dan
--
*
humidity is a percent. The
CF definition doesn't include any text on this subject. Does this happen
to be because 'percent' isn't clear enough - whether it's by volume or
weight?
Any thoughts?
Thanks -
Nan
--
***
* Na
AS/Centre for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
Of Nan Galbraith
Sent: 02 June 2015
ject. Does this happen
to be because 'percent' isn't clear enough - whether it's by volume or
weight?
Any thoughts?
Thanks -
Nan
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group
ion to help people
better understand the data.
Best wishes,
Alison
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Nan
Galbraith
Sent: 27 May 2015 15:45
To: Rich Pawlowicz
Cc:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Salinity units
Hi all -
The '.00
tal Data ArchivalEmail:
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Nan
Galbraith
Sent: 27 May 2015 15:45
To: Rich Pawlowicz
Cc:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.e
ng Rich Pawlowicz on this,
hoping for his input.
Thanks,
-Rich
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
Dimensionless. Please
This is the view of physical oceanographers for whom I have the
greatest respect.
Cheers, Roy.
From: Reyn
eanographers for whom I have the greatest
respect.
Cheers, Roy.
From: Reyna Jenkyns [re...@uvic.ca]
Sent: 22 May 2015 18:06
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Salinity units
I'm interested in this topic since I didn't realize what had been discussed
previous
y in the CF documentation?
Reyna Jenkyns | Data Stewardship Team Lead - Digital Infrastructure
Ocean Networks Canada | T 250 853 3908 | oceannetworks.ca
University of Victoria PO Box 1700 STN CSC 2300 McKenzie Avenue Victoria, BC
V8W 2Y2
________
From: CF-metadata o
nity were '1.00E-03', i.e. parts per thousand. My
> understanding in that since the introduction of the Practical
> Salinity Scale that salinity is dimensionless with units of '1'. Is
> there agreement for our changing the units in the Standard Name
> ta
rd of an "ocean flux density adjustment", and Google finds one hit for
"snowfall flux density". However we could rename them all and establish aliases
to the present names, if that would be an advantage for users of standard
names. Should this be done?
Cheers
Jo
gd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution*
* Woods Hole,
e of modifying CF to accept, e.g. Conventions = "CF-1.8, UGRID-0.9"?
regards,
Martin
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole O
mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution*
* Woods Hole, MA 02543
n
- phosphorous
- silica
- biogenic_silica
- lithogenic_silica
- calcium
- titanium
- manganese
- barium
- magnesium
Respectfully, Matthias
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean
ins use among
themselves.
Yours equally respectfully
Jonathan
----- Forwarded message from Nan Galbraith -
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:20:54 -0500
From: Nan Galbraith
To:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Fwd: Re: Request for new standard-name:
apparent_oxygen_utilization
T
jargon term.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Nan Galbraith -
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:35:36 -0500
From: Nan Galbraith
To:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Fwd: Re: Request for new standard-name:
apparent_oxygen_utilization
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PP
mine.
Regards -
Nan
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name:
apparent_oxygen_utilization
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:24:25 -0500
From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate
To: Nan Galbraith
Hi Nan,
I posed your question to the Science tea
info/cf-metadata
- End forwarded message -
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Pro
end up with consensus.
-Rich
--
*******
* Nan Galbraith(508) 289-2444 *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
_
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Process
_
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
*
ed
parameters I requested months ago. Never fear, is still on my list to do!
John Graybeal
jbgrayb...@mindspring.com
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*****
hed CF 1.7 document.
Is that right, Jeff?
Thanks
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Nan Galbraith -
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 11:14:06 -0400
From: Nan Galbraith
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
To: "cf-metada
mmas, it is assumed to be a
comma-separated list."
Jonathan
Ticket URL:<https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/76#comment:6>
CF Metadata<http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/>
CF Metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Sy
es on http://cf-convention.github.io/,
which repo are we supposed to send a pull request to?
Thanks,
Rich
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanograp
some code that might not be readily available on github; I'd be happy to
just be able to use the page search in my browser.
Thanks again - Nan
On 4/3/14 3:06 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Hi Jeff (and all) -
I know this is a big project, but just want to check that the old
URLs will eventually
other day:
http://cf-convention.github.io/documents.html
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole
.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
- End forwarded message -
_______
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan Galb
n
- Forwarded message from Nan Galbraith -
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:46:14 -0400
From: Nan Galbraith
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0)
Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] featureType attribute (was CF-
lt;mailto:CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan
sured quantity of signal
travel time?
It has been proposed to be done with cell_methods='Z:sum', or with
a coordinate reference frame that includes the orientation of the
instrument.
Is there a 'best practice' for this?
Thanks - Nan
On 6/7/13 3:57 PM, Nan Galbraith wr
ys.
Some well-documented solutions exist:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/NetCDF-CF_File_Examples_for_Satellite_Swath_Data
Our NASA WG will try to identify such netCDF-API options for storing
multiple satellite granules that are a compromise of convenience
(multiple granules/groups per file) a
ay-job!
> However it would be interesting to know more about how different
technology
> from trac would make the task easier.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Spec
is the reality.
If we start from that premise, then the real questions for discussion are
should there be conventions on how groups and hierarchies are used in netcdf4
and hdf5 files, so that a user or software provider will know what to expect,
and the second question is if it is deemed
_
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
*******
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group
e error estimates?"
So if we can some up with a standard way to represent this it will be extremely
helpful.
John
On Jul 1, 2013, at 13:00, Nan Galbraith wrote:
I think that these are fairly important QC checks for wind and current
data, and that they deserve to have standard names to
car.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan Galbraith(508) 289-2444 *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole O
e, and use the error
variable's long_name to describe the error)
very respectfully,
randy
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
******
portion of the shortwave spectrum, I think a different term
(reflectivity? reflectance?) should be used.
Karl
On 6/19/13 8:32 AM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Can we also update the definition for surface_albedo now? It's
currently ' The surface
called "surface" means the lower boundary o
ing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
***
* Nan GalbraithInformation Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes GroupMail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceano
tes
Desc: publishingStandardNames.pdf
URL:
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/443c998e/attachment.pdf>___
CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.uca
ions.
The canonical units would obviously be seconds.
I assume the data would need some additional description to denote the
vertical extent of the measurement, such as cell_bounds and
cell_methods='Z:sum'.
Any comments?
Kind regards, Matthias
--
**
//www.nodc.noaa.gov
_______
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
**
he
standard deviation is the width of that distribution. Neither is a
discrete measurement and only make sense as part of a distribution.
But I am not a statistician so I really do wonder what one would say….
-Ken
On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Nan Galbraith <mailto:ngalbra...@whoi.edu&
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
