> On Dec 18, 2015, at 10:47 AM, V Balaji - NOAA Affiliate
> wrote:
>
> Also, neither I nor any of the original proponents are actively
> developing gridspec at this point. I am happy to support further
> development along the ugrid lines, and treat gridspec's ugrid as a
> historical oddity... t
Inline comments:
Chris Barker writes:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Jonathan Gregory
wrote:
After that proposal was agreed, we had some further discussions concerning
the
relationship of gridspec and ugrid and how they could be made more similar.
I remember that conversation, though I
athan
- Forwarded message from Chris Barker -
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:46:15 -0800
> From: Chris Barker
> To: Jonathan Gregory
> CC: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Reference for GRIDSPEC?
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Jonathan
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> After that proposal was agreed, we had some further discussions concerning
> the
> relationship of gridspec and ugrid and how they could be made more similar.
>
I remember that conversation, though I never took the time to look at
gridsp
...@princeton.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Reference for GRIDSPEC?
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
>
> Hi,
>
>In ESMF we support a subset of the GRIDSPEC convention for creating grids,
> generating regridding weights, etc. In our reference manual we pointed to a
> wiki ho
Hi,
In ESMF we support a subset of the GRIDSPEC convention for creating grids,
generating regridding weights, etc. In our reference manual we pointed to a
wiki hosted by the company Tech-X that described the CF proposal for GRIDSPEC.
(This was also the place to which the CF Metadata Trac pro
