using MS-SQL.
What would be the best way to store an SQL query inside a field? Just as a
simple text string / varchar?
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffu
James,
I use the "THIS" scope for creating complex types to be sent over Web
Services. I think that's about the only time I use it anymore.
-Joe
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:03:43 +0800, James Holmes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone use the THIS scope any more? Having just converted some nas
Mike
> No I haven't. Why? Wouldn't that mean IIS wouldnt be running and
> therefore my non-CF sites woudlnt work?
No, you can run IIS and JRun's builtin server simultaneously on different
ports. JRun will automatically choose a port that's free.
However, using the builtin server isn't really
Sorry - I should have mentioned I cut that from an earlier post from
Sean to one of my questions.
Duncan
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:35:58 -0800, Sean Corfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange... that's my response to another thread here on cf-talk...???
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:11:42 +1100, Du
No I haven't. Why? Wouldn't that mean IIS wouldnt be running and
therefore my non-CF sites woudlnt work?
I could give it a try I guess. Nothing else has worked. But I still
think the installation routine ought to work with WinXPPro, (which it
apparently does in most cases) but give a hint as
For personal dev, I always install using the built-in server. Have you tried
that?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2005 6:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Problems installing CFMX 7
I'm continuing with this farce ...
I'm continuing with this farce ...
Now i've deleted it all again, using uninstall, then deleted the
folders that were left over because even after a simple install, the
uninstall can't clean up after itself. (I really think Macromedia
ought to look for another install engine - this one doesn't do
I probably should have mentioned that we are on 6.1.
Even in that case in CF7, I just tested and they don't have to be THIS
variables, they can be put in the VARIABLES scope.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2005 5:12
To: CF-Talk
Sub
Strange... that's my response to another thread here on cf-talk...???
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:11:42 +1100, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Application.cfc effectively replaces the tag. This tag:
>
>
>
> becomes the following code in the pseudo-constructor area of
> Application.cfc (i.e., im
I have a similar problem, though I arrived at it a different way.
IIS 5 on Windows XP. CF running in J2EE mode on top of JRun4.
Befor installing CF7 I decided to re-install JRun. That went fine. I
downloaded the J2EE version of CF 7 & installed the "cfusion" server in
JRun. That's also fine. I ca
Application.cfc effectively replaces the tag. This tag:
becomes the following code in the pseudo-constructor area of
Application.cfc (i.e., immediately after the opening
tag):
See the following documentation:
Reference Manual:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/069
Does anyone use the THIS scope any more? Having just converted some nasty
old (CF 6.0) CFCs using THIS in external code and all sorts of other bad
things to really nice, new, VARIABLES scope code using getters and setters,
I can't see a use for THIS, except for the return in an init() method.
Does
> Have any more in your library you want to share??
I have a few CFC that leverage Java APIs available here:
http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/
Massimo Foti
DW tools: http://www.massimocorner.com
CF tools: http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/
~~~
> And I still desperately want a checkbox in the preferences which
> allows me to _completely_ disable the design view, which MM seems to
> be _completely_ disinterested in offering me. DW is so closely tied to
> the design view that I find it frequently open in spite of never
> opening it myself -
201 - 214 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
