I am not being sucusfull in finding a simple listing on when the various
versions of ColdFusion where offically released. Anybody here have a
link for that information?
Ian Skinner
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and
Ok, I see, I think I get it. :D
You've got A and B. A is the primary and it is offloading some
processing to B through your JRun cluster. In this case, you don't need
a hardware load balancer, as your site is on one real server.
Right now, server B doesn't have/need/use an HTTP server. Run a
Is the release history of ColdFusion some kind or secret. I can not find
anything searching Google or Macromedia that lists when the versions where
released. I would think somebody made note of this somewhere.
~|
Logware
Did you include the Remoting objects from the common library?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 1:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 Flash Remoting
On 6/15/05, Ben Forta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add a ? to the end of
Carl,
There are a number of things that can go wrong on a CF 5 server. As some
have suggested your code (particularly locking) is a good place to start.
Tuning the server itself and the dreaded zero length mail file bug are
other possibilities. Here's a blog entry that applies from some time ago.
Ray,
I would add to that, that I have had to rerun the connector script
(iisconnector.bat I think) after adding a new site and wanting to use
remoting. The only visible change that it affected was a Jrunscripts
directory. So the next time it happened I simply added a virutal map to the
Ian Skinner wrote:
I am not being sucusfull in finding a simple listing on when the various
versions of ColdFusion where offically released. Anybody here have a
link for that information?
I'm not sure how far back you need to go, or the level of detail needed,
but one of the strongest such
Ian Skinner wrote:
I am not being sucusfull in finding a simple listing on when the various
versions of ColdFusion where offically released. Anybody here have a
link for that information?
Sometimes, on mailing lists, you may not get a custom reply within the
first hour ;-)
For those
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
You didn't! Get out! :P
Yeah, believe it or not. Probably the oldest trick in the
book, but where's a person supposed to learn things they
didn't know they were supposed to learn?
Sorry... I just couldn't resist the pun... because of
getPageContext().getOut() ... I'm
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
Files: use the snapshot capabilities from your OS/FS
For an application that might be deployed on any given
OS/FS?
Which OS/FS on which CFMX is supported does not have
snapshot capabilities?
Don't they vary from one OS to the next? ...
It matches the System.out property. And it's convention to name it
'out' in your servlet code as well.
cheers,
barneyb
On 6/15/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
You didn't! Get out! :P
Yeah, believe it or not. Probably the oldest trick in the
book,
Anyway, say I've got CFMX clustered--one instance on Machine
A and another on Machine B:
If something hoses up CF on Machine B (an endless loop, for
instance), I don't want Machine A's cluster to keep trying to
serve up my CF app from Machine B.
If this is a JRun cluster, it should stop
Okay... so I'm surprised some Java programmer who preceeded the
convention didn't make it more descriptive.
It matches the System.out property. And it's convention to
name it
'out' in your servlet code as well.
cheers,
barneyb
On 6/15/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S.
An error occurred while evaluating the expression:
#HTTP_REFERER# Error near line 293, column
ITYM cgi.HTTP_REFERER
I'd wrap the relevant code in an existence check.
It's worth pointing out that if you explicitly use the CGI scope prefix, you
needn't test for the existence of the
I wish that intelligence and laziness were mutually exclusive!
To hell with that!
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore,
I just ran a quick test, and it appears that getBaseTagList only
returns things inside the most recent CFFUNCTION invocation (be it a
UDF or a CFC method). So bascially each method runs inside a tag
sandbox that getBaseTagList can't jump out of.
Not sure why it works that way, but it does
I suspect it's a holdover from C/C++, where you've got STDIN, STDOUT,
and STDERR. In Java, you've got System.in, System.out, and
System.err. It's not particularly descriptive, no, but the names have
been around longer than Java has. And then JSP/Servlets continued on
the tradition based on the
Okay... so I'm surprised some Java programmer who preceeded the
convention didn't make it more descriptive.
It's analogous to STDOUT - it isn't just within servlets, but is available
if you run a Java program from the command line or anywhere else for that
matter. So, the convention they
On 6/15/05, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My presumption about why it works this way, is that each function is
compiled as a separate Java class.
