Re: Internal webserver vs. Apache on MX for JRun was Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone

2003-01-04 Thread Dave Carabetta
> > What's the advantage of running through a webserver such > > as Apache versus the web server that's built in to JRun? > > Mind you, I'm talking about *CFMX FOR JRUN*, not CFMX > > standalone. I know about the standalone performance > > differences, but do these same differences exist for > > JR

OT Any CFers at MacWorld 2003?

2003-01-04 Thread Dick Applebaum
I know that CF people from MM monitor this list -- I wonder if any CF people will be in the MM booth at MacWorld 2003 -- Starts Jan 07, 2003. TIA Dick ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subsc

Re: newbie school of hard knocks

2003-01-04 Thread Christian Cantrell
Mike, I would consider putting your validation at a lower level than your CF code. In other words, I would put a unique constraint on your table for the fields that you want to be unique. I generally like this approach better than validating in CF because you can be sure the same validat

RE: How do I get the domain name extracted from the URL of a requ ested page?

2003-01-04 Thread Rick Faircloth
Thanks, everyone. CGI.Server_Name worked fine. Sorry I took so long to thank everyone for your help. I believe it was *last year* when I first posted the question! ;o) Rick -Original Message- From: Everett, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 11:45 AM To: CF

RE: Internal webserver vs. Apache on MX for JRun was Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone

2003-01-04 Thread Dave Watts
> What's the advantage of running through a webserver such > as Apache versus the web server that's built in to JRun? > Mind you, I'm talking about *CFMX FOR JRUN*, not CFMX > standalone. I know about the standalone performance > differences, but do these same differences exist for > JRun? As

Re: HELP: Installation of SQL Server 2000 under WinXP Professional

2003-01-04 Thread Li Chunshen \(Don\)
I've installed eval copy of SQL2000 on my XP Prof Edition without any problem. The account I used during installation belongs to "System administrator" group. Don Li --- Peter Tilbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does not appear to be the draconian measures > instilled by the > "Administrato

Internal webserver vs. Apache on MX for JRun was Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone

2003-01-04 Thread Dave Carabetta
I've been enjoying this thread immensely, as the support/community for CFMX for J2EE servers is extremely sparse and I've had lots of different questions. I've seen posts on the forums regarding the following question, but have yet to see a reply. What's the advantage of running through a webserve

RE: newbie school of hard knocks

2003-01-04 Thread Mike Miessen
Not to worry I was not upset by what you said. You have good and valid points. I agree with, for example, with what you say :) -Original Message- From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: newbie school of hard kno

Re: HELP: Installation of SQL Server 2000 under WinXP Professional

2003-01-04 Thread Dustin Snell [Unisyn Software, LLC]
I can't tell you how many times I have run into nonsense errors like this when installing SQL 2000. In my eyes, although SQL 2000 has a good core engine, the install and the interface is very buggy and sensitive to system and software oddities. I wish I could tell give you specific advise, althou

RE: HELP: Installation of SQL Server 2000 under WinXP Professional

2003-01-04 Thread Robert Bailey
I had the problem installing it as well, but even though it hang at the end, my SQL still worked. Then my computer crashed, had to reinstall XP, so started from scratch, and had no problems with the SQL install. Odd, huh? Do you have admin rights on that machine? -Original Message- From: P

RE: newbie school of hard knocks

2003-01-04 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Mike, I did not mean to imply that you shouldn't test thoroughly and that you shouldn't understand and document what user situations you plan on catching, what you will do when you catch them and those situations such as first name/last name that you may choose not too catch. For example, you mig

Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone

2003-01-04 Thread Dick Applebaum
Jochem With your and Sean's comments and reading Sean's Blogs, I think I have it now. With CFMXJ2ee and JRun you can. 1) Set up multiple JRun Servers (Server Instances). Each of these, effectively, uses a separate OS Process and JVM. 2) Each JRun Server Instance can run 1 (or more) applicati

RE: newbie school of hard knocks

2003-01-04 Thread Mike Miessen
Wow I wish the company I work for would take this idea to heart. I work for a centralized laboratory that performs clinical drug trials for the big pharmaceutical companies. We have always been compelled (Forced?) to make our code bullet proof so that the user could not enter any invalid or unaut

Exclude Specific Files from Verity Search - plus one other

2003-01-04 Thread Les Mizzell
Is there a way to specify a list of files (.htm, .cfm or whatever...) for a Verity Collection WHERE the files live in the same folder as files to be indexed? * 2nd question I do not have access to the Cold Fusion administrator for the site in quest

RE: newbie school of hard knocks

2003-01-04 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Mike, You can't find this by checking the names, you might just find 2 people who fit your definition of duplicate. You could only check this by using some other User info, like email address or telephone number. I agree with the earlier note that this is not something you should check for. By

Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone

2003-01-04 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dick Applebaum wrote: > > I haven't seen it mentioned, but wouldn't another advantage be that > each context would be able to use "dangerous" CFMX features such as > cfobject, custom tags, etc., because the contexts are isolated. Contexts are only of limited use here. They only serve to protec

RE: CFMX Install Problem

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Campbell
Rob - Thanks for your input. Digging around, I found *another* libstdc++yaddayadda library buried six or seven subdirectories inside /usr/lib. I did the symlink thing again, and InstallAnywhere was sufficiently fooled enough to install MX. There was much rejoicing and they ate Sir Robin's Minst

Re: the openness of Java and .NET (was RE: RE: CFMX and Java)

2003-01-04 Thread mark brinkworth
>s the open platform? Java is a platform > supported by multiple > > vendors, yes, but I don't believe this qualifies > it as open (despite > > what Sun's marketing department might say). > > > Why not? The various Java specifications are > publicly available. Just > because Sun created its own org

RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-04 Thread mark brinkworth
J2EE can be difficult, but I am not sure what is being meant by J2EE in this. JSP form part of J2EE, as do many other technologies. You just pick the ones you need for the problem at hand. Cheers > I agree with everythin you said except the idea that > Java is less expensive. > J2EE is still q

RE: Looking for SHOESTRING.TTF font

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:43 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: OT: Looking for SHOESTRING.TTF font > > > Anyone know where I can get hold of this very distinct font? > Called "shoestring" it is quite distinct.