That goes for every CFM file too. Though I do agree with your
supposition that function classes are special in some way, and that
specialness
Geez... a guy can't even make the obvious pun... :P
I guess it makes more sense given coming from C ... the days of scarce
system resources... like using 2 digit years...
I suspect it's a holdover from C/C++, where you've got
STDIN, STDOUT,
and STDERR. In Java, you've got System.in,
I'm having a heck of a time with this... trying to build a javascript
regExp for the following pattern:
[1-5 digits] [optional hyphen and 3 digits]
If anyone can help, I'd give you a big hug.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can
Not tested: [0-9]{1,5}(\-[0-9]{3})?
You may need to wrap in slashes: /[0-9]{1,5}(\-[0-9]{3})?/
-Original Message-
From: Rebecca Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:57 a.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: stuck on regex
I'm having a heck of a time with this...
If the problem is in executing a task under another account, use this:
http://www.cftagstore.com/tags/cfxexec.cfm
This is a replacement for CFEXECUTE that allows account switching.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and
Hi all. My company is looking for a usability expert to review our
shopping process and make recommendations on how to improve it.
Could anyone make some recommendations?
Rey..
--
http://www.ReyBango.com
~|
Find out how
Where are you located
++
Kevin Parker
Web Services Consultant
WorkCover Corporation
p: 08 8233 2548
m: 0418 806 166
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.workcover.com
++
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2005 12:48 PM
To:
http://www.usablenet.com/
We are getting a sales conf call with this group next week. They
contacted us, but I think we, being a university, should really make
better use of usability and accessibility.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thanks Mike. Finally, my cf-newbie subscriptions come only to the
other address (not Gmail) so I get three different behaviours from the
list.
On 6/16/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is on my list for today.
I just changed my emaill address over to my gmail account to
what are your opinions on these. Keep in mind I am not Micha and an not working
on any bigger than the universe projects, just little quick jobs.
I tend to like how mach ii is laid out but there isn't much in the way of
decent tuts, I haven't looked for fusebox ones yet. Further, I have a
Should we throw OnTap, PLUM and any others into this discussion? I
know that they aren't all directly competing, but they are all ways of
streamlining/organising apps.
On 6/16/05, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are your opinions on these. Keep in mind I am not Micha and an not
working on
On 6/15/05, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are your opinions on these.
While you're at it, why don't you check the newest OO framework: Model
Glue at http://www.model-glue.com/
--
Eddie.
http://awads.net/
~|
Logware
In general, Mach-II is better suited for larger projects, as it's more
complex, and designed at enforced abstraction. For smaller projects,
that can get in the way, but it's very helpful when you got a zillion
components and a bajillion lines of code to manage.
Mach-II is almost always slower
ok thats in the running
~Dave the disruptor~
A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital
to form a corporation.
From: Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:59 AM
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
hum thats totally the opposite of what I thought.
Thanks Barney :)
~Dave the disruptor~
A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital
to form a corporation.
From: Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June
no, because plum is limited to ms sql and I would like something a lil bit more
main frain then onTap for what I will be using it for.
~Dave the disruptor~
A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital
to form a corporation.
Ah, good points. Looks like fusebox is the go, so far.
On 6/16/05, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, because plum is limited to ms sql and I would like something a lil bit
more main frain then onTap for what I will be using it for.
The reason is that I will be building our new cfug site so I want it easily
delt with by others if I am not around also I am going to be building an
xhtml/cssp/cfm/mysql cart/site system and want something easily adaptable by
most anyone.
this outta be a dandy huh lol
~Dave the disruptor~
A
I just took a CFMX 6.1 skill test from http://www.proveit.com/ and let me say
that I was VERY disappointed. Yes, it was the standard 'memory' over skill but
it was even worse than that. There was one question which had 4 correct answers
and the only difference was your own personal style of
I took that one once and had a similar reaction to it.
My response was to try to contact ProveIt and sell them my services as a
CF expert and tech writer to fix their test. I was never able to get a
response, though.
At 04:53 PM 6/15/2005, you wrote:
I just took a CFMX 6.1 skill test
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
